432 votes

Video: The Teleprompter Had the Results of the Vote Before the Vote was Taken!

Re: the Vote on Rule 12 and 16.

Here is what you did not see on the "mainstream" news media. The teleprompter had the results of the vote before the vote was taken.

Text: in the opinion of the Chair, the "ayes" have it! Go to the 2:00 minute mark to see the pre-fabricated "opinion of the Chair"

Must see and share:

http://youtu.be/77W5OKStO5s
_____
UPDATE! Can Teleprompters Count Votes?

[Washington Examiner] Aug 30, 2012

"RNC Chairman Reince Preibus and House Speaker John Boehner on Tuesday railroaded the party’s grass roots in order to shut down any debate over rule changes or the decision to unseat 10 Ron Paul delegates elected in Maine.

I was on the floor at the time, and I saw these party leaders chairing the convention simply ignore points of order and objections. They also ruled that the Ayes had won a voice vote when the Noes pretty clearly shouted louder. It’s hard to get more undemocratic than simply making up the results of a floor vote." ~ Timothy P. Carney Read more

See also: Carney: Republican Leaders Trample their Grassroots in Tampa




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

MAKE THIS VIRAL.

IT'S IMPORTANT.

www.youtube.com/truefictions

I try to change people every day. Do You?

Send it to Buzzfeed . . .

Ideas & Tips for the Editors
editor@buzzfeed.com

PS I thought only the teleprompter was crooked, YouTube is stuck at 302 for more than an 1 hour!

A good way to defend your freedoms: www.libertymagazine.org

That is common on youtube

The views ALWAYS stick at 300 while youtube verified that the views are legit. In a few hours it will correct itself. It's to keep people from uploading videos and bumping the views up artificially. I've dealt with this many times. No conspiracy there.

I feel like crying

seeing that! its like a movie! everything is staged man, just like Wag The Dog. This is so wrong! our votes are nothing! this should be exposed ya'll, Im hoping this goes viral man

juan maldonado

Can we shut down the

Can we shut down the teleprompter so we don't have to hear reading robots?

I have a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach

when I hear those brain dead chants of "USA! USA!".

USA Chant

The first time I ever heard that USA chant was during the time of Operation Desert Storm in 1991. It was at the University of Montana in Missoula, and there was some sort of big student gathering, like a dance I think. I was walking home from one of our "No Blood for Oil" protests and just stood outside for a while listening and wondering about such a mentality. It was incredibly loud, drowning out the music and easily heard from outside. It was all about getting hyped up for GHW Bush's operation. Even during my intervening mainline GOP days, I can at least state that I never took part in such a chant!

1:49, "If objection is heard go to SCENARIO 1"

I want to believe this as much as you guys, but the teleprompter can apparently change.

Remember: it's important to have facts straight.

================================
Fight the Ron Paul blackout on the Daily Paul (now 'P AU L'), put his removed poster back as your avatar:
http://www.mediafire.com/?9ir62bp8nshv83m

Objection NOT heard.

The tele did NOT go to SCENARIO 1 BECAUSE there was no "objection" to call the vote. The "directions" (goto scenario 1) are for objections of the call to vote. The "directions" are NOT related to the actual vote.

The call for votes are called with the "opinion" of the chair WITHOUT any "directions" to go to another "scenario."

So, this is "complaint" is valid.

And I agree with you: It's important to have facts straight.

Hilbilly, the teleprompter is a SOFTWARE PROGRAM

Not film.

If they go to Scenario 1 the text will change, it didn't.

How can you not believe in the year 2012 they don't have sophisticated enough teleprompters to offer more than one option--that's 1980's tech!

It clearly gave a cue to go to scenario 1 at the Chairman's (Boehner's) discretion.

What this thread is arguing will just make RP supporters into fools.

================================
Fight the Ron Paul blackout on the Daily Paul (now 'P AU L'), put his removed poster back as your avatar:
http://www.mediafire.com/?9ir62bp8nshv83m

.

Dude what are you not getting, the "objection" is not in reference to the vote itself, it's in reference to the call to vote. He had no reason to go to scenario 1.

Washington, DC NW

2:10, "If objection is heard go to SCENARIO 2"

This thing is littered with options and scenarios.

