186 votes

New 9/11 Truth Documentary Among 'Most Watched' on PBS This Week

"9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" is getting public attention and casting doubt on the scientific validity of the U.S. government's investigation into the WTC tragedy. PBS is the first major network to air the program.


Link / honorRP

Just days away from the 11th anniversary of the World Trade Center tragedy and months away from the U.S. presidential election, a game-changing 9/11 documentary is ranking number three among "most watched" documentaries on PBS and number one among "most shared."

Available for free online August 18th - September 4th, the documentary could have a significant effect on public opinion. Both the Republicans and Democrats, as equally staunch defenders of the official story, stand to be affected if the public's suspicion of government corruption grows deeper.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

bumping . . .

for truth--

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--


Hey All
Back when i was a neo con, I called these kind of folks Crazy!! I believed NO ONE could do such a EVIL thing.

I woke up about 2 yrs ago. Having found out how bad our Media lies and OUR government.
One thing , if something in the future again happens as tragic as WTC.
Please think & reason. Don't just look at the news! NWO/Banksters own it all.(got the wars they wanted & Our Liberty)
Been lying to us for 40+ yrs.
Now in that vain, wonder how this got on the AIR?

I still want to know

how a mostly aluminum airplane can cut through steel beams and leave a sillouette like something you'd see on Bugs Bunny. Aluminum won't cut steel no matter how fast it's going, or they'd make machining tools out of it (rather than tool steel or carbide).


Why doesn't everyone arrive at the same conclusion? Does anyone really believe that were one to swing a structural steel girder, the size used in construction of the WTC, with a speed of 500+MPH at the nose of a hollow aluminum airliner, that some how the plane would break to girder upon impact? This is akin to a wiffle ball denting an aluminum bat like a stepped on beer can...

Wha? .....hey....who stole my country?

Conspiracy Theory

The only conspiracy theory about 911 is the official conspiracy theory that starts with "19 hijackers with box cutters...".

All others are merely questioning the official conspiracy theory and hence these are not conspiracy theories.

If I Found Out My Neighbor Lied To Me

I would never believe another word they said.

Lying and cover-ups are standard operating procedure for ALL governments.

The lead attorney for the 9/11 commission wrote a book after the they published their report. He said their was an agreement not to tell the truth about what really happened on 9/11.

One of the 9/11 Commissioners resigned and said the government's cover-up of the events of 9/11 was a national disgrace.

May our efforts in support of Congressman Ron Paul be blessed with supernatural success.

Building 7

Chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, Senator Lieberman has no evidence that this really occured.


Now I know

who not to hire as engineers if I ever build a building... these 9/11 guys. I'm not saying there was not someone behind the terrorists, setting them up perhaps to fly the planes into the buildings, but to say that a jet plane fully loaded with fuel can't bring down the building in the way it did, is UTTERLY LUDICROUS!

It is funny how they all go into their credentials, blah blah blah. I know many engineers with full degrees that don't know basic things. And I love the spooky music throughout the film.

And what if it were true, there were explosives planted somewhere in the buildings; why fly airplanes into it then? Why not just pretend to let the terrorists blow it up? It doesn't make sense at all.

They spend way too much time focusing on why the physics of the building could not collapse at that speed, when in reality, even though the building is made of steel and concrete, it still is very fragile, and is composed of floors that give distance so that the above floor has time to pickup speed before it hits. It allows it to collapse easier... it is no different than Karate masters breaking bricks with their hands.. they always put space between them, so that they only have to break the first brick, and the lower bricks are broken by the weight of the above brick using the momentum of that brick: http://www.karatebyjesse.com/a-quick-awesome-guide-to-tamesh....

I don't know what this documentary is trying to prove? They should not be interviewing engineers! There were 2 PLANES THAT HIT THE BUILDINGS, DUH!!!!! WE ALL SAW THAT. THAT'S WHAT TOOK DOWN THE BUILDINGS! Why don't they follow the money trail. Why don't they talk about blowback???

These pseudo engineers make me sick... just goes to prove you can have all the qualifications in the world and be part of fancy associations, and still know NOTHING!

Don't worry...

With your apparent intellect, you'll never amass enough money to need an architect or an engineer...keep renting...but make sure the structure is stick built out of wood...you'll be safer.

Wha? .....hey....who stole my country?

I'm surprised that you

I'm surprised that you weren't asked to contribute your own expertise, you certainly sound like an expert...LOL

WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Let's Fight the Good Fight

Don't waste your time

These people that still go along with the official story (most people) do so because they believe and support the system. Deep down, the minds have calculated it's better to go along with the lie than to admit the truth. For many, they actually like the idea of killing brownies and polluting the world with Depleted Uranium.

Then they cry innocence in the end as their republic is stolen from them and pretend to support liberty. Understand this world is perfectly just - everyone gets what they truly deserve (including you).

Did an invisible plane hit WTC7?

"They spend way too much time focusing on why the physics of the building could not collapse at that speed..."

Huh? Too much time on logistics? What would you suggest they talk about?


Did an invisible plane hit WTC7? Do you think ADDING CAPITAL LETTERS cancels out 1700 scientist's explanations? "TWO PLUS TWO EQUALS FIVE!!!" See. Is that effective in convincing you?

You do ask an interesting question on why they would need planes in the first place though. Why not just blow up the buildings? Two obvious reasons would be diversion and believability.

