186 votes

New 9/11 Truth Documentary Among 'Most Watched' on PBS This Week

"9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" is getting public attention and casting doubt on the scientific validity of the U.S. government's investigation into the WTC tragedy. PBS is the first major network to air the program.

http://youtu.be/4tTMMNTisBM

Link / honorRP

Just days away from the 11th anniversary of the World Trade Center tragedy and months away from the U.S. presidential election, a game-changing 9/11 documentary is ranking number three among "most watched" documentaries on PBS and number one among "most shared."

Available for free online August 18th - September 4th, the documentary could have a significant effect on public opinion. Both the Republicans and Democrats, as equally staunch defenders of the official story, stand to be affected if the public's suspicion of government corruption grows deeper.

Continue:
http://www.digitaljournal...




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
SteveMT's picture

The truth has no agenda.

Finding the truth is the challenge.

911

the first time I heard of "911 inside job" theory. my reaction was what? that's crazy. I was condescending and ignorant towards "truthers" but when I looked more into it and seen Building 7, and more about the pentagon I was shocked, because those are blaitant giant smoking guns.? Theres a ton of very good but unanswered questions. I've bit my tongue about it during ron paul's campaign because I believed it was counter productive to get him elected, and it was easy for them to smear and discredit us. But 911 is very infuriating

Beep beep boop beep... I am a Paulbot... prepare for liberty and prosperity!

9/11 Truth

I would like to bring up again the brief but information-packed video put together by James Corbett:
"9/11: A Conspiracy Theory"
http://www.dailypaul.com/224723/omg-see-the-ptb-get-their-ss...

Also, AE911Truth has a pretty good documentary and lots of information
AE911Truth
http://ae911truth.org/
AE911Truth on YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/user/ae911truth

When Benjamin Franklin exited the constitutional convention, he was asked by a woman: "Sir, what have you given us?" His immediate response was: "A Republic Ma'am, if you can keep it."

"9/11:

+1. for Corbett.

lindalsalisbury's picture

This coverup

makes Johnson, Hoover, and the Warren Commission look like the "Katz and Jammer Kids". Incredible.

Hope the government doesn't start disappearing these people.

Added video for this post

Pilots for 9/11 Truth Presents "9/11 INTERCEPTED" (full film)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k&feature=related
Flight paths, towers speaking to each other, pilot recordings and more.

and,

What Happened to the Planes and Passengers on 9/11 (short film)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ue-MLMnlTzY&feature=related
Planes sighted after their crash.

When did you quit believing in Santa Claus?

That's the Subject line of an email I wrote and sent out to my email list back in 2009. This was inspired by the 44 story Chinese skyscraper fire in February of that year that I described (below) as having "thoroughly burned into a crinkling cinder. However IT DID NOT COLLAPSE."

I use a stripped down version of this email to answer 9/11 questions on Yahoo Answers (also under Bloatedtoad). The only change here from my original was the addition of the 15 minute Architects & Engineers piece (at the end below) that came out in advance of this excellent 2 1/2 hour special featured here in the article above. I wanted to share this with you here because this will give you a working knowledge of the basics of the 9/11 story that you can convey easily to others.

Get me in front of a computer with almost anyone and I will flip them from a government 9/11 fairytale believer to a 9/11 truth believer, and that's just using the links below in my Santa Claus email. If time is short (most of the time it is) the most important links are the Kenny Johanemann video (1 minute) and the Larry Silverstein "pull it" video (56 seconds) and your explanation of what these two videos mean. Then if you can get the person to watch the Aaron Russo interview that will tie it all together. The fourth most important link here is the BBC advance report (which proves that a story had already been scripted in the media in advance). Those three or four alone with your guiding insights as they watch is usually enough to cause cognitive dissonance. If you get them to go through all the links I present here it will devastate their world view of what really happened and they will be in a daze for a week or more as they sort out their world view. I know. I've been doing this for three years now. It's time to stop this nonsense that guys with box cutters can shut down the greatest country in the world. This will break it open if it reaches enough people. OK, here's the body of my email. Feel free to copy and share:

BEGIN TEXT:

As kids we believed in Santa Claus. Our parents were the gatekeepers of information and, though benign, our environment during that formative time was a controlled one. We were taught to believe in Santa Claus. Initially we accepted all the information that we received at face value. However, as time progressed, we gained bits and pieces of information that led to a cognitive dissonance which, in turn, led us to question our image of Santa Claus. These “bits and pieces” led to questions such as “How could Santa Claus fit through my chimney” or “How does Santa Claus leave gifts in millions of homes during a single night”? Armed with all these bits and pieces of information, we began to get a different picture that caused all the previous illogic that we had learned to come crashing down. This finally led to an epiphany that Santa Claus really isn’t anything like what we had first thought!

