The Smoking Gun. WTC7 taken down by CONTROLLED demolition. WTC1 and WTC2 as well. What are we to make of this?
Submitted by sharkhearted on Sun, 09/16/2012 - 23:07Controlled demolition.
In case you have not seen the new documentary, where now thousands of structural engineers, architects, chemical engineers, and physicists are going on record that IT IS NOT PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE that those three buildings could have been brought down by office fires, or by even high-impact 767 crashes in regards to WTC1 and WTC2. (You can watch that documentary when you have time here:)
http://video.cpt12.org/video/2270078138/
All...I repeat all...of the three buildings brought down that day...comprising the worst structural "failures" in world history...were done by CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
Incontrovertible. Irrefutable.
And extremely high-tech, high energy military grade explosives which are able to melt steel in a flash, were used.
This is now, without question.
We have solved the what. Now we turn to the how...and then the WHO.
But the government's official accounts, the FEMA and the NIST reports, are so ridden with fraud, gross negligence, and pseudoscience, that those reports...are CRIME SCENES in and of themselves.
We need to start prosecuting right there and then work our way up...but I digress...
3000 innocent citizens and first responders have died! Who will speak for them?? Who will bring them justice??
And hundreds of thousands of family members and friends to the victims who carry the pain with them to this day...deserve a right to know what happened... rather than being insulted by these incompetent, taxpayer-funded government-sponsored cover-ups to the scene of the worst mass murder in American history.
WTC7 was demolished differently than the Twin Towers: All or most of its basement supports were severed at once....as evidenced by the free fall, or fall at the speed of gravity with no resistance, of the first 108 feet.
In other words, 108 feet, you know, 8 to 10 stories of the building of the lower floors, just ceased to exist in an instant.
Where did they go? Did those floors slip into a parallel universe?
Or were they blown to smithereens?
Certainly the truth...wherever it may lie...is not the, fake, forced, fraudulent model reconstruction that NIST (MIST?) tried to shove down the throats of the American taxpayer, $22 Million Dollars later!
As to the destruction of the WTC1 and WTC2 towers...two of the STRONGEST vertical structures on Earth...the entire buildings were laden with nano-thermite, with complete destruction set to begin just below the airplane impact zones, and timed to look like a "normal" gravitational collapse.
It was a brilliant execution.
[Except there is no such thing as a "normal gravitational collapse." Asymmetrical damage (the jet impacts)...can not lead to a symmetrical global collapse. Physically impossible.]
You heard the first collective shaped charge "ka-POW" of the south tower floors being blown apart just below the jet impact area, then the explosions of the other successive floors were timed and were increasingly masked by the continuous roar of the massive demolition wave which gained velocity and amplitude as it plummeted to Earth.
Very clever.
But, eyes don't deceive...and ears don't....thanks to the advent of cameras and cell phone cameras.
Complete gravitational collapse on super-highrises from office fires no matter how hot?
Doesn't happen.
Has never happened in the nearly 100 years of high-rise history.
Will never happen in the future, as long as the Laws of Physics apply....which they will forever.
Unless thermite is involved.
Which may explain the molten iron in a sheer 'waterfall' of molten metal off of the south tower as its upper 30 floor block begins to deform and rotate down, but a block no more, its angular momentum of all that incredible mass, suddenly neutralizing into dust...as the "collapse" accelerates in earnest, traveling down the former path of MOST resistance (the core) that in seconds has become--by being blown to bits--the NEW path of LEAST resistance.
Hmmm. 30 stories pulverized into powder in two seconds. Very strange.
The path of MOST resistance...becoming the path of LEAST resistance. Very strange.
Molten iron. Very strange.
What possibly could turn most of the mass of 350 vertical feet of an acre-sized building, into wisps, in a few seconds? Or melt its steel columns in the same??
Must be something...of course NOT mentioned in the taxpayer funded NIST and FEMA and 9/11 Commission Reports.
Here is the smoking gun to how the controlled demolition was set up...innocuously...with unrecognizable boxes of military-grade super-thermite sol-gel shaped charges, placed in the core areas hidden from the office tenants, against the bare columns in and around the elevator banks.
