8 votes

Is Gary Johnson a 9/11 Truther?

I know Ron Paul has courageously said he is in favor of a new investigation. In addition this website has always been in the vanguard of discussing 9/11 truth, which means Dr. Paul won't stop it.

I cannot find any positioning by Gary Johnson on the issue, after extensive google search. Does anyone have any public statements?

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'm against any kind of tax payer funded investigation

of 9/11 as I don't think it will ever find the truth and it would probably go on for at least a decade.

I don't believe the official version and I don't believe most of the conspiracies either.

for 911 Truth.

-1. share with us your intuitive guess or feeling, any hunches.
911 deserves some thought & investment, for justice & settling.


Spoken like a true politician. haha kidding. I think I get what your saying.

I'm a Truther - PERIOD.

9/11 or otherwise. I want the truth to come out on every issue. The official story has even been debunked by most of the people who WROTE IT.

I'm a Gary Johnson supporter but I'm not a DEMON OCRACY supporter so I do not "register to vote" and grant power of attorney to a "representative."

I'm legally/lawfully free... just like the founders intended me to be.

Judge Napolitano is a truther...

and he supports Gary Johnson

Jesse Ventura is a truther...and he supports Gary Johnson

I am a 911 truther...and I support Gary Johnson

Well said brother

Thank you.

My friend who is dying of cancer is a member of pilots for 911 Truth and supports Gary.

Under Gary's administration we can have a new investigation (truly independent one).

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

Denise B's picture

I find it very

telling that the apparent GJ supporters on this thread also seem to question whether or not 911 was an inside job....very interesting indeed..

don't do that

Don't put everyone into categories! There are no GJ Supporters and RP supporters! We all support liberty here, and I supported Ron Paul all the way up until after the convention, and now I am voting for GJ, and that is my choice to move forward the cause of liberty. So, to say that I am a GJ supporter is true at this point, but I did support RP, and I still would be a RP supporter if he was on the ballot. I am sure there are plenty of others here that came to the same decision. We all have slightly different points of view on who we support, whether or not 911 was an inside job or not, but as long as we all support bringing back the Constitution as law of the land, and returning our liberties, we should be attacking each other with insignificant differences.

Denise B's picture

You're right...

I do try not to categorize everyone and should have phrased my statement differently...What I found interesting was that the question was whether or not Gary Johnson was a 911 truther and no one seemed interested in addressing that question, but rather responded that they themselves were truthers and supported GJ, or else seemed to question the 911 truth movement in general, but none of that addresses the initial question, which was whether or not GJ was a 911 truther. I find that a valid question because it goes to the heart of foreign policy perspectives and nobody seems willing to provide (or perhaps even knows) an answer to that question, but it is one that I would be interested in having answered.

9/11 "goes to the heart of foreign policy perspectives..."

...beautifully put. Also Constitutional perspectives. If you truly believe the official story then perhaps their is a need to torture people occasionally...

Release the Sandy Hook video.


Not me.

9/11 was an inside job and all my many friends agree and all of them support Gary Johnson for president.

P.S. We might have some Romney team here on DP.
Attacks against GJ benefit ONLY Romney!

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

Ron Paul is...

...a 9/11 Truther? I haven't seen or heard any statements of his regarding that. All I've ever seen or heard him say is that he believes what happened on 9/11 was blowback from our government's constant meddling in other countries' internal affairs.

If anyone has a link that shows that he thinks 9/11 could have been an inside job, if you would please provide it, I'd appreciate it. Thanks.


I haven't seen that before. Interesting.

myself 9/11 Truther and

George my friend from pilotsfor911truth we both support Gary Johnson!

9/11 section on my website:

Gary Johnson section:

President Gary Johnson is my friend.
And I say screw the Goldman Sachs candidates!

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

Nope, that's one area where GJ

has more sense than most of his supporters. Al Qaeda was responsible for 9/11. Political correctness and the fear of "racially profiling" helped the hijackers tremendously. There were several warning flags sent to the FBI, but, they refused to investigate because they didn't want to appear to be targeting one particular demographic.

