30 votes

The MSM moderated "Presidential Agreements" schedule.


Just look at who the fine moderators from the MSM for the "Agreements" are. PBS - Jim Lehrer, ABC - Martha Raddatz, CNN - Candy Crowley, & CBS - Bob Schieffer.

I just wanted to pass this on to you all, so that you know which days to not have something solid in your hands that you may want to throw at your nice televisions if you do happen to decide to watch the "Agreements" (Hard to call something a "Debate" when both people have the same policies isn't it?)

Why not get moderators that are not with ANY media organization? Maybe economics, foreign policy, domestic policy, etc. professors, or even moderators picked by a vote from the people?

I'm so sick of MSM pundits that truly believe in their hearts that their word is abundantly important to the end.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

is there any chance for a

is there any chance for a court ruling before tonight?

It would be nice.

Not a fan necessarily of Johnson, Goode, or Stein, but I would still have loved to see them all get the chance to debate.

They Were All Rewarded

They were all rewarded for trashing Ron Paul during the primary. They got rewarded with their own debates they get to host!


RONZDAMAN; Well,I havent watched FOX NEWS or listened to their talk radio puppet's since the criminal activity of the Romney ORGANIZATION took over the GOP with their elete CARTAL .After watching Ron Paul expose the lack of knowledge Romney had of the constitution I doubt the debates will be worth watching .

My Vote

As of now I WANT TO GO FOR Gary JOHNSON but not at the expence of electing Romnry.

FOX aren't hosting a debate,

FOX aren't hosting a debate, probably because they haven't fired Judge Napolitano yet.

Support Rand, Amash & other liberty candidates? Check out: http://www.LibertyConservatives.com/


Looking forward to watching the debates.

allegory - ˈalɪg(ə)ri/ - noun - 1. a story, poem, or picture which can be interpreted to reveal a hidden meaning, typically a moral or political one.

I say Boycott the whole charade

I would like to see the ratings so low for these debates that the MSM is kiterally embarrrassed. They live for ratings.


I do want to watch the youtube version done by a random US citizen, so I can watch it and point out all sorts of "They didn't talk about this, and they totally agree here, and what in the world does this mean?" to my friends and relations. Anything to help them consider voting 3rd party.

"Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." -- Thomas Paine

All important

positions in the media, arts and politics are controlled by CIA. It is no brainer, tyranny delegates important outlets to secret police.. Internet is already half taken if you look at the quality of Google search.

That was the same under monarchy in 19th century European countries, USSR, China, etc. And still is.

Debates = Puke

...you won't catch me watching the continuance of the charade on the dumbed-down American people.

Restore the Foundations - "If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?"

Futurama Predicted It


"The casualty of partisanship is objectivity."

Not sure, but I think the

Not sure, but I think the Republicans and Democrats have ALOT of say in who moderates the debates.

"Where liberty is, there is my country." -Benjamin Franklin

The Commission on Presidential Debates

Who's Afraid of an Open Debate?
The Truth About the Commission on Presidential Debates.

How about these guys for moderators?

Lew Rockwell - Economic Policies
Michael Scheuer - Foreign Policies
Judge Andrew Napolitano - Domestic Policies
Tom Woods - Head Moderator

Obama & Romney would probably end up walking off the stage, both in embarrasment for both being so out of touch.

Ron Paul

telepromter programmer

I would pay top dollar to see that.

We all know the debates will be watered down scripted talking points that are within the confines of the left vs. right paradigm. It will be boring as hell and too predictable.

"I am Troll fighter, number one"



SteveMT's picture

Lets get even more radical.

Michael Rivero
Alex Jones
Peter Schiff
Michael Savage

or the most radical of all, how about:

Congressman RON PAUL as moderator!

He has indorsed no one for president. He is no agenda or axe to grind. Ha!

I'm not so sure about Michael Savage

Pretty sure that dude's been compromised a long time ago. Sure, he says some good things- but he always leads people to the wrong conclusion, he is a professional misdirection artist. At the end of the day, after railing against both parties, he always leaves with "Well, i don't like Romney- but he's NOT Obama so therefore I'm voting for him"

"I am Troll fighter, number one"



How about

Jerry Doyle in place of Savage?

Of course you vote for the

Of course you vote for the one who gives you a paycheck.
Never bite the hand that feeds you


Pls send out requests to all your friends/family circle to BOYCOTT this charade, a false spectacle. Do not give any ratings bump whatsoever to the already dying media cartel. Withdraw consent. Withdraw their oxygen & life-blood. CNN was already on deathbed, about time they and their siblings die already.

Utilize the same time of farcical debates to organize local meetups to discuss real issues instead:

Suspension of 4th amendment, NDAA, domestic drones, CISPA
Audit the Fed. Discuss alternatives like BitCoin
Discuss basic issues such as fractional reserve banking
Discuss and/or watch lectures from G Edward Griffin, Lew Rockwell, Tom Woods etc.
Discuss "Project for New American Century" and assorted lies
Discuss support for local sustainable organic farming. Discuss BOYCOTT of Monsanto
etc. etc. etc.

Immoral funding of Military Industrial Complex by Federal Reserve and US taxation system must stop!!!! End illegal/unconstitutional wars! Preserve US currency!


Just to let everyone know #GaryJohnsonMustDebate was trending on Twitter yesterday.

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

All Establishment Lapdogs

Lehrer, Crowley, and Schieffer all did smear job interviews of Dr. Paul where they misrepresented his positions, cut him off, and made sure to add "who can't win" to his last name as if it were part of it (e.g. "Dr. Ron Paul, who can't win"). They love the ratings boost they get when he comes on the show, but sure don't seem to have any journalistic integrity.

I think all Presidential

I think all Presidential Debates should include all candidates that can hypothetically win an Electoral College majority.

I so wish

that Ron Paul could debate them both on foreign policy right now.