UPDATED: Richard Gilbert Speaks about Romney's "Crime Syndicate" - and our Duty as Ron Paul Supporters
Submitted by robot999 on Sat, 07/28/2012 - 12:03Richard Gilbert speaks about Romney's "Crime Syndicate" (his lying, cheating, stealing of the election), and Romney's support of NDAA, Drones, and other Evils.
He goes on to talk about the Duty of Ron Paul supporters to fight until the battle is over (win or lose) to restore the US Constitution by electing Ron Paul POTUS.
Now that the Campaign has officially challenged the Oregon, Louisiana, and Mass. delegate "results" (achieved by outright criminal activity by Romney and local GOP thugs), maybe you can think about supporting Richard, his team, and our Lawsuit against the RNC, and State GOP Chairmen - seeking to unbind the Delegates in Tampa!!
(Unbind by court order - not by some GOP rule or "promise" - which they have proven time and again can be broken when convenient.)
P.S. Have you ever considered that there just might be information and a plan to elect RP that you don't know about? Don't give up, keep fighting!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bK5cqAoYwTU&feature=colike
UPDATE: Listen to what Carol Paul has to say about the LFRP and the lawsuit (approx 4:20)
http://youtu.be/tDruewydBUs
Veterans for Ron Paul!
I will explain:
Here is what just happened to you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P51vKeHjHr4
At about 26 seconds, you'll have what just happened to you.
Eric Hoffer
http://gplus.to/jamesrmoore
At 4:20 from above Carol Paul does say
the people have a right to do this. She says Paul can't be part of it because he wasn't there and witnessed what went on. Looks like the green light is on from the Paul campaign for the lawsuit going forward.
Gold standard: because man can not be trusted to control his greed
You are lying.
Affirming people's right to freedom is not a "green light" from the Paul campaign. It's NO COMMENT from the Paul campaign.
Implying otherwise is LYING.
I guess my ears lied to me then
This is stupid
Gold standard: because man can not be trusted to control his greed
Yes they did!
Post your quote from 4:20 in the video and I'll post mine from 9:06.
The truth speaks for itself!
What MORON voted this down?
What jack@$$ would vote down a reply that says "Let the truth speak for itself."
Only a Gilbert-bot.
I also think people have a right to look into and expose fraud
but I'm adamantly against the L4RP/Gilbert lawsuit.
She didn't say she supported the lawsuit but she did say she doesn't support the badmouthing of her family (e.g., Benton and Rand) which Gilbert and his ilk have done.
That sir
is a valid point. They have bad mouthed Benton and Rand, but so have many other "RP Supporters" here on the DP and in the press. Unfortunately that seems to be a trend lately - sadly resulting in division, diversion, and dissent among the ranks. Hmmm, exactly what the enemy would desire.
Your morals =/= my laws.
He's also had some extremely harsh words
for the MA delegates/alternates.
He calls them traitors and their leader a coward (who has been working hard for Dr. Paul for years - much longer than Mr. opportunistic who jumped in last-minute).
He Has Had Harsh Words
...for anyone who takes *any* legal route other than turning over their testimony to him. That, in itself, should be a huge red flag for anyone.
He and those working with him have solicited lists every way imaginable and then gone after delegates.
"It is your DUTY" ...how arrogant is that? There seems to be no emotional avenue that is off-limits. Outright stating that conversations have taken place with the Campaign and Doug Wead that did not take place. Claiming "certain victorious outcomes" that no lawyer would state in such a situation. Using Carol Paul.
Some of us can't help but be triggered by and outraged at the tactics used. Everything Dr. Paul is not..he is. Everything Dr. Paul is...he is not.
fonta
Another Valid Point
Lawyer 4 and company are not just DP posters trying to find scapegoats for their anger at a corrupt system. They are not journalists paid to have an opinion. Lawyer 4 and company have had and still have a target.
Their target is some of the most fervent and active Ron Paul supporters. Many of them are young and not familiar with "the ways" of many lawyers and easily deceived. Many of them are our *hope* of carrying the Ron Paul message into the next decades (if they are not disenfranchised or dis-spirited over getting their hopes up only to have cold water thrown on all their efforts.
Many of them were influenced mightily by the character and integrity of Ron Paul which has been attacked over and over with double-talk ie "yes, but" ..."of course I am for him, but." Instead of character and integrity they are following a pied piper of questionable character, professionalism and motives (IMO).
And, yes, I agree. "EXACTLY what the enemy would desire." They even stated their purpose front end: "We are TAKING Over the Campaign. We ARE the Campaign now." And, then they claimed there was "mutiny" amongst the ranks prior to any mutiny taking place. I do not believe there is mutiny....I believe their numbers are few but their lies are legion.
fonta
I wouldn't worry too much if that is the goal ...
even if they are very successful.
I would consider that Political Darwinism.
The idiots will be ostracized and smarter, more patient, Liberty lovers will take their place.
WAHOR!!
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/48994
I Think The Goal(s) Encompass
much more than that; however, I would *still* tend to agree with you.
fonta
I am not a big conspiracy nut and I tend to think ...
this is one (or two) men looking for cash and name recognition.
But if it were a conspiracy ...
My bet is that this thing was orchestrated by the RNC, Romney, and Rove in order to bring into the sunshine exactly which ... and how many ... delegates are Ron Paul supporters and if it is found to be substantial to disqualify them before they are credentialed.
WAHOR!!
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/48994
I Tend to Agree About the One Or Two
...and yet believe there is more to it.
It is no conspiracy that there are those in politics who put together a lot of plans to ensnare and discredit....and their tactics certainly leave a lot to be desired in the way of honesty, civility and integrity.