Remember, the goal is to convince all the couch potato, Monday-Night-football robots that brown, middle east, Islamist terrorists attacked us so that we are just justified in attacking (occupying) them over there. If they just blew up the building, they'd have a lot harder time linking it back to the ME. But, thanks to a few decades of (Israel-conrolled) Hollywood, fanatical ME terrorists and hijackings go together like baseball and hotdogs for Americans.

A diversion works by getting people to look at your left hand when all the action is in the right hand. If everyone is convinced it's the planes, then no one is scrutinizing how it *actually* happened. A pretty convenient position to be in if you've committed a crime, yes? To fully appreciate the effectiveness of diversion you really only need to look no further than yourself. You're so focused on the way it did *not* happen that even 1700 scientists (with nothing to gain and everything to lose) can't even pursuade you to even consider an alternative perspective.

WTC 7 wasn't hit by an

WTC 7 wasn't hit by an airplane. There was no jet fuel in WTC 7. There was some minor damage from WTC 1 & 2 falling, but WTC 7 was largely outside the debris field and buildings that were much more damaged than WTC 7 did not fall. (WTC 5,6). There is no good explanation for why WTC 7 fell the way it did except controlled demolition. I was initially resistant to the controlled demolition theory, but I could never explain away WTC 7.

Ever see the video where the UK journalist reported

W7 had fallen down and you could see it standing in the background. :)

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

Flight 93 missed its target.

It took them several hours to decide whether to go ahead and "pull it".


Credit goes out to Larry Silverstien for his help in my theory though.

Go to 1:55:00

And learn about yourself.

What evidence

I am perfectly willing to accept evidence, if there was any presented. What evidence did they present? Evidence to what? What am I denying? That there may have been other motives involved in the buildings destruction, and also other parties that we don't know about? I am not denying that at all! I am denying ignorant engineers saying "in my experience, this could not have caused this"... these are like the engineers that say a bumblebee can't fly or a dolphin can't possibly swim as fast as it does!

Buildings fall down on their own with minor earthquakes... why are two jumbo jets hitting them at full speed not enough to bring them down?
I thought this 'documentary' was going to present some evidence... opinions of people with 'qualifications' is not evidence.

The thing is, people like you are in denial of physics, because you don't understand physics... heck, the engineers in the video don't understand basic physics, how could you be expected to? Steel bends when it is heated, pretty easily... extreme weight, bent steel, boom, building comes down.

What a waste of time, find some of the details of what really took place behind the scenes, funding of Osama etc, and put that in a documentary... this is just a poor quality distraction, designed to make people who believe in another motive for 9/11, look like fools.
Don't deny that there wasn't another cause, and more people pulling strings, but don't deny the physics either, of 2 jet planes hitting buildings at full speed.


You forgot to actually watch the documentary.

The carting off and

The carting off and destroying of the evidence is evidence itself!

COULD you have actually watched this?

What don't you understand about Puddles of MOLTEN STEEL? Other than with high tech explosives, you would need a blast furnace to accomplish this! How about the pyroclastic heat waves? ...incinerating cars in it's path? I mean, you can't actually watch this and be anything but convinced that the damage from "impact and fires" explanation is absolute bullshit! And doesn't begin to explain wiring Bldg 7, weeks ahead of the event, which is what it would have required.

The tool

never watched the presentation.

When I was in engineering college

we studied the construction of the WTC - each tower was and still is unique in it's design and construction.

Time does not permit me to address each of the fallacious claims in your rant, but here's a real easy one:

The 'extreme weight' you mention amounts to just under 6 pounds per square foot, assuming that the entire planes were on one floor - which we know they weren't. So if the plane spanned three floors, that's a little under 2 pounds per square foot. 32 ounces - a medium soda.

Filing cabinets, desks, people, bathroom fixtures all weigh much more that that. The incremental weight can easily be carried by the building - in fact, the plane would have weighed LESS than a floor full of filing cabinets.

It appears that the "evidence" you demand has been given to you, but you just haven't fully grasped it yet.

I think we are wasting our breath

There is a psychological barrier that some can never overcome when it comes to removing blinders from the evidence of 9/11

I have found that alot!

It's like being told your dearly beloved mother turned tricks on the weekends. Even if you have pictures, video's and hundreds of sworn statements you just aren't going to believe it. And you are going to get real hostile to the messenger!

Jim Rogers

I had a really good zing lined up

but.... lol

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.


I could not believe someone would be so EVIL!!! Not anymore!!
They got us believing the poor folks are staving!!!! YEA after we kick them off OUR land! They have farmed for generations!

What evidence?????

You must be either blind, ignorant, dumb or any combination thereof to suggest there is no evidence...
For example:
Signature of thermitic material in all dust samples
Iron spheres in all dust samples suggested massive temperatures not possible by jet fuel
Many many reports of massive explosions in all buidlings
3000F temps seen in thermal scans of all three buidlings
Molten steel in basements of twin towers
Perfect freefall speed of building 7
William Rodriguez (last man out) recounts of explosions
Devastation of lobby in twin tower

NIST claims WT7 was brought down by office furniture fires!

WT7 was an Emergency Operations Center(EOC). EOCs are built to withstand pretty much anything. You can see the charges exploding as the building is brought down.

Please watch the entire video.

I like how they explain

in the last twenty minutes how and why people deny reality. I think this applies to people in general not being able to wake up.