186 votes

New 9/11 Truth Documentary Among 'Most Watched' on PBS This Week

"9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" is getting public attention and casting doubt on the scientific validity of the U.S. government's investigation into the WTC tragedy. PBS is the first major network to air the program.


Link / honorRP

Just days away from the 11th anniversary of the World Trade Center tragedy and months away from the U.S. presidential election, a game-changing 9/11 documentary is ranking number three among "most watched" documentaries on PBS and number one among "most shared."

Available for free online August 18th - September 4th, the documentary could have a significant effect on public opinion. Both the Republicans and Democrats, as equally staunch defenders of the official story, stand to be affected if the public's suspicion of government corruption grows deeper.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Does anyone have links to the

Does anyone have links to the scholarly papers they mentioned in the video such as the one about the molten steel and the one about the nano-thermite?

sharkhearted's picture



Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Inside job duhhh

Any sheep still not realize this by now?

Who and Why?

Conclusion…controlled demolition...So my question is WHO and WHY, and are the answers to those questions beyond what has been considered and discussed publicly thus far?

Try this

Who and why?

Anyone here remember the old joke of the three retired business owners?
I will jump to the punch line: "How do you start a flood"?
You can get tangled up in all the conspiracy theories you can imagine but bottom line 9/11 was an insurance fraud, plain and simple. All the underwriting red flags are there, high vacancy rate, new purchase, insurance amount was many multiples of the purchase price, prior discussions regarding removing the buildings due to asbestos, negotiating out standard restrictions and exclusions in the standard insurance contract prior to the purchase date, and after the event the presence of thermite in the ashes and debris.

The real question that should be asked is how in the hell did the insurance policy get written on these building in the first place?

Insurance fraud involving the entire US government?

For a lousy billion dollars?

The ensuing wars cost trillions.

The ensuing economic downturn cost the average big shot well-connected billionaire a sizeable chunk of his fortune.

They could have just cut Silverstein a billion dollar stimulus check, or used dollars "misplaced" in Iraq.

I'm looking at it from an underwriters perspective

Its all speculation at this point, but if we look at what we know, the official story is full of holes. We know there was advanced knowledge, from the dancing Israelis to the stock market "suspicious" short sales. The buildings were rigged for controlled demolition, then 3 building went down from 2 planes. Every aspect of 9/11 makes no sense, when in doubt follow the money trail.

So, where did the insurance

So, where did the insurance company "get" the money to payout the claim. Maybe that is the who?

The who is 'Lucky" Larry Silverstein

The money the insurance companies paid came from the policyholders reserves, on an account this large there were a number of Ins cos reinsuring the risk. My question is with so many glaring red flags, who made the decision to bind the insurance on what appears to be a highly suspect account.

The who, is the owner, "lucky" Larry Silverstein
The why, is 7.2 billion dollars from a $660 million dollar investment only three months prior. Whatta deal!

Where are you getting those numbers?

Silverstein paid $3.2 billion and got $4.57 billion in his claim.

Here is one source


Its a complex financial transaction, leased property payments etc. However the whole thing should have brought up red flags to an insurance underwriter, if for nothing else than the fact they had looked into having the buildings removed. When the buildings went down the insurance policies had not even been issued yet, appears they were covered with a binder from the broker. Whatever the purchase price vs the settlement amount was there was a substantial gain for Silverstein.

I wonder if any of that money

I wonder if any of that money the Fed printed went to bail out an insurance company for the tune of $7.2B?

If you could be so kind, I would appreciate your opinion here: http://www.dailypaul.com/253758/is-goode-any-good-requesting...

Cyril's picture

My speculation :

My speculation :

"Conclusion…controlled demolition...So my question is WHO and WHY"

WHO ? I let you guess.


As maybe silly as it seems, it is also maybe worth giving it a thought twice, just for the sake of it; the bottom line is, I'd put it as "large scale mind control" (over the U.S. People).

