0 votes

From the front row: recap of supreme court argument over voter ID amendment and why it matters

From the front row: recap of supreme court argument over voter ID amendment and why it matters

TC Jewfolk
By Gabe Kravitz | 09:49 am

I grew up with an eye on Minnesota politics and spent summers interning at the state capitol watching the floor debates on TV; but on July 17th in Saint Paul I had a front row seat. The Minnesota Supreme court heard a challenge to a proposed constitutional amendment that would require valid, state-issued photo identification for voting in Minnesota, and I was courtside.

The room was abuzz and the Justices were beyond well-prepared. The lawyers on both sides had barely introduced their arguments when the storm of questions rained down from the bench and struck to the core of the issue. It was intimidating. At trial was whether the amendment question, as it is being put to the voters, is misleading.

Read more:
http://www.minnpost.com/minnesota-blog-cabin/2012/08/front-r...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
scawarren's picture

I see no reason not to

I see no reason not to require an ID to vote.

Individualism-
To be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best, night and day, to make you everybody else means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can fight; and never stop fighting.
e.e. cummings