Boston Globe Initially showed Paul Landslide with 86,000 Votes ...Must SEE
Submitted by unclesamscam on Fri, 01/11/2008 - 01:03
Better watch these two videos.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=116853
Save this video everyone. McCain had zero support as I saw in New Hampshire.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=116855
This is another, wherein they sort of corrected themselves, but you can see the numbers still aren't anywhere near right.
»
Is voting really accurate at any primary?
Check out this video of a voting machine demonistration making an blatant error, and tell me there isn't a chance of voter fraud in any election with electronic voting machines.
http://liberty-central.blogspot.com/2008/01/deminstration-on...
Davy C Rockett
http://liberty-central.blogspot.com
http://screamfreedom.blogspot.com
http://cystic-fibrosis-symptom.com
http://medical-definitions.com
bumpedee
bump
Intriguing
But the same document that shows Ron Paul winning also shows Tom Tancredo in second place. That I can't believe.
THE ERROR WAS THAT THEY GOT CAUGHT!
Link to this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zu0Oaw9tIPM&NR=1
The only one caught was a
The only one caught was a web developer making an error and lack of a QA department to catch it.
Get rid of this post....
It was on last night now on again..This was a error. Its plain and simple.
www.ronpaul2008.com
There is life at the end of the tunnel my friends!
***********Ron Paul for POTUS 2012***********
*************Obama Is A Communist!************
**********Repeal the 17th Amendment**********
Double the size of the House of Representatives
$$$$$$$$$AUDIT THE FEDERAL RESERVE$$$$$$$$$$
So what?
I'm sorry, but this is absolutely meaningless and we look foolish if we go showing this as some kind of evidence of vote fraud. It is just too easy for this kind of error to occur in the design of a web page, and to this internet software engineer, that's all there is to this.
Do you really believe McCain only had 0 or 1 vote in each precinct? Notice how his column of votes only has 0 or 1. That's pretty clearly a data display bug. If you delete that column of 0s and 1s and then shift the remaining columns to the left one column, you probably have the proper display of vote totals.
And don't give me shit about me being a troll or whatever. Do I believe in vote fraud? Of course! To those that don't believe it, do you think it never occurred to the powerful elite of the NWO that they need to control the counting of votes to prevent a democratic revolt against their power? I'm sure they started planning it years ago and put their people in key positions to create companies like Diebold and get the government contracts, etc.
Was their fraud in NH? I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised and I support a recount. But this Boston Globe web site thing is ridiculous. Please stop posting it.
Are you serious?
THIS IS SOMETHING WE HAVE TO FOLLOW THROUGH WITH AND GET TO THE BOTTOM OF! WHO ARE YOU WORKING FOR?
Nice work guys. Cant wait
Nice work guys. Cant wait for the real numbers, or better yet cant wait to see the look on McCains face.
umm
looks like the boston.com website had the column headers misaligned. No wonder they corrected it.
If you really think McCain got almost no votes and Paul actually won NH, you are looking too hard and really need to get some sleep.
This is very interesting
This is very interesting guys...I thought it should be shared