The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!
120 votes

Brian Lilley: The MSM is lying about the Muslim riots

This reporter from Canada says something interesting.

Great evidence to show to the sheep.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Cyril's picture

Wait ! The MSM is lying about the Muslim riots...

Wait !

The MSM is lying about the Muslim riots ... ONLY ?!


Dude, I thought they were lying pretty much about anything and everything and most of the time, except for a few involuntary hiccups of accuracy by Freudian slips !

'Guess I was wrong. Dang.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

The MSM is lying about the Muslim riots

They occasionally get a sports score right - but not even the weather!

Cyril's picture

Lol. Exactly. Sports do matter !

Lol. Exactly.

Sports do matter !

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

What they don't lie about is a short list.

Most the time there is nothing on it.

Free includes debt-free!

So when high financiers and bankers and politicians told us what

they were going to do, and how they were going to do it - when they said they were going to transform the Soviet Union and the US so one day they "could be comfotably merged", when they told us they were going to institute a world government and dissolve the nation state - with a series of world wars, and if that failed, by using terrorism, and if that failed, by using economic collapse, and if that fails, by using a manufactured threat of an ET invasion, and when we they said they were going to conduct regime change in the middle east and Africa, but only if a "catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor" were to happen, and then when these people get into power and that event happens, and they begin implementing their plans....

We're supposed to believe that everything ELSE this jerk reports is just "spontaneous coincidence?"

Or perhaps, we should heed his point, and he should admit, that much more of what you see in the world is planned by nefarious plots by evil doers, than what he cares to even contemplate.

"MSM doesn't like Israelis" ?

"MSM doesn't like Israelis" ? huh? Blaming it on a language barrier?

The govt doesn't like the truth.

Language was brought up because it is a communication barrier. We are given the footage of events with flags and signs and the msm and govt officials are making up the messages. They know people are getting sick of war and rethinking our destructive foreign policy, so they mislead people about the true origins of the outrage so that they can continue their operations.

Yeah, that anti-Israeli,

Yeah, that anti-Israeli, pro-Islam media isn't promoting war with Iran with enough enthusiasm. Something must be done, pass another law!

gold = money
war = health of the state
liberty = prosperity


to view later

Jackson County Georgia

War is an instrument entirely inefficient toward redressing wrong; and multiplies, instead of indemnifying losses.
Thomas Jefferson

Well that explains

the headlines of...the govt. was planned...the govt did not know...we were surprised..etc.. This makes more sense.

The MSM lies about everything

It is their job.

At least we can observe them to find out where the next war will be or what the latest infringement on our civil liberties is. Lying requires more lies, eventually trapping the liar in their own web of deception.

Our job is to call them out for their blatant lies.

The SUN here in Canada is like a tabloid

it's for a lower demographic that care more about sports and the day's Sunshine Girl (a "model" featured in every issue sporting a bikini and "casual" attire on this inside front and back covers) than they do about real news. To see this as a TV network is like getting your news from USWeekly or InStyle, etc.

Pointing the finger at what other networks are doing isn't really stating what you stand for. People need to be mindful that mainstream media on a global level is suffering and they are trying to hook some of the new truth seekers with this type of vague "objectiveness" to world events where they can still spoon feed them a healthy dose of disinformation.

This video told me nothing my common sense didn't tell me already.

"We are not human beings having a spiritual experience; we are spiritual beings having a human experience"—Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

The British Sun is a centrist

The British Sun is a centrist newspaper, and Britain is more socially tolerant than Canada.

Support Rand, Amash & other liberty candidates? Check out:

We're not that lax though, but more so than North America.

The Sun reminds me of papers from 1984 actually. Trash churned out for "Proles". I wonder if Murdock read it and thought Brits might pay for that.

Out side of soft porn mags page three is the single place nipples where are allowed out, it's pretty weird. Especially seeing as it was the Neo-con Murdock's doing.

It has to be past 9.00 on tv and any ad's showing nipples get complaints. Not like in France or Germany where full frontal is shown midday?!

Europeans think Brits are prudes, we think they're mentalists...

Murdoch is well to the left

Murdoch is well to the left of the neo-cons. He backed Tomy Blair in the UK, Gough Whitlam in Australia, and supported the Labour Parties of both the UK and Australia while in college. He held a fundraiser for Hillary Clinton's re-election bid, but in the Democratic primaries in 2007, came out in support of far-left candidate Barack Obama. He supported Bloomberg for Mayor of NYC. This year, he's bashing Romney from the left, accusing him of listening too much to the "far-right" (which is probably indirectly a dig at Tea Partiers and libertarians like Rand Paul or Connie Mack.)