I find just how some of them might have gotten together (if there are more than two) intriguing. There is *a lot* about this election season that doesn't add up. However, that probably has been the case for a very long time...I just have not observed so closely before.
Not so long ago, I actually believed almost everyone would behave in a *better* way if they knew a better way to behave : ) I wuz wrong.
fonta
Fonta: Very Valid
And also brings into focus another "casualty" of this action.
Your observation regarding delegates:
"Many of them are our *hope* of carrying the Ron Paul message into the next decades.."
Illustrates the fact that:
The miraculous gains made this campaign by the Liberty Movement will be erased due to the ostracization of these new-comers to the GOP.
All their hard work will be negated, and Romney will have an even tighter hold on GOP POLICY for years to come.
Possibly this was the ultimate, BIG PICTURE GOAL all along.
...Lawyer 4....yes, for whom?
"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!
Danton...Read
...where did they find Gilbert and tell me what you think.
fonta
Fonta: I Have Read It
And it certainly is noteworthy; coming from another "old dog" who's been "around the block"...see my comments there:
"WHERE DID THEY FIND GILBERT?...GOOD QUESTION".
"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!
Alright, so the guy is funny looking
I laughed quite hard myself but like others have said, as weird as he may seem AT LEAST he is trying to do something and for that, try and show a little respect. Besides, i cant help but notice this movement is full of funny looking people anyway so he should fit right in...all he is missing is his Tin Foil Hat....lol Lighten up people! Your to caught up in being right all the time....
"If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin."
Samuel Adams
How do you know what he's TRYING to do.
He SAYS a lot of good things. But you don't know anything about what he's doing, in fact. In fact, you are completely ignorant of what he's ACTUALLY DOING.
A lot of people say a lot of good things. You believe them all?
"A sucker is born every minute."
So FBI
you say that Conservative Warrior doesn't know what Richard is doing, but you expect us to believe that YOU DO? Wow, man - that's Obvious and Twisted. Why do you fear this lawsuit so much FBI?
Your morals =/= my laws.
While I don't fear the IdiotSuit I do fear the idea
that people of your ilk drive automobiles and may at any given point in time be sharing the road with others.
In other words, passing Driver's Ed., a driving test, and operating a stick shift are things that I would consider to be more difficult than seeing why this lawyer and his lawsuit are bordering on being perfect material for an episode of MTV's Punk'd.
☧ INSTINCTV • DIVINITATIS • MENTIS • MAGNITVDINE ☧
Hey there FBI Exposure
do you have some inside information for us or something today?
Some official FBI documents or something?
Or are you just giving us YOUR version of what you think he is ACTUALLY DOING ?
No, i don't believe everybody that says a lot of things and that includes...guess who?....YOU !
You are right on one thing, there is "A Sucker born every minute"
and this guy isn't one to listen to some keyboard expert tell me about what he THINKS he knows as facts....I never signed on to this crap to begin with but rest assured you haven't convinced me of anything either....
"If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin."
Samuel Adams
Nice.
Sorry I replied to his BS before I saw your post. Obviously you have it totally under control. Thanks CW.
Your morals =/= my laws.
You're right.
He shouldn't be mocked for his looks. However, there is a PR element to leading a high-profile case. There are some things you can't change, but you should at least put your best foot forward.
Before going on video:
Clean up your office (or better yet, in this case, consider shooting the video in a place that doesn't look like a an old home office)
Use better lighting
Dress the part and button your sleeves if your not going to roll them up (I hope he doesn't go to court looking like that)
Get a haircut
Consider make-up
These are all things he has control over that affected his professional appearance (which is relevant to the PR aspect of a high-profile case).
But
then he would be ATTACKED for not being "real" or for changing who he is so that he can better deceive us. I get your point, but in this case, I think he did the right thing. I am who I am, you are who you are.
Your morals =/= my laws.
Ricard Gilbert has got off his ass
and done something to try and fix this Corrupt system. There are many here that are critical of Gilbert. I would ask what is your plan of action regarding all the Corruption going on right under our noses?
If we do nothing it looks like all Paul delegates will be disqualified before the Tampa Convention.
Gold standard: because man can not be trusted to control his greed
As I stated previously...
Doing something can be more harmful than doing nothing. As it is in this case.
Gilbert will lose the case, no question. He says that's OK because he's taking the "do no harm" approach, that nothing is lost if by the suit if he loses. Wrong. Energy that could have been put to better use is lost, the movement gets a bad reputation, people get turned off by the idiocy of the suit or the infighting it causes, our political opponents are given a nice list of liberty activists to watch out for, Gilbert my convince people to do some very stupid things at the convention that could give us a bad name and bring all kinds of unnecessary blowback, more delegates could be removed because of their involvement, etc. You get the point. Well, you might not get the point but other readers should.
But I'm not advocating doing nothing. You want to know the plan?
In the short term, it's getting as many liberty-minded delegates to the convention as possible. This is done by getting elected, not doing anything to get disqualified, exposing misconduct through various press and media, bringing challenges to the RNC, and filing complaints in state court when appropriate.
There, see, we have a plan. Stupid Gilbert talking point thoroughly defeated.
Want to know the plan in the long term? Here it is:
http://www.dailypaul.com/246744/forbes-the-grand-shi-strateg...
Wish This Could Get
...lawdida's post above...bumped to the top and stay there until everyone gets it!
fonta
Elections
of Delegates is over dude. Hell, we're just trying to keep the ones we have. You can't see that?
If a bank teller cheated you out of a C-note while cashing a check, would you NOT confront them?
Your morals =/= my laws.