Super-thermite melts steel with incredible temperature and exrtreme levels of energy.. and pulverizes the concrete and the non-steel contents in mid-air, as Towers 1 and 2 come down.
Literally all of the floor concrete, gypsum wallboard, and FF&E, including elevators and HVAC equipment... for 110 stories of each building, an enormous weight, was pulverized to a toxic powder as fine as talcum, in mid air in seconds...and it spread out like a volcanic pyroclastic flow, over lower Manhattan...while the melted and distorted steel frames, collapse in a heap below.
Watch another the 18 minute presentation here.
- Login to post comments
Definitely conventional animation
I don't think this is a 2001 animation, but from the much better 2009 or 2010 releases. Actually, these new animations are fabulous. Look at those silly animation they had in 2001 - much easier to spot the signs then. Its getting really hard to separate animations from real videos these days. They are really getting good at it. And now they can create the reality they want.
Here, conclusive evidence for some crucial animations in 2001 - study it and explain it please:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/anthonyc31/5728754807/in/photos...
Get out of your virtual reality. Doesn't matter what you find - it is still virtual reality and your investigation will never lead to anything. Your contributions will always be a total waste of time and useless.
It's much easier to fool people than it is to convince them they've been fooled.
El Buggo=Recent Reception 0.04
Too bad you are not bringing anyone around with your delusions isn't it?
November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul
Is this your YouTube channel? JimConditJr
No
That is not my channel.
November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul
I know
It's much easier to fool people than it is to convince them they've been fooled.
0.04 is not so bad. Have you noticed that I even have disputed the victims part of this operation? That I can get away with that is definitely progress. A very famous and brave congressman was often the only dissenter (1-434). Doesn't prove that he was wrong.
No one has attempted to answer or explain how the height of the impact in WTC2 could be so different between the cameras. They probably cant explain it. What could it be? What is A&E's take on this?
Not easy to distinguish between real and fake footage these days, and that is a very important issue. It isn't?
Test yourself here how good you are at it. I got 8/12, and that is not bad: Fake or Foto? - The Challenge
http://area.autodesk.com/fakeorfoto/challenge
Wow. Bookmarked for later viewing. Thank you.
Guess I will be popping some popcorn and have my movie night cut out for me this evening!
~Chris
Norfolk, VA
Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.
A couple suggestions
Meant as friendly suggestions, and I could be wrong, but...
I think it's nano-thermite, not super thermite. And thermite is not an explosive, it is an incendiary. Buildings are brought down with either or both, and there are significant differences between them. Richard Gage and others explain the differences in their videos.
Great post.
http://brazilforlife.com
Thanks for your comments
Actually, I think it could be safe to call thermite both an incendiary and an explosive, as it exhibits properties of both.
Check out a great documentary chronicling the research of Dr. Steven Jones on the subject of thermite and the WTC towers.
True, thermite cutter charges rely on extreme heat energy to do its dirty work, and thus doesn't produce as loud an explosion as more conventional RDX cutter charges, which rely on the force of the blast itself to do the dirty work, and thus produce a louder report....but thermite is INDEED an explosive...and also an incendiary.
Here's the documentary I was talking about if you haven't seen its called Hypothesis and takes about an hour to watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cfjYUHF8UE&continue_action=3...
~Chris
Norfolk, VA
Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.
Fireant you are wrong
There no amount of fiction or gravity or heat from jet fuel or office furniture or any thing else that was suppose to be in those buildings that could explain the amount of energy released to cause molten metal to be found 5 weeks later to cause this. It HAD TO BE a chemical substance that was added to the building to cause this. Like I said, it is THE SMOKING GUN! Give it up, science doesn't lie.
You said "You have to have corroboration before claiming fact"
What corroboration do you want. The fact that molten metal was there. I have all ready given that to you. You are choosing to ignore it! Look way back in this thread. I have given you eye witness account of molten metal being there. Just because I can't give you to who, what, where, and why of a murder doesn't mean that 3000 people didn't die!
AND sharkhearted just posted a video with it too!!
You'd be thrown out of court if that's all you have.
Think like an investigator.
