-54 votes

Watch out for Oathkeepers.org, psy-ops/ DHS watch behind it

I was going to say watch out for the Oathkeepers.org website, It declares the 10 unconstitutional orders that soldiers can refuse, Not being paranoid but I think it may be a psy-ops to find out who the real patriots are so theyll know who to neutralize first in the event of a revolt, I hope I am wrong but OWS was created apparently by Barry's administration to find out who the dissidents are also, let others know, and keep your eyes

I suggest a leaderless resistance should things go for the worse, can't wait till RP speaks on Leno, so I am optimistic also

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


I'm an active member of Oath Keepers(#012386).
To look back at where we were 30 years ago, and then see the USA as it is today is like viewing the transformation of a Free country in to a socialist government. Little by little our freedoms are being taken away. It starts with little things. Thinks like the mayor of NYC banning "Big Gulp" drinks and cigarettes anywhere. Some of you laugh and say what a joke. But you fail to see the power behind it and how that power is used. When in fact, they are testing the waters to see how far they can push before "the People" start to push back. Then came the March on Wall St. American police beating Americans in the streets to quell the protests. It is websites like this and others that spread rumors and untruths. Perhaps it is actually Homeland Security who sponsors sites like this one? To prevent people from knowing the REAL truth. If any of you have every read "The Art of War" which I know personally is taught at several Military academies including West Point and The Academy at Annapolis. The powers that be will use what ever means open to them to exploit and confuse anyone who objects to their policies and plans. The Art of War is just one such book that is used to teach military officers how to overcome any obstacle or enemy. It is used not only by the military but by many business corporations as well. It's something that everyone who is a patriot should read and apply in their own lives. But getting back to the subject at hand.

It is people like Stewart Rhodes and Sheriff Mack, along with Ron Paul, Pat Buchanan, G. Edward Griffin, Edwin Vieira, Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America, David R. Gillie and now Jesse Ventura who attempt to open the eyes of the American public. They are all to be commended and respected for their dedication and courage to make a stand and expose the truth. I for one, am extremely proud and honored to be a member of Oath Keepers.

But I'm also a first responder and a F.E.M.A. volunteer medic for any possible disasters that may happen in my state. So which side do I support? I believe in helping,and protecting my fellow man, my neighbors,and people who do not have the ability to protect, or help themselves. My first loyalty is to God, Then the Constitution and all that Oath Keepers supports. There is no conflict for me only priorities. Thank you to Stewart Rhodes for his courage and all those at Oath Keepers for trying to bring us together in a common cause. Constitutional Freedoms.
Alex W.

Can't we question here?

Why such a virulent attack for wanting to make sure Oathkeepers is legit?

Aren't we allow to question the "official story" here?

Sorry but the attacks for just questioning are chillingly reminiscent of other sites where the status quo is not to be questioned.

I find it interesting how quickly Stewart Rhodes was made available

Some folks have raised legitimate concerns re Oathkeepers on other boards. THey can express that.

Truth doesn't fear scrutiny. Fierce opposition to scrutiny is a sign of deceit.



Oath Keepers is legit.

Oath Keepers is legit.

Cyril's picture



We, civilians, will need TO BE FRIENDS WITH and SUPPORTIVE OF the Oath Keepers, maybe sooner rather than later :




OP : I think you're confused. Refer to my prior comment. Only a fool would disagree with the 10 points of the Oath Keepers (points that I warmly embrace !), against oppressive orders which would possibly come from bloodthirsty traitors above them.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius


How dare you put this post up !! Did you call Stewart Rhodes ?? do you have any FrICKING EVIDENCE?? NO?? JUST YOUR WEAK ASS ACCUSATIONS ??


Why don't you call him up? why don't you do some of your own homework?

Let me tell you Stewart Rhodes has put himself on the line. Yo think the government likes him? THEY MUST HATE HIM!! He brings real constitutional issues to the conversation to both the general public ,as well as the military, police ,fire, nat. guard, etc...

He brings a topic that perhaps in the future may save lives. Even one as small as yours.

You should delete this thead, and replace it with an apology thread to Stewart Rhodes..... or INTERVIEW HIM! FIND SOME DIRT SHOW US ANYTHING TO BACK UP YOUR PARANOIA!

Dont get your balls in an uproar

I talked to him, I let him know, I have every right to ask anything I want, consistency is in my posts towards aiding the movement, If I see him personally Ill let him know it was me asking, At this time his response to my post was appropriate, you think I suddenly feel bad about it? I chose to post it, that was my decision, I knew Ill get feedback, good or bad, so Im living with it, We have the right especially at these times to ask who is who, If i change anything on this post then it means I went back on my beliefs, sorry I dont do that

They shouldn't fear scrutiny

If they are entirely on the up and up.

