103 votes

The Smoking Gun. WTC7 taken down by CONTROLLED demolition. WTC1 and WTC2 as well. What are we to make of this?

Controlled demolition.

In case you have not seen the new documentary, where now thousands of structural engineers, architects, chemical engineers, and physicists are going on record that IT IS NOT PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE that those three buildings could have been brought down by office fires, or by even high-impact 767 crashes in regards to WTC1 and WTC2. (You can watch that documentary when you have time here:)

http://video.cpt12.org/video/2270078138/

All...I repeat all...of the three buildings brought down that day...comprising the worst structural "failures" in world history...were done by CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

Incontrovertible. Irrefutable.

And extremely high-tech, high energy military grade explosives which are able to melt steel in a flash, were used.

This is now, without question.

We have solved the what. Now we turn to the how...and then the WHO.

But the government's official accounts, the FEMA and the NIST reports, are so ridden with fraud, gross negligence, and pseudoscience, that those reports...are CRIME SCENES in and of themselves.

We need to start prosecuting right there and then work our way up...but I digress...

3000 innocent citizens and first responders have died! Who will speak for them?? Who will bring them justice??

And hundreds of thousands of family members and friends to the victims who carry the pain with them to this day...deserve a right to know what happened... rather than being insulted by these incompetent, taxpayer-funded government-sponsored cover-ups to the scene of the worst mass murder in American history.

WTC7 was demolished differently than the Twin Towers: All or most of its basement supports were severed at once....as evidenced by the free fall, or fall at the speed of gravity with no resistance, of the first 108 feet.

In other words, 108 feet, you know, 8 to 10 stories of the building of the lower floors, just ceased to exist in an instant.

Where did they go? Did those floors slip into a parallel universe?

Or were they blown to smithereens?

Certainly the truth...wherever it may lie...is not the, fake, forced, fraudulent model reconstruction that NIST (MIST?) tried to shove down the throats of the American taxpayer, $22 Million Dollars later!

As to the destruction of the WTC1 and WTC2 towers...two of the STRONGEST vertical structures on Earth...the entire buildings were laden with nano-thermite, with complete destruction set to begin just below the airplane impact zones, and timed to look like a "normal" gravitational collapse.

It was a brilliant execution.

[Except there is no such thing as a "normal gravitational collapse." Asymmetrical damage (the jet impacts)...can not lead to a symmetrical global collapse. Physically impossible.]

You heard the first collective shaped charge "ka-POW" of the south tower floors being blown apart just below the jet impact area, then the explosions of the other successive floors were timed and were increasingly masked by the continuous roar of the massive demolition wave which gained velocity and amplitude as it plummeted to Earth.

Very clever.

But, eyes don't deceive...and ears don't....thanks to the advent of cameras and cell phone cameras.

Complete gravitational collapse on super-highrises from office fires no matter how hot?

Doesn't happen.

Has never happened in the nearly 100 years of high-rise history.

Will never happen in the future, as long as the Laws of Physics apply....which they will forever.

Unless thermite is involved.

Which may explain the molten iron in a sheer 'waterfall' of molten metal off of the south tower as its upper 30 floor block begins to deform and rotate down, but a block no more, its angular momentum of all that incredible mass, suddenly neutralizing into dust...as the "collapse" accelerates in earnest, traveling down the former path of MOST resistance (the core) that in seconds has become--by being blown to bits--the NEW path of LEAST resistance.

Hmmm. 30 stories pulverized into powder in two seconds. Very strange.

The path of MOST resistance...becoming the path of LEAST resistance. Very strange.

Molten iron. Very strange.

What possibly could turn most of the mass of 350 vertical feet of an acre-sized building, into wisps, in a few seconds? Or melt its steel columns in the same??

Must be something...of course NOT mentioned in the taxpayer funded NIST and FEMA and 9/11 Commission Reports.

Here is the smoking gun to how the controlled demolition was set up...innocuously...with unrecognizable boxes of military-grade super-thermite sol-gel shaped charges, placed in the core areas hidden from the office tenants, against the bare columns in and around the elevator banks.

Super-thermite melts steel with incredible temperature and exrtreme levels of energy.. and pulverizes the concrete and the non-steel contents in mid-air, as Towers 1 and 2 come down.

Literally all of the floor concrete, gypsum wallboard, and FF&E, including elevators and HVAC equipment... for 110 stories of each building, an enormous weight, was pulverized to a toxic powder as fine as talcum, in mid air in seconds...and it spread out like a volcanic pyroclastic flow, over lower Manhattan...while the melted and distorted steel frames, collapse in a heap below.

Watch another the 18 minute presentation here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3EQV223Y-M&feature=g-user-u

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
fireant's picture

and no, I'm not overlooking it.

.

Undo what Wilson did

Then what do you

think about the molten metal in the basements???

fireant's picture

Why do you keep asking me? You are the metals guy.

Why don't you find the answer and let us know.

Undo what Wilson did

You keep harping on and on about the beams

I have an answer for my question. You can't find an answer to your question. Where would that put us in an investigation??

fireant's picture

Give me one example of a steel frame building pummeled

in the gut with multiple hits of multi-ton hunks of steel. That is if your are truly looking for a comparison.

Undo what Wilson did

What about WTC7 then?

Not hit by a plane

just off the top of my head

The Empire State building had a B 25 bomber crash into it; and yes, building survived just fine. And that wasnt even built near the standards that the twin towers were.

