41 votes

Dr. Alan Sabrosky of U.S. Army War College: "100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation"

From Veterans Today Article - 9/11 Certainly a False Flag Operation: Mark Dankof

Q: Mark, in your writings and broadcasts about 9/11, you’ve talked about the Israeli foreknowledge of the attacks. Is there compelling evidence to verify this? Do you mean that Israel was somehow involved in the attacks or may have benefited from them in one way or another?

A: I will reiterate what I said on Press TV. I believe Dr. Alan Sabrosky of the U. S. Army War College is correct. The Israeli Mossad pulled off the 9/11 attacks. They had the motive, the means, the opportunity, and the network in the domestic United States to keep their involvement from public exposure. As Dr. Sabrosky puts it, “It is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period.”


Israel did 9/11 - Dr. Alan Sabrosky - U.S Army War College (Video Interview)


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


The phrase "Dr. Alan Sabrosky of U.S. Army War College" is, at best, misleading. He left the U.S. Army War College around 25 years ago and has not been formally associated with it since.

impressive credentials but no facts

If this person had these types of sources, then why does he have no names or no specifics about 9/11? Convince the public.

Just because you work in the government or used to, or were the Director of Studies at the US Naval College, doesn't mean all your theories are true.

no facts?

I did not read the article but there are plenty of facts supporting it being an inside job and and a fact that Mossad were arrested that day cheering the collapse. Logical speculation to presume 1+1=2 in the given scenario, that is beside whatever he presented in the article.

The Abuse of Greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power. - Shakespeare

I believe this--

I guess *they* think they've won, pushing out Dr. Paul, because there haven't been as many neo-conservative Krystol-taught (sp?) trolls on here, crying, "anti-Semite" recently--

A few years ago a DPer who dared to bring this up would be immediately quashed--

I got into trouble myself, and I didn't even use the "Z" word--

you'll notice I still don't--

I guess they are pretty pleased with themselves now; they got rid of Dr. Paul, and they think they've negated *us*--

I don't believe that, or I wouldn't be on here anymore--

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

Let 'em think that.

We haf other vays to make it right. There are lots of other actions being taken by individuals and private groups that will affect the ultimate changes needed. The only real problems we need solved in the government is voting/counting/representation and monetary policy. Auditing the fed is step one of numerous steps toward changing the latter and my latest post is one way I see to take step one on the former.

Either way, their celebration just might be a bit premature and temporary.

911/Mossad - Our FBI is looking like a bunch of fools

Re Israel spying on U.S., just listened to an old 4-pt series by FoxNews (linked from the above veteranstoday article) on how the entire U.S. phone network is controlled by companies with ties to an Israel company with known wire-tapping expertise, with leaked info having compromised various FBI investigations - unrelated and related to 911. This is a company with ties to the Israeli government. Both the company and Israel denied any wrongdoing. And so where did the FBI's investigation into the matter ever go?

This issue of Israel spying on the U.S., including Israel's wiretapping of the CIA, remains to the current time. Oh, this is reassuring. "Such meddling underscores what is widely known but rarely discussed outside intelligence circles: Despite inarguable ties between the U.S. and its closest ally in the Middle East and despite statements from U.S. politicians trumpeting the friendship, U.S. national security officials consider Israel to be, at times, a frustrating ally and a genuine counterintelligence threat."

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

Dual citizen Chertoff in charge of US DHS

Chertoff's dual-nationality doesn't seem to have concerned a single U.S. senator
Published on 2007-06-24 00:00:00

By Jim Kirwan

Very few Americans, not directly affected by this man of many faces have no idea, of who really directs the duties of the 180,000 government employees in DHS: Duties that this man now holds in his stained and conflicted hands.

It seems that the variety of controversies which have paralleled Michael Chertoff's meteoric rise in government have been allowed to languish in the shadows for far too long. If the public does not soon become familiar with who their Director of Homeland Security really is-then they may live to regret that oversight. The details of Michael Chertoff's personal history should have disqualified him for high office: but instead his nomination for this job was approved without objection by the Senate.

"The Senate voted 98-0 to approve Chertoff on February 15. Chertoff, 51, took the oath of office that night in "a private ceremony at the White House."

