103 votes

The Smoking Gun. WTC7 taken down by CONTROLLED demolition. WTC1 and WTC2 as well. What are we to make of this?

Controlled demolition.

In case you have not seen the new documentary, where now thousands of structural engineers, architects, chemical engineers, and physicists are going on record that IT IS NOT PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE that those three buildings could have been brought down by office fires, or by even high-impact 767 crashes in regards to WTC1 and WTC2. (You can watch that documentary when you have time here:)

http://video.cpt12.org/video/2270078138/

All...I repeat all...of the three buildings brought down that day...comprising the worst structural "failures" in world history...were done by CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

Incontrovertible. Irrefutable.

And extremely high-tech, high energy military grade explosives which are able to melt steel in a flash, were used.

This is now, without question.

We have solved the what. Now we turn to the how...and then the WHO.

But the government's official accounts, the FEMA and the NIST reports, are so ridden with fraud, gross negligence, and pseudoscience, that those reports...are CRIME SCENES in and of themselves.

We need to start prosecuting right there and then work our way up...but I digress...

3000 innocent citizens and first responders have died! Who will speak for them?? Who will bring them justice??

And hundreds of thousands of family members and friends to the victims who carry the pain with them to this day...deserve a right to know what happened... rather than being insulted by these incompetent, taxpayer-funded government-sponsored cover-ups to the scene of the worst mass murder in American history.

WTC7 was demolished differently than the Twin Towers: All or most of its basement supports were severed at once....as evidenced by the free fall, or fall at the speed of gravity with no resistance, of the first 108 feet.

In other words, 108 feet, you know, 8 to 10 stories of the building of the lower floors, just ceased to exist in an instant.

Where did they go? Did those floors slip into a parallel universe?

Or were they blown to smithereens?

Certainly the truth...wherever it may lie...is not the, fake, forced, fraudulent model reconstruction that NIST (MIST?) tried to shove down the throats of the American taxpayer, $22 Million Dollars later!

As to the destruction of the WTC1 and WTC2 towers...two of the STRONGEST vertical structures on Earth...the entire buildings were laden with nano-thermite, with complete destruction set to begin just below the airplane impact zones, and timed to look like a "normal" gravitational collapse.

It was a brilliant execution.

[Except there is no such thing as a "normal gravitational collapse." Asymmetrical damage (the jet impacts)...can not lead to a symmetrical global collapse. Physically impossible.]

You heard the first collective shaped charge "ka-POW" of the south tower floors being blown apart just below the jet impact area, then the explosions of the other successive floors were timed and were increasingly masked by the continuous roar of the massive demolition wave which gained velocity and amplitude as it plummeted to Earth.

Very clever.

But, eyes don't deceive...and ears don't....thanks to the advent of cameras and cell phone cameras.

Complete gravitational collapse on super-highrises from office fires no matter how hot?

Doesn't happen.

Has never happened in the nearly 100 years of high-rise history.

Will never happen in the future, as long as the Laws of Physics apply....which they will forever.

Unless thermite is involved.

Which may explain the molten iron in a sheer 'waterfall' of molten metal off of the south tower as its upper 30 floor block begins to deform and rotate down, but a block no more, its angular momentum of all that incredible mass, suddenly neutralizing into dust...as the "collapse" accelerates in earnest, traveling down the former path of MOST resistance (the core) that in seconds has become--by being blown to bits--the NEW path of LEAST resistance.

Hmmm. 30 stories pulverized into powder in two seconds. Very strange.

The path of MOST resistance...becoming the path of LEAST resistance. Very strange.

Molten iron. Very strange.

What possibly could turn most of the mass of 350 vertical feet of an acre-sized building, into wisps, in a few seconds? Or melt its steel columns in the same??

Must be something...of course NOT mentioned in the taxpayer funded NIST and FEMA and 9/11 Commission Reports.

