4 votes

Concrete evidence shows US government nuked WTC towers on 9/11

This is from a reliable canadian website. The canadians have been leading the way on 9/11 truth. I know this will be moved to off-topic but as I have said many times...9/11 is the key to the awakening of the masses.

Article:
Foreign terrorists and hijackers didn't attack the US on September 11, 2001 and bring down the World Trade Center Towers – the U.S. government did that using remote controlled military aircraft and planted tactical nukes.

Terrorists didn't take away the freedom, liberty and justice of the American people – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't draw up the Patriot Act, create the Department of Homeland Security, spy illegally on Americans, launch 3 unprovoked armed attacks against 3 foreign states, abolish habeas corpus, kidnap, deport, torture and murder U.S. and foreign civilians – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't loot $trillions from US Federal Tax Revenue and give it to the Wall Street bankers – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't bankrupt the U.S. – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't create the $15.6 trillion national debt – the U.S. government did that ($13 trillion added by just the last 4 of the 44 presidents of the United States – George HW Bush, Bill Clinton, George W Bush and Barrack Obama – Obama added $5 trillion in just 3 years, George W Bush added $5 trillion over 2 terms, Bill and Hillary Clinton added $1.5 trillion, George HW Bush added $1.5 trillion) .

Terrorists didn't force millions of Americans out of work and onto the street – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't develop and release the Avian Flu and the Swine Flu – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't drop nuclear bombs on civilian cities – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't murder 3 million civilians in Iraq – the U.S. government did that.

Now tell me who is a greater threat to the American people and to the World – a phantom terrorist group called al Qaeda or the U.S. government? Tell me why would you travel thousands of miles to a foreign country to fight and even give your life to protect and restore their rights and freedoms when your own rights and freedoms are being stripped away at home, on US soil, by your government? Who is a greater threat to mankind? Those who have used nukes against foreign and US civilian cities or those seeking to develop nuclear energy.

The American people went off to war to remove by force the leadership of foreign states that were allegedly a threat to their own people and to mankind. The US government justified their murder of those leaders by claiming they eliminated the threat they posed to the US and to the World. However, after the fact, the evidence showed that none posed any imminent or future threat to their people or to any other foreign state. In fact, the evidence clearly shows the World that it is the US leadership who are the greatest threat to mankind and to the American people. Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, and Iran have not and have never attacked the US. It was and is the US government who has attacked or is planning to wage war with Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, and Iran. The US government is the only leadership in the World to use nukes against civilian cities – not just once but 4 times and twice against it own people, on US soil.

http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=68#comment-559



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Maybe it's you!

Maybe it's you!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

What caused the pile of rubble to burn for 2 months?

What's your educated guess on that fact?

Nukes

Nuclear Weapons. Obviously.

You didn't notice the small nuclear bomb that went off? Where have you been?

Eric Hoffer

Just because I didn't see it,

Just because I didn't see it, doesn't mean it never happened. Haven't you heard about all of the rescue workers and residents of NYC that are dying off big time since then? Christie Todd Whitman even lied to everyone and said the air at ground zero was safe! She wouldn't lie would she? But why?

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Can Americans Escape the Deception? by Paul C Roberts

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following.

"Washington’s account of 9/11 is the wildest conspiracy theory known to mankind. The absurdity of Washington’s account is as follows: A few Saudi Arabians without any government’s backing or that of any intelligence service outwitted not only the CIA and the FBI but all 16 US intelligence agencies, even the Defense Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency, together with the intelligence agencies of all of Washington’s NATO allies and Israel’s Mossad, which has infiltrated every radical Muslim group.

These humble Saudis of no known distinction or powers also simultaneously outwitted the National Security Council, NORAD, the Pentagon, Air Traffic Control, and caused Airport Security to fail four times in one hour on the same morning.

In other words, every part of America’s defenses failed at the same moment."

MORE:

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/07/04/can-americans-esc...

Like I said

It was obviously nuclear weapons.

It just makes total sense.

Eric Hoffer

Anything is possible. There's

Anything is possible. There's technology out there that we have no freaking idea we have.

I believe Ron Paul says what he says about 911 because if he talked like a truther, he'd get creamed by our fascist media and would have been swept out of office immediately. So he has to take the official story and use their lies against them.

Ron Paul knows there are conspiracies and false flag events, but he can't talk about them because of where we are in Amerika today.

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

BS

Sorry, calling the BS.

He could talk about it just fine. He has a slim to none shot at the Presidency and he's not running for reelection. If Paul believed the buildings were brought down using explosives or alien technology, he'd have said something by now.

