10 votes

Dr. Paul Has Never And Will Never Endorse Gj For President. PERIOD.

I have been seeing alot of lies posted around here lately.

This was one~

anyone who spouts "Dr. Paul endorsed GJ in 2008" or EVER, for that matter,
is a liar and should be called A LIAR right to their screen!.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

SO you think Ron Paul's coming endorsement of Romney/Ryan...

...is a better idea?

That's what it sure sounds like to me.

What would be so bad about a Gary Johnson endorsement anyway?

It would be a hell of a lot better than what Rand did and what I fear Ron is going to do to.

Then, every dollar I spent on his campaigh will have been wasted.

So if Ron endorses Romney, I'm done with politics for good.

Rand already sold out BIG-TIME - On that piece of crap Hannity's show no less.

"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul

Gary Johnson the long-legged liberal mackdaddy!!

That is it! I've had it!

Your hero Gary Johnson has on his board of directors a squabbling, greedy CFR turncoat thief.

Americans were never this foolish to trust the British during the great tidal war. Why have they changed now?

Gary Johnson is a british agent, and so help me I will see him tossed out with the den of vipers he rode in on!

Ron Paul will indeed

ENDORSE Johnson! Anything less will be Ron Pauless.

Remember this post so I can come back and tell you I told you so, just as I did to those who didn't think Ron Paul's Pos son was going to endorse Romney.

Funny thing is, all the people who thought Rand could never endorse Romney are the same people now who rationalize the endorsement as being a "smart move".

Fkn sheep..

Just as we teach

Just as we teach conservatives to beware of neoconservatives we should be watchful for neolibertarians. Just because Santorum and Romney say they are conservative and the masses believe them that does not make it true. That is why a philosophical understanding is immeasurably more important than a particular party labeling. Just look at Ron Paul. You could argue he is a libertarian, conservative, and constitutionalist. He doesn't get caught into the party line. Watchout for yourself that you do not fall into cultish following of a person or party. We ought to follow the truth. The only exception to person is Jesus Christ because he is truth.

he may not an individual

though he did once with Chuck Baldwin ....
he will (my guess) encourage people to vote for principle reminding them that Third Parties are viable choices.

I don't remember....

anyone saying that Paul endorsed Johnson in '08.

However, Paul did ASK Johnson for his endorsement in '08. Why would Paul seek his endorsement? I would be curious to see a list of people Ron solicited for an endorsement. I bet it's a pretty short list, and I doubt Ron would just ask anybody.


Ron Paul NEVER sought GJ endorsement.
why are you such a liar?

"OH NO! He has a SON?" Neoconservatives and Liberals EVERYWHERE!

Rand Paul 2016

I didn't lie...


Get your facts straight before casting stones, 1777free4all.


A quote from Gary Johnson is what you are using for your facts? Because it comes from him, it must be true, right?

So, you're calling Gary Johnson a liar...

Give me a damn break.

im not only calling him a liar

Im calling for his arrest with all the others.
how is that.
I think he is a murdring slob who has committed several felonies and knows all the corruption and has covered up for it.
He came in after B. Richardson who is CFR and N korean amb..
gov johnson covered up the crimes Richardson did in office.
thats how i know hes filthy.
he covered up for crimes done in the NM governorship and had the chance to make things right and didnt do anything.
richardson is just as filthy as GJ, and all the others.
Only ron paul is clean enough to be president.
to go anywhere else is MORONIC
and you did lie.
paul never said he endorsed gj.
never once.

"OH NO! He has a SON?" Neoconservatives and Liberals EVERYWHERE!

Rand Paul 2016

Chills Pills are tasty

im interested if you really do have cfr info. I definitely choose Paul first, and i want him to grab rand or nap, and go hard to november regardless. If he doesnt do anything by the convention, I will vote GJ and so will 90% of DailyPaulers especially young ones. We will all vote against wars and unbalanced budget. Look my vote is important and I wont cast it without being fully informed. But at this point it looks like GJ is my guy, ive always liked him, i applaud his bravery on some issues, which he speaks more boldy than paul at times. But here is my stand.

Paul must go all out .... he has the most potentially energetic supporters ever... but its his call - use us ... or watch our group instantly begin to develop other associations to fight fight the power structure.

Im ready to revolt, voting is just a tiny task that i support when honest people run, the rest of the time, i speak of it as a false illusion of consent which it represents.

yt = classicalliberalism

Patriotic Senex

You're a person of great character...

and charm.

It's been a pleasure talking to you.

Others can read the text of our conversation and see who the liar is. The people aren't as stupid as you would like them to be. Many are easily led, but they know the truth when they hear it.


