27 votes

Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns (Video)

FLASH! Troops ordered to kill all americans who DO NOT turn in guns (Video)

Only UN peacekeepers will be allowed to carry firearms.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Well get tight with your community

because if they come after you, you will need your communities help to kill them off before they kill you. they will come in numbers.

Military Personnel

Are not going to go for this.

I think the government would have a difficult time with this.

I guess they could send Rosie O'donnell out for them.

The Only Chip I'll Take Are At The Poker Tables...


Lol I did not freak out when I saw this

As soon I looked at this article I know the DP user panicked about it, and it would be from none other than Alex Jones, I don't care any more what anyone says, this man is unhealthy for our movement, all he does is induce fear into us, where does it state that the citizens of every country must be disarmed or could be disarmed?, I won't even go into the flaws of this article, the bottom comments speak for themselves, but this man never offers any solution, any positivity, nor hope, you have to have these virtues to win this, especially at this time. Take our guns?!, WTF is wrong with this man?, we don't need this overdose of constant scare tactics, doesn't even work anymore, DO YOU KNOW THAT THE SOVIET MILITARY LEADERSHIP WAS SCARED SHITLESS TO THINK ABOUT INVADING THE US, MORE SO THAN US?, EVEN AFTER THE NUKES WOULD DROP, THE fallout DAMAGE THEY'D DO HAS BEEN EXAGGERATED BY THE ESTABLISHMENT, JUST LIKE GLOBAL WARMING?, No Soviet army, Blackwater, No gangs, or UN troops will EVER WIN against a ridiculously growing amount of gun owners who will fight for Liberty and their families, If you watched mel gibson's THE PATRIOT, that whole movie is about to replay again, Someone will kill a gun owner's son or daughter, the gun owner will lose it, and savagely kill the murderers. What is the invaders mission or intent?, we lost Iraq because we lost the hearts and souls of the people, we had no purpose there. Did they take into account that arge remnants if not all the air-force, navy, and army would disband and join the resistance?, this is not wishful thinking, this is real, RP commands the true loyalty of the soldiers. IRS, FBI, and DEA have people who are genuine americans, and they too would join the resistance, IF their plans are going so well, why are bankers arming themselves or resigning, I heard the amount of bankers resigned last and this year was the most in our recorded history,

UN is a very real threat, but they blow when it comes to getting their agendas done


All the "EVUL CORPORATION BILDERBEGER 9/11 INSIDE JOB" conspiracy trolls take note. You do nothing but hurt our chances at winning elections and changing policies every time you open your mouths and post on news websites. Thanks PatriotEyes

Pretty much...

"UN is a very real threat, but they blow when it comes to getting their agendas done"

Thank you Patriot Eyes for saying it so I didn't have to.

Alex Jones is the "controlled opposition" (he is owned, bought and paid for) and his purpose is to lure us in and then make us look bad.

Tyrranny is Here, but it will not take Hold

Humanity will free itself


"Take hold of the future or the future will take hold of you." -- Patrick Dixon

When The People Can't Afford To Buy Food Or The Food

can no longer get to market, the whole of the people will hand over their friggin gun for a morsel of food...The miiitary will go door to door to ask you for you gun. In return they will give you food and water as they cart your as#s off to the nearest concentration camp...LOL

--------------------------------SO THEN--------------------------------

Buy storable food, canned goods and lots of water and a water filter.

You're gonna need these things in the event of a natural disaster anyway..Right?

With the RFID chip guns won't matter

We will all be required to go to the doctors office for your medical RFID chip. Maybe if you own a gun your RFID chip will be holding a dose of cyanide which will eliminate you if you refuse to give up your gun.


Gold standard: because man can not be trusted to control his greed

Republicae's picture

Well, I have a definitive

Well, I have a definitive doubt that will happen, especially by 2013. We think the American would raise hell if they tried to take our guns, such a move would mobilize those of just about every religious conviction like never before, so along with us the ranks of Revolutionaries would swell instantly if they were foolish enough to attemp such implants!


"We are not a nation, but a union, a confederacy of equal and sovereign States" John C. Calhoun

Obama-care requires us all to get the implants

starting in 2013 and we all must have them by 2014. This is going to start with the welfare people and government employees, then social security. I can see half the population getting chipped with no problem. Lets not forget how they got the Katrina survivors to give up their guns, they used the local church pastors. So when your local pastor or priest blesses the chip are you going to say no?

I sure hope your right, in that Americans will raise hell about it and stop it. But I don't think so, the sheep have become too dependent on the master.

I used to have a lot of faith in my government until 5 years ago, now I believe they will do anything to get what they want. If there was another 9/11 the sheep will line up for the chip to get the feeling of security.

I hope you watched the youtube video.