So, shall we see ? Controlled demolition MIGHT bring you :

1. definitive outcome

2. high visibility

3. overwhelming, spectacular event of (1) and (2) -- MSM loves the spectacular that doesn't require long, knowledgeable, elaborations for the audience -- the easier to dumb down the message's "conclusion" (bad guys vs. good guys), the better -- "BLOWBACK" is too complicated for your average dude, it requires knowing a bit about "History" (like U.S. intervention in Afghanistan in the 80's, to piss off the Russians by funding Al Qaeda, etc)

4. in turn, (3) implies maximum killings (in the scale of your target's size anyway)

5. also, by definition of demolition : a pretty convenient, timely unfolding of (1), (2), (3), (4) altogether, fitting nicely for real time TV broadcasts (instead of a fire spanning several days and getting boring)

6. in turn, (5) induces optimal psychological shock for low cost (explosives implementation is "cheap", once the planes were already known to come to trigger the catching of everybody's attention)

WHY of the WHY ?

triggering a "spontaneous" appeal (or unfirm rejection, for the least) for the Patriot Act's **CONTENT**, and what ensued, maybe ? E.g., NDAA...

Makes sense ?

... or not at all ?

Hint : check out what is FACTUALLY surrounding my "WHY of the WHY" ever since 9/11.


"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

I think

your "Why" points are well voiced and make sense. I also think the "Who" is a very important question. Because the who points to the true opposition. Do you care to enlighten me per my questions below titled: "Please someone enlighten me"

How many birds do you think are being killed with the same stone? Optimum use of a single crisis or is there more to this tangled web?

Cyril's picture

Sadly, on that one

Sadly, on that one

"I also think the Who is a very important question."

I'm afraid I can't stretch out further my theories.


I have no clue whatsoever about INTEL or CO-INTEL or CO-CO-INTEL or whatnots work in the realm of paranoid, fearmongering bureaucrats and other insiders.

You know, I have a job, a family to sustain, etc.

Still, I suspect it's gonna take us a while before we can point fingers to every single member of the actual "WHO" ...

In 20 or so years, maybe... if we're lucky. And if ever.


"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

Please someone enlighten me

And WHY this?


Please someone enlighten me.

The buildings get hit by planes.

Then for some reason the buildings are blown up by controlled demolition.

Then we water board and torture Lybian detainees who were Gaddafi's enemies.

Then when we are thru with them we turn them over to Gadaffi to be tortured again.

Then she says "we came, we saw, and he is dead" he = Gaddafi; she = Hillary Clinton

Now 14 of the "detainees" are in power in Lybia, you know, the ones who we tortured and then turned over to Gaddafi before we killed Gaddafi.

Meanwhile there is a 9/11 cover up.

Can someone help me here?

Many prominent figures over history have observed...

"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence".

Cyril's picture

I'm glad a summary like this

I'm glad a summary like this of a thorough examination by engineers eventually surfaces up to the public.

I never could buy in the collapses of those huge structures in such A SHORT RANGE OF TIME (as explained by the official version).

But I never could tell anybody. Nobody would care anyway.

I don't know when we'll finally have the full blown truth, but here's my bet :

yes there were explosives used, yes, very likely, extremely powerful ones (e.g., C4 in large quantity or even nastier or whatnot, I have no clue) and here's where I'd have put them : at the very bottom of the master supporting beams / columns. I'd have weakened the feet, chopped them off, right above the foundations, as much as possible.

I don't see any other way to explain those towers collapsing in a matter of just a couple hours. The theory of fire weakening the steel THAT FAST AND WITH THAT MUCH DAMAGES to the steel's initial strength, for the final outcome that we all know, really sounds ridiculous.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

Explosives at the base wouldn't explain what we saw

The tower floors start collapsing just as the debris from above lands on them.

For explosives to have been involved, they would have had to have gone off just as the debris from above hit the floor they were on. And these explosives would have had to have also not been triggered prematurely by the intense heat of the burning jet fuel.

Steel structures are built to support the floors above them. Not to have the floors above them dropped on them from 10's of meters above.