As to your first hypothesis:

Why is only the things you want it to be possible, possible? My favorite thing dealing with chemists and physicists is when they say, "But that's impossible!!" looking at a physical event that just occurred in front of their eyes. Watching them squirm and try to find alternate explanations is just hilarity.

When you say, "it could have been anything!" the whole point of conversation just goes out the window. Using technology as a kind of magic that does whatever you want it to has no place in conversations where you're trying to establish a cause.

How about this: The terrorists on the plane were using specially developed ultrasonic transmitters which they all had sewn into their bodies that all erupted in a sonic wave once they impacted the tower. The ultrasonic frequencies weakened the concrete and metal support structures allowing for near instance collapse.

Eric Hoffer

Wrong! Ron Paul cannot talk

Wrong! Ron Paul cannot talk about it. He has even said he can't.
http://youtu.be/yrQVaiFYmcg

He is the leader of the Liberty movement and he has access to the biggest microphones in the country. If he comes out about 911 truth that all goes away. We do have a fascist media in the country, did you know that? Ron does!

As to your comments that I only want to believe what's possible what I want to believe is possible. I've never said anything like that. And I don't believe I said it could have been anything. I think I said anything is possible, because it is! Doesn't a good scientist study all ideas and discard those that he has proven to be wrong?

I'm curious, What's your theory on how those THREE buildings fell? Do you believe the official story? I call BS on the official lie. If you still believe the government story.............

P.S. If you believe Ron has a slim to none chance at winning, should he abandon all hope now? He is a long distance runner and has even said that even though he is losing the race now, the leader can trip and fall. If he comes out as a truther the fascist media will trip him up and the fight for liberty will be essentially over for Ron Paul, and us.

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Oh jeez

Look, you can rationalize and try and bend reasons all you want, but lets face it:

If Ron Paul believed our government planted bombs in the WTC, or thermite, or nukes, or that blood from the movie alien that dissolves everything, he'd have said so.

He has been the sole voice on so many things, and yet you think he'd inexplicably trip over this? He would've said so back anywhere from 2001-2007 before he was running.

I'm sorry, but I don't believe Dr. Paul is an establish line pulling immoral hack. I just don't, and that's what your pretense is: Ron Paul believes our government knowingly placed bombs in the WTC and brought it down, but he doesn't want to say anything about it because he has political ambitions.

I'm sorry, but that's just absurd to me.

No, I don't believe Paul will the election, but that doesn't mean the war isn't worth fighting here. Look what it's accomplished, at how many people we've woken up. That's worth fighting for, even if we don't get Dr. Paul in the whitehouse. Heck, now we've got Justin Amash and Rand Paul in there, with luck in these elections we'll be sending a few more great congressmen in to join them. Are any of them Ron Paul? Heck no, but if every year we just keep electing more and more liberty minded congressmen, we'll have achieved something permanent towards getting our country back into the hands of the people.

As for what I believe happened? Institutional bureaucratic uselessness. I explain it above. It's the same reason that Paul gives for why 9/11 occurred. A bloated government that sticks its nose into every country in the world can't adequately defend itself.

If you don't believe in the theories and consequences of blowback or that we are in fact that open to attack, that's your problem. I agree with Dr. Paul here. We pissed off some people by blowing crap up in their backyard and killing their families, and so they attacked us the best they could with their limited resources for the maximum value.

I'm sorry if you think they're incapable of doing so, or if you really want it to be nuclear weapons, but that's how it goes. As for citing engineers saying it couldn't happen that way, I'm sorry, but they're just wrong, and the majority of structural engineers in the country obviously don't see it as that big of a problem, or the MAJORITY would be taking to the streets. The rub is that unless something has been tested in the real world, it's hard to predict. The towers were made to resist a SMALL aircraft nailing them. They hadn't imagined a huge plane filled with fuel flying way faster than is safe. It just wasn't in the works. Saying that it's not possible for that kind of damage to occur is just silly.

The argument you're making is the same as, "Water can't cut through steel. That's just silly, if water could cut through steel we'd just bring buildings down with water!" Except that it does if you speed it up.

Listen folks, I've rehashed this same argument since 2007 on these boards, over and over, and so far I've seen nothing even remotely plausible.

Lets just all agree with the OP. It was obviously nuclear weapons and that's the best possible thing. Couldn't have had anything to do with the huge fuel laden airplanes nailing them at high speed.

Nuclear weapons it is.

Eric Hoffer

Oh boy! First off the

Oh boy!

