4 votes

Concrete evidence shows US government nuked WTC towers on 9/11

This is from a reliable canadian website. The canadians have been leading the way on 9/11 truth. I know this will be moved to off-topic but as I have said many times...9/11 is the key to the awakening of the masses.

Article:
Foreign terrorists and hijackers didn't attack the US on September 11, 2001 and bring down the World Trade Center Towers – the U.S. government did that using remote controlled military aircraft and planted tactical nukes.

Terrorists didn't take away the freedom, liberty and justice of the American people – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't draw up the Patriot Act, create the Department of Homeland Security, spy illegally on Americans, launch 3 unprovoked armed attacks against 3 foreign states, abolish habeas corpus, kidnap, deport, torture and murder U.S. and foreign civilians – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't loot $trillions from US Federal Tax Revenue and give it to the Wall Street bankers – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't bankrupt the U.S. – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't create the $15.6 trillion national debt – the U.S. government did that ($13 trillion added by just the last 4 of the 44 presidents of the United States – George HW Bush, Bill Clinton, George W Bush and Barrack Obama – Obama added $5 trillion in just 3 years, George W Bush added $5 trillion over 2 terms, Bill and Hillary Clinton added $1.5 trillion, George HW Bush added $1.5 trillion) .

Terrorists didn't force millions of Americans out of work and onto the street – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't develop and release the Avian Flu and the Swine Flu – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't drop nuclear bombs on civilian cities – the U.S. government did that.

Terrorists didn't murder 3 million civilians in Iraq – the U.S. government did that.

Now tell me who is a greater threat to the American people and to the World – a phantom terrorist group called al Qaeda or the U.S. government? Tell me why would you travel thousands of miles to a foreign country to fight and even give your life to protect and restore their rights and freedoms when your own rights and freedoms are being stripped away at home, on US soil, by your government? Who is a greater threat to mankind? Those who have used nukes against foreign and US civilian cities or those seeking to develop nuclear energy.

The American people went off to war to remove by force the leadership of foreign states that were allegedly a threat to their own people and to mankind. The US government justified their murder of those leaders by claiming they eliminated the threat they posed to the US and to the World. However, after the fact, the evidence showed that none posed any imminent or future threat to their people or to any other foreign state. In fact, the evidence clearly shows the World that it is the US leadership who are the greatest threat to mankind and to the American people. Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, and Iran have not and have never attacked the US. It was and is the US government who has attacked or is planning to wage war with Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, and Iran. The US government is the only leadership in the World to use nukes against civilian cities – not just once but 4 times and twice against it own people, on US soil.

http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=68#comment-559



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

In trying to FALSELY smear

In trying to FALSELY smear doctor Paul as a supporter of the inside job theory, you are the CIA's best friend. They love you for your efforts which serve only to undermine the liberty movement.

STILL NOTHING OF ANY SUBSTANCE

... another globalist shill exposed. User 43,165 is a gov.shill without a shred of positive contribution to this thread . . . Open your mind :::

http://www.artbook.com/3883755079.html

The Hollow Towers: http://philjayhan.com/category/9-11-the-wtc-hollow-towers

Seriously, the fact that this

Seriously, the fact that this thread hasn't been nuked and has net 17 positive votes shows how frightening Paulbots can be and why Ron Paul could never get past the primaries.

Rein in the insanity, folks, you're scaring the normal people.

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty." - Thomas Jefferson
"Annoyance is step one of thinking"
"We're all in the same boat, it doesn't matter if you like me"

Well said. They claim to be

Well said. They claim to be pro-Ron Paul but completely ignore his repeated statements that the inside job theory is nonsense. They also ignore the whole premise of his foreign policy e.g. that foreign terrorists (NOT the CIA, Rumsfeld, Cheney, etc. attacked us because are over there. If the inside job theorists are right (and they're not), Ron Paul is either a fool or liar.

many rp supporters are for islamists,

hence their contradiction in being for rp and that 'they' (muslims or 19 islamists) attacked us bec we're over there, and again rp supporters are saying they didn't attack us but our own gov't did.

unfortunately many rp supporters are serial hypocrites and accuse others of speaking out of both sides of their mouth. too bad they really have no leaders. they just look up to the crony establishmetn staff that gop shadow leadership assigned and forced paul to have.

they need help. sure, those vicious muslims must have had a lot of fianncing and help to infiltrate the us. however, it was clearly muslims that did the blowign up and terroist activity. yet, rp supporters don't want to talk about that.

jj

I'd be willing to bet my life that 9/11 was NOT an accident

and it was NOT pulled off by towelheads from caves. For you to be so sure 9/11 IS what the Government has told you clearly shows how little research you have done. You are wrong.