It's also worth noting that the the towers were built less robustly than most steel structures, with increased office space at the expense of a huge internal area with no support.

The mainstream News is just propaganda

If you have been following Ron Paul and believe the mainstream media has been biased against him and you have come to the conclusion that someone at the top is working to keep the message of liberty from getting to the people then you are on the right track.

Then take this one step further and ask; "if someone has the power to do this then what else could they potentially do?"

Then ask; "have there been other false flag events in history?" and after researching that then ask; "have there been other false flag events planned and executed by the US Government/military/CIA/FBI?"

Then look at 911 and make up your own mind.

Well said Lars

Goes to show we can go further and have more impact just by refining the message.

Well done!

Tell the world.

Because: Some animals are more equal than other animals. -Animal Farm-

What the? > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MTIwY3_-ks

I about to head out with a

I'm about to head out with a little projector and a battery pack and play the video on the side of our shinny new $200,000,000 federal court house. Wish me luck!

Good luck

Thanks for working to get the truth out.

Thank you for posting this

I find that as more time goes by I start to forget about this unsolved mass murder. This documentary reminds me of how angry I was like all of you when we first heard about this murder and were lied to. Until the murderers responsible for 911 are brought to justice we should never stop talking about it.

Has anyone here found that some of your friends or family refuse to hear the truth about 911, or even look at the evidence? I don't know if it's denial, or just an unwillingness to believe that our nation is in the business killing it's own for profit. Some of the people I know who refuse to hear the argument are liberty loving Ron Paul supporters like me. I know that being one of the good guys doesn't make you a "truther" by default but it seems like we would be the most capable of looking past the cover story and excepting the truth.... Maybe it's just too much for some people to except.. Sorry, just rambling..

Law and liberty cannot rationally become the objects of our love, unless they first become the objects of our knowledge.

James Wilson

Sleeping With the Devil: How U.S. and Saudi Backing of Al Qaeda

Sleeping With the Devil: How U.S. and Saudi Backing of Al Qaeda Led to 9/11

Ronald Reagan meets Afghan Mujahideen Commanders at the White House in 1985 (Reagan Archives)
We Created Al Qaeda to Fight the Soviets in Afghanistan

Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski admitted on CNN that the U.S. organized and supported Bin Laden and the other originators of “Al Qaeda” in the 1970s to fight the Soviets.

Brzezinski told Al Qaeda’s forefathers – the Mujahadin:

We know of their deep belief in god – that they’re confident that their struggle will succeed. – That land over-there is yours – and you’ll go back to it some day, because your fight will prevail, and you’ll have your homes, your mosques, back again, because your cause is right, and god is on your side.


For the skeptic

Watch this 2.5 min video entitled, "This is an Orange".

Then, ask yourself these questions: "WHY?"

WHY didn't you ever hear about wtc-7? WHY was it not all over the news? WHY did this super-steel framed building just decide to fall down? And lastly, "HOW," HOW is it even possible that after all of these years that people "still don't know about this?"

Do you not YET understand that the lying, sick, twisted med-ia controls your minds? Most people only believe what they see on the news. Well the news did very VERY little reporting on this, so in most peoples minds, "it doesn't exist".


Because: Some animals are more equal than other animals. -Animal Farm-

What the? > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MTIwY3_-ks

The dedication at the end of the "orange" video...

This is the dedication at the end of the video:

"Dedicated to the victims of 9/11, Afghanistan and Iraq...
...and to those who may be next."

I hope that sinks in with people.

Thanks for posting that video link.

Thanks for the "orange" link

That's an effective short video. I will use this to start the conversation with some of the people in my life who refuse to have the conversation.

Law and liberty cannot rationally become the objects of our love, unless they first become the objects of our knowledge.

James Wilson


for the thanks.

Yeah, I think the video is one of the best, but I think it could even be better with the "ask yourself why" questions because I show it to some and they get it, but some need a little more info to drive the point home.

take care

Because: Some animals are more equal than other animals. -Animal Farm-

What the? > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MTIwY3_-ks