If you claim the reports of molten metal and recorded heat in the basements came from thermate, the burden of proof is on you.
Have you taken the first step to do so?
That would be finding comparisons, such as other structures demolished with thermate and find those structures with pools of molten steel at the bottom of the pile. Have you taken that step?
It's up to you to prove it. i would like to know the results of your findings.
Undo what Wilson did
How do you know?
How do you really know that 3000 died? How do you really know that? You have red the official victims list? Where can I find such a list? What? Not even an official list with names and accurate numbers?
Why are you so sure about this? What if they faked that part of the story too? What if? The basis for the War on Terror will evaporate, so do not look into this part of the story. The truth is never hidden behind a veil of tears of course.
Also, is it possible that this eye witness is an actor, paid by the 911 operation management? Is it possible? Do you believe that the 911 operation management retired 911? What are they up to these days you think? Hiding somwhere, and with no agents on the street?
No response Fireant?!?
Like I said science doesn't lie.
Science based on actors scripts
isn't worth so much. These eyewitness (or actors as I believe they are) don't risk so much even if they should be busted as actors and liars. Their actions are protected by the First Amendment. 911 operation management had billions for bribery and stuff. Should be able to hire some scriptwriters, actors, producers and some computer animation people for that kind of money.
Molten Metal - NIST head engineer LIES on camera
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU&feature=related
~Chris
Norfolk, VA
Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.
WTC 6 - Molten Metal There Too??
At the 3:51 mark Ken Holden (NY Department of Design & Construction - Director) testifies "underground it was still so hot that molten metal dripped down the sides of a wall from building 6".
Maybe I'm wrong but wasn't the idea that molten metal only should've been in buildings that collapsed due to thermite (or nano-thermite or whatever)? WTC 6 didn't collapse but had molten steel? I guess if the thermite theory (that the buildings were brought down from it) is accurate that it's also possible that it shot out from WTC 1, 2 or 7. But if it didn't (and assuming there was thermite theory was correct), was there also possibly an intention to bring down WTC 6?
No investigation is complete
without a look at Dr. Judy Wood's book, "Where Did the Towers Go?"
"If you listen to the evidence carefully enough, it will speak to you and tell you exactly what happened. If you don't know what happened, keep listening until you do. The evidence always tells the truth. The key is not to allow yourself to be distracted away from seeing what the evidence is telling you. 'Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic' Thank you for having courage to look at the evidence." Dr. Judy Wood
"Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done ahd how it was done." Dr. Judy Wood
This is a 500 page text book.
I commented on Dr Judy wood, the Mods deleted my comment!
I posted her website address and my comment was deleted by the mods here! She brings up some anomalies that can't seem to be explained with conventional means. The destruction of so many cars, some with engine blocks melted out, what can do that? The city bus, completely rusted out with TC#7 still standing in the back ground. Something acted on the metal beams causing extremely rapid oxidation, some rusted down to sharp edges. How can that happen in so short a time? The steel beams bent into a horse shoe shape with no cracking or splitting of the metal, like it was taffee. Maybe the photos in her book are faked, but if its correct, she has pointed out evidence of some very strange phenomenon.
Truxtonc at least I hear You , better late than never
Mentioning Judy's name here is a way to get some sh-t. Until I read her book I was convinced of the thermite theory. I look at the date of your post and realize it is still an uphill battle to get this message out without getting some pretty rude remarks.
I question the integrity of Gage and Jones. Andrew Johnson explains the soap opera of Scholars for 911 truth internal strife.
It is good to have an ally sometimes.
Mikoni
You are watching conventional animations
What anomaly cant be explained as an animation or some planted stuff or a staged event? Destruction of the cars, engine blocks, rusted buses - these are just distractions. Have nothing do with the War on Terror, etc. You are watching some silly animations or some planted stuff. Quite irrelevant distractions. Planes and victims are the important parts of this story. Also, how do you know that you are watching real videos and genuine photos and listening to real people? Can very well just be some computer animations or special effects, photoshopped photos and actors.
Wood and other UFO stories
Energy weapons? Give me a brake. An other much simpler explanation is that we are looking at fake footage. She never talks about that, even if she has faked a photo of her self with her "friends" on her web page: http://www.drjudywood.com/pics/080601/DSC04879_ss.jpg
No shadow for her - only for her "friends".
