63 votes

Paul Ryan SELF-COMBUSTS on Neocon Central Fox Propaganda Channel


Hahahahahahaha!!!!! I'm rolling on the floor laughing & can't stop. This is too hilarious to watch.

This is the Paul Ryan, the Wrong Paul touted as the savior for pathetic Romney's fascism charade? He can't even break himself out of a paper bag on HIS OWN FREAKING Neocon Central Fox channel. Yes, the Goldman Sachs funded one! With Neocon cheerleader Brit Hume sitting their to ASSIST him and feed the words into his mouth.

Even with so much propaganda setup, he manages to self-combust himself.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This is the jerk with the soviet ten-year plan, right?

This is the jerk with the soviet ten-year plan, right? Or is it thirty? Thirty years till the budget balances?

"That's why the soviet state collapsed. They only planned out five years. I'll plan it out thirty years, an' then we'll REALLY see some sheatt fly. Vote for me and Mitt in December."


"November! November, right. Right!"

"Cowards & idiots can come along for the ride but they gotta sit in the back seat!"

Cyril's picture

Paul Ryan is archetypical of

Paul Ryan is archetypical of the perfect arrivist:

1. no conviction, no principles: he will go wherever the wind blows best; will betray just as well as a Romney can, maybe hiding better his flip flopping

2. not even ideas, no values: he will repeat, like a parrot, whatever was said before to best fit the masquerading of (1)

3. mediocre intelligence: can't even figure when the argument/questions become hazardous for his credibility

4. no education: I'd bet my right arm he has no clue in the stakes of the Keynesian vs Austrian economics debate

5. no pride: all the above combined, still pretends he cares about charges in a public office for the people

What does he have for him ? Great liar, a la Obama ? Not even !

Tell you what : he has nothing for him but complete lameness.

Because :

He was picked. Chosen. A pawn on the gameboard "they" play.

My claim: and you can see ALL THIS in that few minutes-long video.

A human political tool. He might as well be one of their "platform" paper brochures full of lies. But he is flesh and bones.

I feel for his parents.

But politics pays so well when you're high enough to rig everything. Plus, you can have some fun doing it.


"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius


and cryin ryan are an embarrassments to the country, the party, and themselves. We are in deep deep kimshee.


I can't stand seeing the RNC shooting itself in the face over, and over and over!
RNC, get a clue!
I don't want to hear the name Obama come out of your mouths umkay? because I tune out that name & everything you say with it umkay?
I don't want you to regurgitate how bad Obama is umkay?

Oh, and I am NOT voting for Romney, and Im not voting for Obama UMKAY????

Galatians 5:1
It is for FREEDOM that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.


....what an idiot.

Uh, balance? When does it come to balance? Uh, well, uh, derp, I don't, uh, derp duh derp, I can't count that high....

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

No brains, no morals,

An his suit looks too big on him.

I'm torn between rooting for Obama to win, just to say "Nyaaah, Nyaaah, Nyaaaah, how's that 'Hope and Change' working for you again?"

Or hoping Mitts and Ryan win, so I can scream at the pundits Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, and the rest; "Hey Bozos, you could have supported the only man who guaranteed to cut one Trillion dollars! But you wanted a state of constant warfare instead!"

I know its petty to think like that, but its the only comfort I have to look forward to when someday in the future I will be standing in long shopping queues with newspapers stuffed in my holey shoes holding a wheelbarrow of inflated cash hoping to buy the last available loaf of week-old bread while under the watchful eyes of armored Homeland security agents itching to shoot off some billion or so-rounds of ammo with his fully automatic firearm complete with grenade launcher, bayonet, and taser.

Conscience does not exist if not exercised

"No matter how cynical you get, it's impossible to keep up!
---Lily Tomlin

Yeah... Ryan can't respond

Yeah... Ryan can't respond because he knows Romney is a stuffed shirt. No substance!

Its a shame that the idiot

Its a shame that the idiot guy from the Young Turks has like a 20 IQ and understands economics and political systems like a caveman understands rocket science.

To this day, dispite having done numerous "im so disapointed about Obombya" spots, He's still a shill for the party.

Its fun to watch him rip into morons like Romney and Ryan, sure... but then he has to put on display his utter epic failure to understand even the most basic concepts of Individualism, and then blast out of his ass all the virtues of the Tyranny of the Majority and Collectivism. Its hard to take him seriously when all I want to do is bust a lamp in his face everytime the word "Libertarian" escapes his mouth surrounded by a spout of words which directly translate to: "Im stupid and have no freaking clue what im talking about."