"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." -- James Madison

Yes Fireant

And building have been hit buy planes before.

scawarren's picture

It amazes me how many people

It amazes me how many people have commented on this thread without watching the documentary. I'm hoping they havn't watched it yet because if they have and they're still making these ignorant comments there is no hope for us.

It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. – Mark Twain

there is no hope.

and rightfully so. the words "hope" or "wish" when stated place the burden of responsibility and action BEYOND the individual or group and therefore we have what we have.

there is only do or do not.

yes, the power of thought is important. if people believe something, that is important. hence i think therefore i am.

but "i hope" is far separate and different from "i think"

only sheeple, as i once was one, can perfect such a word as "hope"

ATTENTION MODERATORS!

This user's name needs to be change to Yoda.... ;-

I Don't Need To Know Anything Else

But building 7. Building 7 is the smoking gun. We can debate till the sun comes up how the first two WTC's fell down but there is no logical explanation of how building 7 came down at near free fall speed.

People will try to deflect back to the first two WTC's because a cause can be debated (the planes, jet fuel, explosion)

Building 7 no planes it, the only thing that hit it was metal from another building which is not enough to bring it down at free fall speed. Office fires will bring it down at free fall speed? We need to fire all demolition squads and ban anything that can cause a fire from any hi rises.

fireant's picture

Actually there could be a logical explanation.

By eliminating the entire spectrum of possibility, you may allow the real criminals to get away.

Undo what Wilson did

That's your job!

That's your job!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Smoke and mirrors----

The planes were only a diversion. Looks like it worked on most of the sheeple.

It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people that pay no price for being wrong.
Thomas Sowell

We made the decision to pull it

and then we watched as it was brought down.
L. Silverstein

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq-0JIR38V0

Thanks

Luke has balls of steel, I must say.

It makes me feel so much better knowing...

that the government spent ten times the money investigating President Clinton getting a few Lewinski's under the desk than they did the events on 9/11. You don't have to be head cashier at the wal-marts to figure this thing out.

SORRY, I had to say it.

Lewinski is voting republican this year....the democrats left a bad taste in her mouth.

...

If you need me, I'll be finding scouring my brain to remove the mental image.

Eric Hoffer

The crux of the whole thing is

Ignorance is Strength : a gem of a 5-minute video on youtube

Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something...
The New Freedom/Woodrow Wilson

.

.

SteveMT's picture

Is there evidence to the contrary for this:

This is just a logical argument, my logic, which may be flawed.

Do asymmetric hits cause symmetric building collapses? That is the central question, correct? Yes, by what we saw; that is what was witnessed with all three buildings. Whether these asymmetric hits are from planes or from buildings falling onto other buildings, how will the resulting damaged buildings fall: asymmetrically or symmetrically?

If it didn't matter where buildings were hit to fall symmetrically, then demolition experts would place charges on only one main column or just randomly. It should not matter, correct? No, IMO. It does matter very much. These companies work and plan for months to bring down these buildings symmetrically. Asymmetrically placed charges would result in asymmetric collapses. Symmetrically placed charges will result in symmetric collapses. End of story; these three buildings were rigged.

In addition, no skyscraper would be allowed to be built if there was no "redundancy" in the structure. In other words, don't put all of your eggs into one basket. Don't build a 47-story building with only one column holding up the entire structure. Mainly columns that can take on the additional stress of adjacent column failure is taught in structure engineering 101. It's called redundancy.

See how they work Steve.....

Anything can be argued.....

See how they do politics these daze? ARGUE every point. Start with one point and when that point has been blasted to smitherings they just move to the next point.

They can do this until there's nothing left to argue, but nothing can ever move forward because it's always hung up in endless debates, legal or otherwise....

Because: Some animals are more equal than other animals. -Animal Farm-

What the? > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MTIwY3_-ks

SteveMT's picture

You're right. This is a grim situation, dailypauler.

There is no basic common denominator.

The odds of this happening without some demolition encouragement in nil, IMO:
(This is the most basic argument that can be made.)

1. Two planes hit two nearly identical buildings (one had an antenna on top) in two different places, and they both fell the same way....straight down,....nothing left.

2. WTC7 hit hit by debris asymmetrically as the surroundings buildings were hit, yet WTC7 alone the tallest one, fell the same way as WTC1 and WCT2,...straight down,...nothing left.

fireant's picture

Since you haven't replied,

I hope I haven't put you off in some way. I consider you a friend on this board.
I think you raised the most important point on the thread, and it caused me to think about the abnormality of the leaning tops further. It's bothered me for a long time.
It's really simple, but important. All it means is the two parts were still attached. The core was not fully severed in both towers. The violent action of the core in the tops disjointed it, and all the contents just poured right down into the tower, equalizing the collapse while the upper shell just fell apart.
Again, I meant no offense. It was a pretty intense day of debate on my part.

Undo what Wilson did

SteveMT's picture

Replied to what, fireant?

Many responses are posted below to your additional questions.
Scrolls down to find them. I have replied.

Fireant - What do you make of Larry Silverstein saying

"Just pull it, and we watched the building fall"?

fireant's picture

I think Bill answered it best in his thread.

They knew the building was destroyed, so just blow it up.
It is an absolute fact the fire dept deemed the building in danger of collapse and "pulled" their crews sometime early afternoon. All of lower Manhattan knew it. Pull has many meanings, and simply because he used the word does not mean he ordered it taken down.
Don't think for a minute however, Mr. S is off the hook.
But like I've admonished so many on this thread go213mph, please get your facts straight. If you claim truth, there is no need for embellishment. He did not say pull "it".

Undo what Wilson did