I have ordered her book....
I think that she and the CD people are both onto something and the truth will be a combination of both theories.
~Chris
Norfolk, VA
Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.
Speaking of which ...
Speaking of which ... DISINFORMATION, MISINFORMATION, or INFORMATION WARS, you might want to check out this fresh finding :
http://www.dailypaul.com/257711/tor-project-government-funds...
Now I can guess better how this project's name was, indeed, chosen very APPROPRIATELY.
My name's pronounced like "see real". Its root is "Lord".
"The demand of a great people is always at the scale of its most serious misfortunes." --De Gaulle
http://Laissez-Faire.Me/Liberty
When did you quit believing in Santa Claus?
That's the Subject line of an email I wrote and sent out to my email list back in 2009. This was inspired by the 44 story Chinese skyscraper fire in February of that year that I described (below) as having "thoroughly burned into a crinkling cinder. However IT DID NOT COLLAPSE."
I use a stripped down version of this email to answer 9/11 questions on Yahoo Answers (also under Bloatedtoad). The only change here from my original was the addition of the 15 minute Architects & Engineers piece (at the end below) that came out in advance of this excellent piece featured here in the article above. I wanted to share this with you here because this will give you a working knowledge of the basics of the 9/11 story (including who benefits) that you can convey easily to others.
Get me in front of a computer with almost anyone and I will flip them from a government 9/11 fairytale believer to a 9/11 truth believer, and that's just using the links below in my Santa Claus email. If time is short (most of the time it is) the most important links are the Kenny Johanemann video (1 minute) and the Larry Silverstein "pull it" video (56 seconds) and your explanation of what these two videos mean. Then if you can get the person to watch the Aaron Russo interview that will tie it all together. The fourth most important link here is the BBC advance report (which proves that a story had already been scripted in the media in advance). Those three or four alone with your guiding insights as they watch is usually enough to cause cognitive dissonance. If you get them to go through all the links I present here it will devastate their world view of what really happened and they will be in a daze for a week or more as they sort out their world view. I know. I've been doing this for three years now. It's time to shut down this nonsense that guys with box cutters can shut down the greatest country in the world. This will break it open if it reaches enough people. OK, here's the body of my email. Feel free to copy and share:
BEGIN TEXT:
As kids we believed in Santa Claus. Our parents were the gatekeepers of information and, though benign, our environment during that formative time was a controlled one. We were taught to believe in Santa Claus. Initially we accepted all the information that we received at face value. However, as time progressed, we gained bits and pieces of information that led to a cognitive dissonance which, in turn, led us to question our image of Santa Claus. These “bits and pieces” led to questions such as “How could Santa Claus fit through my chimney” or “How does Santa Claus leave gifts in millions of homes during a single night”? Armed with all these bits and pieces of information, we began to get a different picture that caused all the previous illogic that we had learned to come crashing down. This finally led to an epiphany that Santa Claus really isn’t anything like what we had first thought!
There are other things in life that we have always taken for granted as “fact” that later prove to be only an illusion as well. It’s only a matter of getting more information. As in the case of the Santa Claus myth, it is only a matter of time as new evidence unfolds that we are forced to rethink our view on what the truth is.
I want to try an experiment here:
Please watch this first video linked here. It’s only one minute. You’ve read this far into my letter so please take just one small minute and watch this first video. You’re going to be impressed. This is a local news video of a witness named Kenny Johannemann testifying to explosions that happened in the basement of one of the WTC towers. While he is testifying you still see both of the twin towers burning behind him in the background. This was live footage and it's only ONE minute long. Go ahead and watch this here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEuzU3LMgCA
(YouTube Key Words: Johannemann suicide)
Those explosions were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling the tower. You say, “wait, this doesn’t fit anything I know, maybe there is some other explanation for those explosions in the basement.” True. This is just one piece of evidence, but it’s a piece of evidence that raises a lot of questions. You didn’t see this on TV either. Does that prick your interest?
