-13 votes

#letgaryjohnsondebate Twitter Bomb - Trending Now

If you want to guarantee that some of the tough issues will get talked about in the debates, we need to stand together to help #LetGaryJohnsonDebate!

If you have a Twitter account, please join in - https://twitter.com/#!/search/?q=%23LetGaryJohnsonDebate&src=hash

Join the Unofficial Gary Johnson Twitter Army - http://www.facebook.com/GaryJohnsonTwitterArmy

Check out the statistics for the current #LetGaryJohnsonDebate Twitter Bomb - http://hashtagpolls.com/hashtag/letgaryjohnsondebate/

Be active in achieving your Liberty! This is a good cause!

Oh - Please Tweet this post! I have hit my tweet limit for the time being. Thanks!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Not "trending NOW".... More

Not "trending NOW"....

More like "Trending DOWN".

"OH NO! He has a SON?" Neoconservatives and Liberals EVERYWHERE!

Rand Paul 2016

free for all

as long as all agree with your idea of freedom, right?
Gary Johnson will be on ballots in at least 48 states, prob all 50 and you feel the man has no right to debate the 2 phonies that will be there??? How pathetic!

Formerly rprevolutionist

Judge Nap

Judge Nap just tweeted I absolutely think they should let Gary Johnson debate.


Judge Nap (L) 2016

Official Daily Paul BTC address: 16oZXSGAcDrSbZeBnSu84w5UWwbLtZsBms


Thanks Judge Napolitano!


@JudgeNap rocks!

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

Trending here in Toronto

**TRENDING** -----> #LetGaryJohnsonDebate @GovGaryJohnson

Dwalters I added you to followed.

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

Yeah... Talk about your peaceful religious beliefs and then....

call over 2000 people twits - http://hashtagpolls.com/hashtag/letgaryjohnsondebate/

Do you sit in one of the back pews?

You're not really as slow as Tom are you?

Where exactly did I EVER talk about my "peaceful religious beliefs"?? That's what I thought. I don't go to church Derrell, and I'm not religious. Not surprising you're on here making such assumptions. Is it you or Tom that leads the Gary "charge" these days? Maybe you should use something that Tom STILL hasn't figure out how to use...the "Track" feature of this website. Comical your comment got up voted for FALSE ASSUMPTIONS...Like many things, the purpose of my comment flew directly over your head...So, where do you sit, Derrell?

De criminalize Liberty!

It's not my day to keep up with you...

I have no interest in what you've said in the past. It's not going to change my day any. I don't know you. You're not important to me. I have better things to do.

With that in mind your comment was -

"Sorry, today is national prayer day for Dr. Paul... Not twits for Johnson day..."

I took it for what it says and seemed to most logically imply - religious hypocrisy. Forgive me for not exhaustively researching your past opinions before commenting - which I still haven't done, btw.

Again, you fail...

I guess you're more like Tom than what I was hoping..At least I've heard SOME logical arguments out of you regarding Johnson in the past..

With that in mind -

If you would have taken literally 15 seconds of your life and clicked the links before you went running your mouth, you would have found that the "national day of prayer" thread was from Tom himself, you know, the person I was addressing with my original comment(not you), as well as the second link that was about the twitter "bomb" but got 403'd by the mods because Tom is constantly disrespectful to people here. Almost comical that you think it's okay to demand why someone down votes a comment of yours without leaving an explanation why, but yet here you are, making a comment to someone you don't know without even following the links that were provided first. If you notice, there were links in my original comment. Seriously, it doesn't take a rocket scientist and it certainly wouldn't take "exhaustive research" to figure out a few simple things, such as I did not "imply" "religious hypocrisy". You're about as bad as Tom in your ASSUMPTIONS though. I feel sorry for Mr. Johnson with people like you as such ardent "activists".

Funny, you say "it's not my day to keep up with you"...which interestingly enough, IMPLIES you do have an interest, because you've obviously had a conversation or two about me..But I won't make that assumption. I'd hate to make an ass out of you, btw.

De criminalize Liberty!

If you weren't so rude with your approach...

I may have clicked your links.

However, with your first comment, you resorted to name calling. That immediately turns anyone off to what you have to say.

Maybe you're the 'twit' after all. Maybe not. I don't really care one way or the other.

How was I rude to YOU when my comment

was directed specifically to an individual, and that individual was not you? Oh that's right, you felt the need to put yourself in the middle of someone elses business. And if you don't believe I have a right to be "rude" to Tom, I once again suggest you learn how to use the "track" feature. I don't really enjoy being called things like "Romney troll" or "lazy non-activist" or "NAZI", among many other things. And these are the type of Johnson "activists" that are trying to garner support for their candidate? What a JOKE!!!

You say: "That immediately turns anyone off to what you have to say."

So sorry, I wasn't aware that you speak for all people (anyone implying everyone). Perhaps I'm not the 'twit' after all, just not so sure of a few people here. However, my first comment was directed toward a particular individual, and that individual wasn't you. Maybe you should mind your own business next time. Maybe not. I don't really care one way or the other. For every 1 person you convince to support Johnson, Tom is losing 10. Good luck and peace out.

De criminalize Liberty!

I'm the author of the post...

You commented directly to the post by calling everyone that participated in the twitter bomb a 'twit.'

As a matter of fact, as I pointed out previously, you labeled well over 2000 people twits... including Judge Napolitano that participated in addition to Penn Jillette. Of course, I guess you don't mind using broad generalizations to classify an entire group of people.

After all, collectivism is the name of liberty's game, huh?

Well, I guess you can be collectivist

all ya want..to each his own..I still don't understand how it's so hard to understand though. I know your the author, what's your point? As a matter of fact, I did NOT comment DIRECTLY to your thread, I commented DIRECTLY to another user that posted on your thread. And if you think liberty is a game, I suggest you take a step back and re-assess YOUR approach. As a matter of fact, it doesn't matter what ya rattle off next, I'm done responding to you in this thread. You don't seem to know much of what's going on anyway, and I certainly don't want to keep this ridiculous thread "alive" any longer (you're pretty good at dragging conversations on and on and on with some other people though, JUST to keep worthless threads alive, or try and get under someones skin like a couple other "Johnson pushers" that have recently been removed from this site). Later.

De criminalize Liberty!


Can't it be both? Can I not still pray for Ron Paul, and help tweet for Governor Johnson? I honestly don't see what harm letting Gary debate would cause. I think I would really enjoy watching him and Dr. Paul tear Obama apart.

Just pointing out the hypocricy of a 5 year member

that has been disrespecting many people on this website, including Dr. Paul, while actively trying to push garbage down every ones throat. So, at this particular point in time, for me personally, NO it can't be both..I have integrity.

De criminalize Liberty!

Not a Johnson fan, but what is the harm in letting him debate?

It's trending here in Austin too.