Sen. Paul Introduces Downsize DC's 'One subject at a time' bill
Submitted by Matt Sterba on Mon, 07/16/2012 - 13:50AKRON, Ohio, July 16, 2012 -- [PRNewswire-USNewswire] -- "It's been a long time since Congress needed a majority to pass a law," says Jim Babka, President of DownsizeDC.org, Inc. "But that could change, thanks to Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, who has introduced our 'One Subject at a Time Act' (OSTA) in the Senate."
"OSTA would require each bill Congress passes to be about one subject only," Babka explains. "This would end the practice of clustering unrelated measures into one package. Congressional leaders have long used this trick to pass unpopular laws on the strength of the popular proposals with which they're unnaturally joined. OSTA would end this fraud forever."
"Every bill would have to stand or fall on its own merits," declares Babka.
By introducing OSTA (S. 3359), Senator Paul fulfills a campaign promise. In a recent debate, Senator Paul noted, "No wonder our approval rating is 10 percent. Nobody knows what we're voting on. In fact, things have been stuck in this bill last night that have nothing to do with any of these bills and we're just now discovering it."
"But multi-subject bills are an old bipartisan problem. DownsizeDC.org created OSTA in response to numerous omnibus bills passed when the Republicans controlled Congress. For instance, the massively unpopular Real ID Act was only passed because the Republican leadership included it in an Emergency Troop Appropriation bill. That bill also included tsunami relief! Another example is the ban on Internet poker. It was included in a Port Security bill," says Babka.
OSTA was introduced in the House (H.R. 3806), back in January, by Representative Tom Marino (R-PA). It has several co-sponsors.
Babka commends Senator Paul for keeping his word. "It's a rare politician that honors his promises. Now we can begin to collect Senate co-sponsors for this vital reform," Babka concluded.
- Login to post comments





Updates?
Any news or updates on how this is going?
Eric Hoffer
http://gplus.to/jamesrmoore
I think a lot of our
I think a lot of our opposition fears Rand and the popularity he is breeding. Just look at all the negative posts here regarding him. If they weren't just so excessive in their vitriol, I might believe the motivation, but as it is, it looks like they are just members of our opposition who are working early to discredit Rand and turn us away from him.
"As the circle of light increases, so does the circumference of darkness around it." - Albert Einstein
"Now, more than ever, the choice between Obama and Romney will be which one do you want to ruin your country?" ~ Wead
There is Hope
One of the most important bills to come along in decades. We just have to hire new people to pass this.
Harry Reid and John Boner
will make sure that this bill will never come to the floor for a vote...but it is good PR for 2018.
alex jones said recently that
alex jones said recently that at this point the corporations don't care if everything is libertarian because by now they've got control of everything
lawrence
As he voted to send how many BILLION tax dollars to
THe King Rothschild's private country IzUnReal. Oh but he is different huh? Garbage just one more sold out prostitute that went to washing to engorge himself at the pig trouth.
sovereign
what's with all the
what's with all the rothschild sympathizers on this thread? You guys are angry at people for calling rand paul out as a self-serving rider of his father's coattails? because it's true. rand paul likes baron rothschild a little too much.
lawrence
Some of you guys need to
Some of you guys need to relax a bit with the anti-Rand stuff. He's obviously not perfect, but stacking him against your average senator he's a large improvement. I wouldn't exactly be proud to live in a country where every Senator was a Rand Paul, but I'd be a whole lot less embarrassed.
Bad Things About Rand:
He plays the political game.
His philosophy isn't entirely libertarian.
Good Things About Rand:
His general philosophy is more libertarian than most.
He actually has some semblance of a philosophy.
He plays the political game
and that is why he will actually accomplish something. This bill would be a home run - a real momentum builder.
Rand is a cheap hack
He knows how to have the appearance but not the real thing.
The Sage dwells in the fruit not the flower.
Agreed
I believe the "supposed" inability to carry the support of Ron Paul supporters is what caused Rand to be dropped from the vetting process for VP.
What sickens me is the thought that a majority of Ron Paul supporters might have had no problem with Rand but it appears this site was descended upon by people posting disinformation and distortions to make outsiders think that ALL Ron Paul supporters were anti-Rand. Better moderating here might have made a huge difference.
A great opportunity was lost. Score one for the [self-edit]s that lurk here.
What kind of a traitorous
What kind of a traitorous douchebag would vote against this? I mean. you would have to be in the pocket pf big money special interests to oppose this....oh wait....nevermind.
Rand who?
Is he related to Ron?
Rand is a phony
and is compromised. The support of these nonsensical bills are but a distraction designed to keep your focus off the important issues. Keep your eyes on he prize.
Move on...
"The problem is not those in power, the problem is right between your ears." ~Larken Rose
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5FNDRgPOLs&list=FL4wdZ0dK3HG...
rand is a phony for sure.
nothing authentic about Mr. Cheap Political Hack Rand.
You think THIS is a "nonsensical bill", dakealo???
Eliminating bundled-up bills, in which controversial unconstitutional bills are secretly slipped in, is an important COMMON-sensical bill, imho.
Rand is doing a fine job by promoting this bill.
liar
not true
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Interested
I'm interested in seeing which elected officials object to this.
I'm glad it's coming up now
prior to elections.
Me too
Perfect timing really. Who in the world would object to this?!
Eric Hoffer
http://gplus.to/jamesrmoore
Oh, tons of 'RINO's will say they are for it....
And then thank their lucky stars that the president and the Dems in the Senate will take the hit for killing it.
McCain may even try to attach an "Attack Iran Now" provision to this bill about only dealing with one matter at a time.
This
This is an awesome bill.
Whatever happened to the "read the bills" act or whatever? Did that ever get passed or offered up?
Eric Hoffer
http://gplus.to/jamesrmoore
Nice start and a good idea
What they need is a one bill in two laws out rule!
Excellent
news. This bill is one of those I've been wishin'/hopin' would get passed (I do find it sad, though, that a bill like this even needs passage--one bill at a time should just be common sense, imo.).
I give Sen. Paul a big thumbs up for this course of action. I do believe it's time to contact our Congress critters to push for its passage, eh?
O.P.O.G.G. - Fighting the attempted devolution of the rEVOLution
Ron Paul 2012...and beyond
BAN ELECTRONIC VOTING!!