38 votes

Here is why people are wrong in supporting traitor Flip Flopney and Paul Ryan for President.

My letter to Dixie-Paleocon, after their appropriately downvoted "reasons" for supporting the Romney/Ryan ticket.

You can see their post here:

http://www.dailypaul.com/252600/i-endorse-and-intend-to-vote...

UPDATE: Here is a reason #5): Anyone who can possibly vote this rigged, fraudulent ticket, including Senator Paul, is sacrificing their principles and bowing down to the throne of Prince Machiavelli.

Remember this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B39W91O-rUg

---------------------------------

1) You are voting against your principles...which kind of cancels out your principles....much like when your VP choice whored himself out on the Congressional floor in defense of TARP (!) to the "madame" Speaker, with one of the WORST breaches of logic in recent history:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4uj59SMdbM

2) You are choosing the "lesser of two evils" (much like Roosevelt sided with Stalin to defeat Hitler)....although, aside from the millions of unborn children slaughtered (which is bad enough), there are not scores of millions currently being starved to death in gulags and, in a lesser number simultaneously roasted in concentration camps in Germany and Poland.

So, in essence, the lesser of two evils is not applicable here because it all balances out. HEAR ME CAREFULLY HERE: Hayek wrote that socialism brings the natural outgrowth of fascism.

And while Flip-Flopney may (may) slow down the socialism (and really straight up communism and marxism of Obama), Flip-Flopney will be powerless to slow down the FASCISM....as he is bought out by the same corporatist overlords that bought out and paid for Obama in 2008.

{And I don't need to refer you to opensecrets.org so you can see who the donors are/were....as I am sure you probably already know who they are.]

The sheer evils of the presidential-assasination wielding, ULTRA neo-con betrayer named Barak Hussein Obama...are now balanced out by the fact that the Romney campaign is now saying that Obama is too weak on foreign policy(!).

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000087239639044450600457761...

HUH?

(How does that offend your principles, Dixie-paleocon, with this bastardization of the peace-loving Old Right? Yeah I thought so. It offends mine, too.)

3) Paul Ryan voted for the NDAA, and then voted AGAINST (against! )the repeal of sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA.

He is no Ayn Rand disciple. Nor is he a "conservative". Voted for Medicare Part D, TARP, and the bailouts.

http://www.dailypaul.com/249218/paul-ryans-atrocious-record-...

4) Flip Flopney has a similar and equally sordid record.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1yY3NCiMVQ

I am not sure what further incontrovertible evidence you need but for all of the foregoing, you are wrong wrong wrong on this...and DULY downvoted.

For Lady Liberty,

Chris
Norfolk, VA

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The Bush tax cuts will expire if Obama remains

in office. Obama will continue to pile on regulation after regulation through executive order. He will appoint one - possibly two more Supreme Court Justices, giving us a nightmare Court like FDR did. Obama will continue his unilateral drone war making the U.S. more enemies in the Middle East. He will likely continue to get us involved militarily in more countries like he has in Libya and Kenya. I fully expect him to use the CIA and military to overthrow Assad if he wins reelection. There is really no difference in his approach toward Iran and Romney's approach to Iran, only a difference in their rhetoric. So, whether we get four more years of Obama or Romney gets elected, the United States is going to continue sanctioning the crap out of the Iranian people, covertly killing their scientists and military personnel, and very possibly provoking them to war.

RomBama's foreign policy is the foreign policy that the majority of the American people want. It will be our foreign policy until the majority of the American people don't want that kind of fp any more. However, Romney is much, much better than Obama on domestic issues. If we're going to get a War-Monger-in-Chief, I'd rather he at least be half-way decent on the economy. Romney, unlike Obama doesn't believe Uncle Sam should take care of us from cradle to grave.

So What?

Right, Barack Obama would have waged just as vicious of a total war against the free and independent people of the Southern states as Abraham Lincoln. So would Romney/Ryan. If Obama think he has the authority to unilaterally murder anyone in the world who represents a threat to his regime, the secession of states on which the federal government and his constituents depend for economic exploitation would have been a crisis. Probably all U.S. presidents since then save for Grover Cleveland would have done the same, however. U.S. presidents, by and large, are a rotten crop of human beings.

This is largely an academic question, and beside the point. Whether Barack Obama is "worse" or "potentially worse" or whatever than Abraham Lincoln is irrelevant. What matters is that Republicans are not any better. If Republicans were truly better defenders of freedom, even marginally, then voting for them may make sense. But the fact is that Republicans are looters and moochers, just like Democrats.

The Republican House of Representatives has not checked Barack Obama at all, not even in the slightest. Not only have they continued to ratify debt-ceiling increases, maintain historically unprecedented levels of spending, and fund the atrocity that is ObamaCare, but Republicans and Democrats both came together to pass the odiously authoritarian National Defense Authorization Act.

"Yesterday we obeyed kings and bent our necks before emperors, but today we kneel only to truth." - Kahlil Gibran

sharkhearted's picture

Self bump.

This message needs to get out there.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.