There are other things in life that we have always taken for granted as “fact” that later prove to be only an illusion as well. It’s only a matter of getting more information. As in the case of the Santa Claus myth, it is only a matter of time as new evidence unfolds that we are forced to rethink our view on what the truth is.

I want to try an experiment here:

Please watch this first video linked here. It’s only one minute. You’ve read this far into my letter so please take just one small minute and watch this first video. You’re going to be impressed. This is a local news video of a witness named Kenny Johannemann testifying to explosions that happened in the basement of one of the WTC towers. While he is testifying you still see both of the twin towers burning behind him in the background. This was live footage and it's only ONE minute long. Go ahead and watch this here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEuzU3LMgCA
(YouTube Key Words: Johannemann suicide)

Those explosions were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling the tower. You say, “wait, this doesn’t fit anything I know, maybe there is some other explanation for those explosions in the basement.” True. This is just one piece of evidence, but it’s a piece of evidence that raises a lot of questions. You didn’t see this on TV either. Does that prick your interest?

The government has promoted a “theory” that maybe the fuel from the jet trickled down the elevator shafts into the basement and subsequently exploded. Could this be? Let’s continue and look at other evidence. Barry Jennings was another witness that got stuck in Building Seven during 9/11. Remember, Building Seven was NEVER hit by a jet. In Barry's case an explosion blew out a stair well below him leaving him hanging and stranded for hours until the fire department got him out. Both the twin towers went down during the time he was stranded. Building Seven, a tall building in it’s own right (47 stories tall), came down at around 5:20 (later that day). Fortunately, he was saved. Watch his account here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbbZE7c3a8Q
(YouTube Key Words: Barry Jennings dead age – more hits when “dead age” excluded)

Again, the explosions he talked about were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling down this building. You say, “Hold On! Building Seven housed the FBI and the CIA offices, so who would have access to set up explosives in there? There has got to be another explanation.” True. This is just one piece of evidence which raises more questions. Again, you didn't see Barry’s testimony on TV.

William Rodriguez, head janitor at the towers, was meeting with some people in basement level #1 (the highest of several basement levels) when an explosion from below pushed everyone upwards, causing ceiling tiles to fall and walls to crack. Just as William started to express to others what he thought that explosion might be, an airplane hit and shook the building from above. His story begins at 9:31 here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWXTk5aNAAs
(Google Video Key Words: William Rodriguez Alex Jones)

Now, let’s look for other different kinds of evidence. Steve Jones, a physicist, obtained WTC dust samples from the collapsed WTC towers from people who lived nearby. He analyzed it and found that the dust contained residues of explosives. Steve Jones first became famous when he became known as the “voice of reason” during the Pons / Fleischman "Cold Fusion" debacle of 1989, if you remember that. For a Nuclear Physicist, like Steve Jones, analyzing dust samples for explosive residues is a relatively simple task. It may be similar to asking a PhD mathematician to do arithmetic. He reported his detailed findings here in Boston:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1957490867030316250&...
(Google Video Key Words: Steve Jones Boston)

In this lecture, you recall, he offered other scientists to take parts of his samples in order to analyze the "red chips" that he had recently discovered. That was December 2007. These specks have now, in fact, been confirmed to be unexploded “nanostructured super-thermite” particles. That confirmation is not just a smoking gun IT IS THE GUN. See the article here:

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Scientists_find_active_superth...

The actual paper in its entirety can be found here in PDF form. Be sure to click the “download” link here:

http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm?T...

If you get into the actual paper, you learn that the explosives may actually have been sprayed into position like paint or insulation!

Steve Jones’ findings may not fit the stories that you have heard in the news but it does lend support to what Johannemann, Jennings and Rodriguez testified that they saw. You say, “The news media isn’t going to shoot itself in the foot by making something up.” So how do we rectify all the contradictions that we were told in the news? Could Steve Jones and these witnesses be glory-seeking kooks trying to make a name for themselves?