The government has promoted a “theory” that maybe the fuel from the jet trickled down the elevator shafts into the basement and subsequently exploded. Could this be? Let’s continue and look at other evidence. Barry Jennings was another witness that got stuck in Building Seven during 9/11. Remember, Building Seven was NEVER hit by a jet. In Barry's case an explosion blew out a stair well below him leaving him hanging and stranded for hours until the fire department got him out. Both the twin towers went down during the time he was stranded. Building Seven, a tall building in it’s own right (47 stories tall), came down at around 5:20 (later that day). Fortunately, he was saved. Watch his account here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbbZE7c3a8Q
(YouTube Key Words: Barry Jennings dead age – more hits when “dead age” excluded)
Again, the explosions he talked about were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling down this building. You say, “Hold On! Building Seven housed the FBI and the CIA offices, so who would have access to set up explosives in there? There has got to be another explanation.” True. This is just one piece of evidence which raises more questions. Again, you didn't see Barry’s testimony on TV.
William Rodriguez, head janitor at the towers, was meeting with some people in basement level #1 (the highest of several basement levels) when an explosion from below pushed everyone upwards, causing ceiling tiles to fall and walls to crack. Just as William started to express to others what he thought that explosion might be, an airplane hit and shook the building from above. His story begins at 9:31 here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWXTk5aNAAs
(Google Video Key Words: William Rodriguez Alex Jones)
Now, let’s look for other different kinds of evidence. Steve Jones, a physicist, obtained WTC dust samples from the collapsed WTC towers from people who lived nearby. He analyzed it and found that the dust contained residues of explosives. Steve Jones first became famous when he became known as the “voice of reason” during the Pons / Fleischman "Cold Fusion" debacle of 1989, if you remember that. For a Nuclear Physicist, like Steve Jones, analyzing dust samples for explosive residues is a relatively simple task. It may be similar to asking a PhD mathematician to do arithmetic. He reported his detailed findings here in Boston:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1957490867030316250&...
(Google Video Key Words: Steve Jones Boston)
In this lecture, you recall, he offered other scientists to take parts of his samples in order to analyze the "red chips" that he had recently discovered. That was December 2007. These specks have now, in fact, been confirmed to be unexploded “nanostructured super-thermite” particles. That confirmation is not just a smoking gun IT IS THE GUN. See the article here:
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Scientists_find_active_superth...
The actual paper in its entirety can be found here in PDF form. Be sure to click the “download” link here:
http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm?T...
If you get into the actual paper, you learn that the explosives may actually have been sprayed into position like paint or insulation!
Steve Jones’ findings may not fit the stories that you have heard in the news but it does lend support to what Johannemann, Jennings and Rodriguez testified that they saw. You say, “The news media isn’t going to shoot itself in the foot by making something up.” So how do we rectify all the contradictions that we were told in the news? Could Steve Jones and these witnesses be glory-seeking kooks trying to make a name for themselves?
Then take a look at this:
Here is a BBC report announcing the collapse of the Solomon Building (the official name for Building Seven). There is only one problem. The reporter standing at the scene and announcing this didn't realize that, in fact, you could still see Building Seven still standing off to the right. It actually collapsed within about 20 minutes after that live report. Watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlL6ewlW6oc
(YouTube Key Words: BBC Solomon slips – you get more hits by excluding “slips”)
How did the BBC know in advance that Building Seven would collapse? The fact that it was announced in advance is strong support that the flow of information on this tragedy was being controlled (but in a more sinister way than how information about Santa Claus was controlled in your life).
Were the people at the BBC the only people privy to this information? Probably not. Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of Building Seven. In a 2002 PBS documentary he talked about how he discussed the Building Seven situation with the fire department and how the decision was made by that department to "pull" it. Well, there is one problem with his testimony that you may want to consider. It takes about a week to rig a building with explosives before you pull it. So are buildings constructed with built-in explosives just in case they need to be blown up in a hurry? Building Seven went down that same day. Whoops! Watch Larry's testimony from the PBS documentary here in this short clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3E-26oVIIs
(YouTube Key words: PBS Silverstein)
Incidentally, luckily for Larry, he insured his property in the nick of time just six months before September 11th! It was a sweet deal. So who orchestrated this terrorist event anyway? They had to get past the FBI and CIA and prepare at least three buildings for demolition as well as direct the activities of men with box cutters (if they even existed). It’s clear from the evidence presented here so far that at least some of the media was in on this. What else could explain the BBC blunder? They had to control the information to those of us who might not like the idea that a few thousand people had to be killed in order to fulfill some kind of agenda. What’s in it for these people that were “in the know?”