Fine....but then go somewhere

Fine....but then go somewhere else with your theory but it attacks the entire premise of Ron's foreign policy e.g. "towelheads" attacked us on 9-11 because we are over there. Find a new candidate because Ron thinks you are peddling nonsense.

no... stay here and debate actual evidence...

That's what real truthseekers do.

Post evidence, state your interpretation, and await honest analysis. Then post your honest reply to that analysis, await further replies ... and debate. You on the other hand post slurs, await nothing, and post nothing of any substance whatsoever. YOU SUCKK, SHILL.

You have no evidence that

You have no evidence that hasn't been totally debunked repeatedly

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty." - Thomas Jefferson
"Annoyance is step one of thinking"
"We're all in the same boat, it doesn't matter if you like me"

sorry troll

... but your idea of "normal" is people burying their heads deeeeeeeep into the sand.

We The People . . .

do hereby . . .

RE-OPEN ALL INVESTIGATIONS :

• JFK state-sponsored assassination

• Larry P Macdonald / flight 007

• Iran Contra / CIA coke-dealing / Air America / George HW "Poppy" Bush / Mena Arkansas

• Vincent Foster murder

• mysterious 9/11/04 small-plane crash into the White House

• Wolfgang Boeringer / Mohammad Atta / casino boat meetings prior to 9/11

• Amalgam Virgo - the truth about this yearly DOD war game: scenario : a cruise missile fired from a barge in the Chesapeake Bay into the Pentagon .... later changed to a drill in Florida?

Hey CIA / NSA trolls: I'm here in beautiful Breckenridge Colorado. I challenge any of you FUCKING TOTAL SCUM to a public debate on the FACTS OF 911.

Fair debate / standard rules / total transparency. What are you fucking scumbags sooooooo

. . . afraid of?

Afraid of being seen in

Afraid of being seen in public with a "fucking" insane tinfoil hat wackjob, really.

Who wants to be crazy by association?

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty." - Thomas Jefferson
"Annoyance is step one of thinking"
"We're all in the same boat, it doesn't matter if you like me"

Such harsh language John Ashman

Losing your argument much? And with it your vocabulary skills?

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

I'm just using the language

I'm just using the language of the guy to whom I am responding. And then added in CRAAAAAZY. Because he is.

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty." - Thomas Jefferson
"Annoyance is step one of thinking"
"We're all in the same boat, it doesn't matter if you like me"

The true trolls are those who

The true trolls are those who are falsely implying that Ron Paul, who theyclaim to support, in any way or shape or form agrees with their wacky "inside job theories." These trolls are serving only to discredit the liberty movement by attacking the whole premise of Ron's foreign policy e.g. they (not Donald Rumsfeld or the CIA) attacked us on 9-11 because we are over there.

4 week "supporter"

... "calls out" 2 time State delegate, 3weeks from 5 year DP'er and over 10-year 911 truther ( and fucking proud of it ) + currently Committee Person in a precinct which was won by Dr. Ron Paul 8 to 3 over Robamneycare and Little Ricky...

You seem to need help in your

You seem to need help in your math skills. My current account dates from the end of last year. That's a lot longer than "4 weeks." I had an earlier account from 2007 but lost the password....but let's not quibble about that. Oh, btw, newbie my support for Ron dates back to 1980 when I petitioned for his bill to abolish the selective service. How about you?

Looks more like you are more

Looks more like you are more of an inside jobber as a truther infiltrator than anyone in the Konspiracy Klub for Kids.

You're a state

You're a state delegate?!?

You shouldn't even be legally allowed to vote for dogcatcher.

Crazy.....crazy.....crazy.....crazy
Crazy.....a suitable case for treatment
Crazy,crazy......just a suitable case for treatment
Crazy,crazy
Crazy....crazy.....crazy......

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty." - Thomas Jefferson
"Annoyance is step one of thinking"
"We're all in the same boat, it doesn't matter if you like me"

very well reasoned

... and intelligent reply { sarc / off }

I would be happy to debate you in public on these subjects ( though you will be required to piece together complete sentences, John ... )

Would someone like to address

Would someone like to address the lack of EMP with this? You can not have a nuclear blast happen with out it causing an EMP. It would have caused power surges all over the city. Keep in mind, many of the electrical conduits are in fact underground in NY. So, while the ground does indeed block out many electrical signals, it would have been no help against an EMP underground in this case.

