We are Change confronts Jack Hunter on Bilderberg & John Tate on Jesse Benton

Look how the video is being used - to attack one of our own... to attack a man that worked closely to Dr. Paul. So - seeing how these guys operate - why should Jack give them the time of day? The only reason they released the video is as an attack on Jack Hunter - one of our own. Why? Because he believes the conspiracy theories hurt the Liberty Movement.

Seriously - look at how many of you are reacting. You'd think Jack just came out of a secret Bilderberg meeting. Jack should be free to not answer questions. Yes - 'We Are Change' is free to publish their video - but this is an attack, plain and simple... it serves absolutely no other purpose.

And not only do they attack Jack Hunter - but John Tate. And you guys are buying it! Sorry - I won't stand for these attacks.

When I first talk to someone about Ron Paul, the first thing I have to clear up with them is "Ron Paul? Doesn't he think 9/11 was an inside job?" Geez... Thanks guys. Yes - thanks to you, 9/11 conspiracy theories are tied to Ron Paul's neck. Here is some truth: You Hurt the Movement!

Oh, and for the Truthers that think Ron Paul believes your 9/11 theory... he doesn't. If he did, he shouldn't have voted to give authority to go into Afghanistan. He wouldn't cite 9/11 as an example of blowback.

Jack was totally on the money with this one. Part of what has harmed this movement's message is when some have called their congressmen ranting "The Bilderbergers er gonna mayke a holocaust happen!" He's pissed off at people like this guy for making the rest of us look like anti-intellectual idiots.

before or after the interview, I completely agree with what he said from 0:20 to 1:25 of the second video.

Back in the 2008 election, I remember Dr. Paul being cornered by a woman from "We are change". She asked him why he hadn't come out about the "truth" on 9/11. This, at a time when the media was doing its best to tarnish Dr. Paul. That ROYALLY ticked me off. So she possibly gets the quote she wants, pats herself on the back, and does irreparable damage to the movement.

I have enyoyed some of their interviews in the past, such as the Doug Wead interview, but they need to tone it down with liberty candidates. The interviewer may have wanted to ask Hunter innocent questions at the end, but Jack had no way of knowing about that from past encounters the figures in the movement have had with "We are change".

Btw, I think the interviewer conducted himself well, they just need to start asking different questions. What do we think would happen if all of our liberty figures came out on record completely agreeing with everything "We are change" would like them to admit to on tape? The media would have a field day and the movement would cut itself off at the knees.

Sorry, I had to vent a bit. I actually like this particular interviewer compared to others.