ABC "Covers" NebraskaSubmitted by ausscyn on Thu, 07/12/2012 - 15:46
What makes me weep is the statement that the campaign didn't have an office in Nebraska. Why? Why, in this most important state could the campaign not have placed some help there in the last month? It's Campaigning 101, and these kinds of things just have the supporters up in arms, and wondering what is going on?
Below is what I posted:
Good "omitted" an important FACT about Louisiana. The delegates elected a new Chair by a clear majority. The former Chair REFUSED to seat the new Chair & tried the Ignore tactic. When this didn't work, he had his thugs DRAG OUT the new Chair, almost breaking his recently operated on hip replacement. That's when the delegates turned their chairs around & resumed the convention under the newly ELECTED leadership. Then, the old voted out Chair, tried to remove the mic from the Convention Secretary. His thugs BROKE THE GUY'S FINGERS trying to remove the mic!!!!
Good, how could you in "good" conscience omit these things from your "report?" You also left out how Romney's thugs have denied the ELECTED delegates in Massachusetts their seats at the convention. Do you not know there is a revolution going on in this country & it's not being reported or televised? Do you know what a wreck our nominating system is? Do you not know the crimes that are being comitted? Do you know there's a suit over this in the 9th Circuit RIGHT NOW???
BTW, I have spent the last six days e-mailing with Carol Paul, pleading with her to convince Ron to go to Nebraska. He says the campaign thinks it's not necessary & could be detrimental. How could they think that? I am all messed-up in the head again over trying to figure out the campaign's logic. When I read they didn't have an office there, I wanted to hit somebody! They are throwing Nebraska to the wolves, and I just hope that we get a miracle for a change rather than a sock in the gut.