Here is the smoking gun to how the controlled demolition was set up...innocuously...with unrecognizable boxes of military-grade super-thermite sol-gel shaped charges, placed in the core areas hidden from the office tenants, against the bare columns in and around the elevator banks.

Super-thermite melts steel with incredible temperature and exrtreme levels of energy.. and pulverizes the concrete and the non-steel contents in mid-air, as Towers 1 and 2 come down.

Literally all of the floor concrete, gypsum wallboard, and FF&E, including elevators and HVAC equipment... for 110 stories of each building, an enormous weight, was pulverized to a toxic powder as fine as talcum, in mid air in seconds...and it spread out like a volcanic pyroclastic flow, over lower Manhattan...while the melted and distorted steel frames, collapse in a heap below.

Watch another the 18 minute presentation here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3EQV223Y-M&feature=g-user-u



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Psst ... Fireant ...

... here's a 14-minute video that shows why the government's conspiracy theory is ... IMPOSSIBLE.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QWvkAgyIY4&feature=channel&l...

Let us know if you can refute the points made.

sharkhearted's picture

This one is a tour de force.

Going to repost it up top. Thank you.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

sharkhearted's picture

Pollman has provided these links. Definitely worth the view....

No need to go to the movies tonight or turn on the boob tube.

All you gotta do is pop some popcorn and view these. Thanks Pollman!

North Tower Exploding
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSApOavkHg8

Cutter Charges in the North Tower of the World Trade Center
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoAD8HlrLZg

Firemen Explosion Testimony
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO1ps1mzU8o

Firefighters for 9-11 Truth RECORDED EXPLOSION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W902B6obIqM

AE911Truth's EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW!
Tom Sullivan
Former Explosives Loader for Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg

Did NIST Edit WTC 7 Footage To Hide Evidence Of Implosion? Yes...
http://www.infowars.com/did-nist-edit-wtc-7-footage-to-hide-...

WTC 7 Collapse Compilation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWorDrTC0Qg

New Footage of WTC 7 Collapse Controlled Demolition Unseen Rare (charge flash at 4 seconds)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cm7aGzubz9A

Demolition Flashes At 8 Seconds Visible at South Tower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=170XJFF2KTQ

WTC 7 Explosion
Explosion heard at 0:11 mark, just before east penthouse collapse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrnmbUDeHus

Building 7
1:01 Remedial building fires for slow learners...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Eyewitesses in WTC7

Reported explosions in the lobby, and elsewhere within the building. Silverstein said to "Pull It." But the 9/11 commission didn't mention anything like that - it said the building dropped into it's own footprint in realtime because of some fires in the building. Those are the facts - like it or not.

sharkhearted's picture

Multiple reports of explosions....

Thank you for your comments! AGREED.

Even though the top qualified controlled demolition expert in the world (his dad invented the concept) CDI president Mark Loizeaux....derides those report (of explosions)...basically making a mockery of hundreds of first responders and eye witnesses on that day.

That, in and of itself, is an extreme insult to those that have died....and should be sufficient grounds to investigate this individual.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vhy22V_95p0

And this guy was brought in to get rid of the evidence....two days after the disaster...when what he was basically contracted to do, was destroying the evidence of a mass murder crime scene...and so that should not be considered a HIGH crime, in and of itself???

So many unanswered questions....

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

fireant's picture

Please prove "impossible".

The burden of proof is yours; you made the claim.
Have you ever stopped to consider how they may have collapsed due to the airplane strikes? Really think it through?
That is the main point I am trying to make here. By claiming it impossible, you eliminate all conclusions except the one you have drawn. I have never known that to be a recipe for finding truth.

Undo what Wilson did

 

Proven impossible here: http://heiwaco.tripod.com/tower.htm

fireant's picture

Thank you for removing the childish personal attacks

.

Undo what Wilson did

 

 

Jefferson's picture

El Buggo

I've seen you roll out this theory over the years whenever a 9/11 topic is brought up. I've also seen you pushing it on youtube under the same name.