Then take a look at this:

Here is a BBC report announcing the collapse of the Solomon Building (the official name for Building Seven). There is only one problem. The reporter standing at the scene and announcing this didn't realize that, in fact, you could still see Building Seven still standing off to the right. It actually collapsed within about 20 minutes after that live report. Watch it here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlL6ewlW6oc
(YouTube Key Words: BBC Solomon slips – you get more hits by excluding “slips”)

How did the BBC know in advance that Building Seven would collapse? The fact that it was announced in advance is strong support that the flow of information on this tragedy was being controlled (but in a more sinister way than how information about Santa Claus was controlled in your life).

Were the people at the BBC the only people privy to this information? Probably not. Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of Building Seven. In a 2002 PBS documentary he talked about how he discussed the Building Seven situation with the fire department and how the decision was made by that department to "pull" it. Well, there is one problem with his testimony that you may want to consider. It takes about a week to rig a building with explosives before you pull it. So are buildings constructed with built-in explosives just in case they need to be blown up in a hurry? Building Seven went down that same day. Whoops! Watch Larry's testimony from the PBS documentary here in this short clip:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3E-26oVIIs
(YouTube Key words: PBS Silverstein)

Incidentally, luckily for Larry, he insured his property in the nick of time just six months before September 11th! It was a sweet deal. So who orchestrated this terrorist event anyway? They had to get past the FBI and CIA and prepare at least three buildings for demolition as well as direct the activities of men with box cutters (if they even existed). It’s clear from the evidence presented here so far that at least some of the media was in on this. What else could explain the BBC blunder? They had to control the information to those of us who might not like the idea that a few thousand people had to be killed in order to fulfill some kind of agenda. What’s in it for these people that were “in the know?”

Aaron Russo was a famous movie producer who became best friends with one of the Rockefeller family members (Remember “The Rose” and "Trading Places" starring Eddie Murphy?). This is the same Rockefeller family that is a large shareholder of the Federal Reserve Bank -- a private company that loans money to our government and contributes to our huge national debt. You see the name “Federal Reserve” at the top the dollar bill. Yes, we're talking about THAT Bank! Anyway, the upshot of this friendship was that in the year 2000 (11 months before 9/11) Aaron Russo learned from his Rockefeller buddy that there was going to be an "event". He was told that out of this event the U.S. would go into Afghanistan and look for Bin Laden in Caves and then the U.S. would go into Iraq. His fascinating testimony about this "event" starts at 26:45 here in this interview:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGAaPjqdbgQ
(Google Video Key Words: Aaron Russo Reflections Warnings)

One more thing. In February 2009 a 44 story Chinese skyscraper caught fire and thoroughly burned into a crinkling cinder. However IT DID NOT COLLAPSE. By comparison WTC Building Seven had a few small fires and was never hit by a plane. It DID COLLAPSE. See that article here:

http://www.infowars.com/fire-consumes-wtc-7-size-skyscraper-...
(Google Key Words: China 44 fire consumes)

Now see this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw
(YouTube Key Words: architects engineers 911 truth)

Amazingly, all this evidence is only the tip of the iceberg. Each of these are separate independent pieces of evidence from unconnected sources. When taken together they paint a clear picture. You are a juror in a court of law. What would be your verdict? Remember, the word “conspiracy” is not in the dictionary to describe a fiction.

To forward this as a clean readable e-mail (without the accumulation of all the “>” symbols) just highlight all the text and COPY IT FIRST. Then paste it into your new e-mail before sending it on. It works like a charm!

NOTE: I included key words below each link because it’s common for a video to disappear. Usually multiple versions exist and the key words will assist in finding another copy.

-Bloatedtoad

"Reichstag" 2.0

"Reichstag" 2.0

Play it.

Play it.

Transparency in government

Having just watched Loose Change 9/11:An American Coup, I suggest that we write our representatives and senators asking to reopen the 9/11 investigation. We are mired in wars that resulted from the "terrorist attack," so further study should be warranted. To truly get our nation back on track, we need transparency in this matter in order to restore our liberties that have been lost in the resulting power grab. The effects of that day were far reaching indeed, NDAA, wire taps, undeclared wars, the Patriot Act, domestic drone flights, beefy police budgets, the department of Homeland Security...

I'm skeptical of 911 docos

I'm skeptical of 911 docos hosted/funded by big media.

One of the best documentaries I have seen is free for anyone with a broadband internet connection. It is called "September Clues final version". It is not easy to watch as a it provides some huge challenges to mass perception, but imo - it was well worth it for those with an open mind.

Watch it. (I'm sure you have by now.)

It's a great collection of experts' opinions, but it's not technical. I like the psychologists' perspective on the denial as well.