Gold standard: because man can not be trusted to control his greed

Republicae's picture

I have read the entire bill

I have read the entire bill and while the first verson of the bill did, in fact include the language that could include such implantable devices as part of the national medical registry, the final bill did not include such language...it is not in it!

Besides, would it be very logical for the most recent challenge by the States to the Individual Mandate just to force people to buy insurance and not challenge something even more invasive like implants? If that were in the bill then I can assure you there would be a massive outcry and a definitive challenge in the courts if it were actually in the bill....it is however, not!


"We are not a nation, but a union, a confederacy of equal and sovereign States" John C. Calhoun


They'll just "re-interpret" it, or Obama/Rombama will issue an "executive" decree.
There is no stinking law anymore.

Republicae's picture

If they want a real

If they want a real revolution then by all means let them try. There would instantly be such an insurgency arising that they would realize their mistake in such a move. There is nothing more fearful to any government, or army than an invisible insurgency. With the current state of paranoia that is present within this government, it would take little to shut cities down and they could be incapacitated relatively easy through an invisible insurgency....of course, I am speaking purely theoretically mind you.


"We are not a nation, but a union, a confederacy of equal and sovereign States" John C. Calhoun

You are better than Congress

they voted Obama-care in without even reading it. I haven't read the 2000+ pages, only excerpts of it. I hope your right, but doubt it, because the media sure seems to be pushing this.

40 years ago I thought this would be impossible at any time, but I see people are so accepting. They think big government has their best interest at heart. When the threat of losing S.S.,welfare, medi-care, and all other perks the government hands out the sheep will fall in line whether it is in the bill or not.

My only hope we hit hyperinflation first, and big government goes broke.

Gold standard: because man can not be trusted to control his greed

Republicae's picture

Well, unless I am totally

Yes, I am better than Congress, but that is not saying much is it? Well, unless I am totally blind it is not in there. But logic would dictate, would it not, that if there was such an uproar by many over the Individual Mandate, then the uproar would have been even louder over such a mandate as the implantation of radio chips.


"We are not a nation, but a union, a confederacy of equal and sovereign States" John C. Calhoun

In governmental parlance, an

In governmental parlance, an RFID chip is referred to as FDA Device 2. I also found no mention of it, but I was skimming pretty fast and may have missed something.

Republicae's picture

Exactly, it was in the

Exactly, it was in the original version of the bill, but was removed before final passage. I think the thugs realized that they would probably start a real revolt over such a tyrannical measure which, may not have been a bad thing...the revolt that is.


"We are not a nation, but a union, a confederacy of equal and sovereign States" John C. Calhoun

I disagree as I said the sheep will follow

your forgetting what is called the herd mentality, in that if many are doing it others will follow. We all know from the past primary the media is just a tool of the elites. They will show hundreds getting the chip with no big deal, and the mutitude of sheeple will follow.

Gold standard: because man can not be trusted to control his greed

Republicae's picture

Well, it's not in the bill,

Well, it's not in the bill, so there is no mandate for it to happen by 2013 based on the bill, thus your argument has no basis in fact nor in logic. It is not a matter of herd mentality when the State Attorney's Generals, that brought the suit over the Individual Mandate, would have, in such concern over the view of governmental intrusion into the private lives of Americans, to have neglected a far more intrusive mandate such as the physical implantation of RFIDs into the bodies of every American, sorry but that would not be a case of herd mentality. Herd mentality would be absolutely no uproar at all over the legislation, herd mentality would have simply accepted the fact that the legislation has passed and would simply go along with it, accepting every aspect of it without any calls for repeal or nullification of its mandates by the States, that is not the case.

Besides, if there were such a mandate for RFID implantation do you really think that Dr. Paul would be silent on the subject, or that any of the others such a Lew Rockwell, Judge Nepolitanto or any of the others with a voice would be silent this late in the year with 2013 approaching? Come on now...


"We are not a nation, but a union, a confederacy of equal and sovereign States" John C. Calhoun

I guess you forgot to read page 1001

which states:

Subtitle C—National Medical
Device Registry
12 (a) REGISTRY.—
13 (1) IN
519 of the Federal
14 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i) is
15 amended—
(A) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub-
section (h); and
(B) by inserting after subsection (f) the
‘‘National Medical Device Registry
‘‘(g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national med-
22 ical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the
23 ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and
24 outcomes data on each device that—
‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and
‘‘(B) is—
2 ‘‘(i) a class III device; or
3 ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable,

Gold standard: because man can not be trusted to control his greed

Republicae's picture

Again, you are incorrect! That was indeed in the

Again, you are incorrect! That was indeed in the original bill as it was first presented and did appear on page 1001 of the bill however, again that wording no longer appears anywhere in the bill, certainly not on page 1001, which provides: "SEC. 8M SPECIAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE HEALTH CHOICES ADMINISTRATION AND THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES., which speaks about the various audits, evaluations, investigations, programs, operations of the Health Choices Administration and has absolutely nothing whatsoever do to with the implantation of any type of medical device.

