Why I Won't Vote - As timely today as it was 56 years ago
Submitted by Missy on Fri, 10/05/2012 - 20:45Why I Won't Vote
By W.E.B. Dubois, The Nation, 20 October 1956
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/298.html
On October 20, 1956, W. E. B. Du Bois delivers this eloquent indictment of US politics while explaining to Nation readers why he won't vote in the upcoming Presidential election. Du Bois condemns both Democrats and Republicans for their indifferent positions on the influence of corporate wealth, racial inequality, arms proliferation and unaffordable health care.
...In 1956, I shall not go to the polls. I have not registered. I believe that democracy has so far disappeared in the United States that no "two evils" exist. There is but one evil party with two names, and it will be elected despite all I can do or say. There is no third party. On the Presidential ballot in a few states (seventeen in 1952), a "Socialist" Party will appear. Few will hear its appeal because it will have almost no opportunity to take part in the campaign and explain its platform. If a voter organizes or advocates a real third-party movement, he may be accused of seeking to overthrow this government by "force and violence." Anything he advocates by way of significant reform will be called "Communist" and will of necessity be Communist in the sense that it must advocate such things as government ownership of the means of production; government in business; the limitation of private profit; social medicine, government housing and federal aid to education; the total abolition of race bias; and the welfare state. These things are on every Communist program; these things are the aim of socialism. Any American who advocates them today, no matter how sincerely, stands in danger of losing his job, surrendering his social status and perhaps landing in jail. The witnesses against him may be liars or insane or criminals. These witnesses need give no proof for their charges and may not even be known or appear in person. They may be in the pay of the United States Government. A.D.A.'s and "Liberals" are not third parties; they seek to act as tails to kites. But since the kites are self-propelled and radar-controlled, tails are quite superfluous and rather silly.
The present Administration is carrying on the greatest preparation for war in the history of mankind. Stevenson promises to maintain or increase this effort. The weight of our taxation is unbearable and rests mainly and deliberately on the poor. This Administration is dominated and directed by wealth and for the accumulation of wealth. It runs smoothly like a well-organized industry and should do so because industry runs it for the benefit of industry. Corporate wealth profits as never before in history. We turn over the national resources to private profit and have few funds left for education, health or housing. Our crime, especially juvenile crime, is increasing. Its increase is perfectly logical; for a generation we have been teaching our youth to kill, destroy, steal and rape in war; what can we expect in peace? We let men take wealth which is not theirs; if the seizure is "legal" we call it high profits and the profiteers help decide what is legal. If the theft is "illegal" the thief can fight it out in court, with excellent chances to win if he receives the accolade of the right newspapers. Gambling in home, church and on the stock market is increasing and all prices are rising. It costs three times his salary to elect a Senator and many millions to elect a President. This money comes from the very corporations which today are the government. This in a real democracy would be enough to turn the party responsible out of power. Yet this we cannot do.
I have no advice for others in this election. Are you voting Democratic? Well and good; all I ask is why? Are you voting for Eisenhower and his smooth team of bright ghost writers? Again, why? Will your helpless vote either way support or restore democracy to America?
...Is the refusal to vote in this phony election a counsel of despair? No, it is dogged hope. It is hope that if twenty-five million voters refrain from voting in 1956 because of their own accord and not because of a sly wink from Khrushchev, this might make the American people ask how much longer this dumb farce can proceed without even a whimper of protest. Yet if we protest, off the nation goes to Russia and China. Fifty-five American ministers and philanthropists are asking the Soviet Union "to face manfully the doubts and promptings of their conscience." Can not these do-gooders face their own consciences? Can they not see that American culture is rotting away: our honesty, our human sympathy; our literature, save what we import from abroad? Our only "review" of literature has wisely dropped "literature" from its name. Our manners are gone and the one thing we want is to be rich--to show off. Success is measured by income. University education is for income, not culture, and is partially supported by private industry. We are not training poets or musicians, but atomic engineers. Business is built on successful lying called advertising. We want money in vast amount, no matter how we get it. So we have it, and what then?