I can't believe I'm even entertaining this theory, but I have some questions. There are definitely some anomalies in the footage of the impacts that day. I'm just trying to get a handle on what exactly it is you believe.

Do you believe:

A) That holograms were projected over cruise missiles that impacted the buildings, or that planes were superimposed over cruise missiles in a film studio, and that actors were used make people believe that planes went into the sides of the buildings? If it is the latter, then why would an actor say they saw a grey military plane with no windows, instead of saying it was an American Airlines jet?

B) That the ENTIRE collapse sequence of the buildings was faked, and all of the thousands of people running around were actors and extras participating in the most elaborate film set known to man? If this was all a Hollywood production as you claim, then what happened to the buildings? Why would this elaborate video they created, show explosive squibs of material coming out much faster than the upper floors of the building were coming down, making it look like a controlled demo?

C) Was all of the clean up faked as well? All of the dumptrucks leaving with material, and people standing along the road cheering them on, just a bunch of actors as well? Where did they get all of these oddly twisted steel columns, and masses of fused material? Are those just props too?

D) You claim that there weren't any lists of the people who died that day. I have a personal family friend who was killed that day. They had a funeral for him, and his family (and we) definitely think he's dead. Where is he, because his wife and family would surely like to know.
http://memorial.mmc.com/pgBio.php?ID=195

Do you think that I am one of the "actors" because I enquire about our family friend?

E) You say that the burned out cars and trucks were just "distractions." Was someone going around with a can of gas lighting these vehicles on fire, or was this also done in a studio? Where is this studio BTW?

Surely you see how asinine this looks at face value. I would like to give you a chance to give a detailed explanation of WHAT you think happened, HOW they pulled it off, and WHY they did it that way so we can finally put this to bed. I don't want short cryptic answers. I want a detailed accounting, please.

Hi Jefferson,

Thank you for your very excellent questions. I appreciate it, really.

A) Holograms are something wild and unproven. An obvious distraction strategy, and can discredit everyone that accepts and promotes it. As the project manager for this operation, I really cant see why I should need missiles. Would add risk to this operation and could just create a mess. Really cant see why I should need or want them at all. Lets fake it instead. The animation team can easily fake some planes anyway, really simple. Yes, after the first hit we need someone that can confirm the rumors so that we can get the story on the right track. I think we have to use some of our own people here (please watch this review of the first eye witnesses on TV: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuB4jLAuVLk )

"They saw a grey military plane" etc? I think this is very important part of the trick. If we create lots of different leads, it will be harder for the public to unite behind a common platform. We will argue day and night for years. Most people will be exhausted and confused, and after a while give us up and go with the largest group (that media will create) like sheep. Accepted: "planes crashed into buildings and killed 3000 Americans. We must support WoT, etc". We argue day and night, and have way to complicated stories with way to many elements. That way, we would have a hard time creating the largest group (that the sheep will follow). I’m sure others have better ideas here than me.

B)Yes, we have to fake that part too. We cant reveal how we really blew up the buildings. Besides, the animation team can create something much more spectacular. We like that. Have to broadcast it lots of times and people really have to get it. Someone from the horror movie business have to assist I suggest. The Independence Day (1996) team were pretty good. We need something more than a boring puff. People must see how horrible it is.

As project manager for this operation, I'm really pleased how far we have come in this operation without killing anyone. Because it is simply a bad strategy. It is much harder to recruit the people we do need when it involves a conspiracy to murder. The producers at Fox wouldn't like to be involved in that! And even I as the project manager could be black mailed! And get angry banksters families with access to Uptown lawyers chasing us? No thanks! The Statue of Limitations for insurance fraud in New York is 5 years, and I'm sure we can delay the investigation that long. Illegal demolitions of buildings without permit? 2 years? All the actors and producers and many other have their actions protected as Free Speech if busted. Fake news isn't illegal at all. Killing is the bad strategy and I will not be project manager with such unnecessary risks. Lets fake it all!