DHS has a $32 billion budget, 180,000 employees, and jurisdiction over immigration, customs and transportation security, the Coast Guard, the Secret Service and the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

The question of Chertoff's dual-nationality doesn't seem to have concerned a single U.S. senator.

Many have wondered who let the detained suspected Israeli agents go back to Israel, immediately after 911. Apparently it was Michael Chertoff. (See Video Report: VIDEO: 911 Truckload of Explosives)

"Chertoff allowed scores of suspected Israeli terrorists and spies to quietly return to Israel . In several cases, Israeli suspects working for phoney moving companies, such as Urban Moving Systems from Weehawken, N.J., were caught driving moving vans which tested positive for explosives. On September 14, Dominic Suter, the owner of the moving company, which was found to be a Mossad front company, fled to Israel after FBI agents requested a second interview.

One group of 5 Israelis was seen on the roof of Urban Moving Systems videotaping and celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Center. These Israeli agents were returned to Israel on visa violations....

Criminal gangs vs. national actors?

Or maybe national actors are blaming the criminal gangs.

History confounds the modern marketing simplifications.

Free includes debt-free!

When did you quit believing in Santa Claus?

9/11 was such a vast false flag operation that you certainly cannot rule out a role by the Mossad. As to what percent they participated, well, that would remain to be seen. What is more important in my opinion (at this stage at least) is getting people to realize that 9/11 was a staged event. So that is my focus at this point, though I'd definitely be interested in all who's of all the participants, especially who benefits.

"When did you quit believing in Santa Claus?" was the Subject line of an email I wrote and sent out to my email list back in 2009. This was inspired by the 44 story Chinese skyscraper fire in February of that year that I described (below) as having "thoroughly burned into a crinkling cinder. However IT DID NOT COLLAPSE."

I use a stripped down version of this email to answer 9/11 questions on Yahoo Answers (also under Bloatedtoad). The only change here from my original was the addition of the 15 minute Architects & Engineers piece (at the end below). I wanted to share this with you here because this will give you a working knowledge of the basics of the 9/11 story that you can convey easily to others.

Get me in front of a computer with almost anyone and I will flip them from a government 9/11 fairytale believer to a 9/11 truth believer, and that's just using the links below in my Santa Claus email. If time is short (most of the time it is) the most important links are the Kenny Johanemann video (1 minute) and the Larry Silverstein "pull it" video (56 seconds) and your explanation of what these two videos mean. Then if you can get the person to watch the Aaron Russo interview that will tie it all together. The fourth most important link here is the BBC advance report (which proves that a story had already been scripted in the media in advance). Those three or four alone with your guiding insights as they watch is usually enough to cause cognitive dissonance. If you get them to go through all the links I present here it will devastate their world view of what really happened and they will be in a daze for a week or more as they sort out their world view. I know. I've been doing this for three years now. It's time to stop this nonsense that guys with box cutters can shut down the greatest country in the world. This will break it open if it reaches enough people. OK, here's the body of my email. Feel free to copy and share:


As kids we believed in Santa Claus. Our parents were the gatekeepers of information and, though benign, our environment during that formative time was a controlled one. We were taught to believe in Santa Claus. Initially we accepted all the information that we received at face value. However, as time progressed, we gained bits and pieces of information that led to a cognitive dissonance which, in turn, led us to question our image of Santa Claus. These “bits and pieces” led to questions such as “How could Santa Claus fit through my chimney” or “How does Santa Claus leave gifts in millions of homes during a single night”? Armed with all these bits and pieces of information, we began to get a different picture that caused all the previous illogic that we had learned to come crashing down. This finally led to an epiphany that Santa Claus really isn’t anything like what we had first thought!

There are other things in life that we have always taken for granted as “fact” that later prove to be only an illusion as well. It’s only a matter of getting more information. As in the case of the Santa Claus myth, it is only a matter of time as new evidence unfolds that we are forced to rethink our view on what the truth is.