Me too

I also liked the segment on the psychological perspective of denial. This is becoming the most interesting aspect of the event. The official story has been thoroughly disproved by an international group of highly credentialed scientists, who at the same time have proven the controlled demolition hypothesis, and yet the masses are still terrified to even watch a one-hour fact-filled documentary that would threaten to destroy their current world-view. Fascinating stuff.

I have not believed the

I have not believed the official story since around 2005. I've watched numerous documentaries on 911, including Loose Change final cut, The Great Conspiracy - the 911 News Special You Never Saw, 911 In Plane site, Painful Deceptions and various others.

They all provided some interesting information. However, there is one thing they all miss:

Analysis that shows evidence of Television Fakery. I've come to believe this is intentional. The Media doesn't care if you believe 911 was an inside job - they just want to make damn sure you keep trusting them to tell you the truth and that they played no part whatsoever in the official fiction we were sold.

That is why I recommend "September Clues final version" and associated videos.

My husband is an ENGINEER 30 years experience & is

with this group of high-caliber engineers & architects, and after analyzing all the evidence, he has a firm belief that all 3 buildings were blown up by demolition. Building 7 is the "smoking gun", because no airplane hit it, and yet it collapsed into its own footprint.

You can ask him any questions you want in this forum!

2 steel frame high rises, fell 1350 feet. in under 12 seconds.

due to kerosene fires.
they both very clearly withstood the aircraft impact. even that was confined to the relatively lightweight upper floors.

you mean the official

you mean the official (control your opposition) conspiracy theory dis-info hoax story? Or, are you referring to the official story in the books, and calling it a conspiracy theory?

a nod's as good as a wink to a blind bat

We're all under mind control

Watch any 'video' of the 'planes' closely and very slowly, clicking on your mouse in micro-seconds. You will see it was all a fraud, a "cartoon," all designed by the criminal media cabal.

No planes. Watch. You'll see.

lol, That one was definitely

lol, That one was definitely a government (or dumbass) created conspiracy. The only thing I know for sure is that the FBI DID NOT find undamaged passports and clean red bandanas at the "crime scene"

a nod's as good as a wink to a blind bat

We sat through this when Richard Gage came to town!

It's quite long, so when you get to the psychological therapists' opinions, you could definitely skip over that!

Great evidence, otherwise, just fantastic!

TwelveOhOne's picture

Watch the psychologists

Actually I very much enjoyed hearing from the psychologists; one in particular said something that resonated. She said upon reading the truth, she felt physically ill and took a walk for several blocks. During this walk, she decided that she had to be involved in sharing the truth with others.

I feel the same way. She also described cognitive dissonance, when you receive input that does not match the model that you built of the world from previous input. I experienced this dramatically during my awakening. I was frightened; I did not know who I could trust. I still don't, really, but during that time it was very difficult.

I am glad they included the psychologist interviews, as it helps me moving forward.

I love you. I'm sorry. Please forgive me. Thank you.
http://fija.org - Fully Informed Jury Association
http://jsjinc.net - Jin Shin Jyutsu (energy healing)

placeholder

This comment went to the top for some reason..
meant for this
http://www.dailypaul.com/253111#comment-2717561

a nod's as good as a wink to a blind bat

Thanks..

I just watched the video over at Colorado PBS. I think today is the last day you can watch it there:

http://video.pbs.org/video/2270078138

This is the first tv station to show it.

All of the people in this video are willing to risk their.......

.....careers, freedom, and possibly lives, to speak about what they consider the truth. The government provides opinion and theory, these individuals in the video provide evidence. Who should we believe?

Thank you so much for posting this video! I have sent it on.

YOU'RE HURTING RON PAUL'S CHANCES AT ...

Oh. Wait. They already did that.

WELL!

Maybe now we can stop tip toeing like chicken shits around ALL of the conspiracies against Americans.

What do we have to lose?

We're all FED/IRS Complex slaves anyway.

yes, we can talk about 911 again.

I do think it was a good idea to banish such discussions to "off topic" while we were in campaign mode though....
pretty much only HVACTechs and elevator guys have free run in commercial high rises.
hit one up if you have questions.

One of the very few things Dr

One of the very few things Dr Paul and I disagree on, is the account of the official story of 9/11

One world, under government, with power and money for the elite

I think Dr. Paul stays away

I think Dr. Paul stays away from the topic because of the controversy, not nesissarily because he believes the government's story.

To climb the mountain, you must believe you can.

I tend to agree with you on

I tend to agree with you on that, too.

One world, under government, with power and money for the elite

Oh, oh.

Retard alert, retard alert.