29 votes

Fox News: Gary Johnson Will NOT Be Allowed to Debate

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
LIBERTY2ME's picture

Regarding the lawsuit for GJ

Regarding the lawsuit for GJ to be allowed in the debates - does anyone know anything about the judges history or background?

"I know how the system

"I know how the system works." -Ron Paul

“Wasting a vote is sometimes voting for somebody that you don't really believe in."
-Ron Paul

He didn't have 15%, Ron Paul did. If he had invited Ron

to be the top of the ticket he'd be looking a debate with Biden right now. Now he has nothing. It's all his own fault. Write in Ron Paul 2012.


Release the Sandy Hook video.

If he had 15%

then, the rules would be changed to 20%.
I know how the system works too.


Ron Paul declined many times to run as a 3rd-Party, and was never interested...so where the hell do you get off blaming Gary Johnson for not making Paul the Libertarian Nominee? Ron Paul has to take the blame for that -- he never ran for it.

In fact, Ron Paul refused to even compete against Mitt Romney as a GOP candidate, and just pre-emptively bailed-out of his own Campaign waay, way back in April -- giving Romney an uncontested path to the Nomination (much to the dismay of his supporters)...as his own son publically endorsed Mitt Romney.

Face the truth, Gary Johnson is the only guy out there actually fighting the top Establishment candidates. Ron Paul only wanted to fight Rick Santorum.


whatsup with all your posts....was just digging through your page...seems like a large percentage of negatives...mostly about Ron Paul or his campaign. Not calling you a troll...but seems a little odd.

Johnson does not have the

Johnson does not have the power to just change the Libertarian Ticket, and also if he did it would have been too late to change the ballots in many states.

SteveMT's picture

Is that what's in that secret debate contract: 3's a crowd?

I would bet, and there is a lot more, too.

Groups Demand To See Secret Presidential Debate Contract

who cares if its a

gun grabber vs gun grabber debate or gun grabber vs gun grabber vs gun grabber debate? they all 3 want us unarmed then killed.

Where do you get the idea

Where do you get the idea Gary is a "gun grabber"?

If Gary Johnson had any sense he would have created

an account here and states his case here and debated with us after he RNC was over.

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

I have pondered this question too.

I agree, and am completely amazed that he doees not seem to know that would be a great move. He gave a very good speech at the Paulfest in Tampa, like he was parroting Dr. Paul.
I am shocked that he's not courting us more. Completely baffles me.
You make a good point.


We write in Dr. Paul, who else are we going to vote for? He probably sees it as a given.

You could've engaged him in a

You could've engaged him in a series of questions any time he has made himself available on Reddit, Google+ or in person when he has spoken and had Q$A sessions. It's your responsibility to seek out the answers to your questions.

Besides, it would be far more interesting for you if you posed the questions in person and spoke to him face to face to get a sense of him as an individual. I've found him to be unusually accessible as I've managed to speak with him on several occasions. Make an effort.

It's up to Johnson not I

that is why it's called campaigning. I don't really have any questions for him but others here do. It is becoming apparent like Romney Gary doesn't really want to win either. Shill or fool you decide.

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

Dog 'em Gary!

I don't even want to see a Romney / Obama / Johnson debate. There's no chance Romney could win, and he doesn't offer any differences in opinion from Obama. I'd rather just see an Obama / Johnson debate.

Michael Nystrom's fists can punch through FUD.

Imagine this, at each debate,

Imagine this, at each debate, they take a few questions from the public, each one of those questions is "Why are you two afraid of the most conservative, anti-war candidate on the ballot, Gary Johnson, and if you are not afraid of him, why don't you allow him into the debates?"

He should just

He should just make his own video where he answers all the questions in the time allotted. Then edit it together with clips of them asking the questions and claim commentary copyright exemption as he is commenting on the questions with his answers. :)

Mass protest

outside the places where they are having the debates and demand Gary to be in them. Gary should also be there protesting. The American people deserve a third voice in the debates.

Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our Liberty. -Thomas Jefferson


While I do appreciate the visibility a candidate gets from participating in these debates, I also recognize them for the ridiculous circus they are.


... and all subsidiary corporate liar media whores. Ignore them, boycott them vociferously, demand their corporate charter be revoked and their entire corporate octopus be dissolved / all of that.

No compliance of executive orders than

and any murderer enforcers will be retaliated against than then delivered punishment of treason by the people in the future.

boycott the presidential debates....

show the world we dont believe this crap either.

A true flower can not blossom without sunlight and a true man can not live without love.

Oh NICE Neal, get caught in a LIE at the end

Facepalm moment for Cavuto. Nobody told Gary he's supposed to play along with the cute deceptions of Foxnews hosts.

Most of those who think so actually don't and most of those who think sew actually rip.

GJ is on MSNBC now

Regarding the debates

What a weak answer

What a weak answer on why not run for U.S. Senate

Well that's odd. Since so many of us are voting for him.

Debates or not.

But I contend that if a candidate is on the ballot in all 50 states, they should be allowed to vote.

"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul

He's not on the ballot in all 50 States

He's not on the ballot in all 50 States

He doesn't need to be

If he's on the ballot in enough states that he could statistically win, he should be allowed in the debates.

He is in 48

And the other 2 are in court. He might be.

Ron Paul convert from the Heart of Dixie