-27 votes

Ron Paul Revolution: Stopping The Gary Johnson Nonsense

RON PAUL REVOLUTION: Stopping The Gary Johnson Nonsense:

***NOTE***: All Pro-Ron Paul Comments Are Being Voted Down.

That should tell us something. So Obvious.

Very simple:

Go out and ask people who Gary Johnson is.

Good luck out there.

Sure: Gary Johnson is going to defeat both OBAMA and ROMNEY in just a few days.


OBAMA WILL SHRED ROMNEY TO PIECES, and as a consolation prize:



The World Knows This.

They lost THE FUTURE. All The Youth. WE ARE THE FUTURE.



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

To keep pointing out that

Gary Johnson is NOT Ron Paul, that Rand is NOT Ron, that neither one of them are libertarian when it counts and that they are controlled opp. diversions.
What a pain, right? We are not going to make it easy for you to co-opt this forum and movement.

The Libertarian Party has Gary Johnson on the ballot for all...

of us already. 48 states so far and fighting off the Republican Party in the last two states.

I have talked with people about Gary Johnson and told them about his being governor of New Mexico, cutting their taxes and vetoing 750 bills, getting re elected by a landslide as a Republican in a Democrat state. How 43% of each dollar the federal government spends now each day HAS TO BE BORROWED!

How Gary Johnson would cut the budget 43% thus eliminating the deficit right away not in ten years!

How he will eliminate the income tax and abolish the IRS and have a consumption tax of 23% while he cuts out departments and agencies as Ron Paul would have done.


IF there are a couple of million of us between Libertarian Party folks who worked to get him on the ballot and Ron Paul folks who said they will vote for Gary Johnson rather than Romney, then our numbers could double on a daily basis. !,2,4,8, 16,32 million, 64 million. We could grow his support EXPONENTIALLY if each tells another who spreads the word. We DO HAVE THE TIME.

So many people are disinchanted with both Obama and Romney. WE CAN DO IT.

Just tell everyone you meet or do business with and use the internet and facebook and twitter etc.

No Man's need constitutes an obligation on the part of another man to fulfill that need.

Unforutunately I can only

Unforutunately I can only upvote you once, but that post was worth 1,000!!!! I was already charged but you just gave me a boost! ONWARD FOR LIBERTY!!!

Attention CA, IA, WI, VT Ron Paul: Write-In Ballots Now OUT

post here:


"No excuse required" absentee ballots are now available in the states of CA, IA, WI, VT, where write-in votes are definitely counted and Ron Paul is strong. This means that no excuse such as being out of state on election day is required. Absentee write-in ballots provide a paper record of your vote which you can photocopy. The early voting block is expected to be 25% or higher this year.

Ron Paul write-in votes will definitely be counted in these states.

Ron Paul taking a huge write-in vote in these states is fraud proof (because we will have the paper copies to prove a real count of the vote) and will send an Earth-rocking message to the GOP and to the world. NO WE ARE NOT DEFEATED. YOU DID NOT SUCCEED. WE ARE HERE AND YOU WILL NEED TO DEAL WITH US...


Release the Sandy Hook video.

It's Full Court Press. Every which was but loose, for Liberty

The only thing the MSM is worried about is turning out the vote, any vote.

The Great No Show 2012!

Think that would send the world a message.

Free includes debt-free!

I'm inclined to agree that a mass, vocal voting boycott...

...might send a better message to the world, perhaps second only to a "none of the above" voting option.

I find that people don't like to feel like their vote is wasted, so they vote for the choice they think can win, even if they don't really like the candidate they vote for.

There doesn't appear to be a huge amount of visible support for Romney or Obama and people are fed up, even if they haven't figured out the illusion of the party system yet. So "none of the above" has a very good chance of winning. Even if it didn't, it would probably garner a significant enough percentage of the vote to draw worldwide attention.

However, a "none of the above" option would leave people vulnerable because votes can still be tampered with as long as there is not paper ballot with open count.

What is your point?

So what if Johnson doesn't win?

I will have voted for him and it's not my fault that others didn't.

Anyway, what exactly are you trying to say? That we should all vote for Obamney because he is going to win anyway?

This whole topic is retarded.

Do Not Put Wods In My Mouth. REVOLUTION TO YOU.

And I quote you:

"Anyway, what exactly are you trying to say? That we should all vote for Obamney because he is going to win anyway?"

Where have I EVER said that? Hmmmmm?

Have a nice weekend. Thanks for the insults but you are so far below me that I will not respond in kind.


Wisdom Strategies

You voted for "A President."

What part of the recent Presidencies do you support?

Free includes debt-free!


You're gonna have to rephrase that question...

Not sure which nonsense you stopped

but it seems to have kept going in your post.

Michael Nystrom's fists can punch through FUD.

Post makes no sense.

I'll stay in the Republican party as part of that strategy and I'm not sure about Gary Johnson as a vote (maybe), but it doesn't mean I shouldn't support any efforts to raise awareness of liberty issues. I'd like the debates to be open. I'd like the news to be forced by events to discuss Gary Johnson talking points on liberty. You say he can't win as if that is a deciding factor... Even if I don't end up voting for him I still hope for his greatest success possible because more liberty talk and consideration is a good thing and reveals cracks in the existing machinery of power.

