Public Notice: "Attention To All Gun-Grabbing Politicians - The Jig Is Up!" - "Govern Yourselves Accordingly"Submitted by The South on Fri, 07/27/2012 - 19:08
Here's the Beef!
Do you people really think every 2nd Amendment Loving American isn't onto your statutory scheme by now? Well, you're correct, a large number of them are not, but some of us are and the word is getting out.
Better shut down the internet quick before people actually learn the truth!
Your internal corporate so called 'gun laws', which are NOT laws, but rather statutes that only apply to employees of the corporation known as the UNITED STATES, do not apply to the average American who is not on the government payroll.
How many times has the Supreme Court struck down you power hungry politicians and your so called 'gun laws' to date? Yet, you continue to enforce your statutory codes (internal rules) on every and all Americans who have not awaken to the con.
Why? Because most Americans do not understand the difference between statutory rules and Law of the Land - Laws. The two are mutually exclusive of each other.
The united States Constitution is the Law of the Land and USC code is not. That code is for the corporate UNITED STATES located in the District of Columbia and it's few Territories.
One is the Law of the Land; the other is the law of a corporation, such as Wal-Mart's own-internal, statutory rules and codes that only apply to Wal-Mart employees.
And redefining a word such as person(s)/federal person(s)/individual/corporation/office/elected official cannot and does NOT define the living man/woman unless you have in your possession an employment contract and current payroll records for said "person(s)"... proving that individual agreed to be that 'person/individual/corporation/office', because government agreed to pay them to operate in that capacity.
Remember: Slavery is illegal in the United States, but voluntary servitude is not. But what we are dealing with in respect to government is known as Involuntary Servitude, in my humble opinion.
You cannot arbitrarily codify/define every living-breathing man/woman within the borders from sea to shining sea (not the District of Columbia and it's Territories), as being a federal employee without proof of employment by way of employment contract and current payroll records to back up your claims of jurisdiction over every living man/woman's life.
If we were to look up Title 18 USC ss 921 ourselves, we could very easily see who your internal-statutory codes ACTUALLY do apply to:
Title 18: USC ss 921:
(a) As used in this chapter—
(1) The term “person” and the term “whoever” include any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, or joint stock company.
2nd Amendment Lovers of Liberty, ask yourself this question:
Are you an individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, or joint stock company? Or are you flesh in the blood-living people with a pulse that can actually fog a mirror; a man or woman?
Now, look up those definitions, and remember: Whatever definition of a word they scrabble together in an attempt to define YOU into their legislation, does NOT apply to you unless at the time of the complaint (gun possession, high capacity mag possession, etc.), you were actually Performing A Function Of Government, and they have an employment contract and current payroll records on file for you, to prove at the time of the complaint, you actually were operating in the capacity of and getting paid to operate in the capacity of an government agent/employee.
These codes, rules, regulations, and statutes do NOT apply to anyone other than government employees/agents.
That includes any and all gun restriction laws (I mean statutes) on the books, past-present and future.
Where in the US Constitution does it say you cannot have a pistol with a laser sight, or a shotgun with an 12" barrel? Where does it say you must register your firearms with state or ask permission (gun carry permit) to actually carry it?
Law of the Land v.s Statutory Codes of the Corporation.
NOTE: If you do not know if you are a government employee/agent, then you more than likely are not. If you were in fact an government employee/agent, you would probably have in your possession several-previous payroll receipts or check stubs, and proof of bi-weekly EFT deposits from the government on your banking statements.
Definitions to words have meanings, and THEIR definitions and ours are not the same.
Ex: In the world of government, the definition of "person(s)" might be - 'a corporation, lawnmower, sno-cone stand, jelly doughnut, kitchen sink, and any other word we may some day decide to add to this list to hoodwink the average American into believing we have jurisdiction over their lives'
In our world, the definition of "person(s)" means: A Human Being; a living Man or Woman that is nothing but a living man or woman.
Why are our definitions so simple and self explanatory, and governments definitions so vague and misleading?
Because no one wants to work for their corporation (most people anyway), and the only way they can "hoodwink" us into becoming government employees who are bound by their statutory BS, rules, regulation, and codes, is to make up a broad sweeping definition to a word, hence the above aforementioned examples.
Government is out of control because the average American has not forced them to cough up and employment contract and current payroll records proving said government is their master.
Always remember: No Contract = No Jurisdiction.
Know your God Given Inherent Birth Rights and how to enforce them, or someday you will be governed by your inferiors.
If someone from the Government claims Social Security or a Drivers License is the contract, perhaps this may change their mind?
Social Security or a Drivers License is not a contract:
If they don't believe that, perhaps they will believe what's written on their own website:
"There has been a temptation throughout the program's history for some people to suppose that their FICA payroll taxes entitle them to a benefit in a legal, contractual sense. That is to say, if a person makes FICA contributions over a number of years, Congress cannot, according to this reasoning, change the rules in such a way that deprives a contributor of a promised future benefit."
There is no consideration and there is no obligation. This was already decided by the Supreme Court in Helvering v. Davis.
Now, what if a government official claims the 14th Amendment gives them the power to rule over you?
How about what a former State Senator had to say about the 14th Amendment?
What if the STATE wants to bring charges against you for breaking one of their internal-statutory codes?
Are you aware the courts are operating under Trust Law, and their method of madness is the art of presumptions?
What if the STATE insists you MUST hire an attorney? Did you know by doing so, you are considered a ward of the STATE?
Why do their internal statutory gun laws (I mean rules) apply to the average American?
Because the average American hasn't learned to tell government to kiss their A$$, and if they expect him/her to follow some internal rule, code, or regulation, then government needs to start coughing up some weekly cash that would entice or obligate said American to follow said gun laws (I mean internal rules).
No Contract = No Jurisdiction
At the time of the complaint, were you performing a function of government and getting paid to do so? Surely they do not allow non-employees to perform functions of government, do they?
If we were all government employees, then any one of us could walk onto an Air Force Base and fire up an F-16 or AH-64 Apache and take it to pick up a pizza, right?
The only ones who can do that are people who have signed into an employment contract; went through the proper training; and are receiving pay from the government right?
If anyone with a social security number or drivers license is considered to be an government agent/employee, then why is the lady working at the DMV getting a government check and you are not?
Are we hiring on a sliding scale? Some get pay and others don't?
Doesn't the lady working at the DMV have a social security number and a drivers license? What about the person working at the state capitol as a receptionist?
Under this insane logic of government, that lady at the DMV could come to my Concrete business and jump in a Class A or B concrete truck and start driving it, just because she had a social security card and drivers license, which led her to believe she were entitled to do so.
Hopefully this serves as an educational tool for politicians as well as ordinary-everyday Americans who work at the gas station or Wal-Mart.
Remember: We have not had a legitimate government since 1871 when the 41st Congress walked out and the corporate actors guild took over.
Supreme Court Justice Marshall Harlan (Downes v. Bidwell, 182, U.S. 244 1901)gave the following dissenting opinion: “Two national governments exist; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and Independently of that Instrument.”
Govern Yourselves or Be Governed.
Disclaimer: Everything below and above this line is my opinion, and not meant to be taken as legal advice. Do your own due diligence and educate yourselves and your family. Not knowing your rights is the equivalent of not having any at all. And do not expect anyone from government to explain your rights, for if they did, there would be no more government to control you :)