Yay for hopelessly miseducated "D's". At least they are good at pointing out how utterly ridiculous their mirror image "R" counterparts are.

always skip turk

when he airs clips, i always skip is commentary and watch the clip.

i like this romney/ryan budget plan of massively reducing the size of government. would like it better if there was any belief they would follow through on it.

Cyril's picture

You make many great points. I

You make many great points.

I watched it just like that, too.

Pure politics slapping and spanking. Ironically, or rather cynically, STILL from a bipartism point of view, with complete disregard and ignorance of what matters most:

Principles. Those written in the foundational text of the same, very country they love to nitpick and dumb down the spirit thereof.

More or less taxes? And where? And what for? And for or from whom?

Meaningless. Contempt full. Ignorant. Reckless.

Ryan self-annihilation on video record is indeed such a bitter consolation...


"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

This is what happens when you

This is what happens when you sell your soul. He has these conflicting messages in his head - what HIS message is, and what MITT'S message is. This is what happened to Palin.

You wouldn't have to worry about this with a Paul/Napolitano ticket.

The Commentator Was Annoying

Otherwise it was interesting watching Ryan trip over simple questions.

Ha ha the zombies sell their soul

Paul Ryan voted for TARP, the bailouts, making the PATRIOT Act permanent, surveillance without a warrant, No Child Left Behind, keep the troops in Iraq indefinitely, and the 2008 & 2009 stimulus. Ryan wants to balance the budget by 2040! Doesn't cut spending at all! RON PAUL will balance the budget in his first term & voted against Ryan every time.

Ayn Rand wrote some good books.

When I was a young man I read "The Fountainhead" and "Atlas Shrugged" and enjoyed them both. I had no idea that Ayn Rand had a philosophy called Objectivism and when I later read she did I had no interest in discovering what it was. She was a novelist who wrote interesting stories as far as I was concerned.

In Mr. Cenk's opinion that makes me an idiot? What Paul Ryan said about Ayn Rand made perfect sense to me because I could relate precisely to it. What Mr. Cenk said in his critique made no sense at all.

One does not have to agree with a person's philosophy in order to enjoy their writing. e.g. George Orwell was one of my favourite writers but he was a socialist idealist whose views I could sympathise with but also disagree with. Simone de Beauvoir was an existentialist whose novel about WWII "The Mandarins" I enjoyed immensely but that didn't mean that I agreed with her philosophy. Many people who are not Christians have read C.S. Lewis' novels without being influenced to become Christians.

This notion that one must necessarily be a disciple of a novelist who has a particular belief or a philosophy if one reads their books is a dangerous path to follow. It may at the very least lead to a degree of self censorship that is the antithesis of liberty. In a surveillance society it could lead to much worse. Mr. Cenk is apparently a demagogue whose access to the public mind could be influential in subtly promoting pernicious fascist ideas.

"Jesus answered them: 'Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin. The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son remains forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.'" (John 8:34-36)

I believe Britt said...

"You have called yourself a disciple of Ayn Rand?"

Having read or enjoyed her writing is one thing, being a disciple is another. It is not unreasonable to suppose that a disciple of some intellectual would share most if not all of that intellectual's views.

Was Peter a disciple of Christ because he read the New Testament a few times and thought it wasn't half bad?

...in any case, I agree with much of what you said, just thought I'd nitpick this one point. : )

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

You don't seem to understand

In our modern society, if someone believes one stupid thing, no matter if all their other ideas are wonderful, we are supposed to ignore all the good things they believe, because of the one bad thing! Therefore, we must not pay attention to anything anyone believes, and must also not even agree with our own selves, because everyone is incorrect about something! I guess we should just be like ostriches with our butts in the air, and our heads in the dirt!

Little Bit Farm

Cyril's picture

Now, this is genuine wisdom,

Now, this is genuine wisdom, in my opinion :

"This notion that one must necessarily be a disciple of a novelist who has a particular belief or a philosophy if one reads their books is a dangerous path to follow. It may at the very least lead to a degree of self censorship that is the antithesis of liberty."

I just couldn't have put it better.

Again :

"Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakes."

-- Carl Jung

That's what FREE man does, eventually. It took me more than 30 years. I'm 42.

Your mileage may vary.

(If one is a believer...) Only God knows with which spirit Ayn Rand left this world.


"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

You do know that Rand was an

You do know that Rand was an atheist... right?