You can stay in the GOP...

...and vote for Gary Johnson in this election. I don't understand why some people are acting as though continuing to put liberty candidates into the GOP and voting for Gary Johnson are mutually exclusive. YOU CAN DO BOTH!


You're responding to me because...? I never said they were mutually exclusive and never thought it.

I am sure

He knew that, looked to me like he was merely venting or stating for other peoples benefits or both.

Gary Johnson is a long shot,

Gary Johnson is a long shot, but still a shot. If he can manage to get into the debates, it' a game changer. A nationally televised debate is instant name recognition from that point on. One good showing in a debate could easily propel his number skyward.

I don't know if that will happen, and doubt it will, but it would be a giant leap forward for the Republic. With such restrictions on entry to the presidency that is a real win for liberty to see a third party in the debates yet again.

Perot almost won it. Had the GOP not threatened him and he stayed him, he probably would have.

Commerce with all nations, alliance with none, should be our motto. - T. Jefferson rЭVO˩ution

"Everyone wants to live at the expense of the state. They forget that the state wants to live at the expense of everyone.” - BASTIAT

Gary Johnson Is An Impossible Long Shot.

Gary Johnson Is An Impossible Long Shot.

Just look at us: RON PAUL R[3]VOLUTION.

5 Years building TWO World-Class Presidential Campaigns!

Wisdom Strategies

Impossible you say? Anything

Impossible you say? Anything is possible when you are included in the national debates. Perot was leading the pack before his hiatus from the race.

Commerce with all nations, alliance with none, should be our motto. - T. Jefferson rЭVO˩ution

"Everyone wants to live at the expense of the state. They forget that the state wants to live at the expense of everyone.” - BASTIAT

Like we who had our eyes opened

there are so many who are holding their noses to vote Obama or Romney. Nobody likes them! When they meet someone they really do like, they will jump on board in numbers.

The key to an Obamney victory is to make sure nobody hears Gary Johnson. That's still their focus.

Michael Nystrom's fists can punch through FUD.

You're right about one thing.

Gary Johnson is a WASTE OF TIME!!! Nobody knows who Gary Johnson is, nor, do they care. The Leftist media is having its fun with Romney's 47% comment, that's why he's down in the polls. That will wear off in about a week.

Romney/Ryan 2012!!!


...what the heck are you thinking? How can you have supported Ron Paul and now support the exact opposite of everything he stood for?

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

Nobody knew who Ron Paul was

Nobody knew who Ron Paul was either. Eh, forget it. You having that disgusting Romney/Ryan 2012 shows that you're just in the wrong place. You're a waste of time.

And still nobody would know who Ron Paul is if he had

run as a Libertarian.

Ron Paul Said That Himself About Third Parties.

Ron Paul Said That Himself About Third Parties.

He gave the example or Ross Perot: A BILLIONAIRE!

Ross Perot couldn't do it. So unfortunately Ron Paul had to go with The Republican Party.

I honestly think that if he would have run under the Democrats, he would have won hands down - in 2008.

Obama got the "Anti-War" vote when it should have been Ron Paul the one to get it. Ron Paul wanted to RESTORE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.

I always wondered: Why even try? But that is just me.

Wisdom Strategies

Ross Perot actually could have

done it. Ross Perot took off running and dropped ball midway.
Had Ross Perot not dropped out of the race and re-entered, but stuck it through beginning to end, he very well could have possibly won it.

Ron Paul chose a different and easier route by going Republican in hopes of picking up the R only vote as Ron Paul obviously did not have the $$ or the Air time to convert them to his views.

I remember the Ross Perot adds to this day from when I was a kid. My parents, both Republican diehards voted for him. When you have the money, get the Air Time and have a logical message, anything is possible.

As to Ron Paul winning in 2008 under the Democrats, I doubt it. From what I heard, Hillary suffered nearly the same fate as we did this Primary.

Why try? Because the Rs are already established and it was presumed to be easier than following the footsteps of the L party in trying to be a viable alternative as a 3rd party. It still could be doable if we act together and get our votes quantified. Then we would have some leverage to work with. Till then, we get ridiculed and scoffed at as we have nothing of substance to point to when we make threats, such as not voting for the Establishment favorite...

That's possible but I

That's possible but I disagree. People know who he is because of US. The GRASSROOTS. If we put the same energy and focus on other liberty candidates we can have a similar impact. Our movement has gained a lot of traction, as has the Libertarian Party over the past few years, and much of that is due to Ron Paul and his supporters. Fin.

It's bigger than this

It's bigger than this election. In 2007 we were fighting the same battle and made huge gains since. Why shouldn't we continue to do the same? I'm fighting for liberty, and I'm in it for the long haul.

I didn't realize you don't know what I am talking about

because you weren't around when people were asking "Who is Ron Paul?".

Free and Brave
or Cradle to Grave
You can't have both

The first political sign I ever put up said

"Who is Ron Paul?" I don't see why the next one shouldn't read.
"Who is Gary Johnson?"

Free and Brave
or Cradle to Grave
You can't have both

Do It, But You Better Hurry.

Do It, But You Better Hurry.

Don't forget Massive Multi-Million Dollar Money Bombs and Leasing The Largest Blimp In The World as the icing on the cake.

Wisdom Strategies