First off the buildings were designed to take a hit, actually more than one hit, by the largest commercial airline of its time, about the same size as the ones that hit it. It's all out there. There's only about a dozen really honest documentaries out there that prove this. (It was NOT on Fox News however)

And the majority on nobody ever takes it to the streets. It's always the tireless irate minority that do that and when the fight is turning towards their side, the sunshine patriots climb on board

I'm not going to blindly agree with the OP, I just KNOW the official story is a lie, and a lot more intelligent people than me who have studied this scientifically say the same thing. Wake up, please!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Sooo

Are you ruling out nukes or no?

Would you say nuclear weapons are more or less likely the cause than an airplane?

Eric Hoffer

Google and Youtube "building

Google and Youtube "building 7"!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Just did

Youtube is saying there were nukes in building 7 too.

Think that about wraps it up! Nukes it is!

Eric Hoffer

Really? Where? Buried on page

Really? Where? Buried on page 59?

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Just curious, what does a

Just curious, what does a disinfo agent earn nowadays? I might sell my soul for the right amount of shekles too....

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Frighteningly little, I imagine

I'm not sure, ask the guy who's saying they planted nuclear weapons in the WTC.

Eric Hoffer

EricHoffer- 9/11: Confessions of a Former CIA Asset

Former CIA Asset Susan Lindauer says "Throughout the summer, we discussed the use of a miniature thermo-nuclear device. It could have been a combination."

9/11 was an Inside Job that played a magician’s trick on the American people. All eyes were on the left hand — that would be airplanes crashing into the Towers — But the real action was done by the right hand. The controlled demolition of the Towers using a combination of military grade explosives.

There, I bow to explosives experts on the type of explosive devices and materials. There has been some excellent research on thermatic bombs, which produce such heat intensity as to melt steel, and create dust from a sulfur compound. [More recent research, however, especially by T. Mark Hightower, suggests that thermite / thermate / nanothermite could not have been the principal cause of the destruction of the Twin Towers.] Throughout the summer, we discussed the use of a miniature thermo-nuclear device. It could have been a combination.

The point I must underscore is that our discussions from June, July and August always presumed explosives would be used in combination with the airplane hijackings to destroy the Towers. I recall conversations where and how somebody could locate the necessary explosives inside the United States—even a nuke. How those explosives could be stolen from a military base in driving range to New York City. We always forecast the total destruction of the Towers in the attack, and predicted “mass human casualties.”

Entire Article:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/08/30/911-confessions-of-a...

You ask. You're the most

You ask. You're the most adamant one. I'm merely suggesting the official story is a big fat lie, which anyone with two bain cells can see!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Again, WTC 7?

Never claimed anything about nukes there. (In fact, my "claims" of nukes were postulations put forward by the ARTICLE above that I posted.) But back to WTC 7. How did it fall? It was not hit by a plane.

And, explain these pictures?
Revealing Pentagon Pics (Huge HD Photos)

Is there ANYTHING missing from this picture? You tell me.

http://truthandshadows.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/pentagon-...

About a half hour later:
http://truthandshadows.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/dsc_0460.jpg

Your constant argument that all I'm doing is hurting Dr Paul is getting tired. NOTED for gods sake. I don't happen to feel that my posts on this site regarding MY views on 9/11 have any bearing on President Paul.

If, after all that has been posted under this thread, you still beleive that the only thing that happened is our government is a just a bunch of incompetent losers and $hit happens...well, Eric, you are either sealed off from the real world or you have a neurological disorder. Seriously, I wonder about people that put so much energy into defending the State when it comes to 9/11. There just can't be that many failures and coincidences in a matter of several hours.

But, that's the biggest problem with our society today...there are a bunch of people like you that just refuse to look at the evidence. I hope you are being paid well to provide moral support for criminals. I suppose you think the oligarchs that own the FED are stealing our money in our best interest too.

This is my last post on this thread. I typically don't waste my time arguing back and forth with people that can't see the forest for the trees but you have exposed yourself as being particularly bull headed for the very strange reason that I might offend Dr Paul. You may think that gives you more credibility but in my view it's one of the weakest rebuttals I've ever heard.

Have the last word...its all yours E.

Whoa

I thought we had it from a reliable source that it was brought down with nukes?

Is it not nukes?

Eric Hoffer

High-Level Officials Eager to Spill the Beans...

s Senator Patrick Leahy said that Congress doesn’t want to know what happened:

The two questions that the congress will not ask . . . is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush’s watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? And…Why did they allow it to happen?

And the people who can explain what happened are being gagged.

FBI Translator – “The Most Gagged Person” In History

For example, former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds – President of the National Security Whistleblower Coalition – who has been deemed credible by the Department of Justice’s Inspector General, several senators, and a coalition of prominent conservative and liberal groups – has fought for years to testify about what she knows about 9/11, and has repeatedly asked to be subpoenaed (so as to avoid violation of her oath of secrecy as a government employee).

