Who Really Won Last Night's Debate? Goldman Sachs
Submitted by robbylane on Thu, 10/04/2012 - 19:30by Mike Adams, Natural News
Political theater is so amusing these days that it deserves some comment. All across the internet, people are asking, "Who won last night's presidential debate?" The conventional wisdom is that Mitt Romney won the debate and that Obama turned in a very poor performance, but even that's not the real story. The correct answer is that Goldman Sachs won the debate. And why? Because both candidates are beholden to Wall Street interests and the global banksters who now influence nearly everything that happens at the highest levels of government.
The recent Fed announcement of QE unlimited (infinite money creation) is, for example, an unlimited, never-ending banker bailout pledge which will destroy the value of the U.S. dollar over the long term. It is a massive theft program that steals from the working middle class and gives to the rich. Both candidates quietly support this program because they're both puppets of the banking power elite. QE unlimited was never even mentioned during the presidential debate.
Who lost the debate? The People of America
If the bankers won the debate, then who lost? The People, of course.
Nowhere in the debate was there any mention or discussion of the following subjects which are crucial to restoring America to a nation of abundance and freedom:
- Login to post comments
Destroy the country in order to save the bankers
Whatever happened to the word "treason"? When politicians knowingly betray their country to pay off the most generous donors to their campaigns, is this not a great example of the meaning of that word? It should be brought back into common use, it might actually get their attention and scare them into a modicum of decency.
Bottom line is...
...the borrower is servant to the lender. As long as the government owes money, is will first be a servant to the lenders. Hmmm? Guess that should really be us!
Well
they will continue this until there broken glass or crystal night comes from the people they made mad and that is what history shows.
Gary Johnson won
8,000 new followers on Twitter.
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
My website: http://www.libertypoet.com/
STAND WITH RAND 2016
So...legalize, GJ won with
So...legalize, GJ won with even being invited...snicker!
If my need to be RIGHT is greater then my desire for TRUTH, then I will not recognize it when it arrives ~ Libertybelle
Yes, so many have it right here....what is the difference?
It is all planned anyway and until the American public wake up to it we are a sinking ship. Sometimes I wonder if their agenda is not to have riots in the streets??
Please everyone take a look at my current full time job, say some prayers because we need them.
http://www.dailypaul.com/257537/freedom-supporter-needs-your...
And who cares?
What difference will either make. It is all window dressing. Behind these two guys there is a machinery neither can change as they are voted in as their "man"... Sorry, but I have lost all faith in the political system.
Understand perfectly, getor
I've lost all faith, too. Sometimes, after your eyes have been opened to all this, you wonder why everyone around you can't see it, too. However, they continue acting like it all matters and the upcoming election is the "most important election of our lifetime." Of course that's nothing more than a bunch of bull!
When the American spirit was in its youth, the language of America was different: Liberty, sir, was the primary object. - Patrick Henry
I agree. Some had the same tip
I agree.
Some had the same tip as early as 2008, or even before.
From that point on, whenever that was, anyway, the people might have as well gone straight to Goldman Sachs' board of directors, and a couple active buddies they have at the Federal Reserve, and asked, prior to the campaigns :
"okay, so, who's the guy you picked for us for the oval office ?"
The MSM being solely around to maintain the smoke veil for nothing but an illusion.
My name's pronounced like "see real". Its root is "Lord".
"The demand of a great people is always at the scale of its most serious misfortunes." --De Gaulle
http://Laissez-Faire.Me/Liberty
Some people look at the list of donors
and get confused. They assume that corporations donate to candidates and the PACs. This is not so.
For example, the top three Ron Paul's donors are branches of Pentagon. If we apply the same logic of weak-minded among us, we can conclude that Ron Paul is owned by Pentagon.
In a nutshell.....
"It's all just mental masturbation to keep the masses occupied while the bankers steal everything." WOW.
You've got to narrow it down
You've got to narrow it down a little more then that ! Goldman Sachs puppet A; Obama, or Goldman Sachs puppet B; Mitt Romney?
Rational analysis, thanks
.
bump--
.
it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--