103 votes

The Smoking Gun. WTC7 taken down by CONTROLLED demolition. WTC1 and WTC2 as well. What are we to make of this?

Controlled demolition.

In case you have not seen the new documentary, where now thousands of structural engineers, architects, chemical engineers, and physicists are going on record that IT IS NOT PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE that those three buildings could have been brought down by office fires, or by even high-impact 767 crashes in regards to WTC1 and WTC2. (You can watch that documentary when you have time here:)

http://video.cpt12.org/video/2270078138/

All...I repeat all...of the three buildings brought down that day...comprising the worst structural "failures" in world history...were done by CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

Incontrovertible. Irrefutable.

And extremely high-tech, high energy military grade explosives which are able to melt steel in a flash, were used.

This is now, without question.

We have solved the what. Now we turn to the how...and then the WHO.

But the government's official accounts, the FEMA and the NIST reports, are so ridden with fraud, gross negligence, and pseudoscience, that those reports...are CRIME SCENES in and of themselves.

We need to start prosecuting right there and then work our way up...but I digress...

3000 innocent citizens and first responders have died! Who will speak for them?? Who will bring them justice??

And hundreds of thousands of family members and friends to the victims who carry the pain with them to this day...deserve a right to know what happened... rather than being insulted by these incompetent, taxpayer-funded government-sponsored cover-ups to the scene of the worst mass murder in American history.

WTC7 was demolished differently than the Twin Towers: All or most of its basement supports were severed at once....as evidenced by the free fall, or fall at the speed of gravity with no resistance, of the first 108 feet.

In other words, 108 feet, you know, 8 to 10 stories of the building of the lower floors, just ceased to exist in an instant.

Where did they go? Did those floors slip into a parallel universe?

Or were they blown to smithereens?

Certainly the truth...wherever it may lie...is not the, fake, forced, fraudulent model reconstruction that NIST (MIST?) tried to shove down the throats of the American taxpayer, $22 Million Dollars later!

As to the destruction of the WTC1 and WTC2 towers...two of the STRONGEST vertical structures on Earth...the entire buildings were laden with nano-thermite, with complete destruction set to begin just below the airplane impact zones, and timed to look like a "normal" gravitational collapse.

It was a brilliant execution.

[Except there is no such thing as a "normal gravitational collapse." Asymmetrical damage (the jet impacts)...can not lead to a symmetrical global collapse. Physically impossible.]

You heard the first collective shaped charge "ka-POW" of the south tower floors being blown apart just below the jet impact area, then the explosions of the other successive floors were timed and were increasingly masked by the continuous roar of the massive demolition wave which gained velocity and amplitude as it plummeted to Earth.

Very clever.

But, eyes don't deceive...and ears don't....thanks to the advent of cameras and cell phone cameras.

Complete gravitational collapse on super-highrises from office fires no matter how hot?

Doesn't happen.

Has never happened in the nearly 100 years of high-rise history.

Will never happen in the future, as long as the Laws of Physics apply....which they will forever.

Unless thermite is involved.

Which may explain the molten iron in a sheer 'waterfall' of molten metal off of the south tower as its upper 30 floor block begins to deform and rotate down, but a block no more, its angular momentum of all that incredible mass, suddenly neutralizing into dust...as the "collapse" accelerates in earnest, traveling down the former path of MOST resistance (the core) that in seconds has become--by being blown to bits--the NEW path of LEAST resistance.

Hmmm. 30 stories pulverized into powder in two seconds. Very strange.

The path of MOST resistance...becoming the path of LEAST resistance. Very strange.

Molten iron. Very strange.

What possibly could turn most of the mass of 350 vertical feet of an acre-sized building, into wisps, in a few seconds? Or melt its steel columns in the same??

Must be something...of course NOT mentioned in the taxpayer funded NIST and FEMA and 9/11 Commission Reports.

Here is the smoking gun to how the controlled demolition was set up...innocuously...with unrecognizable boxes of military-grade super-thermite sol-gel shaped charges, placed in the core areas hidden from the office tenants, against the bare columns in and around the elevator banks.