The ACLU described Edmonds as:

The most gagged person in the history of the United States of America.

And famed Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg says that Edmonds possesses information “far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers”.

Not a single politician or prosecutor has been willing to issue a subpoena.

Edmonds also made the following offer:

If anyone of the major networks — ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, FOX — promise to air the entire segment, without editing, I promise to tell them everything that I know,” about everything mentioned above, she told us.

“I can tell the American public exactly what it is, and what it is that they are covering up,” she continued. “I’m not compromising ongoing investigations,” Edmonds explained, because “they’ve all been shut down since.”

Not a single major network has let Edmonds say what she knows.

Indeed, Ellsberg says that the government has ordered the media not to touch Edmonds:

Ellsberg seemed hardly surprised that today’s American mainstream broadcast media has so far failed to take [former FBI translator and 9/11 whistleblower Sibel] Edmonds up on her offer, despite the blockbuster nature of her allegations.

As Edmonds has also alluded, Ellsberg pointed to the New York Times, who “sat on the NSA spying story for over a year” when they “could have put it out before the 2004 election, which might have changed the outcome.”

“There will be phone calls going out to the media saying ‘don’t even think of touching it, you will be prosecuted for violating national security,’” he told us.

“I am confident that there is conversation inside the Government as to ‘How do we deal with Sibel?’” contends Ellsberg. “The first line of defense is to ensure that she doesn’t get into the media. I think any outlet that thought of using her materials would go to the government and they would be told ‘don’t touch this . . . .‘”

Other Whistleblowers Being Silenced

Edmonds also says that she has been contacted by two high-ranking military officers who would like to shed light on 9/11, but – due to their oaths of secrecy – can only do so if subpoenaed. No one in Washington wants to issue a subpoena.

High-Level Military Intelligence Officer: No One In Washington Wants To Know

Similarly, a high-level military intelligence officer says that his unit – tasked with tracking Bin Laden prior to 9/11 – was pulled off the task, and there warnings that the World Trade Center and Pentagon were being targeted were ignored.

Moreover, he says that he has information that can shed light on 9/11, and that he has repeatedly tried to get this information to the Obama administration and Congress, but that no one in the administration or Congress wants to hear about it. As just one example, Nancy Pelosi’s office demanded that he not even email any information which he has about 9/11.

He is still working in military intelligence, and so he can only publicly speak about 9/11 if he is subpoenaed. He is therefore asking that he be subpoenaed … but no one wants to look into it:

There are numerous other whistleblowers with key information about 9/11. But no one in the government or media wants to hear what they know.

9/11 was one of the most important events in American history, as 10 years of war in numerous countries – costing trillions of dollars – and the crackdown on liberties like freedom of speech have all been justified by that one event. And yet the politicians in D.C. and the corporate media don’t want to hear from the people who can explain the gross incompetence (or worse) which occurred on that day.

Bit by bit, piece by piece, the US government is taking away all your rights, freedoms, and property. How far are you willing to let them go until you refuse to comply?

Better think about this now…while you still have the chance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbNIU2KEz4g&feature=player_de...

America Must Be Free Again

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CGCe3XOVys&feature=player_de...

Remember, all our freedoms and the bill of rights was shredded based on 9/11. If (as I and millions of others now know) 9/11 was NOT an accident...then we have been totally screwed by our Government. Below are some of the people in Washington who know 9/11 was no accident. The most important name to add to the list IS YOUR OWN! I encourage you to do some research. I encourage you to wake up.

The State Secrets Privilege is not used to protect our national security, but rather to hide embarrassing facts and cover up criminal activity.

9/11 Commission: We Never Got All of the Facts

9/11 Commissioners admit that they never got to the bottom of 9/11.

For example:

9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says “I don’t believe for a minute we got everything right”, that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate should continue

9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that “There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .” He also says that it might take “a permanent 9/11 commission” to end the remaining mysteries of September 11

Indeed, 9/11 Commissioners and other officials say that the true facts were hidden from them, or covered up.

The 9/11 Commission’s co-chairs said that the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials misrepresented the facts to the Commission, and the Commission considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements

9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”

9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”

The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) – who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry – recently said “At some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened“. He also said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.” And he said: “It’s almost a culture of concealment, for lack of a better word. There were interviews made at the FAA’s New York center the night of 9/11 and those tapes were destroyed. The CIA tapes of the interrogations were destroyed. The story of 9/11 itself, to put it mildly, was distorted and was completely different from the way things happened”

A 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials, and who has for years been a tireless anti-war advocate and critic of imperial foreign policy (Raymond McGovern) said “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke”

A 29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence Officer (NIO) and former Director of the CIA’s Office of Regional and Political Analysis (William Bill Christison) said “I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe.