Cyril's picture

Well, duh. Yes I do, so

Well, duh. Yes I do, so what?

And I'm a Christian. Thus, that still doesn't prevent me to see where she had been right BEFORE EVERYBODY else (in her younger age more than in the older, granted).

It wasn't about faith or bigotry. It was about Liberty vs. Planners. Be the latter classic soviet collectivists or crony capitalists using the force of government to compensate their failure or lack of "sheer ability" (as Ayn called it).

As a Russian-American, I take it she exactly knew WHAT collectivism "leads" to, and is used for. I suspect she had VERY reliable clues.

More than most of today's OWS folks, for instance.

That's what some day dreamers at OWS still don't get :

there is nothing wrong in capitalism. Being successful because you work hard and associate with others on a free market, making good products and lots of customers, is okay.

Greed, however, will always be part of the nature of some men.

Just like when you start having food addiction: property MAY make you want always more.

Hence the VERY Evil is to try to PLAN about an entire society's destiny. Like socialists would do in USSR or the Globalists do today.

Because THEY USE GOVERNMENT to their advantage.

SHRINK the government and they will have TO ABIDE TO FREE MARKET laws.

The corrupt HATE THIS IDEA. They don't like to play FAIR. Duh.

They prefer to cheat over entire nations. In their small elitist clubs where they can devise how to have the rules rigged further.

It's for A FEW to ENSLAVE the many. The few don't have to work AND CAN WATCH the many work, under the force of the FEW'S "LAWS" and bureaucrats.

It's no rocket science.

But Hell Is Paved With Good Intentions, for some, STILL TODAY.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

Puppet's don't need a brain

They just need a hand up their backside to pull the string. I think in this case they sent the puppet out on his own and he forgot his lines.

I miss Sarah Palin, she is so

I miss Sarah Palin, she is so bright compared to this clown!
Wow, to have a candidate like Ron Paul and end up with someone like Obama/Romney...sad.

I don't really miss her.

"Wrong Paul" indeed!

"Wrong Paul" indeed!

If my need to be RIGHT is greater than my desire for TRUTH, then I will not recognize it when it arrives ~ Libertybelle

Ryan is about as intelligent as Romney.

Great pair of total fools. And they may SOON be running the USA and the world? Can the voters be so blind?

Will the media continue to push these two morons, because the MEDIA people will be affected by what fool choices President Romney/Ryan make when they command the most powerful seat of power in the world.

The world really needs an intelligent statesman like Ron Paul.

reedr3v's picture

The people need a principled statesman, but

the powers behind the throne like them dim and unprincipled.

Typical Progressive Spin

I wasted my time watching this video - it is typical cynical progressive spin. This same guy would be lampooning Ron Paul if Ron Paul were in Paul Ryan's shoes at this time. This video will not change any opinions but it will be enjoyed by committed leftists and perhaps by a few mis-directed liberty supporters.

In denial much?

Correct me if I'm wrong... but isn't "spinning" a story/quote mean twisting what really happened in your own words?

It's kind of hard to label this "progressive spin", considering they showed the actual VIDEO. And it wasn't just a 5 second snippet, they showed each question as well as the entire answer to give context.

With or without TYT commentary Paul Ryan struggled to answer any questions without fumbling on his own words and appearing incompetent.

Commentator spoke as much as Ryan

The commentator took the interview snippet by snippet and gave each snippet his spin - entire video was 8 minutes long and I bet Paul Ryan didn't speak much more than half of it - I don't think that the interview taken as a whole without interruption and commentary would have sounded so stupid - quite the opposite in fact.

Ryan's best argument is that the federal government spending as a % of GNP must go down and then the economy will grow and the deficit will shrink - when it goes into balance is harder to predict but I think Ron Paul would agree that Paul Ryan's basic premise here is right but Ron Paul might take federal spending to 17-18% of GNP instead of Ryan's goal of 20%. In any event on this point they are on the same side - just Paul Ryan doesn't go far enough.

And with whom do you think Ron Paul would stand - Paul Ryan or the radical left wing commentator?

False choice. Ron Paul stands on his own.

And his plan (Ron Paul's that is) would have reached balance in THREE (3) years!

There was no scheme of "putting us on a path" that reaches balance.

Ron Paul was not concerned with % of GDP.

You don't balance a budget by focusing on what % of GDP you spend.

You balance a budget by not spending more than you take in.

You have just nominated yourself for the League of the Clueless.