27 votes

Arpaio calls Congress to move on Obama eligibility

Tuesday's press conference added weight to the Cold Case Posse's earlier findings. In addition to the electronic evidence that the president's long-form birth certificate had been tampered with, the investigators introduced supporting evidence related to a box titled "Race of Father." In it was written the word "African". Not only was "African" not used as a race identifier until 1989, 28 years after Obama's birth, but the box is also coded with a number nine. Nine signifies that no information was provided, meaning the box should have been empty. The fact that there is information in the box suggests someone had tampered with the birth certificate, the investigators say.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Time to stop hoping the

Time to stop hoping the Congress will ever do a good thing for the people, look at their lastes approval poll, 16%, look where US is right now economicaly and financialy...those guys are idiots, bunch of semi-retarded clowns pushing buttons...they have no power, brain, don't have the concepts of good or wrong...


The US Congress is corrupt and dumb, look at 90% of the congressman, they are f****** clueless about what the reality is, stop thinking something good would ever come from them. When was the last time the Congress did something right?

And this: Dreams from My Real Father

It's the gas, man...



“The moral and constitutional obligations of our representatives in Washington are to protect our liberty, not coddle the world, precipitating no-win wars, while bringing bankruptcy and economic turmoil to our people.” - Ron Paul

fireant's picture

I still think the DNC should be sued for fraud.

They are the ones who put forth the candidate; make them prove he is eligible.

Undo what Wilson did

The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

The most obvious constitutional crisis in American history, the seating of an unconstitutional and anti-American president.

Evidence of What?

*Barack Obama is an unconstitutional resident of the people’s White House.
*He did not become America’s first unconstitutional president alone, he had help.
*While most of the criminal cabal are Democrats, some are Republicans.
*Every member of congress knew Obama was ineligible for the office of president.
*Every member of the U.S. Supreme Court knows that Obama is unconstitutional.
*Every intelligent member of the press knows the truth, but won’t dare tell this story.
*Numerous people tried to remove natural born citizen from the constitution.
*They all know the correct definition of natural born citizen and applied it to John McCain.
*None of these people wants to apply the same definition to Barack Obama.
*Nobody in the Federal Government is going to do anything about the greatest constitutional crisis in American history, because all of them are complicit on one level or another.

As a result, the DNC was forced to remove the “constitutionally eligible” language from the 2008 DNC certification of the Obama-Biden ticket, omitting from the certification the following language –

“and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”

Instead, the DNC only certified that the Obama-Biden ticket was duly nominated for the offices of President and Vice President, using the following language –

“THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:”

To Read More: http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/the-greatest-fraud-...
Watch more: http://youtu.be/va7TjXIPfwE

Apparently, Hawaii was the only state to "vet"

Barack Obama. All the other states' Democratic committees just piggy-backed on that one "vetting." (handled by none other than Nancy Pelosi)

The whole thing stinks, and has from the get go.


HI vetted him and refused to certify his nomination with the words Constitutionally eligible. Instead, to get him on the ballot in HI Pelosi had to submit his nomination falsifying it with the words Constitutionally eligible for that state. She signed it under penalty of perjury in front of a notary at the same time she signed the other 49 certificates of nomination for the other states omitting the eligibility language. Only HI received the nomination certificate with the words Constitutionally eligible because only HI has a law that the nominee must be eligible per the Constitution.

Blessings )o(

Question of the Day

If his foreign birth could be proved %100 without a doubt, would the items he approved while in office be void??

If it could be proved 100%

If it could be proved 100% that the constitution says we can't go to war without a declaration of war by the congress (hint: it can) do you think the troops would all be coming home immediately or it would be ignored?

Evidence of a crime

I really wish that people cared more and trusted that our politicians can and often are criminal. People get so worked up over non-crimes ("He put his dog of the roof!" "He got booed!"), but they tend to not want to look at evidence of crime like this as a reason for not supporting someone as president.

I really hope that the people repent and start being honest with themselves and with the political world. We kinda need this.

"Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." -- Thomas Paine

F%$& Arpaio

Give it a rest already!
Sheesh... :/

F#%& anyone who expects...

An elected official not to do what his constituents petition him do....I don't like Arpai's stance on the drug war...But I respect that he seems to be following the constitution and the laws of his state...

Bad food, worse weather, please rEVOLution the states so I can bring my family back home!
Rosa Koire for for President!



It shouldn't matter if it is

It shouldn't matter if it is Obama or anyone else, if there is evidence then Congress SHOULD conduct an investigation. Of course the justice department should do it, but seeing as how there is a conflict of interest that is out. Sadly, NOTHING will ever get done about this. That's where my money is anyway.

"As the circle of light increases, so does the circumference of darkness around it." - Albert Einstein
"Now, more than ever, the choice between Obama and Romney will be which one do you want to ruin your country?" ~ Wead

Would the A.C.L.U. take on a

Would the A.C.L.U. take on a case of this type?



"The ACLU is our nation's guardian of liberty, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country." http://www.aclu.org/about-aclu-0

The group lists four Constitutional that are included, but it doesn't specify that that's all they cover. And after all, it's increasingly looking like 313 million people have had their Constitutional rights violated. If only half were willing to have the case brought to court, that would still make for one heckuva class-action suit. If the ACLU wouldn't take the case, how about the ACLJ? http://aclj.org/our-mission

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

"ACLU", h'mm?

American Communist Lawyers Union?

"Left Wing Radicals At Their Worst"

This ACLU?

Just came across this

I found it surprising, myself. It seems the ACLU isn't a big fan of this president/administration and its tactics, the organization's left-leaning orientation notwithstanding.

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

In a hopeful moment

I was recalling that it defended the Nazis in Skokie, Illinois (not exactly a popular case). And if not establishment Democrats, there are plenty on the left disgusted with Obama - the whole anti-war left; some among the Occupy movement and WTO globalization protesters; and those who are fed up with the invasions of our personal privacy. The president's birth certificate IS a case of fraud. And if HE is found to also be a fraud, his executive orders and legislation he signed into law will all come under review. Well, I think all ideas thrown out here for comment should be considered. If our wimpy Congress won't take action to seek the truth on behalf of THE PEOPLE IT REPRESENTS, who will? The options are limited as to who can be persuaded to carry the torch from here. As Arpaio said, no one wants to TOUCH this thing, afraid of the consequences.

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

I agree

That no matter who it is this should not be allowed to go on without proof of citizenship. And I'm not sure if A.C.L.U. would look at it but that certificate is a total fake. If you have Acrobat, and I don't mean Acrobat reader, you can clearly see the layers of added text of a computer format not a 60's style typewriter. You can see the layers because the fool who faked it saved it in it's original form instead of changing the format which would of made it impossible to see the layers. Besides that just looking at it anyone can catch on that it's a total fake.