The nature of the attacks to your hypothesis strengthens my doubts re Oathkeepers. I question everything in today's times. Those who attack those who question is reminiscent of those who scream racism if you question Obama or Nazi if you question Israel.

BTW, try questioning Zionism on Oathkeepers. You can bash anything on the Oathkeeper site, just not Zionism. That is cause for pause.

And so it begins.

It's only fitting because they are on the front line.

I will agree in part to your last statement..

"I suggest a leaderless resistance"

Patriot Cell Service.
"When you want to really reach out and touch someone"

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

Actually it was a question, no one was blasting them

understand that this may be the last time we can make a stand in history, so I think its alright to ask who is for Liberty, and who is looking to round people up, I do say Oathkeepers do exist, there are millions the government cant find, but I still keep to my belief that It was alright to ask this question, Not looking to put fear or strife, My history on here shows that

None of what you posted was posed as a question.

You gave an opinion that you thought they might not be on the up and up.

I'm leery of everything that could threaten this cause, especially organizations, but until there is evidence to the contrary they're one of the front lines of protection for us.

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

Debbie's picture

They might be, but they are not.

They might be, but they are not.


On the right track

I think PatriotEyes may be inadvertently on to something. There are websites that are watched by other entities. DHS watches sites that center around areas of suspicion listed by the Southern Poverty Law Center etc.

There are fusion centers everywhere and now the NSA is building that huge intelligence gathering facility in Utah. http://publicintelligence.net/ufouo-dhs-project-12-report-cr... There's no doubt in my mind they are monitoring the OathKeepers site, & even this one. I would certainly hope that the sites' Back doors are closed and locked up tight.

Back in 2009 DHS was seeking computer hackers ("cyber experts"). What was the real reason? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/18/homeland-security-d...

We definitely know they got in the back door of FaceBook when they arrested Brandon Raub based on his Private posts between his siblings.

To me this is the ONLY way OathKeepers could even slightly be considered psy-ops, but then that would make the DP & other Patriot/Liberty sites psy-ops too. That's not right.

now I'm gonna upvote :)

... cause Stewart popped in to say hi. Hi Stewart ... nice to have you here brother. One area of psy-ops by government clickers is to stir up division. In today's world division is everywhere and certainly getting a little more sophisticated and more evil. Behind this campaign against liberty you'll find the super-wealthy so-called "elite" eugenics cult and behind them there's likely something even darker, kinda like that huge ball of fire in the movie "Fifth Element".

Here on Earth we see scary advances in robot-warrior technology: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/24/every_friday_is_robo...

... at the same time rumors of foreign troops massing inside our borders and inside word that a new false-flag is "going hot": http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/6640#more-6640

... as the Persian Gulf is on a hair-trigger: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2012-09/06/content_157377...

... the rumors of Obama playing the old "October surprise" card have plenty of dots being connected. If a new massive false-flag attack occurs the Oathkeepers and all patriots may be all that stand between our seemingly peaceful nation and total despotism beyond comprehension:

Imagine smart bombs being delivered to your doorstep by unmanned Reaper drones. Imagine unmanned 18-wheelers pull into your little peaceful town like the beginning of "Red Dawn" then the back door swings open and robot dogs designed to hunt humans autonomously run out the back and begin killing all life. Then you'll need to watch "Terminator" for the hellish nightmare that would be "the land formerly known as the USA"...

Thanks for all that you are doing on the "front lines" in our campaign for liberty. Let's get "A Noble Lie" into the hands of all law enforcement officers across the country.

This is Stewart Rhodes. So,

This is Stewart Rhodes. So, upon what do you base your contention that my org "might be psy-ops or DHS behind it?" Anything at all? Do you have a secret-squirrel"inside source" in DHS that says so, or is this just you spouting off with nothing to back up your claims? As someone else here said, makes as much sense for us to say we should watch out for YOU. You might be a psy-ops or have DHS behind you. Maybe you are here to undermine my mission by getting Ron Paul supporters to not help me reach out to the troops. Doesn't feel good to have people call your integrity into question, based on pure conjecture, does it?

If you are going to impugn the honor of other men, have the personal integrity, and the personal, physical courage to do it face-to-face. I speak all over the country, and no doubt you can attend one of my public appearances and look me in the eye and say it to my face. I invite you to do so.

Now, as to the idea that "hey, it just has to be a fly-paper operation, because what better way is there for the powers that be to find out who will disobey them" here is my response:

As someone else already alluded to, we see what we are doing as being like an iceberg. There is the very necessary, visible tip of current serving who openly join Oath Keepers. That visible tip let's the bad people in power know we are not fooling around, and that there are Oath Keepers in the ranks. But then there is the vast, unseen, unquantifiable mass under the surface who DO NOT join, but who hear our message and take their oaths seriously. They are hard to locate, and hard to purge out of the ranks, and most importantly, the powers that be cannot measure with any accuracy, how big that mass is. It cannot be easily quantified, and thus they cannot accurately account for it, or war-game for it. They have a hard time planning around it, because they don't know how big it is, or where they are. THAT IS HOW I LIKE IT. That's the whole point.

