18 votes

Should Obama and Congress be arrested under NDAA?

Should Obama and Congress be arrested under NDAA

Should President Obama (alongside Lindsay Graham and John McCain) be wearing an orange jumpsuit?

August 4, 2012

Welcome to the beautiful and surreal reality of life under American corporatism, under a Congress that churns out thousands and thousands of pages of (often contradictory) legislation a year.

If providing material assistance to al-Qaeda is illegal under the National Defence Authorization Act (2012), and Obama and Congress are sending $25 million of aid to al-Qaeda-affiliated Syrian opposition, aren’t Congress and President Obama violating their own law? Should Obama (or at least the Justice Department) not be using “all necessary and appropriate force” including “the power to indefinitely detain” to prevent Obama and Congress from assisting al-Qaeda? Did anyone in Congress or the Obama administration even bother to read the law that they were signing? Do Federal laws no longer apply to lawmakers?

Read more: http://azizonomics.com/2012/08/04/should-obama-and-congress-...

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Right after

Congress passed that horrid bill I had a little fantasy in my head that I became President and one of my first acts was to use that bill against every single congresscritter who voted for the it, snatch 'em up, stuff 'em into those FEMA camps and hold them indefinitely. Such peace reigned in the land because there weren't many skanks left in DC to tyrannize the citizenry and those left were more than happy to reverse all the liberty-draining legislation that's been passed over the last century.

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison

Where do we need to sign up

Where do we need to sign up to make this happen?

I guess we all need to sign up!

Bump to front page

They should be arrested for

They should be arrested for Treason under the Constitution.
We do not want to give the NDAA legitimacy by setting precedent for its use. It is unconstitutional. Why would we use it?

"The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that." — Alan Greenspan

Here's A Compromise

After we jail every politician who supported the aid package, then we can repeal the NDAA. Sound good?

Article Three of the United States Constitution

Section 3 defines treason and its punishment.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.


"I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."


There is no duration defined in the Oath

Oh Please Be So

This would be the greatest justice since Clinton was impeached for violating the sexual-harassment laws he signed into existence.



It's time! Rand Paul 2016!

"Truth, Justice, and the American Way!"

The Problem is this....

These people are gods.....so they think in their own eyes.
They will one day come to realize the truth when it is too late!
God has a day appointed for them as with all mankind!
They are great deceivers of themselves!
True justice is coming soon!

" In Thee O Lord do I put my trust " ~ Psalm 31:1~