The thousands of people? I haven’t counted, but I will guess a few hundred was sufficient. Not all actors, we can use extra. And we can cut and past them into the movie, so should be solved someway with enough people in the movie scenes to make it horrific and credible. Several smaller camera teams that we can cut paste into the movie - not just one big recording. You need to direct me to a video with these thousands of extra. I'm not familiar with that scene.

We do not know what happened to the buildings. My guess is that they were blown up the conventional way.

"explosive squibs of material" etc. Well it had to look spectacular I think - scary and horrific. A bonus is that some people will have even more to argue about, and create distractions and plurality. Works great as long as they keep the discussion inside the virtual reality. The Big Lie strategy is to broadcast a Hollywood horror movie on TV. Anyone who blows the whistle on that will be labeled as a lunatic and easily be dismissed. That Big Lie is to big to be believed (we have lots of experience with this - and it works we know).

C) The faked rubble was discovered only 2-3 years ago. Not familiar with the "dump trucks leaving with material, and people standing along the road cheering them on". Could be real or not. Cannot see that the dump trucks proves so much. Had to get the rubble out one way or another. I think you need 1 scripted line or scripted task on camera to be an actor. Otherwise I think the right term could be extra. Probably exceptions here, but this is a tiny detail.

"oddly twisted steel columns" etc? Don’t know. Some could be real and some staged and whatever. As long as it looks great on TV, I'll take it.

D) I can accept what you describe. Does NOT prove you are an agent for the operation management - absolutely not. I know that many "investigators" would be trilled if they could discuss the matter with some family members of the missing persons. They tend to not show up there were they discuss this issue. Usually they had a friend or uncle or someone they ones went to school with or worked with. But the family members tend not to show up. I can maybe get Stewart Ogilby http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/04/29/were-real-persons-mu... over here by tomorrow to discuss this with you if interested. I'm on a too low level unfortunately.

F) Burning cars etc? Not sure exactly what purpose they had. Created some shock and horror (very important to get people mad) when New York looked like a war zone. Not sure where or how these impressions were created. Staged somewhere? Some Photoshop? If it looks good on TV, I'll take it. J Wood like them. She has an opportunity to promote this fantasy with energy weapons that makes everyone who accepts or promote the idea look really bad to sane people. Obviously paid by the 911 operation to lead the opposition, and also keep it inside the virtual reality. That the 911 live news broadcast was faked must be protected.

Studio? Probably more than one. We have a whole book on movie tricks, and we use what we need. Oliver Stone made a 9/11 movie ("World Trade Center") and filmed it in a "rubble field" in Los Angeles. What else could have been made there? Oliver talks about it here, 1:30 - 1:43: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1hmntCeLoY

It is really hard to separate real footage from fake footage these days. Now they can create the reality they want. If you can tell a lie to everyone simultaneously, and repeat it so many times that people themselves begin to spread it, you can create a new reality. This is the weapon. They have fooled us many times. I'm shocked. If people knew what I think I understand, we would have an revolution before tomorrow noon.

Thank you for your attention.

One of the most baffling aspects of this

Is how any mention of anything that is not compatible with the official story is attacked in the media. Its alot easier to understand how the buildings could be rigged for controlled demolition than to understand how all the media could act in unison to cover this up. So much for a free press.

how all the media could act in unison to cover this up?

They are running this operation, and they were deeply involved 911. If you don't go along, you will be labeled as a conspiracy theorist and pushed out. Or if you are an honest person in Congress, you will get the Nutwork after you in addition to all the media. It is the same people who control the media that planed and carried out this operation (the Nutwork). And they haven't retired. Lenin allegedly said: The best way to control the opposition is to...