The whole notion that Murdoch is an "ultra capitalist" is a lie perpetrated by the leftist MSM. He supports candidates on both sides through different media - WSJ talks about how great Romney is, New York Post talks about how great Obama is, etc. He supports socialized healthcare among other left wing policies.

If Rand Paul is the 2016 Republican nominee, watch how fast Murdoch runs back over to the Dems. He'll probably leave FOX News backing Rand, but the rest of the empire will quickly swing back over to the side of Hillary or whoever else the Dem nominee is.

Support Rand, Amash & other liberty candidates? Check out:

This is not the Toronto Sun

This is not the Toronto Sun newspaper. Sun Media only owns 49% of the Sun News Network, they are not the same. The news channel is a lot more socially conservative than the newspaper.

Support Rand, Amash & other liberty candidates? Check out:

ecorob's picture

sounds like you don't like the message so...

you will shoot the messenger!

we've seen this tactic before...sit your ass down, ninja, and stfu

you had your two minutes and you wasted are irrelevent now!

also sounds like you are out of touch, condescending, and a "tool" of the ignorance of the times

Ron Paul
I like Brian Lilley!

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Looks like someone needs a schooling

First, I have worked in the Canadian advertising industry for the last decade and have worked for clients such as The Globe and Mail, National Post and the Toronto Star to name a few so I believe I know a thing or two about how the media covers issues even being able to "read between the lines" of very carefully crafted news reports such as the above. Sure, there is a lot or relevant things that Brian brings to light but it's still done in that same and tired "tactic" of a dash of truth to later "bait and switch" it for some propaganda. Rachel Maddow is a good example. You think they're on you're side a bit... but not really. I'm simply reminding people to be wary and vigilant about mainstream sources seeming to be on the people's side. They're really not no matter how you feel about the above report.

Second, you know what I think is MORE IRRELEVANT? It's YOUR condescending ignorant use of the English language where you yourself wasted your two minutes to call me a "tool" rather than contributing to the conversation in a respectful and positive way. You seem to not really grasp the idea of liberty expressed through the opinions of others. But you see, unlike you, I won't use this opportunity to call you names and make no contribution to this conversation—I will use it to show you my appreciation for giving me a reason to better illustrate my point.

So, Thank you.

"We are not human beings having a spiritual experience; we are spiritual beings having a human experience"—Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

Still a neocon...

This network and reporter are a "kill the brown people" crowd.

This is my opinion from somewhat limited viewing. Notice he doesn't say anything about not getting involved.

How can you be sure? I didn't

How can you be sure? I didn't hear him advocating an interventionist foreign policy. Chuck Baldwin has been very critical of Muslims too, you can't call him a neo-con at all.

Also a lot of the extreme neo-cons aren't openly anti-Islam at all, they claim to be helping the Middle Eastern people rise up against the dictators and the like. Remember how frequently McCain, one of the biggest proponents of interventionism in Libya went after those in his own party who criticized Islam, yet voted against the Libyan intervention.

Being an Islam critic doesn't make you one of them at all.

Support Rand, Amash & other liberty candidates? Check out:

ecorob's picture

i respect your observation, sc...

however, i am still glad this is out there!

its a start

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.


What an excellent find eeeeee

"If you want something you've never had before, you have to do something you've never done before." Debra Medina

Thank you for filling in the gaps.

Thank you for putting this up. I'm at that stage of cynicism/understanding of the world now that I didn't believe for a moment that a You Tube video was the source of the rioting. But I didn't know what was. This video has filled in some gaps for me.

seems there was another video involved

An immediate effect of al-Zawahiri's video was that an angry armed mob, led by Islamist outfit Ansar al Sharia, set fire to the US consulate in Benghazi. The US ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, was killed. It didn't matter that Stevens happened to be a hero of the "NATO rebels" who had "liberated" Libya - notoriously sprinkled with Salafi-jihadis of the al-Libi kind.

Is Muhammad Movie a Contrived Fraud?

Bizarre story behind film that supposedly sparked middle east unrest and conceals the true narrative behind these attacks.

"One resists the invasion of armies; one does not resist the invasion of ideas" Victor Hugo

Looks like it's time to start

Looks like it's time to start cracking down on what gets posted on the internet now isn't it?

a Canadian Ben Swann

Now we need one like him in every country.
Thank you Brian Lilley!

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison

He's No Swan

Sun News is basically Fox News Canada. This guy is a hardcore neo-con.

reedr3v's picture

If so that is disappointing. This one isolated

news report looked so promising.