I want to try an experiment here:

Please watch this first video linked here. It’s only one minute. You’ve read this far into my letter so please take just one small minute and watch this first video. You’re going to be impressed. This is a local news video of a witness named Kenny Johannemann testifying to explosions that happened in the basement of one of the WTC towers. While he is testifying you still see both of the twin towers burning behind him in the background. This was live footage and it's only ONE minute long. Go ahead and watch this here:

(YouTube Key Words: Johannemann suicide)

Those explosions were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling the tower. You say, “wait, this doesn’t fit anything I know, maybe there is some other explanation for those explosions in the basement.” True. This is just one piece of evidence, but it’s a piece of evidence that raises a lot of questions. You didn’t see this on TV either. Does that prick your interest?

The government has promoted a “theory” that maybe the fuel from the jet trickled down the elevator shafts into the basement and subsequently exploded. Could this be? Let’s continue and look at other evidence. Barry Jennings was another witness that got stuck in Building Seven during 9/11. Remember, Building Seven was NEVER hit by a jet. In Barry's case an explosion blew out a stair well below him leaving him hanging and stranded for hours until the fire department got him out. Both the twin towers went down during the time he was stranded. Building Seven, a tall building in it’s own right (47 stories tall), came down at around 5:20 (later that day). Fortunately, he was saved. Watch his account here:

(YouTube Key Words: Barry Jennings dead age – more hits when “dead age” excluded)

Again, the explosions he talked about were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling down this building. You say, “Hold On! Building Seven housed the FBI and the CIA offices, so who would have access to set up explosives in there? There has got to be another explanation.” True. This is just one piece of evidence which raises more questions. Again, you didn't see Barry’s testimony on TV.

William Rodriguez, head janitor at the towers, was meeting with some people in basement level #1 (the highest of several basement levels) when an explosion from below pushed everyone upwards, causing ceiling tiles to fall and walls to crack. Just as William started to express to others what he thought that explosion might be, an airplane hit and shook the building from above. His story begins at 9:31 here:

(Google Video Key Words: William Rodriguez)

Now, let’s look for other different kinds of evidence. Steve Jones, a physicist, obtained WTC dust samples from the collapsed WTC towers from people who lived nearby. He analyzed it and found that the dust contained residues of explosives. Steve Jones first became famous when he became known as the “voice of reason” during the Pons / Fleischman "Cold Fusion" debacle of 1989, if you remember that. For a Nuclear Physicist, like Steve Jones, analyzing dust samples for explosive residues is a relatively simple task. It may be similar to asking a PhD mathematician to do arithmetic. He reported his detailed findings here in Boston:

(Google Video Key Words: Steve Jones Boston)

In this lecture, you recall, he offered other scientists to take parts of his samples in order to analyze the "red chips" that he had recently discovered. That was December 2007. These specks have now, in fact, been confirmed to be unexploded “nanostructured super-thermite” particles. That confirmation is not just a smoking gun IT IS THE GUN. See the article here:


The actual paper in its entirety can be found here in PDF form. Be sure to click the “download” link here:


If you get into the actual paper, you learn that the explosives may actually have been sprayed into position like paint or insulation!

Steve Jones’ findings may not fit the stories that you have heard in the news but it does lend support to what Johannemann, Jennings and Rodriguez testified that they saw. You say, “The news media isn’t going to shoot itself in the foot by making something up.” So how do we rectify all the contradictions that we were told in the news? Could Steve Jones and these witnesses be glory-seeking kooks trying to make a name for themselves?

Then take a look at this:

Here is a BBC report announcing the collapse of the Solomon Building (the official name for Building Seven). There is only one problem. The reporter standing at the scene and announcing this didn't realize that, in fact, you could still see Building Seven still standing off to the right. It actually collapsed within about 20 minutes after that live report. Watch it here:

(YouTube Key Words: BBC Solomon slips – you get more hits by excluding “slips”)

How did the BBC know in advance that Building Seven would collapse? The fact that it was announced in advance is strong support that the flow of information on this tragedy was being controlled (but in a more sinister way than how information about Santa Claus was controlled in your life).