I highly recommend this very long piece if you want to know more about this:

MASS MEDIA 101 or The How and Why of the DisInformation Age
http://www.aircrash.org/burnelli/med101.htm

That is a long read, but very informative

The part about the two attorneys is spot on. I bought a business in the late 1980s, the owner and I decided on the price and the terms in less than an hour. Then we made a big mistake, we decided to both get attorneys to have a legal contract drawn up. Months later we finally had a contract. After the closeing he and I sat at a bar for a beer, then the realization hit us, those attornets both played us for every charge they could. They were not representing us, they were representing themselfs financially.

sharkhearted's picture

Subtle Mind Control & Brainwashing.

That is the only thing that seems to explain this phenomenon.

When you add to that the tendencies of people to participate in Groupthink Disorder and Mass Cognintive Dissonance.

Mind control and brainwashing have been experimented with since the 30s...and their techniques have become much more advanced over time.

The Media, the President, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve...all of them, and more, seem like zombies and puppets.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Can group think hold out in light of science and physics?

The orchestrated media machines have done everything to cover this event up, but its also apparent more and more people are waking up. Even after 11 years there is more interest and investigations by some very credible and qualified people than ever before. What happens when this hits a tipping point and the general population figures it out?

sharkhearted's picture

Groupthink disorder is powerful...but I hear ya.

The truth is like water...and one of these days soon the dam is going to bust.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Just Now

figuring that out? Where have you been. browse for "Clearchannel" for starters. Notice I don't say "google"? I use startpage or bing. Google tracks for the DHS now.

skippy

sharkhearted's picture

PollMan has provided these links for people to view.

No need to go to the movies tonight or turn on the boob tube.

All you gotta do is pop some popcorn and view these. Thanks Pollman!

North Tower Exploding
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSApOavkHg8

Cutter Charges in the North Tower of the World Trade Center
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoAD8HlrLZg

Firemen Explosion Testimony
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO1ps1mzU8o

Firefighters for 9-11 Truth RECORDED EXPLOSION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W902B6obIqM

AE911Truth's EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW!
Tom Sullivan
Former Explosives Loader for Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg

Did NIST Edit WTC 7 Footage To Hide Evidence Of Implosion? Yes...
http://www.infowars.com/did-nist-edit-wtc-7-footage-to-hide-...

WTC 7 Collapse Compilation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWorDrTC0Qg

New Footage of WTC 7 Collapse Controlled Demolition Unseen Rare (charge flash at 4 seconds)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cm7aGzubz9A

Demolition Flashes At 8 Seconds Visible at South Tower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=170XJFF2KTQ

WTC 7 Explosion
Explosion heard at 0:11 mark, just before east penthouse collapse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrnmbUDeHus

Building 7
1:01 Remedial building fires for slow learners...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

sharkhearted's picture

"9/11 Doubts Seep into the Mainstream as Evidence Accumulates"

"The most significant expert may turn out to be Judge Ferdinando Imposimato, the widely respected honorary president of the Italian Supreme Court and legendary mafia hunter who lost his brother in a revenge attack.

(LONDON) - As the annual 9/11 remembrance draws to a close, the world is as split as ever. Not only on whether the Afghan and Iraq invasions were justified, but between those who accept Washington's official 9/11 story and those who do not.

Under the mainstream media radar, the number of those who do not is steadily increasing, forming substantial majorities in places like Pakistan and Egypt and significant minorities even in NATO's heartland countries, France, the UK and the US itself. The issue is not whether, despite his denials, Osama Bin Laden might have wanted to organise the 9/11 attacks but whether Al Qaeda actually had the capability to infiltrate 19 terrorists into the US, including some very well known to the CIA, and the four highly skilled pilots necessary to pull off the spectacular coup. Up to then Al Qaeda's biggest success was setting off two truck bombs in East Africa. (1)

The stereotype promoted by the corporate media of a 9/11 sceptic, a badly educated redneck watching Fox News in a trailer park, could hardly be further from the truth. The website Patriot's Question 9/11 lists hundreds of University Professors, over a thousand architects and engineers and hundreds of aviation professionals who have spoken out against the official 9/11 story."

Read more here:

http://www.salem-news.com/articles/september192012/roundup-9...