Super-thermite melts steel with incredible temperature and exrtreme levels of energy.. and pulverizes the concrete and the non-steel contents in mid-air, as Towers 1 and 2 come down.

Literally all of the floor concrete, gypsum wallboard, and FF&E, including elevators and HVAC equipment... for 110 stories of each building, an enormous weight, was pulverized to a toxic powder as fine as talcum, in mid air in seconds...and it spread out like a volcanic pyroclastic flow, over lower Manhattan...while the melted and distorted steel frames, collapse in a heap below.

Watch another the 18 minute presentation here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3EQV223Y-M&feature=g-user-u

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
sharkhearted's picture

NONSENSE.

They were not "hollow tubes". The cores and elevator banks of WTC1 and WTC2 were MASSIVE....you know...at the CENTER of the buildings...where the path of MOST resistance would be.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/core.html

But you are correct on one point (although by mistake):

"There was very little resistance to the falling matter. The falling matter actually took the path of least resistance."

Indeed it did.

Because the path of MOST resistance (the massive core) was being blown to bits in midair, turing the path of MOST resistance, into the path of LEAST resistance, in seconds.

Controlled demolition.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

fireant's picture

The cores and elevators were all clustered in one

rectangle accounting for 27% of the square footage. That leaves 73% unsupported vertically.
And the core structure of one tower we know was still standing. How do you blow it up causing the building to fall and it still be standing?

Undo what Wilson did

sharkhearted's picture

You are talking out of your ass.

The center core was MASSIVE with huge steel columns.

And the 73% was not "unsupported vertically"...otherwise the building would not stand in the first place. DUH.

The perimeter columns provided the necessary support on the exterior, and the live loads of the "unsupported" floors were transfered into the ground via the center core, and the perimeter columns .

The core structure of one tower we know was NOT standing. They were completely destroyed.

You are so full of sh*t your the whites of your eyes are brown.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

fireant's picture

Do your own math then. Have you bothered?

You see the yellow areas? All of that had no vertical support underneath.
http://algoxy.com/psych/whatis9-11disinfo-florplan.html
(scroll down to the 3rd illustration)

Undo what Wilson did

sharkhearted's picture

So?

I TOLD you that that the "vertical" support of the floors between the core and perimeter columns, the live load of those floors, was transferred laterally primarily to the massive center core and into the ground, but also to a much lesser degree, to the perimeter columns.

Trusses supporting these "free" floors connected from the massive core columns to the perimeter columns.

It worked just fine.

You have no idea what you are talking about...and are obviously trying to disprove the CD theory with every feeble attempt which makes you suspect.

If you were a true scientist, you would care about the truth...wherever it leads you...even to CD.

But all you want to do is argue with carefully spun sophistry and try and prove the government's official account...which is a lie.

So....who is paying you?

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

He's paid for by the "Dept.

He's paid for by the "Dept. of Official Deniers"

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

fireant's picture

Those 60' spans of sandwiched trusses were no match for all

the jumbled mass pummeling down upon it, esp considering they likely were already compromised (and possibly partially collapsed) due to the core being stressed as the tops began to topple.

Undo what Wilson did

I call BS on fireant again.

I call BS on fireant again. They were not still standing! Show me the core structure of one tower still standing.

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

fireant's picture

Start here at about 1:20.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fe1_1334032521
here's the base of one core still standing:
http://s2.hubimg.com/u/215185_f520.jpg

You might want to look at all the beams there. I can find no cut beams; only square milled ends.

Undo what Wilson did

Your first "proof" video is a

Your first "proof" video is a real knee slapper! That second silly example is the outer "skin" of the bldg., not the core. Another FAIL demerit to go on your record at the Dept. of Official Denier's. If you're compromised you get promoted!!!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

fireant's picture

Wrong again.

That first one shows the core standing. It's common knowledge; there are plenty of videos showing it. And look again at the second one. The core is standing in the center. You are looking at approx 3 stories of core. You can tell by using the unique design of the arches in the lowest floor siding as a reference.

Undo what Wilson did

3 stories out of 100. Yep

3 stories out of 100. Yep that proves it, NOT!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

fireant's picture

Then explain this one:

The truth is the truth, no

The truth is the truth, no explaining required! Thanks for the link.

