9 votes

Small Arms Treaty Passes in UN, What's Next?

As the accompanying write up states, why hasn't ANY media reported on this passing? Well most know, as the article states, all MSM is controlled, and the alternative media is being distracted by the Middle East uprising trying to expose the culprits. Anyhow, we know treaties are to be affirmed by Senate vote, but Mr Executive Order could sign one, just as Clinton did with Agenda 21, and as seen with the other tresonous EO's he has signed the collectivists from the GOP will do nothing to stop him. It's time to spread the word to force these sellouts to stand up and stop this undermining of the Bill of Rights, ASAP, before Obama drops the hammer with and EO. http://keystoliberty.wordpress.com/2012/09/14/u-n-small-arms...

Note: links to its passage are located where the writer says (See Last Post)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Knew it was coming...

so much for everyone screaming at second amendment supporters that this would never happen.

Another term for preventive war is aggressive war- starting wars because someday somebody might do something to us. That is not part of the American tradition.
-Ron Paul

"Live Free or Die"

Do not let your own life or the sacrifices of those who came before you for the cause of liberty be in vain. Globalists are not bulletproof.

I did not sign that

treaty, and that my friends is exactly what civil disobedience is all about. If you don't intend to use your small arms to hurt anyone intentionally, keep em.

Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must. like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it.-Thomas Paine

The R3volution requires action, not observation!!!!

They win

we lose.

May the LORD bless you and keep you
May the LORD make His face shed light upon you and be gracious unto you
May the LORD lift up His face unto you and give you peace
Follow me on Twitter @ http://twitter.com/Burning_Sirius

"The court also has ruled

"The court also has ruled separately that treaty obligations may not infringe on individual constitutional protections and rights within U.S. borders. This goes back at least to a 1920 ruling that a migratory bird treaty with Canada, which prohibited the hunting or capturing of certain birds, was an unconstitutional interference with states’ rights under the 10th Amendment.

Treaties are government-to-government agreements and do not subject citizens of one nation to laws of another or to those of an outside body".


“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

The courts have been compromised. Some brave holdouts remain.

Besides,since when has Barry proved anything but disdain for the Constitution as his predecessor has. The courts will not stop him. Obamacare was a test case for bigger Supreme Court rulings to come,in my opinion.