A number of intelligence officials, including a CIA Operations Officer who co-chaired a CIA multi-agency task force coordinating intelligence efforts among many intelligence and law enforcement agencies (Lynne Larkin) sent a joint letter to Congress expressing their concerns about “serious shortcomings,” “omissions,” and “major flaws” in the 9/11 Commission Report and offering their services for a new investigation (they were ignored)

A decorated 20-year CIA veteran, who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh called “perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in the Middle East”, and whose astounding career formed the script for the Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana (Robert Baer) said that “the evidence points at” 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job.

The Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs, who served as Senior Analyst from 1966 – 1990. He also served as Professor of International Security at the National War College from 1986 – 2004 (Melvin Goodman) said “The final [9/11 Commission] report is ultimately a coverup”

According to the Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham, an FBI informant had hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House.

Congressman Dennis Kucinich hints that we aren’t being told the truth about 9/11

Congressman Jason Chafetz says that we need to be vigilant and continue to investigate 9/11

Senator Lincoln Chaffee endorses a new 9/11 investigation

Congressman Dan Hamburg doesn’t believe the official version of events

Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee Curt Weldon has shown that the U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about explosives in the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that something very different from the Bush-Cheney version of events occurred on 9/11

U.S. General, Commanding General of U.S. European Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe, decorated with the Bronze Star, Silver Star, and Purple Heart (General Wesley Clark) said “We’ve never finished the investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the intelligence information it had. The evidence seems pretty clear to me. I’ve seen that for a long time”

Former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter (Morton Goulder), former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on Terrorism (Edward L. Peck), and former US Department of State Foreign Service Officer (J. Michael Springmann), as well as a who’s who of liberals and independents) jointly call for a new investigation into 9/11

Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and intelligence services (John Loftus) says “The information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defense of incompetence”

The Group Director on matters of national security in the U.S. Government Accountability Office said that President Bush did not respond to unprecedented warnings of the 9/11 disaster and conducted a massive cover-up instead of accepting responsibility

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan (Col. Ronald D. Ray) said that the official story of 9/11 is “the dog that doesn’t hunt”

Several key employees for the defense department say that the government covered up their testimony about tracking Mohammed Atta before 9/11

The former director of the FBI (Louis Freeh) says there was a cover up by the 9/11 Commission

Apparently...

You have never seen a thermonuclear explosion. Nano-thermite was used. Get your facts straight. What's the big deal anyway? 3000 American lives, 1,000,000 foreigners. Move along sheeple, the government will protect you, nothing to think here.

Share this:

http://youtu.be/yuC_4mGTs98

I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility to every form of tyranny over the mind of man.

Wouldn't more people have died that way?

what nuke could you make that could kill such a small number of people for a a weapon? i think it was controlled demolition because of the way smoke came out of the building and than the straight down fall.

It wasn't

a tactical nuke or you would have seen it go off in the towers. They used thermite to cut the steel beams and used the "hijacked" planes as a cover. The tactical nuke comes from someone that was told to stay out of NYC on September 11. If a tact nuke would've went off then more than just the towers and WTC 7 would of been demolished, there would have been fallout and most of lower Manhattan would have been glassed. They could not make a nuke small enough to hide the flash of 100 suns.

Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our Liberty. -Thomas Jefferson

not true...

I was assigned to the 56th Field Artillary brigade...that is Pershing. The Pershing II missiles carried multiple warheads and the blast on each can be controlled to incinerate an area over ten square miles or can be set to blow up only a garbage can.

I did not know of such things

for I am not military. I will admit I was wrong, however we may never know what really happened. All I know is that those planes did not bring down towers, because jet fuel cannot melt steel. There are plenty of examples of high rise building fires burning for like 20 hours and not collapsing. I believed the official story until my friend forced me to watch Loose Change the first edition. Also there is another video in which it shows the building just starting to collapse and you can clearly tell that the beams were cut because of how the top piece jerks and slants over as if cut at an angle. Either way the American populace has been fooled into spending trillions of dollars to bomb a country or countries that had nothing to do with it.

Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our Liberty. -Thomas Jefferson

...

You realize thermite only burns downward right? You can't make it burn horizontally.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8a2OeWS3G-A

Notice the metal can around the thermite to the sides stayed completely intact?

Eric Hoffer

Here is another example at 9:35

cutting sideways http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E20yiD_QdPw

Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our Liberty. -Thomas Jefferson

Here is Thermite cutting sideways through steel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRMG2HSMozA

Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our Liberty. -Thomas Jefferson