Were the people at the BBC the only people privy to this information? Probably not. Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of Building Seven. In a 2002 PBS documentary he talked about how he discussed the Building Seven situation with the fire department and how the decision was made by that department to "pull" it. Well, there is one problem with his testimony that you may want to consider. It takes about a week to rig a building with explosives before you pull it. So are buildings constructed with built-in explosives just in case they need to be blown up in a hurry? Building Seven went down that same day. Whoops! Watch Larry's testimony from the PBS documentary here in this short clip:

(YouTube Key words: PBS Silverstein)

Incidentally, luckily for Larry, he insured his property in the nick of time just six months before September 11th! It was a sweet deal. So who orchestrated this terrorist event anyway? They had to get past the FBI and CIA and prepare at least three buildings for demolition as well as direct the activities of men with box cutters (if they even existed). It’s clear from the evidence presented here so far that at least some of the media was in on this. What else could explain the BBC blunder? They had to control the information to those of us who might not like the idea that a few thousand people had to be killed in order to fulfill some kind of agenda. What’s in it for these people that were “in the know?”

Aaron Russo was a famous movie producer who became best friends with one of the Rockefeller family members (Remember “The Rose” and "Trading Places" starring Eddie Murphy?). This is the same Rockefeller family that is a large shareholder of the Federal Reserve Bank -- a private company that loans money to our government and contributes to our huge national debt. You see the name “Federal Reserve” at the top the dollar bill. Yes, we're talking about THAT Bank! Anyway, the upshot of this friendship was that in the year 2000 (11 months before 9/11) Aaron Russo learned from his Rockefeller buddy that there was going to be an "event". He was told that out of this event the U.S. would go into Afghanistan and look for Bin Laden in Caves and then the U.S. would go into Iraq. His fascinating testimony about this "event" starts at 26:45 here in this interview:

(Google Video Key Words: Aaron Russo Reflections Warnings)

One more thing. In February 2009 a 44 story Chinese skyscraper caught fire and thoroughly burned into a crinkling cinder. However IT DID NOT COLLAPSE. By comparison WTC Building Seven had a few small fires and was never hit by a plane. It DID COLLAPSE. See that article here:

(Google Key Words: China 44 fire consumes)

Now see this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw
(YouTube Key Words: architects engineers 911 truth)

Amazingly, all this evidence is only the tip of the iceberg. Each of these are separate independent pieces of evidence from unconnected sources. When taken together they paint a clear picture. You are a juror in a court of law. What would be your verdict? Remember, the word “conspiracy” is not in the dictionary to describe a fiction.

To forward this as a clean readable e-mail (without the accumulation of all the “>” symbols) just highlight all the text and COPY IT FIRST. Then paste it into your new e-mail before sending it on. It works like a charm!

NOTE: I included key words below each link because it’s common for a video to disappear. Usually multiple versions exist and the key words will assist in finding another copy.


I thought this was debunked?

William Rodriguez heard/felt something blow up below him - in the basement... he was about to tell his supervisor that it must be a generator - but before he could, they heard the huge crash of the plane striking the building. To Rodriguez and others, this is an indication that what actually blew up in the basement was the start of the government's explosive charges. ??

Of course, what probably really happened was exactly what William Rodriguez's first thought was - a generator blew up below him. This was caused by the plane striking the building. See - light goes much faster than sound. So, the generator blew up at the very moment the building was struck - the sound of the plane hitting arrived about 1 second later.

You are one of two possibilities

You either are someone who does not truly understand science and is incapable of looking at several independent pieces of testimony that reveals a pattern in all this or you are a paid government troll. I'm having a hard time deciding which one you are because either is quite capable of such an unenlightened answer as this one that you present here.


So - you disagree that light is faster than sound?

I am a fighter against junk science. You and many Truthers are its purveyor.

You say I don't understand science? You think my argument is unsound - unenlightened? So - give me debate - don't give me 'you are a troll or a government agent.' That is chickenshit. Don't pick a fight and run. Stand your ground. I listened to the argument - and now I am fighting it.

Here is the science:

Speed of sound is about 1,000 fps.
Height of plane strike was about 1,000 feet.
Speed of light: just under 1,000,000,000 fps.

So... plane hits - causes generator to blow. 1 second later, they hear the plane hit (these guys are in the basement).

Now, dispute my reasoning.

I'm sorry the guy doesn't understand that light travels faster than sound. But - you want to defend his position and use it as proof of a government conspiracy? Go Ahead. Make an ass of yourself - continue to make the Truther movement look like science dolts.

I don't think you want debate because you have invested/wasted too much time believing crap science from idiots.


huh , you sir are a tool!

