20 votes

Watch what happens when Guns are banned in Australia. Same result for the US ?

"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."

~Thomas Jefferson

Watch the video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8RDWltHxRc&feature=autoplay&...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The globalist plan one step

The globalist plan

one step at a time.

Port Arthur Massacre - staged psyop terror attack

Investigation by Joe Vialls - this attack that killed thirty five
people in Tasmania in April, 1996 was a pivotal event that
led to mass gun bans in Australia.

Supposedly the work of a young loner with an IQ of 60
with no known firearms experience of training, Vialls shows
that it could only have been accomplished by a highly
trained professional.

Vialls had previously investigated the shooting in 1984 of
a British policewoman at the Libyan Embassy in London -
attributed to someone firing from within the embassy the
incident was used to kick the Libyans out at a time when
the US was pushing to blame them for the Lockerbie bombing
(which was likely not the Libyans, but the Iranians retaliating
for the US shootdown of an Iranian airliner).

Vialls showed that the fatal shot did not come from the embassy,
but from outside - from a building with links to US intelligence...

http://www.whale.to/b/viallspam.html

(Vialls' whole account - a little long and a bit disorganized due
to him adding updates over time)

This one summarizes it all a bit more clearly:

http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/port_arthur.htm

I agree

I do not believe there is any way this semi-retarded guy, with no training, can shoot with military accuracy and take out people the way "he" did.

Hmm local contacts suggest otherwise

I live in Tassie and have met people from the local area on occasion. This is one that can't be dumped onto psyops. People had been worried for some time about Bryant, and knew who it would be even before he was identified.

Sometimes shit just happens.

He would have never been convicted.

If this went to trail, he would have never been convicted.

How can he shoot with such accuracy, with no training? It just doesnt add up to me.

Plus the only reason he is in jail is because -

"From the time of his arrest, remand prisoner Martin Bryant was illegally held in strict solitary confinement and denied access to media of any kind until his police interrogation on 4th July 1996. When he refused to admit to the Port Arthur Massacre at interrogation, he was once more placed back in illegal solitary confinement. Eventually in desperation during November 1996, Martin Bryant pleaded "guilty" 72 times, thereby allowing the authorities to avoid a humiliating trial at which they could present no hard evidence of guilt. Intellectually impaired Martin Bryant was convicted by a hysterical media pack, then forced to plead guilty by prison officials illegally enforcing solitary confinement. "

http://members.iinet.net.au/~nedwood/portarthur.html

Eyewitnesses can be terrible

Eyewitnesses can be terrible witnesses. Just look at how many people in New York still believe the 9-11 lie!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

KEEP YOUR GUNS!

BUMP!

(Thanks for posting.)