26 votes

Bill Gates funds scheme to spray artificial 'planet-cooling' sulfur particles into atmosphere

(NaturalNews) Geo-engineers are finally coming out of the "chemtrail" closet, as reports are now emerging about deliberate plans in the works to dump untold tons of sulfate chemicals into the atmosphere for the purported purpose of fighting so-called "global warming."

The U.K.'s Guardian and others are reporting that a multi-million dollar research fund, which just so happens to have been started and funded by Microsoft founder and vaccine enthusiast Bill Gates, is being used to fund the project. A large balloon hovering at 80,000 feet over Fort Sumner, New Mexico, will release the sulfates into the atmosphere within the next year.

The stated purpose for this massive release of toxic sulfate particles is that doing so will allegedly reflect sunlight back into the atmosphere, and thus cool the planet. But many environmental groups and advocates of common sense are decrying the idea as dangerous, and one that could result in permanent damage to ecosystems all across the globe.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This sounds more lethal than

This sounds more lethal than a madman with an assault rifle.



Before you condemn Gates

Please read the Chapter in Super Freakonmics that details his funding for research into the feasibility of using stratospheric sulfur dioxide as a potential geoengineering measure to mitigate global warming IF it arises in the future, AND presents a catastrophic threat to humankind.

I think it's good to explore these ideas, if for nothing else than to allay the hysteria raised by global warming alarmists. I would much rather research these solutions than have the alarmists ruin western civilization with disastrous carbon caps.

I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. ~ Thomas Jefferson

False Dichotomy

The false dichotomy is looking at the two options of chemicals in the air or carbon taxes.
The reality of the situation is we have an option for neither: Which is what I am standing up for.


I am no chemist but after a brief look into this, I found out that this not only bad for the respiratory system obviously, it also neutralizes vitamin B1 but .........it will disinfect our wines at least ;)


Bill Gates ACID RAIN

The Mining industry already did all this, when roasting sulfide ores was common place. The EPA shut it all down.

The result of roasting sulfide ores was massive amounts of sulfurous acid being released into the atmosphere. This is further oxidized in the atmosphere to sulfuric acid which falls on the forests acidifying the soil, killing entire ecosystems.


"Take hold of the future or the future will take hold of you." -- Patrick Dixon

Ok I've got to point out

that from a libertarian perspective Bill Gates can do what he wants. There is no law saying that you can't release toxins into the atmosphere. I mean we can't have government interfering with the aspirations of one of our task masters. Besides if you think of the environmental damage that has been caused by all it takes just to manufacture the computers we use then what's a little toxic sulfate going to hurt.

Let this be a lesson as to why the libertarian ideology cannot work in this society. The libertarian model can only work from scratch and we are way past that now. This person has made his money by making us slaves and destroying our environment and now he is able to influence our government and control our lives, and he is just one. Libertarianism does not address that.

Yes, He Can...

Bill Gates can do whatever he wants: He is free to reap the consequences

If there is no law saying someone can't release toxins into the air then we would have to stand idly by when we are attacked by chemical weapons. It's no different!

No, this is clearly not the case, if Bill Gates can do whatever he wants then he can meet the consequence of his actions as we have the right do whatever we want: To defend ourselves from attacks; both apparent and subversive attacks.

Libertarian model says you cannot polute the air that ....

crosses my land.

Because that is encroaching on my unalienable right to life.

I think your model and understanding of libertarianism is broken.
Libertarian can do what ever they want as long as they do no harm to others.


"Take hold of the future or the future will take hold of you." -- Patrick Dixon

NO no no

You must wait until someone actually causes harm and then you prosecute. You can't stop him just because you disagree with him. You as a libertarian cannot support government regulation to put an end to this.

And I know that libertarians "can do what they want as long as they do no harm to others". But Bill Gates is not libertarian and you can't force him to be. That would be unlibertarian.