Sorry, but you are really straining at gnats while finding it easy to swallow a camel. Like I said, I have read the bill.

Believe me, if it were in the bill I would be shouting it from the roof tops, there is enough in that monstrosity as it is that we should be shouting about, but RFID are not one of the them.


"We are not a nation, but a union, a confederacy of equal and sovereign States" John C. Calhoun

The criminals will still

have guns. Only the average working American will be deprived of protecting his/her family. Of course this IS all about power and control of the people and the fascist police state.

Someone posted something recently about Pearl Harbor and the reason the Japanese did not continue inland after wiping out the fleet. They feared the American people, because every American had a gun.

When it comes to a police state I would not give up my gun so that hired federal thugs with guns could brutalize me and my family.

Obama has just written an executive order taking federal control of communications, and now this as well? Americans need to draw the line SOON, and say we have had enough of this fascist government, before all freedoms are lost.

UN Peacekeeper = oxymoron.

UN Peacekeeper = oxymoron.

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty." - Thomas Jefferson
"Annoyance is step one of thinking"
"We're all in the same boat, it doesn't matter if you like me"

fireant's picture

If we has a "House", the Prez would be forewarned of

impeachment should he sign the treaty.
I think pick-up trucks, etc. are needed in the District of Corruption prior to O even thinking of pickin up that pen.
edit: as a protest like the truckers are known to do on occasion.

Undo what Wilson did

I agree with most posters - not gonna happen

Yet. Yet is the key word.
No - they will not use soldiers or LEO's and sure wouldn't use the UN. They will do what they are doing now - allowing HUGE gangs to literally take over portions of most cities. Allowing illegal immigrants to come here to form gangs(thanks to Holder - armed very well by the way). These gangs don't care about right and wrong - they are brutal animals. And while I know it is not PC to talk the truth - most of these gangs are made up of minorities. The very same people who think Obama is the second coming of Jesus Christ.
It is clear Eric Holder and his posse are using every chance to fuel race wars, arm the "oppressed" and empower the illegals against honest citizens.

No - they won't use those who have a semblance of right and wrong. They will use class warfare to give power to those who believe they have been wronged. Those indoctrinated into the legal system. Those who have no downside.

Here in CT it is comical. I leave my sleepy little town that hasnt had a murder or major crime in decades and I usually see at least one or two State Troopers daily - pulling people over for such heinous crimes as talking on a cell phone, or not coming to a complete stop.
I then drive on 91N for 20 miles and usually pass at least one more cop getting those vicious speeders. At this point, I am feeling warm and fuzzy - just as safe as can be. I then get off my exit in Hartford and proceed to our building, which happens to be in one of the worst areas in CT. In six years how many times have I seen a State Trooper IN this neighborhood? MAYBE 5 - Maybe. The answer - it is a jurisdiction thing with the city. Yeh - sure it is. Or it could be that they really don't want to stop the violence and the gangs. It is sad to see little kids having to walk to school going by drug dealers, prostitutes and thugs. You would think it would be better resources to send those 3 State Troopers I pass daily to the city - just driving around aimlessly - to at least give these kids SOME sense of security - so MAYBE they MIGHT have the courage to say no to the gangs and the violence.
Chicago has 14 people shot in one weekend. Did Illinois re-task all area troopers off road duty to protect those people - probably not. Getting revenue is more important.

We live in sad times.

That being said - Alex Jones is a fear monger and we would be better off distancing ourselves if we want any credibility.

As governments have become

As governments have become more powerful throughout history, some have reached a point where they wanted their subjects disarmed to achieve maximum power. This should always be something we'd be concerned with, especially if there is a economic collapse and disorder. Just look at countries where disorder has led to tyranny - Germany, France, Russia and many others.

Now in saying this, Alex is trying to panic folks based on a lot of old data. What we should be focused on is why is the United States giving credence to the UN to further restrict guns worldwide? We should not allow our name to become involved in something like that, and frankly should withdraw support from the organization.

How are they going to control the over population of wild life?

Deer over population especially. In central Texas we have a heavy deer population. The deer are smaller in this area because of their population. If it weren't for hunters, the problem would be even worse and animals would suffer by starvation. How will we get to eat wild game? Will that be outlawed? What about cross-bows? Will they take that too? And archery bows and arrows? High powered sling shots? This is getting ridiculous.


working on it.

There are no politicians or bankers in foxholes.