Peter Schiff interviews John McCain: You Can't FIX a Ponzi Scheme Senator!
Submitted by goldenequity on Thu, 10/04/2012 - 16:27in
»
- Login to post comments
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


the "government" stole it??????
YOU ARE the government you friggin idiot Mccaint!!!!
what a liar!! He stole it!!!
Gwinnett County Georgia
War is an instrument entirely inefficient toward redressing wrong; and multiplies, instead of indemnifying losses.
Thomas Jefferson
Schiff
Has no mercy. Some might be offended. I am not because a sixteen trillion dollar debt has no mercy. John McCain is worthless just like he has always been.
McCain is not use to being beaten over the head with the truth.
McCain was treated much better than Erwin Schiff is being treated by the U.S. Government.
McCain was treated the same way that Peter treats every guest on this show who is talking a bunch of nonsense....mercilessly. Will he ever return as a guest on the Peter Schiff show? Having a 'round two' would be great, but I don't believe neocon McCain will be back.
Peter needs to let people
Peter needs to let people speak... it gets on my nerve the way he interrupts...
If you disagree with me on anything you are not a real libertarian...
I agree IF
they actually had something to say.
You want McCain to speak?? ahahahahahah thats good.
Gwinnett County Georgia
War is an instrument entirely inefficient toward redressing wrong; and multiplies, instead of indemnifying losses.
Thomas Jefferson
I agree... I have a feeling
I agree... I have a feeling Mcain won't be back on his show. If you had enough time... I would have let him talk, then bitch slap the truth across his face.
I have a feeling you get on the defensive when your ideas and thoughts are being interrupted like this, and it's not productive if you want someone to understand your view point.
I respect Peter greatly though.
"A message without meaning falls on deft ears, Meaning without a message falls on no ears, but a message with meaning is revolutionary." - Quote I made up. :D
Agreed. His style is off
Agreed. His style is off putting. Peter Schiff, always the interrupter.
Memo to Schiff: shift gears, let your guests speak uninterrupted unless to reign in a diatribe (which, ironically, you do habitually) or you're coming up against a commercial.
School's fine. Just don't let it get in the way of thinking. -Me
It is his show, he has to
It is his show, he has to take control.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFxvy9XyUtg
Yes, Peter's show is Peter's
Yes, Peter's show is Peter's show. But if a host behaves how Peter did without substantial finances, something I bet Peter has, that host's show would be short lived and wouldn't attract big names.
Guests who are interrupted and worse decline invitations. Sooner or later, word about a host who harangues his guests spreads. I wouldn't consider going on Peter's show and I wouldn't invite Peter onto my show if I had one.
You said the word control. In broadcast media, control should be applied when a guest is out of control, which McCain was not. Peter loves control. He's not a conversationalist or a journalist. This clip was Peter being Peter once again.
School's fine. Just don't let it get in the way of thinking. -Me
Here is what is wrong with the RNC
This is a quote from John McCain from the interview (starts at 7:30 in the video):
"The government can act with the right kind of legislators to make sure the free market is in the business."
Isn't government intervention the OPPOSITE of a free market? How about the government enforce contracts and protect liberty, then let the chips fall where they may in the free market economy. Government intervention is what happened when TARP was passed under Bush (that McCain voted for), just as there was intervention when Solyndra was given subsidies and GM was bailed out under Obama.
;-))
Peter needs to understand the questions he's asking better, not a good interview in my eyes!! Like stop the war & EPA , DEA ect to save the old folks SS. Then opt out for younger folks! ;-))PEACE