"He's this eccentric Ghandi-Like figure that you cant touch with the normal bribes that people respond to."
the man Doug Wead on DR. RON PAUL

What commercial airliners, the ones undetected by NORAD.

No planes, no argument.

Free includes debt-free!

So why

do you suppose this generator just "blew up" at that particular time; what is the scientific evidence?

? I don't have proof

I am just giving a logical explanation to something that people use to support the Truther theory. The man very strongly suggests that there was an explosion below him (the basement level below him). I'm suggesting that he was correct, but that it wasn't some part of a government conspiracy.... it was actually what he stated he was about to tell his superior (that was with him at the time) - he was about to tell him that it had to be a generator blowing up - but never got to because they heard the plane crashing into the tower, and all hell broke loose.

So - proof? No, I can't prove it. But it is certainly more likely than government agents setting off explosives.

Generators don't "blow up"

There's nothing explosive in them. They do blow apart after extreme heating caused by overloading. What stops overloading? Well, just like in your house, there are circuit breakers. An overload in the building would have to last for a long time (minutes) and would have to remain under the breaker's rating (say 14.9 amps for a 15 amp breaker) AND have to encompass many overloaded end circuits because it would take thousands of amps to do this. There's also sub-panel breakers that have lower limits than the total of all the end breakers. Then there's main breakers with even smaller aggregate totals. All in all, it's just not possible. The only way that generators do blow is because of a mechanical failure inside that generator or in the wires between it and the main breakers. Those wires would only be a dozen or so feet long, e.g. in the basement.

But, you wanted a debate so I'll give you one you simply cannot dispel with any official theory. What melted the molten steel that we see pouring from the damaged floors in the videos? To save time, I'll offer some proven facts. Steel melts (not referring to weakening it), at 2900 degrees F. Jet fuel, aka kerosene, burns at 750, 1300 or 1800, depending on if it is oxygen starved (like the 911 fires), oxygen balanced, or forced-air-induced (think blast furnace). This is why we use coal in blast furnaces to melt steel. No other 'fuel' works well. Also, office fires are lower temps. Simply, there's exactly zero sources physically capable of melting steel in this scenario. Numerous reports have been verified that show so much steel melted in the rubble that it remained molten for 6 weeks afterward. That quantity of steel would take the energy of 100 buildings falling (if that COULD magically be converted into metal melting heat) or it would take the energy of dozens of planes' fuel loads (again assuming magic melting capabilities).

The only credible possibility is nano-structured super thermite. That substance is only available from the US military, is easy to test for and has been found by those tests to be present in every dust sample.

To use that to down a building, one would need weeks of effort to strip the insulation from the support beams and paint this chemical on the steel beams. Many accounts report secret, night work crews doing just that on cordoned off floors in the weeks prior. ..and the whole building reported insulation dust coming from the air vents for those weeks also. To do that, one only needs control of the building's security system. Marvin Bush heads the company that runs WTC security.


You don't find it

very coincidental that a "generator blew up" at that particular time?

not so fast . . .

• Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney involvement
• highest level Pentagon dual-citizenship involvement
• links to shadowy network of "outer-nationalists" such as Wolfgang Boehringer
• CIA involvement across-the-board
• ties to Chicago mafia
• George HW Bush involvement
• Marvin Bush security firm
• Jeb Bush declared state of emergency prior to
• FBI on scene almost instantly
• US Secret Service complicity
• FAA high-level involvement
• who prevented NORAD intercepts?
• who killed John O'Neill?
• who destroyed SEC records of foreknowledge?
• NY Port Authority involvement
... as well as evidence of Mossad involvement everywhere you look.


The owner wanted the buildings down anyway and even checked into getting them leveled due to asbestos.

the israeli firsters

are not gonna like this article. And could you imagine what Glenn Beck say about it? Maybe his head would really explode if he read it. And I used to like Beck when he was exposing all those nasties like MAD, Agenda 21 and such.

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison

most concise article on who and how

absolutely devastating to the willfully ignorant masses. time to reclaim what was stolen.

awareness is the answer.

I am thinking

Jack Hunter and this guy should get together and have coffee.

We should push that meme.

We should push that meme.

Jack Hunter needs to debate! Since he's such a know-it-all!!

How do we make this happen?