U.S. to Surrender Military Control to UN While Disarming Americans!
Submitted by thomas jefferson 2 on Sat, 08/04/2012 - 09:55Alex also talks with Bernadine Smith, the founder of the Second Amendment Committee, a nationwide organization working to make sure the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights is upheld as the supreme protective law for firearms of law-abiding people. Smith also authored legislation to restore the militia system to its proper role as designed by the framers of the Constitution.
http://www.libertygunrights.com/index.html
http://www.americandeception.com/index.php?page=home
link to video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkeDBeW7dIc&list=UUvsye7V9psc...
»
- Login to post comments
we are a ways away from this
we are a ways away from this happening, they cant even get control of our internet yet and you all think theyre gonna pull this off.. not anytime soon trust me!
...
agreed.
Once Americans wake up to the fact that the entire government is stealing and/or watching porn all day, and comes to the realization there is NO WAY the FED could ever EXTRACT a positive outcome for them if Martial law took the land, the gig will be up.
In martial law,
the authoritarians would crush the businesses they need for their very power..
They would have to force an entire new system and even the dumbest American no longer trusts government to do that, with the exception of current congress.
The authoritarians would have to have troops come in from other nations but Americans have technology at their finger tips to CHECK an authoritarian government, and check it QUICKLY!
The kids in iraq took 30 days to figure out how to put together an IED using 3rd world tech.. One of our own turned Apple/ATT on their heads when the millons they spent on IPHONE security when up in smoke, because it was hacked by an 18 yo in HIS GARAGE, in no less...wait for it...
then 24 hours upon its release.
Even if the military thinks they can control the population, for how long would this be? a day? a week? really no longer. Then their trials would ensue. dont be fooled, these people are so confused about the disinfo going on. They have no idea what side they are on.
There is greed and back stabbing in their own ranks and none of them trust one or the other..
I often wonder if this is a set up for them... a trap they have wandered into, but now cant escape from. how ironic would THAT BE???
If the cameras and wiretaps and reading of emails can work in their favor, are they as arrogant as to believe one day it will not be turned as used AGAINST THEM?
Of course they ARE this ignorant!!! and thats why the GIG IS UP.
People of the world will not forget the last 100 years and the ones who have committed crimes against us and our country will most certainly pay.
Thats what I see, but how far it have to go??
Thats the question.
"OH NO! He has a SON?" Neoconservatives and Liberals EVERYWHERE!
Rand Paul 2016
Question: Just what is the argument for gun control?
I see the gun topic repeatably brought up on here and the MSM and I do try to look at both sides of an issue. I'm having a real difficulty understanding the argument for gun control. As far as I can see, it appears that the argument for gun restrictions is to save lives and injuries? Or is there another agenda as Alex points out in this video? A quick Google search shows about 17,000 were killed with guns per year, exclusive of suicide. Another Google search shows 42 million die in auto accidents per year. So if the people who advocate gun control are honest and really wanted to save lives and injuries, it would be logical to address the bigger problem first. Because it is so easy to correct. A law restricting the speed limit in the USA to 35 would practically eliminate almost all fatalities in auto accidents, problem solved. I don't recall anyone ever advocating a "drive 35 stay alive" campaign. I know its an extreme analogy, but it does shine some light on their real intent. One thing for sure, its not to save lives.
That's the problem with arguments.
The problem is they get the facts wrong. It's closer to 42 thousand not 42 million. If that was the case, all Americans would be dead in less than 10 years. I'm not advocating gun control, just common sense. If you take into account how many people drive everyday compared to how many people play with guns everyday, I'm sure you would see the death to use ratio decline dramatically.
A point that I would make against the argument is that when you get into a vehicle, you assume the risks. However when you walk into a movie theater or go to school/college, you are not assuming the risk that you are going to get shot.
Further more, government has taken steps to make driving safer. Seat belt laws, yes speed limits, harsh punishment for DUI's and stricter safety regulations for automobiles.
On the other hand there are politicians and organizations who will fight tooth and nail against any safety regulation that comes down the gun control pipeline.
And don't get me wrong, I'm not against your right to own a gun. I also don't believe that because someone wants a little common sense and safety in the argument automatically wants to take all your guns. However, I don't think guns are milk, they shouldn't be able to be purchased by anyone. There should always be some type of background check. And there should be a line to what guns should be legal and what shouldn't. I'm not going to draw the line here, but there is a reason why it's not legal to walk around with a rocket launcher or having a missile silo in your back yard.
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
John Adams
Restrictive covenants: no lumber year; no saloon.
My backyard has 2 restrictive covenants:
They were the only restrictions placed upon my land use when I purchased my property many years ago. None that come along have restricted my land use since. Yes, many a code or ordinance has been foist upon the land. Easements, set backs, height, length, depth... None are binding. I never agreed; I was never compensated. Folks make-believe time & time again. Just ain't so.