My goal is not to get all of the current serving who are awake and aware to join Oath Keepers. My goal is to wake all of the current serving up, and get them to study the Constitution and draw some serious lines in the sand, in advance. I don't want them all to join. That would make it too easy to purge them.

Those who want to join, and take an overt leadership position, are welcome to. Everyone else, just keep their dang oath when the chips are down, and I will be pleased as punch.

Stewart Rhodes

You Swore an Oath to the Constitution ... Not the Politicians.

Guardians of the Republic, Honor Your Oath. Join Us.


Cyril's picture

Hi Stewart,This is for us all, dear patriot :

Hi Stewart,

This is for us all, dear patriot :


Please feel free to contribute your links to me directly any time.

We need to get rid of those placeholders ASAP.

For Liberty !

God Bless.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

Hi Stewart! Keep fighting the good fight!

We are all Oath Keepers here!

Release the Sandy Hook video.

I could care less if it was downvoted -1000

As for having impugning honor of other men I find it quite interesting, I have the individual liberty and right to question everything and anything, And from constant posting one should realize I chose Liberty, one of the points the movement teaches is that your belief may be unpopular, but you still have to run with it, like RP was labelled as, yes, As I suggested, facts are needed IF it is a claim, but There is nothing wrong with verifying with others what source is real and who is a shadow, I AM ONE WHO FACES DEATH, AND I GUARENTEE YOU I AM READY TO DIE FOR THIS,MORE THAN YOU CAN FATHOM", I know this could be the last time free men can make a resistance in history, so if the post impugned you, then you have missed the whole point

How much less could you care?

How much less could you care?

Sorry it doesnt bother me that I asked this

From my posts It doesn't take a genius to see I choose conscience over ignorance, if it bothers so many that I asked this question, that doesnt matter to me, im not here to have my posts voted 500 times, Im not looking for popularity, I asked what I thought is right to, thats my right, no one died, no one got hurt, so respect that, if you think Im a dhs psy-op, all the power to you, I will still sleep sound knowing im not

You said, "I could care less

You said, "I could care less if it was downvoted -1000". I ask you again, how much less could you care?

well yea

Im not here to be popular with votes, It was a serious post, and I understand people are pissed, but the whole point of this post was to remain emotionally consistent and calm no matter who disagrees no matter who swears or curses, it was a test,
yes the subject is touchy, but notice that it was my intention to have my fellow peers talk like this. TPTB have honed that ability to tell the mass something and stick with it, so we should also. and what better way than to be unpopular with your peers, because its the hardest people you can face, justifying was hard, but I had to be consistent and calm, I know oathkeepers are real and out there
its a practice the elite do, thats why they are so successful, and so is Ron Paul, I promise many Liberty lovers still have not understood Ron Paul's views, and his attitude, they still don't understand what it means to be really consistent, there was nothing wrong with my suggestion, and really its only you(as in people) who will choose how to react to others opinions

Should I assume that you are

Should I assume that you are unwilling to answer the question?

enough that others opinions dont bother me

If I know what Im doing is right

I don't think you are

I don't think you are understanding my original question. Once again, you said "I could care less if it was downvoted -1000". Your statement implies that you care a certain amount, but that it would be possible for that amount to be reduced. So let me rephrase my question: How much do you you care, and by how much would it be possible for that amount to be reduced? Further to that, is there some way to quantify care, i.e. is there a unit in which it's measured?

Well if i said it wrong Ill say it again

I dont care enough to the point if ppl swear at me or downvote, because thats not what im here for

deacon's picture

stewart rhodes

i would like to ask a question,
i have sources that have told me the oathkeepers
helped the FEDS in apprehending the july4patriot
charles dyer
namely,aided the FEDS with his whereabouts
i for one have never heard of a federal manhunt
for the bogus charges brought against him
so did what i hear lies? or is there more to it?

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

Provide those sources.

He has never said anything about them doing so.

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

His sources probably are the

His sources probably are the "FEDS".

Support Rand, Amash & other liberty candidates? Check out: http://www.LibertyConservatives.com/

Pleased as Punch

Punch was (and is) a puppet, a character in a children's play. He is contemptuous of all authority, to such an extent that he even beats the constable with his slapstick. When the devil and the hangman Jack Ketch come to get him, he does the same to them. Whap, whap, whap! He is always so pleased with himself that he cries out, "That's the way to do it!"

Ĵīɣȩ Ɖåđşŏń

"Fully half the quotations found on the internet are either mis-attributed, or outright fabrications." - Abraham Lincoln