I'm not trying to cause a fight here. I am just pointing out that libertarianism cannot work. It's sounds great but so does communism on paper but in practice it doesn't work. And especially since there are so many who have gained positions of power and wealth by our current and past systems that if government suddenly turned Libertarian then we would be even further enslaved to those people, people we most affectionately call the PTB. Libertarianism does not address that.

You will still have ABC and other special interest mass media brainwashing people and spreading their ilk. You will still have people like Bill Gates doing their thing and others destroying our environment to enrich themselves.

Libertarianism will only work if you have a clean slate and a fresh start and that ain't gonna happen. That is why I am a libertarian "leaning" Conservative. Because reality takes precedence.

In a libertarian society

the aggrieved party can just as easily take steps to stop the aggressor and then let a mediator sort it out. After all, if there are no laws preventing polluters from polluting there would be no laws preventing anyone from stopping polluters. Such scenarios would be much less likely in a libertarian spociety because their would be many more small landowners who would want to prrotect their property instead of megacorporations and the state owning it and poisoning it. There worst eco-disasters have been the result of state activities (Chernobyl, the disappearing Aural Sea, the diversion of water out west in the US) or the result of states colluding with and protecting corporations (Bhopal). Take the state out of the equation and the predatory humans would have to behave or deal with angry neighbors. The state does not protect the weak, you need to get that illogic out of your head. The state is a criminal gang that has indoctrinated the masses as children into worshipping them as superior, noble protectors when the truth is that they are the worst psychopaths among humanity.

You miss the point

You say: "Such scenarios would be much less likely in a libertarian spociety because their would be many more small landowners who would want to prrotect their property instead of megacorporations and the state owning it and poisoning it."

What you fail to address is that these megacorporations already exist and libertarianism does not address that problem. And if government went totally libertarian right now they would still exist and their money and influence would be just as powerful. So you would be starting with an uneven playing field that makes you and me the losers.

You are not thinking the whole thing through. True libertarianism is impossible in this society unless you destroy everything and start from scratch. Unless you like being a slave to GM, Dupont, Microsoft, GE, ABC, CBS, NBC, etc...


corporations may already exist but they require continual propping up and protectionism by the state. As that protection is stopped those smaller minions within it will jump ship. To maintain a private army requires a lot of $ and that requires state confiscation, slavery, and centralized "money" presses. No system involving humans is perfect but the capacity of individual psycho power seekers to kill/harm on a massive scale would be greatly reduced and eventually neutralized. This would require the masses of people to understand the lie that government is their protector, overcome 12 years of government "skooling". And THAT is the point YOU do not get. Power corrupts. Even "good" men, given the monopoly of aggression against their fellow men can make bad judgments and mistakes thinking they are doing something for "the greater good". Hand that power over to corrupt and evil men (who well understand where that power lies and will stop at nothing to get it) and you get what we are living under now. Your basic premise that the state protects the powerless is wrong.
Never seen "Lord of the Rings"???

Hold on a minute

Did I say that the state protects the powerless? I am saying that Libertarianism at this point will not make a bit of difference.

You seem to be under the false assumption that everyone will miraculously turn libertarian when at present no more than what percentage would identify themselves as such. People will not change as they never have and they never will.

And without government intervention even libertarians will support those who have rule over us like Bill Gates who has made billions by giving you the ability to do what you are doing right now. And even though we will complain about what he is doing to our environment, or to children in Afghanistan, we will still support him by purchasing his companies product. This is common across the spectrum and flies in the face of your assumption that people would free themselves if they just "understood the lie". I don't even think you comprehend the scope of the lie. Not to sound demeaning.

Yes I have seen Lord of the Rings and to be honest the fact that you bring up someone else fantasy, which was produced by the very corporations and Hollywood ilk that has made our slave society what it is today and perpetuates the lie that you speak of, tells me that you are still not clear as to the point I am trying to get across or the situation we are in.