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

fireant's picture

Got the crap beat out of me by a fascist mob,

also known as "truthers",
for trying to tell the truth.
Why does the truth require thuggery?
I only offer omitted facts and ask questions.
It makes them angry to question their doctrine.
Point for the mob.
They have might against a single poster.
Might makes truth.
Believe us or we beat you up.
Welcome to "liberty".
Read the OP and you'll see.
All for posting omitted facts.

Undo what Wilson did

sharkhearted's picture

Always shifting the blame to someone else!

If there ever was a "mob of one"...it is YOU.

Walking around here dragging your knuckles and trying to hit reasonable people with a blunt object called logical fallacy.

People who debate honestly, present FACTS, not disinformation. Logic, not logical fallacies. And they admit when they are wrong.

I see a pattern here: The MULTIPLE times you are called out, you sidestep the responses, slithering out of the argument like an eel out of a fishing net...and you either answer with some sort of pseudoscientific response that a child could make up, or you immediately go off chasing some red herring or the other... trying to bait and switch the reader to something else....because you could not answer the question in the first place.

No..."might doesn't make truth."

TRUTH....makes truth.

And no matter how hard you try with your shapeshifting, you can't bend logic and you can't create your own laws of physics.

I suppose you can in your own make-believe world, but you are doing a dishonor to the many that died on 9-11 taking up for the same pseudoscience b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t that NIST and FEMA produced.

Let's see your theory? Oh, thats right. You don't have one.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

the stranger's picture

...the sun, the moon, and the truth.

“People who debate honestly, present FACTS, not disinformation. Logic, not logical fallacies. And they admit when they are wrong.”

I think you just summed up what gives a person credibility, not unlike yourself. Thanks for your well considered comments and integrity.

sharkhearted's picture

Thank you for the nice words.

I really appreciate them!

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

fireant's picture

You are describing yourself.

nice try though...I'll let the written record speak.

Undo what Wilson did

It isn't too hard to see explosives were used if you open your

eyes.Tuck these away for later "debates" Chris.

North Tower Exploding
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSApOavkHg8

Cutter Charges in the North Tower of the World Trade Center
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoAD8HlrLZg

Firemen Explosion Testimony
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO1ps1mzU8o

Firefighters for 9-11 Truth RECORDED EXPLOSION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W902B6obIqM

AE911Truth's EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW!
Tom Sullivan
Former Explosives Loader for Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg

Did NIST Edit WTC 7 Footage To Hide Evidence Of Implosion? Yes...
http://www.infowars.com/did-nist-edit-wtc-7-footage-to-hide-...

WTC 7 Collapse Compilation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWorDrTC0Qg

New Footage of WTC 7 Collapse Controlled Demolition Unseen Rare (charge flash at 4 seconds)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cm7aGzubz9A

Demolition Flashes At 8 Seconds Visible at South Tower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=170XJFF2KTQ

WTC 7 Explosion
Explosion heard at 0:11 mark, just before east penthouse collapse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrnmbUDeHus

Building 7
1:01 Remedial building fires for slow learners...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

Actors and Hollywood animations mostly

Why are you promoting this stuff? Oh, you believe these are real videos with real people and not just actors reading their script and some Hollywood animations as credible as the movie Independence Day from 1996? That must be why.

Much more important illustration here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/anthonyc31/5728754807/in/photos...

El Buggo you are a mentally deranged horses ass if

you think this is a Hollywood animation. El Buggo = psyops.

North Tower Exploding
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSApOavkHg8

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

Conclusive evidence: NO cars in Los Angeles!

How can you tell that this is a fake video?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrgsHneMcaM

 

Animations, how we can tell - example: at 0:37 the shadows of the 2 guys cast in the exact opposite direction:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6CSYgfd65A

Also, where did all the dust in the streets come from before WTC2 fell? Would really like to know that.

How they could have made it: Stargate Studios Virtual Backlot Reel 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clnozSXyF4k