Hand counted-only towns show RON PAUL 3rd NH
Hand Count Shows 15% For Ron Paul
This would have placed Dr. Paul in 3rd place, just as the polls were showing before the primary…
The computer counted votes are the problem.
Not a single hand count township showed less than 10%
Supposedly, Ron Paul got 8% - this does not make sense.
richmond is hand count 34% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
lyman is hand count 28.7% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Orange is hand count 25% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Harts location is hand count 25% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
wentworth is hand count 24% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
goshen is hand count 17.68% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
marlow is hand count 16.6% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
cornish is hand count 14.8% for dr. Paul…100% reporting
Rumney is hand count 14.5% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
croydon is hand count 14 % for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
dorchester is hand count 13.89% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
effingham is hand count 13% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
albany is hand count 12.9% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
antrim is hand count 12% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
south hampton is hand count 12% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
sullivan is hand count 12.61% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
troy is hand count 12.21% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
mason is hand count 11.88% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
newport is hand count 11.45% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
charlstown is hand count 11.3% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Allenstown is hand count 11.16% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
bristol is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
warren is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Strafford is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
washington is hand count 11.02% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
lancaster is hand count 10.9% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
springfield is hand count 10.6% for Dr.Paul…100% reporting
wilton is hand count 10.37% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Northfield is hand count 10.3% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
mont vernon is hand count 10.25% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
WHY WHY WHY
is this mis-info being posted again and again? It is OBVIOUSLY only a very small part of the total voting AND it does not include the actual number of votes. It tells us NOTHING.
h-daddy
Correction!
Greenville admits to having found 25 votes for Dr. Paul... Sutton had earlier found 31. Both originally had transferred 0 votes to the tally sheet.
This is where the fraud likely occurs. Of course, 0 sends up a red flag to those in town who KNOW who they voted for, but in other towns, one could leave out 30 votes say from 200 and who would notice? If you multiply that times the number of polling places, it mounts up to thousands of votes cheated.
Regardless of the numbers massive vote fraud Both the DR
and Obama. They hosed Obama...beyond hosed.
Read about 2004 fraud. Vote fraud is NOW THE NORM!
Unify
STOP with the MIS-information...
....I pasted the counts onto an Excel sheet, and....
1) There are PLENTY of hand-count locations with UNDER 5%
2) There are several COMPUTER counted locations with MORE THAN 20%
just...stop...it....now
(Oh and to the one who ASKED...the RECOUNT is not until next Wednesday. After the Mich. primary, and more importantly, leaving plenty of time for the bastards to "re-fix" the count to what is already published. Info from Bev Harris on CHAIN of CUSTODY is of the utmost importance!!)
Thanks for helping to stop the spread of this mis-info..
:)
This is wrong there were 119 hand count townships..
You probably only have the list of the 30 that had RP at >10% of the vote. Somehow the 30 ended up getting listed somewhere as being the only 30 handcounted townships, I looked on ronrox.com and was able to come up with an additional 89 townships that were handcounted (all under 10% of the vote) that people seem to not be including in the hand count vs machine count debate. I'm glad there is a recount effort going, but make sure of the numbers you post if you can.
You can find a list of the townships and vote count methods here:
http://ronrox.com/paulsta...
Township % of vote
Acworth 7.88
Alexandria 8.68
Alstead 7.31
Andover 8.99
Bartlett 8.87
Bath 8.73
Bethleham 9.81
Boscawen 9.38
Braford 6.87
Bridgewater 7.46
Brookfield 6.22
Carroll 5.77
Chatham 6.17
Chesterfield 7.64
Chichester 8.35
Claremont 7.36
Colebrook 9.02
Dalton 9.38
Danbury 9.39
Deering 9.07
Dixville 0 total of 5 votes cast
Dublin 5.47
Dunbarton 6.41
East Kingston 8.74
Easton 5.77
Eaton 5.75
Ellsworth 5.88
Errol 5.63
Francestown 9.91
Franconia 2.17
Farnklin 7.80
Freedom 3.79
Gilsum 6.85
Greenfiled 8.40
Greenville 0 total of 144 votes cast (suspicious)
Hankcock 8.41
Harrisville 8.67
Herbron 7.73
Hill 9.09
Hindsdale 8.91
Holderness 4.73
Jackson 3.11
Jefferson 7.17
Kensington 7.22
Landaff 3.30
Langdon 7.48
Lempster 8.45
Lincoln 3.76
Lisbon 5.59
Lyme 7.11
Madbury 7.36
Marlborough 9.77
Middleton 9.09
Millsfield 0 total of 5 votes cast
Monroe 8.14
Moultonborough 7.78
Nelson 8.33
New Boston 6.67
New Castle 2.52
Newington 6.72
Northumberland 9.78
Nottingham 7.62
Orford 9.27
Piermont 8.51
Plainfield 8.44
Randolph 7.32
Rollinsford 7.42
Roxbury 6.06
Salsibury 8.43
Sandwich 6.33
Sharon 9.20
Shelburne 7.78
Stark 6.31
Stoddard 5.77
Stratford 4.92
Sugar Hill 8.76
Surry 9.39
Sutton 7.43 poor infamous Sutton, the town that started it all when it incorrectly reported 0% (31 missed votes) for RP
Temple 4.69
Thorton 7.54
Tuftonboro 6.22
Unity 9.72
Walpole 7.24
Waterville 1.41 no mention of count method
Westmoreland 4.09
Whitefield 9.97
Wilmont 6.07
woodstock 5.19
I wish I would have included the actual numbers (not just the %) but my computer with excel on it is down atm so i just real quick made a list of counties and the % of the vote RP recieved.
Please try to keep that original set of 30 results from being reported as the only hand counted townships.
Thank you but what about Greenville and if so what about others?
*** God bless Ron Paul ***
* Ron Paul For President *
______________________
*** God bless Ron Paul ***
* Ron Paul For President *
Thanks for this...
We need to keep a clear head... even if supervision and recounts are necessary to keep them on tip-toes.
Hey, according to latest polls (Mitchell Interactive) Ron Paul is at 8% in Michigan, neck-and-neck with JulieAnnie and within reach of the Huckster's 11% for third place. Fred Flintstone is not recordable in Michigan.
http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/articles/michigan-prima...
Linky?
We're link starved when stuff like this is posted. Is this a compilation of data you put together? If not, can you link to it's source? Thank you :-)
Real eyes realize real lies
2012, we want our country back
2012 is the year for Ron Paul!
MSM Report: http://www.msmreport.com/
? What are you posting?
Is this the recount---or a rehash of the original "results"? If original, are these ALL of the handcount precincts?
salt-of-the-earth
Great work : )
Where did you get your information? do you have a link? - is this officially accepted results?