Aaron Russo was a famous movie producer who became best friends with one of the Rockefeller family members (Remember “The Rose” and "Trading Places" starring Eddie Murphy?). This is the same Rockefeller family that is a large shareholder of the Federal Reserve Bank -- a private company that loans money to our government and contributes to our huge national debt. You see the name “Federal Reserve” at the top the dollar bill. Yes, we're talking about THAT Bank! Anyway, the upshot of this friendship was that in the year 2000 (11 months before 9/11) Aaron Russo learned from his Rockefeller buddy that there was going to be an "event". He was told that out of this event the U.S. would go into Afghanistan and look for Bin Laden in Caves and then the U.S. would go into Iraq. His fascinating testimony about this "event" starts at 26:45 here in this interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGAaPjqdbgQ
(Google Video Key Words: Aaron Russo Reflections Warnings)
One more thing. In February 2009 a 44 story Chinese skyscraper caught fire and thoroughly burned into a crinkling cinder. However IT DID NOT COLLAPSE. By comparison WTC Building Seven had a few small fires and was never hit by a plane. It DID COLLAPSE. See that article here:
http://www.infowars.com/fire-consumes-wtc-7-size-skyscraper-...
(Google Key Words: China 44 fire consumes)
Now see this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw
(YouTube Key Words: architects engineers 911 truth)
Amazingly, all this evidence is only the tip of the iceberg. Each of these are separate independent pieces of evidence from unconnected sources. When taken together they paint a clear picture. You are a juror in a court of law. What would be your verdict? Remember, the word “conspiracy” is not in the dictionary to describe a fiction.
To forward this as a clean readable e-mail (without the accumulation of all the “>” symbols) just highlight all the text and COPY IT FIRST. Then paste it into your new e-mail before sending it on. It works like a charm!
NOTE: I included key words below each link because it’s common for a video to disappear. Usually multiple versions exist and the key words will assist in finding another copy.
-Bloatedtoad
Mini-documentary on the explosions here...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOTwE8DaaTo&feature=related
~Chris
Norfolk, VA
Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.
There are many eyewitness accounts of explosions
before all 3 towers came down. That is enough evidence to warrant a real investigation, because the 9/11 commission is B.S. and did not account for any of this. In fact, it didn't even talk about WTC7 and the explosions that were witnessed within it. WTF?
I agree.
It is time to start prosecuting the 9-11 Commission, NIST, FEMA, and the American Society of Civil Engineers...for their incompetence, gross negligence, and criminal coverup of the worst mass murder event in American history.
Right now!
~Chris
Norfolk, VA
Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.
Simple question. No answers.
Everyone says those WTC Tower cores were strong (agreed) and there is NO WAY those buildings could have come down without removing the cores via demolition. If that is the case, why was at least one of the cores we know of still standing after collapse? 60 to 70 stories of core remained: http://enki.hubpages.com/hub/911-Misdirection#slide210683
I keep getting accused of somehow being weak minded or stupid. Is it stupid to ask this question? Seems reasonable to me. But all I get is attacked; no answers.
Undo what Wilson did
LOL
so please show the pictures of the core columns standing 60 stories. That link didn't show anything like that.
_________________
Romney is a detour on the way to liberty, anyone else is a shorter path, win or lose.
Yes it did. Scroll down about 2/3. The copy under the photo says
"Huge parts of the core are still standing after the facade collapses."
Here's the image url: http://s4.hubimg.com/u/210683_f520.jpg
Undo what Wilson did
Obvious Hollywood psychic
The animation crew screwed up somewhat. They turned that steel into dust on the live CNN footage. Worked for a long time though. When you understand that this wast just a Hollywood horror movie on TV, everything we have been told will be easy to explain.