Is the answer the election of 1956? We can make a sick man President and set him to a job which would strain a man in robust health. So he dies, and what do we get to lead us? With Stevenson and Nixon, with Eisenhower and Eastland, we remain in the same mess. I will be no party to it and that will make little difference. You will take large part and bravely march to the polls, and that also will make no difference. Stop running Russia and giving Chinese advice when we cannot rule ourselves decently. Stop yelling about a democracy we do not have. Democracy is dead in the United States. Yet there is still nothing to replace real democracy. Drop the chains, then, that bind our brains. Drive the money-changers from the seats of the Cabinet and the halls of Congress. Call back some faint spirit of Jefferson and Lincoln,and when again we can hold a fair election on real issues, let's vote, and not till then. Is this impossible? Then democracy in America is impossible.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Login to post comments





One Problem
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. - Plato
Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide. - John Adams (1814)
The preservation of the sacred fire of liberty, and the destiny of the Republican model of government, are justly considered as deeply, perhaps as finally staked, on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people. - George Washington
The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.
-Thomas Paine
I agree! democracy is dead in
I agree! democracy is dead in America. We have both a welfare and a police state. We are moving toward totalitarianism in this country. we moved past socialism a long time ago. It was the people who demanded more government programs and more spending for the military complex because they were seeing terrorist everywhere. Congress just complied and were only too glad to do so.
Bob Marshall
Many citizens are under the
Many citizens are under the illusion that a real two party system exist.
Bob Marshall
It is not 1956
Maybe Du Bois made the right decision in 1956 because he did not have option of voting against the kind of government that oppressed him. Now however he is wrong because he can vote against the government that oppresses us. Every vote for Gary Johnson is a vote against that kind of government and the American people need to be heard. That is what we were doing when we supported Ron Paul When we look at the history of the campaign we can see that there was no more chance of him becoming president then Gary Johnson does have now. However it was and is still very important for us to speak up and say we do not accept this oppression. I do not accept their oppression so I will vote for Gary Johnson.
http://hnn.us/blogs/liberty_and_power/148640.htmlqe
Keith Halderman
a buddy asked me:
Hi Al,
Just received my Absentee Ballot the other day. Have not yet opened it.
Could use some counseling though. Would you give me a hand? Lee
I replied:
'Lo, Lee
My counsel goes like this: I think both major parities are for the birds. So I do not select either a democrat or republican anywhere on the ballot. I then look at who is left, and pick from one of them for president.
Where I see only republican and democratic candidates for an office and no other choice, I do not vote there. That way there would be one less vote acknowledging the validity of either major party. That's worth it to me.
The various remaining candidates on the ballot after eliminating voting for dems or reps, I choose from.
In the SD case that left only two choices.
For pres I had a Libertarian or Constitution party to choose from. I chose Libertarian (Gary Johnson).
The other one was for a municipal director's job, and I chose the only other choice, another Libertarian.
I was not able to write in Ron Paul, because in SD write-ins are not allowed. That was OK with me though, because before I got the ballot, I had decided to vote for Johnson, after the doctor bowed out.
Hope my detailing of my thought process during voting helps in your deliberations, only other thing to say: Vote what you heart tells you to do! AL
W. E. B. Du Bois was a sellout
when he got together with that racist Eugenist Margaret Sanger who called blacks weeds that needed to be gotten rid of
DuBois
Was most likely ignorant of Sanger's real agenda. He was ill-informed on economics and taken in by the tempting false altruism of socialism. But he had no trouble seeing through the rigged electoral system and figuring out the best way to undermine it...something many here at the Daily Paul(!!!) haven't figured out yet.
In other words, "I give up"
"I'm, not even going to do the absolute minimum to change things; voting. Let things happen without my influence, let others take charge."
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
hmmmmmm
Why do I have the feeling that Dubois would be happy to vote for Obama?
“With laws shall our land be built up, but with lawlessness laid waste.”
-Njal Thorgeirsson
Socialists
are morons.