We do see.

Another -1

I doubt you even read the conversation...


And, You would be wrong


So, you're saying...

Gary Johnson is a liar too?

For being Ron Paul supporters, many people here sure are willing to make outlandish personal accusations with no evidence.

I'm sure Ron would be proud of you. That's always been one of Ron's methods - call people liars and names rather than making a reasonable argument. Yeah... That's what Ron would have done.

Give me a break.

The word 'liar'

came from your keyboard.

My word would be 'shill', as in, 'I would never buy a used car from that shill'.


Gary said he was endorsed and had a perfect score with the corrupt aclu!lol
he said he differs with paul on marriage equality.
only because Gairi chooses to use power of the state and not a constitutional argument. Gairi acknowledges the sate has power over this as president, Paul only acknowledges the fed has no role and stops there. Paul lets freedom take its course where as gairi forces something down others throats.

again libtard, im not listening to gairi say he was endorsed by ron paul because never was. and if some how you heard he did, you heard wrong.
My facts are perfect and ron paul never endorsed gairy johnson.
gairi saying he did is a lie.

you are confused and there are one or two others but you will learn that you will not win with a paul supporter because we are always right when it comes to our candidate.

"OH NO! He has a SON?" Neoconservatives and Liberals EVERYWHERE!

Rand Paul 2016

At 3:24 GJ says his thing has never been about getting support

In 2008 GJ says, RP asked REPUBLICAN GJ for support 3:31

Is that what you are fefeering to?

Then he admits he's giving Ron Paul's message, before that he's competing with RP on the ACLU..

I'm sorry the more I listen to GJ, the more I don't like him.



I did dozens of hours on GJ and studied him.
The guy is as filthy as they come.
for real.
what an actor.
hes better then obama at acting! I never thought i would ever see a better actor then obamma, and up pops johnson.

ron paul will never mention the aclu, and distances himself from them.
gary brags about them and then wonders why republicans hate him.
Then Gairi talks about jewish and gay marriage.
what a tard.
Those were pokes at paul and speaks to gay neocons!!!lol

"OH NO! He has a SON?" Neoconservatives and Liberals EVERYWHERE!

Rand Paul 2016

That said...

I don't think Paul is going to endorse Johnson for POTUS for the simple reason that Rand is in the picture. If there were no family business at stake, I bet Ron would have already endorsed.


if Johnson wasn't so obviously 'making it up as he goes along'.

Wow, It just hit me why you feel so warm and fuzzy about him.

The Great Divide on Strategy

I don't know enough about Gary Johnson to offer an opinion on his background. But it is clear to me that Ron Paul's current strategy is to take the Republican Party. He became a twelve(?)term Congressman/Statesman, his son became a Senator, and he will be nominated for President - as a Republican. He got nowhere during his third party endeavors. Consequently, it would seem to me that he will sit out this election - no Presidential endorsement unless he is the nominee.

The Ron Paul strategy is understandable because the electorate won't pick anyone other than Republicans or Democrats. Except in VERY RARE exceptions, everyone who has worked a third party campaign has experienced the frustrations of trying to get their candidate elected by voters who are prejudiced against anyone who does not have the Republican or Democratic tag.

That does not mean that the third party route is wrong. We do not know what it will take to wake up the public. But if you want to follow Paul's guidance, you will follow the Republican route.

Gary Johnson does not fit in that plan.

However, there is nothing wrong with choosing any route that you think will succeed. Just understand that the people who chose the Republican route are not anti-third party - they just have a different philosophy.

In my case, I will consider the third party route ONLY AFTER the convention. At that point, I will be considering the best possible results-based alternatives in a dire situation.

Gene Louis
Supporting a Needed Tool for Government Feedback:
A Citizen-Operated Legal System.

Ron Paul will have nothing to do with Gary Johnson, the faker.

Because Gary Johnson is exactly like Paul Ryan and he is a false, ultra city liberal running around taking other labels.

Gary Johnson wants to have prosperity packages, wireless credit cards and all sorts of Artificial Intelligence to manage our world.

He is unfortunately a fake, is NOT a libertarian in any sense.....and fits right in with the Federal Reserve cartel.

Gary Johnson is a plant, by the Fed and Dr Paul would never throw any support that direction. He would instead remind us we should never have created a Fed, which is eerily very true.

Anyone have that video handy

of GJ doing that interview that was so painful to watch?
The man showed zero knowledge of libertarian principles.


I don't understand why people

I don't understand why people enjoy making statements shouting things like "PERIOD" and "NEVER", as if the capital letters will convince everyone that there is no arguing. Is it out of fear?