4 votes

Texas judge warns of possible ‘civil war’ if President Obama is re-elected

As if the negative political ads aren't enough, now a county judge in Lubbock, Texas, predicts possible "civil war" if President Obama is re-elected.

Judge Tom Head was on a local TV news show making his case for a tax increase, when he said hiring extra sheriff's deputies would especially be needed if Obama wins in November.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/texas-judge-warns-possib...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Lexington - Concord

PREPARING FOR THE WORST.
Folks are saying he is nuts, a conspiracy theorist.
I have given thought to moving to Miracopa County.

How many peaceful steps are remaining?
"Rapidly Closing Window For Peaceful Revolution" -
Stewart Rhodes reports the shocking state of affairs that America now is facing. It is later than I thought. Bottom line - the fate is in the hands of the ones with the weapons - and they NEED to BE OATHKEEPERS. Courage and honor needs to stand up.

Listen: http://youtu.be/QzxKlxqb4vA Stewart Rhodes on the Pete Santilli Show

Very strong warnings from Rhodes during the interview included, "America is at a crossroads and we are on the short track to a Hitler type Government. We have to decide whether we are going to turn back the clock to 1775 America or a 1930's Nazi Germany America. We have a very rapidly closing window for peaceful solutions --- we are running out of time," says Stewart Rhodes.
Stewart Rhodes has promised that constitutional leaders, Ron Paul, Andrew Napolitano, Chuck Baldwin, Sheriff Richard Mack who will be gathered at the Republican National Convention will be having a meeting of the minds to talk about what they plan to do to fight back against a Government that is obviously out of control.
Obviously, the Government's endless, relentless and ongoing campaign to demonize patriots and in particular the United States Veteran, is working.

The judge says the following about Obama if re-elected:

"He's going to try to hand over the sovereignty of the United States to the U.N., and what is going to happen when that happens?," Head asked. "I'm thinking the worst. Civil unrest, civil disobedience, civil war...

Romney will do exactly the same, hand over American sovereignty to the U.N.

It appears that NATO-UN-NWO already commands the US military, and the tax payers are paying for them to take over the world!

Ron Paul alone will oppose the U.N. take over of America and end the wars.

Things like this really do

Things like this really do harm to the states' rights movement.

When you secede, or threaten to secede, it has to be over a major issue. Like slavery. Or the federal reserve. Or the Patriot Act. You don't threaten to secede over a goddamn 4% increase in taxes.

Look, the reality of the situation is that Texas benefits tremendously economically from being part of the union, as do all states. For them to actually secede, they would need to make their claims about a serious issue, and one that is not about economics. Because when Texas says "we protest a 4% increase in the top marginal tax rate because it will hurt our businesses, so we will secede", the reality is that secession/civil war would do MUCH more damage to their economy. And, of course, the reality that the vast majority of Texans would be against secession.

Secession will be taken seriously when you not only have a passionate, real support for it at the grassroots level, but when it is about a moral issue where the cost in other areas is irrelevant,

Plan for eliminating the national debt in 10-20 years:

Overview: http://rolexian.wordpress.com/2010/09/12/my-plan-for-reducin...

Specific cuts; defense spending: http://rolexian.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/more-detailed-look-a

Handing US sovereignty over to the UN is a MAJOR ISSUE!

Did Ya Read the Link?

"He's going to try to hand over the sovereignty of the United States to the U.N., and what is going to happen when that happens?," Head asked.

"I'm thinking the worst. Civil unrest, civil disobedience, civil war maybe. And we're not just talking a few riots here and demonstrations, we're talking Lexington, Concord, take up arms and get rid of the guy.

That has nothing to do with a tax increase. Handing US sovereignty over to the UN is a MAJOR ISSUE!

...

Yeah, that's not going to

Yeah, that's not going to happen.

It is one thing to say, if Obama hands over the US sovereignty to the UN, then we'll secede.

It is another thing to say, "if Obama wins, he's going to hand the US sovereignty to the UN, so we're going to pre-emptively secede".

This is such a ridiculous notion. The fact that people think this is a significant issue is the problem with Democracy.

Plan for eliminating the national debt in 10-20 years:

Overview: http://rolexian.wordpress.com/2010/09/12/my-plan-for-reducin...

Specific cuts; defense spending: http://rolexian.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/more-detailed-look-a

Civil War?

Not to be a know it all, because I barely know anything, but I didn't hear a word about pre-emptive succession. I heard the judge say that if Obama is reelected he will try to hand US sovereignty over to the UN and worse-case scenario people will “take up arms and get rid of the guy,” [exact quote] causing Obama to call in UN troops and the judge himself is going to stand in front of the UN armored personnel carrier because he does not want the UN in Lubbock county and the sheriff has said he would back him so that is part of why he wants a tax increase in order to keep experienced officers on hand should such a worst case scenario unfold.

The headline of the article is a little misleading IMO, but the text as well as the video give the judge’s exact words which I have paraphrased above into a very lengthy sentence. It sounds alarming to me.