The author has some logical
The author has some logical fallacies that destroy the whole point of his article. He promotes socialism and government control of production...then turns around and complains that major corporations are the government...how is this any different from what he proposes? He is right about a few things, but wrong about so many others he has no moral ground to stand on...especially not with his reference to Lincoln...a tyrant if ever there was one. Lincoln accomplished some good...but it was accidental more than anything else.
That was exactly
what many RP supporters had decided to do after their defeat in 1988 and 2008. No wonder we did not have the numbers this year.
Hurt feelings (anger, resentment, distrust, hopelessness, etc) take over rational thinking.
WAY OUT: One should understand that it is not a minority of bankers or politicians who rules us - it is tyrannical majority of PUBLIC OPINION rooted in morality of sacrifice shared by both progressive left and religious right. (Since RP and Rothbard libertarians do not explore this, I suggest to read Ayn Rand books to extend your understanding.) Voting is the same as influencing public opinion. We rattle the cage, people notice.
You are wrong. I have not heard of any Ron Paul supporters of
98 or 2008 that did not support him this year. We had the numbers. The voting was rigged and the results were changed. Voting does not mean anything anymore.We rattled the cage and they changed the rules. The majority who are not informed did not even notice.
hthomas
Millions are awake and listening now
And that's all a result of rattling the cage, not staying home upset.
Voting is the absolute minimum we must do.
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
Today we have internet
GJ is starting to go viral -- he has well over 1 million followers on Google+ social site.
I say:
Down with apathy!
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
My website: http://www.libertypoet.com/
STAND WITH RAND 2016
Second that.
:)
Yep, we did not have the internet when Ross Perot ran. If
only Dr. Paul had realized what could have been with a third party run this time.
hthomas
Maybe the choice "not to vote" is WHY it is still timely.
Voting and using the system of law is the last bastion against anarchy and "frontier justice". I agree with Gandhi and will paraphrase, "If I must choose between cowardice and violence, I will choice violence but it will be the LEAST amount of violence to accomplish my goal."
According to Webster, this is also "violence".
a : intense, turbulent, or furious and often destructive action or force
b : vehement feeling or expression : fervor; also : an instance of such action or feeling
c : a clashing or jarring quality : discordance
So you so, voting and political or social activism is also a form of violence. For me, the most effective "act of violence" I can commit is to actively support Gary Johnson, as this is the most effective form of "violence" to "send a message" to the "powers that be".
Our government does most ot these things today.
We could be called terrorists and detained indefinitely for suggesting the government has overreached the Constitutional limits of federal power. The government has taken over the means of production is some cases, government is constantly regulating business, socialized medicine to some extent through Obama-care and Medicaid. We have the government involved in housing and aid to education, an attempt to abolish racial bias with diversity trainings and minority hiring quotas. A welfare state with food stamps, Medicaid, Social Security, cash for clunkers, Obama phones and other aid programs.
So we are a socialist country.
"If a voter organizes or advocates a real third-party movement, he may be accused of seeking to overthrow this government by "force and violence." Anything he advocates by way of significant reform will be called "Communist" and will of necessity be Communist in the sense that it must advocate such things as government ownership of the means of production; government in business; the limitation of private profit; social medicine, government housing and federal aid to education; the total abolition of race bias; and the welfare state. These things are on every Communist program; these things are the aim of socialism. Any American who advocates them today, no matter how sincerely, stands in danger of losing his job, surrendering his social status and perhaps landing in jail. The witnesses against him may be liars or insane or criminals. These witnesses need give no proof for their charges and may not even be known or appear in person. They may be in the pay of the United States Government...."
This is quite true.
The difference is that it is the final synthesis of Marxism. Dubois was probably so focused on antipathy towards 'Capitalism' he failed to see the movement in America towards collectivism that began in earnest with FDR. This was also shortly after the McCarthy witch hunts and the start of the Cold War against the USSR. These all tended to be distractions to prevent people seeing what was going on under their noses.