Heres another good one, if there was a nuclear device in the basement, why did the buildings collapse from the top down? The entire tower would have started collapsing at once rather than what we saw.

I am sorry, but this sort of thing is just disinfo BS. There is absolutely no reason to bother with this exotic crap when more conventional means are alot more likely and believable.

To climb the mountain, you must believe you can.

Mini-Nukes is such b.s.

The whole Mini-Nuke theory is total scam, and I am amazed people continue to fall for it.

The towers didn't fall down into the basement like the mini-nuke people say, they kind of disintegrated around the middle and just vanished.

Either conventional demolitions or directed energy (or both) seems like a much more logical conclusion.

Judy Wood to me seems like a disinfo character- not unlike Ace Baker was to no-plane theory.. She's also from ding ding Virginia Tech.. She claims directed energy weapons can split the earth.. that sounds like fear mongering to me.

That said, I know the military is working on and has directed energy weapons, so it's quiet possible they were used in tandem with traditional explosives as a redundancy- I just think Woods is disinfo.

on 2/26/93

... these same perps FAILED in their attempt to drop one tower into the other and murder 50,000 + human souls despite a top-secret vapor-bomb which demolished 6 underground levels . . .

On 9/11/01 they threw everything they had at these two over-engineered towers:

• basement detonations so powerful they damaged at least 10 floors above
• possible missiles fired from the Woolworth building rooftop next door
• possible space-based weapon test / demonstration
• possible death-squad assassinations ( in the documentary "Truth Rising" a first-responder mentions a body he found inside a closet ... see also "B Thing" @ letsroll911.org ) ( In the documentary "911 Mysteries" a strange helicopter hovers in the smoke cloud above the towers prior to the controlled demo ... did this chopper retrieve a demolitions / death-squad operative from the rooftop? )



You are insane. Completely

You are insane. Completely certifiable. If you need help, I will do everything in my power to see that you get the attention you need in a controlled environment.

Too Late ..... The Loony Label Sticks.

These are the sort of posts that gets Ron Paul supporters stuck on the "looney" label. Too late - our opponents will use this post no matter what sane remarks might fall into the comments columns.

You don't have to believe the official theory (and I certainly don't) to have to invent all sorts of exotic other theories. I've seen some theories supported by some hard evidence - I've seen some silly ones. Nukes? That's a silly one. There would be radiation there - and in the surrounding areas - to this very day. It looked, walked and talked like a controlled demolition - so I'm fairly certain that is what it was. How it occured is another matter entirely - and one best left off the Daily Paul. Perhaps Dr. Paul might want to re-open the 9/11 enquiry if ever he got elected? But that's all.

End The Fed used to get the

End The Fed used to get the same "looney" label - I know cause I've been at this for 15 years. We are here to puch the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth - not just some sample platter.

Do It On Romney's Site.

Yeah! I know. And you're just dying to get the truth out there. Because it's so obvious. And - you know what - you are probably right! Well - more so right than the official story.

And I didn't say you were wrong did I? But this is neither the time nor the place for this sort of distraction. As somebody else here said - do it on Romney's site!

Dr. Paul, who is a better

Dr. Paul, who is a better position to know the truth, rejects your campaign. He has said repeatedly that 9-11 was NOT an inside job. You are only hurting him by linking him with these theories! Please stop. Here's a thought: why don't you try to link Romney to your theories? Please leave us alone.

talk to grandma about the dangers of fluoride

... and you will be met with derision. Not sure exactly how Edward Bernays accomplished this unprecedented feat of indoctrination ... but there's little doubt he did.

Edward Bernays @ Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays

Dr. Judy Wood Suggests a DEW (Direct Energy Weapon) Was Used

See: http://www.drjudywood.com

Professor Wood is a structural engineer who has done a lot of research on what happened to the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11. Her theory revolves around the military's development of some type of exotic focused energy device that was used to pulverize the steel frames of the buildings. She does not believe the buildings were brought down using explosives as in a CD (controlled demolition).

She writes about the phenomena of the "Hutchison Effect" that alters the physical properties of various materials such as steel, wood, etc. beyond their normal state of matter.

I'm not an engineer or scientist but I found her theory based upon a detailed explanation and evidence presented to be within the realm of plausibility.