I do have to get along with the neighbors; so I ain't causing trouble for them.
Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul ☑
.
.
The agenda calls for Britain to be the NWO Bank
and the USA will be the NWO military. The bankers who rule the money will rule the world. That's why every member of NATO has a CENTRAL BANK controlled ultimately by Rothschild-Rockefeller who merged their power and wealth in June of 2012, no doubt to better control the world under the obviously emerging NWO. http://english.ruvr.ru/2012_06_08/77502619/
If you trace the roots deep enough the British Monarchy, Rothschilds, Hitler, and all the monied elites are part of the same blood line.
Hitler was NOT a Rothschild
I'll copypaste my response to this from another thread:
No credible evidence exists that Hitler was a Rothschild. This rumour, along with others -such as his being Jewish or a British Agent- were conjured up during WW2 by British Intelligence as part of a "black propaganda" campaign to demoralise European supporters and Germans in general. Such stories continue to be parroted today by people like David Icke and Alex Jones, however, anyone who bothers to research the origin of said stories will discover that they hold no water.
Sorry, I know it sounds good with the conspiracy narrative and all, but it's a baseless lie.
Bank records show many traces. DTCC.com: Quadrillions every year
Follow the money. Large international companies continued international operations through the tremulous wars. Switzerland, Hong Kong & related money centers allowed "legal tender" to do its evil deeds w/o respect for boarders. Little respect for anything.
Genealogy is error ridden history passed down through the ages. Fascinating. Authentication is difficult at best. Little of the vast quantity of family relations can be traced with certainty... except in folks imagination.
See Depository Trust Credit Clearing DTCC.com for financial details.
$1.66 Quadrillion Cash Flow Racket Run By Monopoly Boyz! Mark Twain, 04/08/2012
$2 Quadrillion Fed Inflates Itself Beyond "Alice in Wonderland" Mark Twain, 09/11/2011
Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul ☑
Mr Bauer came with almost nothing to Frankfurt centuries ago.
ROTHSCHILD, THE RED SHIELD FROM FRANKFURT
Amshel Rothschild (also known as: Moses Bauer).
In order to be better acquainted with the new sovereign and his dukes, let us look at the lineage and chronology of this dynasty. It all began centuries ago.
Mr Rothschild (aka: Bauer) opened a small Frankfurt shop as a tenant at a crossroads. The shop building housed an inn nearest the crossroad corner. A red shield was hung outside the inn as a landmark for travels to recognize. One day, Mr Bauer changed his family name to Rothschild (Red Shield).
Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul ☑
Why the down vote?
That really hurts my feelings. :-(
I have read many articles
that say Hitler was a Rothschild. If possible please provide some articles that say differently. I am always seeking truth!
Here is a link
To the book I mentioned below on Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/British-Subversive-Operations-Against-...
I think you would find it an interesting read.
Thanks for the link
:)
There are several existing theories about Hitler's Ancestry
that have not been disproved as far as I know, the Maria Schicklgruber/Barron Rothschild of Vienna theory being one of those. I don't believe you can categorically state that "Hitler was NOT a Rothschild".
What is your source for that statement?
*
Funny that the burden of proof somehow falls on me. Please, show me proof that he was.
Anyhow, for an in-depth look on the subject, I would recommend reading "The Black Game: British subversive operations against the Germans during the Second World War" by Ellic Howe. Howe worked on psychological warfare and forgery techniques for Britain's Political Warfare Executive during WW2. In the book, he covers the "Hitler was a Rothschild" myth, along with some hundred other myths that were circulated across Europe with the intent of demoralizing those who supported the Nazis.
This myth, along with others from the same source, was later revived by one Walter Langer in his 1972 book, "The Mind of Adolf Hitler: The Secret Wartime Report." Langer claims the Austrian police had conducted an investigation into the Hitler family and compiled a "secret document" proving that Maria Anna Schicklgruber was living in Vienna at the time she conceived, and was employed as a servant in the home of Baron Rothschild. As the story goes, when the family discovered her pregnancy she was immediately sent back to her home in Spital where Alois was born. However, Langer himself admitted that this story lacked credibility, and no "secret document" or any shred of evidence has ever been found.
Again, the only reason this silly story is given any legitimacy at all is due to it still being touted as fact on certain conspiracy sites by people who did not do their homework.
.
.
Thanks
For the book recommendation I'm a real fan of psyops and other black propaganda operations in WWII in particular. For example "Soldatensender Calais" an alleged renagade anti-Nazi radio station which was actually an allied operation.
It never ceases to amaze me of the patent nonsense people will believe. I sometimes think, if there really was a conspiracy, that this stuff would be planted to confuse and discredit those who believe it.
For a good history of Hitlers early life I recommend "Hitler in Vienna".
Thetis