For as long as I can remember I have believed that Marx and Engels used the dialectic of Capitalism and Socialism to bring forth Managerialism...the rule of the technocrat. This places those with the monopoly of money creation at the centre of power surrounded by an army of experts and managers who run their empire for them. It is a kind of oligarchy surrounded by a priesthood. I believe this is what is presently being engineered in its final form and the struggles underway are to determine who will be at the centre of power.
This objective was completely obscured from those involved in the two wings of the thesis-antithesis like Dubois but there was one former Trotskyist who saw it coming and wrote a book about it. His name was James Burnham and his book was The Managerial Revolution published in 1941.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Burnham#The_Managerial_Re...
"The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son does remain forever. So if the Son makes you free, you will be free indeed." (John 8:35-36)
All I see here is a failure in education that goes way back
Democracy socialism communism entitlements Lincoln Jefferson! Drive out the money changers give power to government cause it's the problem!
This all begs the question: is liberty of any use if you are too stupid to use it?
Hidden Harvest: Long Term Food Storage Techniques For Rich And Poor is and inespensive ebook for beginners to advanced food storage preppers. Download one today!
I tend to agree
It may well be that to vote is to endorse the very system we oppose. It has become so much an article of faith that one has a duty to vote if one seeks to change the direction the country is moving in. However if it makes no difference since all the power is concentrated at the top and is meted out in a miserly fashion and generally to those who kowtow to the party line then the best way to oppose the system is to boycott the voting process that gives it credibility.
This could easily become a way to expose the corrupt nature of the system especially the way in which the public mind has been conditioned through the controlled media and how the votes are allocated to candidates chosen by the oligarchy no matter how the people actually vote. There is much else that could be used to build a case against supporting the system through voting and the boycott could become a way to propagate the message of liberty.
The OP article was written 56 years go and the same conditions apply today but writ large. In other words nothing has really changed and the system has simply grown more corrupt. Perhaps it really is time to think outside the box. To continue doing the same things when they are not working is as we know the definition of insanity.
"The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son does remain forever. So if the Son makes you free, you will be free indeed." (John 8:35-36)
DuBois was a communist
W.E.B. DuBois was a communist. I'm sure we could find someone a bit less statist to promote not voting.
No King but Jesus, no President but Ron Paul
how about some LeFevre?
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/lefevre2.html
“With laws shall our land be built up, but with lawlessness laid waste.”
-Njal Thorgeirsson
Way gooder
Way gooder than DuBois.
No King but Jesus, no President but Ron Paul
I don't care what he was
His article on (not) voting and the rigged electoral system is spot on. Victor Hugo was a socialist and I sure as hell would not avoid his great novels just because of that.
Why give a communist credibility?
Why give a totalitarian/communist/fascist/nazi credibility on political issues if you can find a conservative/libertarian/anarchist commentator on the same issue? Don't you understand that the bad guys often tell the truth to suck you in to their crap? If the electorate had more discernment, we wouldn't be in the mess we are in.
No King but Jesus, no President but Ron Paul
Why throw the baby out with the bathwater
I'm never going to agree 100% with anybody, so I take from each what's useful and discard what isn't. Socialism isn't the central issue of the piece, it's focused on voting and the broken electoral system. Just disregard the socialist stuff as ill informed nonsense like I did and enjoy his wise words on the uselessness of suffrage in a rigged system, Mr. Spock.
You Are Correct!
I've gotten a lot of hate mail and nasty grams from characters like the one above who truly believe in their hearts that people like myself who stop empowering a corrupt two-party system by not participating in it costs Dr. Paul votes. "Rigged electoral system" is being kind - and Ron Paul supporters should know better than anyone.
I didn't register to vote in Nevada because the two-party system had "NONE" removed from the ballot. Nobody is going to change the current system - it's "fallen down and can't get up".
Be seeing you.
Not that you should or have to,
but personally I've always cast ballots. "None" has never been an option in my state, but I've often cast my ballot unchecked(blank). That is a "none" vote. You have reminded me though, that in case I'm feeling a bit randy, I can always with my own hand write "None" on my ballot and check it. :D
http://spiderjohn.com/music/van/takefind.wma
http://spiderjohn.com/direction/