There you go. Tim Johnson supports the fable of Ali Baba

Laden and His 19 Hijackers. Let's have him do a bedtime story reading.

Release the Sandy Hook video.

When you are taking on 2 parties

who both have "players" up to their eyeball in the events of 9/11, it probably wouldn't be wise to voice that you suspect them of murder.
Having said that, I think he is too weak to tackle it head-on.

I agree .


Doesn't sound like a truther


I'm pretty disappointed in his statement regarding how our troops are fighting to keep us safe.

I have come out on this site saying I would now vote for GJ, but statements like this show he is no Ron Paul. I wish I had another option that would make an impact.

With liberty and justice for all...who can afford it.

In other words he is a coward. Dr. Paul is on record

favoring a new investigation.

Release the Sandy Hook video.

Who cares?

Who cares? How about discussing something important?


you don't care about a false flag attack which killed 3,000

Americans in cold blood? Are you even American? I doubt it.

Release the Sandy Hook video.

Typical touchy , feely...

Typical touchy feely and aim for the emotional button. Try to put someone on the defensive technique. Sorry it doesn't work on me, maybe it will work on some bleeding heart liberals, they fall for that crap all the time. If you are that committed to that issue do something about it instead of trying to play holier than thou with me. I have a thick skin and I am not impressed.


But you don't any proof...

...just speculation. Yes, it looks fishy but let's not do what non liberty minded folks do and just look at one side of a coin and make a rash judgement as if fact regardless where the evidence points, the bottom line is that there is no proof and so we shouldn't state it as fact when it is merely faith and gut feelings. Therefore I don't think it's that important as other issues right now

Ron Paul 2012

No proof of what?


There is abundant physical proof!

1700+ Architects and Engineers would beg to differ...

It just takes a willingness to open your eyes and let it in.


Chemistry and Physics are NOT "...just speculation"

I've seen their "Explosive Evidence" documentary

It's very well put together but also completely one-sided.

Everyone acts shocked about the "free fall" collapse of towers 1 and 2 but there's no mention of the point that steel beams are built to support the floors above, not catch them when they are dropped from of a height of 10+ meters. There's a major paper that concludes that even if the upper floors dropped only half a meter it would overwhelm the support structure and create an accelerating cascade.

To me ignoring that is disingenious and casts doubt on the other claims about building 7 and "micro-spheres". I'm glad someone pursues these matters though.

Yes they were built to "catch them." This is one of the

favorite pseudo-science explanations for the magic show. Chief design engineer John Skilling and Chief construction engineer Frank Demartini both said the towers were designed to take multiple jetliner hits. That would include any consequences of the hits, including "catching" partial collapses as you so childishly describe it.


Release the Sandy Hook video.

Try this

With cardboard boxes, wire mesh, popsicle sticks, plastic boxes, whatever. Shape it into two scale boxes in the proportions of the lower half and upper portion of the trade center at the point of impact. Then you can drop the top box onto the bottom from a distance even greater than the proportional drop of the building and it will not crush the material. Hell you can even use folded paper boxes. It doesn't matter the weight or material, the proportion of top to bottom mass is the same whether its paper or the tallest building in the world. So you can build a model with practically anything that will hold the weight of the box above, but an engineer can't design a building to to do the same thing?
As the force came down on the floor below the that floor would try to resist the load. The bulding is designed for an enormous live load in the event that every floor was packed with people and equipment. It would have provided some resistance and even if it failed it would have slowed the fall. This would occur at every single floor.This would have prevented freefall speed from occuring.

The only way columns would have to "catch" all the above weight is if every single structural column failed at the exact same moment. Fires spread, and even if we assume the temps of the jetfuel were high enough to melt steel, which it should not have been, then a fire would melt different columns as it spread. So you would get a progressive column failure from a fire. This would result in an initial collapse in only the areas that failed first, and would cause a lean to the upper area which should have sent it toppling over rather than straight down through the floors below.