I wish that what you say was true but I just don't see it happening. As you said "Power corrupts" and that is not going to change. People can be bought and deals can be made to no end.

You think Gates

isn't benefitting by state protectionism? By credentialling, licensing, copyright laws preventing upstarts from competing against him? Read some history look around you, everywherethe taxpayers are propping up and obeying laws that prevent them from competing against the cronies of the state like Gates. SOMEONE will invent something better than Gates' product and he'll be obsolete...unless he has his buddies in the state poisoning us, etc. It is exactly BECAUSE of hguman nature that the true nature of the state must be recognized. It can happen, it happened in tthe 1700s...we were just derailed by seemingly plausible statist solutions that have since been debunked..big time. No state is going to protect you and a libertarian state is an oxymoron.

that really stinks

Bill Gates is really smart and uses money to help the human race

Glad to see at least some of people who become super rich are looking out for the human race long term.


Yes, he's writing a cookbook on how to "serve" man.

Sounds like a comment by an agent provocateur

nobody who can read the 4th amendment, posts their email as their user-name.


"Take hold of the future or the future will take hold of you." -- Patrick Dixon


yea forcing poor homeless people at gun point who live in Africa to take his vaccine is really looking out for the the human race.lolz

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” – Dresden James

Ya that Rambo outfit he wears is sweet

Ya that Rambo outfit he wears is sweet

That's a straw man comment.

He may not go out and force people to take his vaccines, but even worse he pays others to do it for him.

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” – Dresden James

Wasn't it sulfur emissions

that was causing sulfuric "acid rain" that was destroying ecosystems and historic landmarks a few decades ago?? Isn't this just what Gates is doing??
I'm no scientist, but..DUHH!
Oh well, Gates has money and he's a Bilderberger so he can kill off whoever he wants. He "knows best" how the world should be and who should be in it. Why aren't they dropping this over DC?

Did anyone see

The Lew Rockwell newswire about how men are more responsible for global warming than women? Some quality entertainment these fools who take themselves as serious intellectuals give us.

Aren't there treaties against this?

When this action results in the death of millions, Bill Gates ought to receive justice for his "crimes against humanity."

The actions of he and his ilk don't even qualify as "genocide" but their goal is to wipe out the entirety of homo sapiens.

We do not

Even know if any warming is man made. Sunspots and sun flares can have an affect on climate change, even if we knew beyond a shadow of doubt that global warming was happening, there would still be the need to know if it is permanent or temporary and if it was caused by man or a natural occurance. What happens if it cools naturally coupled with this? I suppose they would declare war on the ozone layer in order to offset the possibility of an ice age! Of course, the very wise men like Gates and our media would demand government assist in "helping."

I have never liked the Gates, who contribute to the abortion industry, now I dislike them even more. They should move their home to the place in which this is happening if they are so certain of the likelyhood of it being necessary.

Maybe now, even more


When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

The elite have prepared for their own safety.

Gates is into "depopulation" and who knows what he might be up to between vaccinations for every human and spraying the planet. There are underground cities already built for the wealthy.

Sue him for criminal trespass.

We have to prove damages. No matter what Bill believes he is doing makes no difference.

Free includes debt-free!

Oh, kind of like a volcano

This is something people tend to forget, especially when they have an agenda of "proving" that the global rise in temperatures is due to human activity, but we actually have natural processes that will cool the earth when they occur. For instance, when ash particles get spewed out of a hole in the ground and absorb sunlight, and act as nuclei for condensation and cloud cover. The fact that earth has had relatively little volcanic activity in the last 50 or so years is responsible for much of the observed rise in temperatures. What would really suck is if this madman actually got his way, and then after cooling the earth, we had another Mount Tambora-like volcano (the year without a summer in wikipedia is a good article, look it up) go off. That could be all she wrote for humankind.

It's only a matter of time before it happens again. It's really hard to root for that devastation, but if it prevents these psychopaths from screwing things up, I guess I'll keep my fingers crossed.