What are YOU getting on about?

Feel free to blame it all on the teleprompter though. I'm sure Boehner couldn't have hoped for better.

"Oh I heard an objection but the teleprompter didn't register it so yeah!"

================================
Fight the Ron Paul blackout on the Daily Paul (now 'P AU L'), put his removed poster back as your avatar:
http://www.mediafire.com/?9ir62bp8nshv83m

Yeah, they scammed the vote, but not by teleprompter

This thread makes RP supporters look desperate. The teleprompter clearly offers options to change meaning...

IT'S BOEHNER'S FAULT NOT THE TELEPROMPTER'S!

Scenario 1 could have had a roll call, they didn't use it so we don't know.

================================
Fight the Ron Paul blackout on the Daily Paul (now 'P AU L'), put his removed poster back as your avatar:
http://www.mediafire.com/?9ir62bp8nshv83m

Why are you so intent on

Why are you so intent on defending the teleprompter? The title is 100% correct. 1:59 dispels all of your concerns.

No it doesn't, why can't you get it?

The teleprompter can change--it's a computer screen running software!

What is so hard to get?

It says, "Go to Scenario 1 if objection is heard" before they take the vote. That means anytime they want to the teleprompter can change the words.

Why are you so intent on a 'Teleprompter Conspiracy' instead of blaming it on Boehner who WAS THE CHAIRMAN OF THE RNC.

================================
Fight the Ron Paul blackout on the Daily Paul (now 'P AU L'), put his removed poster back as your avatar:
http://www.mediafire.com/?9ir62bp8nshv83m

I don't know much about teleprompters.

But is it that Boehner is able to click a button or something pertaining to a certain scenario and then the teleprompter changes to that scenario?

Yep, EXACTLY

You have to pretty naive to think that Boehner didn't get together with the RNC elite and PLAN TO PASS THESE RULES.

There is no teleprompter conspiracy--it's Boehner's fault!

================================
Fight the Ron Paul blackout on the Daily Paul (now 'P AU L'), put his removed poster back as your avatar:
http://www.mediafire.com/?9ir62bp8nshv83m

Boehner is chair. He is supposed to be a bright person ...

If one of us was the chair and heard the ayes/nayes and then looked at the teleprompter, we immediately would have done a Carol Paul (you know, her doing it in such a sweet way like the way she was at the rally), and stated that 'the teleprompter is incorrect'.

The comment someone else left

The comment someone else left literally below my comment that you just responded to:

"Objection was heard. There was no attempt by Boehner to go to any "scenerio". He just kept reading the "scenario" that was currently being displayed." Please watch the video and read the comments.

Objection was heard.

There was no attempt by Boehner to go to any "scenerio". He just kept reading the "scenario" that was currently being displayed.

I yelled Divsion first then POINT OF ORDER!

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED

Yeah...

Not sure if the teleprompter is a big issue. Boehner declaring that the "ayes" have it, when it was not at all clear IS a big issue.

Ignoring calls for a point of order IS a HUGE issue.

Why didn't the teleprompter

Why didn't the teleprompter read: "the nays have it"?

HAL isn't programmed for Liberty.

.

this DP headline is a bit

this DP headline is a bit misleading/misguided.

The teleprompter had a couple of different scripts ready to go should it be necessary - IT WAS necessary but Boner decided to plow through it and carry on with the 'party business'.

Boner was the issue here - not the teleprompter.

Not true

If you look at the script, the part where it says "if objection is heard go to scenario 1" refers to if there is an objection to THE PREVIOUS QUESTION. In other words, the motion to adopt the rules. There was no audible objection at that point.

When he then called for the voice vote...that was where the problem ensued. There was no "if the ayes and no's are the same go to scenario 1".

It immediately went to "the ayes have it"

The next note saying anything about going to another scenario was if there was an objection to the motion being laid on the table. There obviously was at that point but it was ignored.

Nowhere in the script was there any alternative scenario offered if the ayes did not win. It was predetermined.

The title is 100% correct.

The title is 100% correct. 1:59 dispels all of your concerns.

Debbie's picture

Thank you! Sending this out now.

Thank you to whoever video'd this and for posting!!

Debbie

youtube struck this video down

does anyone have an alternate link? time to download and spread