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

sharkhearted's picture

Fireant...so who is paying you?

Come on....who is writing that paycheck??

Or do you just enjoy making a fool out of yourself on your own volunteer time??

As far as the "base of one core" standing...yeah about 4 stories? Big f*u*c*k*I*n*g deal! Four stories of part of the core.

This is hardly "the core of one of the [110 story] buildings was left standing" as you claimed.

And what to make of the perimeter steel columns that seem to to turn to dust or something in the footage that you provide that supposedly "disproves CD" of the WTC towers?

What happened to those perimeter columns and aluminum cladding?? Where did they go all of the sudden?

As far as "all the beams there being milled"...did you observe the crime scene in person??

No, you did not.

(Or did you??)

And what to make of the 99.7 % of the steel that was hastily shipped to China for recycling?

Destruction of evidence in the worst crime scene in American soil in its history??

You bet.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

fireant's picture

4 stories of standing core says the building was not undercut.

You are lying again. I said 60 to 70 stories were standing, not 110.
If they were blown apart in order to drop the building, why were they still standing? I'm just dealing with the facts and asking questions. It's gotta add up. So far it doesn't.
If those columns were cut apart in order to drop the building, why were they still standing? It just doesn't make any sense. Obviously everything attached to the core is gone, yet the core stood.

Undo what Wilson did

Fireant, you should know that

Fireant, you should know that most who argue for CD believe that the building was imploded from the top down. That would explain four stories left standing. Buildings can be demolished from above or below. See David Ray Griffin's Debunking 9/11 Debunking.

I want to see a picture of that.

Fireant said " I said 60 to 70 stories were standing, not 110."

fireant's picture

http://enki.hubpages.com/hub/

http://enki.hubpages.com/hub/911-Misdirection#slide210683
Actually it's common knowledge. The only people who don't know about it, it seems, are the pro demo folks. Wonder why? Mr. Shark doesn't tell you. Just trust him. He'll tell you straight.
Here's a different view with measurements: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t64rlnaCqY8

Undo what Wilson did

Me thinks YOU are paying him

Me thinks YOU are paying him to keep your thread alive!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

sharkhearted's picture

No. LOL

Say it isn't so.

And if I did, I would pay someone who used science, and not disinformation to achieve his goal.

The latter of which is impossible in this case, as the evidence is so VERY obvious.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

C'mon, the jig is up. You've

C'mon, the jig is up. You've been outed as a self bumping whatever dude, fireant!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

sharkhearted's picture

I know it is astounding.

Its like debating with a 5 year old.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

It is indeed. But it keeps

It is indeed. But it keeps the thread alive and the more people see the evidence shown here the more likely someone will wake up, either here or somewhere else a link is sent to somebody. Just kidding about calling you fireant!!!!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

And there was molten metal in the basement too, right???

The one in madrid, the fire as seen by the video were MUCH hotter, yet only part of the top came off. It didn't completely fall at near free fall speed to the ground to dust did it?? Yes I already knew about these and I still don't think they compare to what happened on 9/11. In fact the building in Madrid had a raging fire for 18 hour before a partial collapse that left the core columns.

And here is McCormick Place
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/mccormick.html

Don't know where the first partial colapse is from.

sharkhearted's picture

CORRECTED FACT number 2:

The Windsor Building in Spain sustained a PARTIAL collapse only.

The floors less affected by the roaring fires below, did exactly what you would expect. Newton's Third Law of Motion in action. They stood.

The collapse was partial and asymmetrical.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/windsor.html

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

fireant's picture

I hate to seem so picky, but comparing the lower floors of

Windsor to the lower floors of 1&2WTC is a non sequitur. Windsor was a more traditional framed structure while the towers were essentially hollow tubes. There is just no comparison.

Undo what Wilson did

sharkhearted's picture

Your comment is insanely wrong.

WTC1 and WTC2 had massive MASSIVE cores/elevator banks covering the center of the buildings from top to bottom with HUGE structural columns anchored very deep in the Manhattan bedrock.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/core.html

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

fireant's picture

Only 27% of the square footage was framed, all in one cluster.

That left 73% wide open with no framing.

Undo what Wilson did