2 votes

Obamaphones, The Welfare State & Voting

In the wake of the video debuting on the interwebs of the Cleveland woman yelling and screaming about how much Romney “sucks” (in her defense, Romney does in fact suck) and how “every minority in Cleveland” has a free Obamaphone, we’ll step in to comment for a moment. A couple quick hits:

1. Yes, this is a repulsive display of the welfare state at work and a perfect example of government control over a populace through soft power. In this instance, all of the people in Cleveland (or anywhere) that are on welfare, food stamps, etc., or ANY of these programs (including the national school Free Lunch Program) qualify for the “Lifeline” program. This program provides them discounts or free pre-paid cell phones with 250 minutes a month – “Obamaphones” as this woman so aptly puts it. These people will protest Romney without knowing very much about what he stands for (or even if he intends to do away with this program) to support Obama, even though Obama didn’t directly call for this. In fact, the program was enacted under Ronald Reagan originally. The issue however, is with an explosion in cost and use by an expanding welfare population, coupled with the program’s extension into cell carriers from land lines in 2008. Because Obama was in office when the cell phones started becoming available, he is credited by a populace that hasn’t been educated otherwise.

2. Proponents of the program will argue that some of the costs are offset by cell carriers who donate revenue to the program. This is untrue, as many providers simply add on what they donate to what they charge the rest of us – the paying consumer. So this is simply a hidden government tax.

Continue Reading




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Obamaphoooooone

Bump for a way better analysts than Rush Limbaugh

http://lionsofliberty.com/
*Advancing the Ideas of Liberty Daily*

Not tough

That's a very low bar to leap.