-6 votes

It's Time To Put Aside Our Differences And Unite Behind Johnson.

Some of you may have read me lately claiming that we should support Mitt Romney for president. I must admit, I was basing my logic on reason and not emotion. I had not researched Johnson's website thoroughly enough to make a sensible decision on him and his policies. However, after a few clicks of the mouse, it is now clear to me that there is only ONE true voice for liberty crying in the wilderness of this presidential clown show and that one voice crying is not in the Republican or Democratic Parties.

Please donate whatever you can to the ONLY candidate capable of making a difference in this country.

LET'S DO THIS BABY!!! Johnson 2012!!!

http://www.johnsonsbaby.com/



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'm a Johnson supporter

And I don't support the idea of this thread. While I think people should vote for Johnson, and am willing to convince people to do so, I don't like the argument of "put our differences aside." This argument was used by GOP to try and get RP to drop out of the race way back when Newt did. I think the only reason to vote for Johnson is if you think Johnson is the best option available, not based on the bogus "let's all come together" bit.

LOL!

Click the link.

ecorob's picture

NEVER support this cfr globalist!

...didn't we tell you 6 months ago

geez, you got rocks in your brains?

ron paul or obombya!

i can live with that!

bachmann, cain, sanitorum, gitmo gary...

and the hits just keep on coming for the sheeple to hold onto!

you take your cfr candidate and shove him where the sun don't shine!

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

ecorob

you used to post reasonable stuff but now??? Your "CFR globalist" comment is not credible. There is no evidence directly connecting Johnson to CFR. Why do insist on repeating the same stupid remark?

Move on!

h-daddy

Fun fact:

The baby is more mature than Gitmo Gary supporters.

I don't play, I commission the league.

DERP!

Gary has never been to Gitmo. LOL!

It's time to unite behind Virgil Goode!

Virgil Goode 2012! http://www.goodeforpresident2012.com
I am joking and know that anyone can vote for whomever they want,though I would not mind it if we did.

Ron/Rand Paul 2016! Constitution Party 2016!

Gitmo Gary 2012!

Gitmo Gary 2012!

“It is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set, uprooting the evil in the fields that we know, so that those who live after may have clean earth to till." -J.R.R. Tolkien

I support

Johnson for POTUS too, but I came to this conclusion based on logic and reason not emotion. It is clear that Mitt was selected to carry out the same 'ol policies as BO, just as BO was selected to carry on the same policies as Bush.

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” – Dresden James

it is satire

look at the link he posted.

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
http://www.dailypaul.com/203008/south-carolina-battle-of-cow...
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

lol

I knew it was satire, didn't even bother clicking the link. She-he has support for willard because of the fear of a BO 2nd term, as the saying goes, "anybody but BO," which is strictly emotion. Quite sad, and in fact the reason we are in this mess. It is comical the one says they support willard based on reason, for if one used reasoning they would come to the conclusion that Willard is the same as BO except he has a different skin color, religion, and an (R) next to his name besides a (D). Other than those 3 huge differences, there is no other.lol

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” – Dresden James

The main difference I see in the two

is states' rights. B.O. has an FDR view of federalism while Romney appears to be a lot better than Bush on federalism.

you are blind

you are blind

Maybe it's true

Maybe it's true. Maybe you can tell us, Is ignorance really bliss?

And where do you get your

views from? He supported TARP, says the sick cannot seek natural medicine because of federal law, and said RomneyCare would be a great model for the nation, which we later received. To me, that looks top down central govt, not a states' rights believer at all. I think you are motivated by fear of another BO presidency, so you are willing to vote for his mirrored double on the other side of the isle. Rest assured you will get what you voted for, and that is bad governance. Have fun running around with the blinders on.

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” – Dresden James

He says Romneycare would make a good model

for the other states. He has never supported healthcare takeover from the federal level. I would NEVER vote for Romney for governor, even if the Democrat was worse.

Plus, he wants to block grant Medicaid to the states. He supports the right of states to set their own voter id laws. He supports the right of states to apply their own laws to detecting and detaining illegal immigrants, and I believe he will strongly weaken the EPA and other federal departments in terrorizing states and businesses within the states. He also does not support the Employment Non-Discrimination Act at the federal level. ENDA is a big deal in my opinion. There's is a chance that could pass under Obama. Even Ryan voted for it.

Who are

you trying to convince? Me or you?

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” – Dresden James

No one. Just answering questions.

And you gotta admit. If policy didn't matter and it came down to who would make the cutest president, Governor Baby Johnson would win hands down. ((((((

When they were

being passed, Mitt supported the TARP bailouts, the auto bailouts, he did in fact say Romneycare would be a good model for the nation (if you'd like I will get you the youtube link,) then when he ran for POTUS he changed his wording to "other states," he is for the PATRIOT ACT and wants to strengthen it, he is for the 2012NDAA.

Okay, he might have conveniently changed his mind about the TARP bailouts / Auto bailouts, and Romneycare being a model for the nation now that he is running for office, but he still currently supports a stronger patriot act and the 2012NDAA act, and the FRB's actions. How can you honestly say those policies are more federalist than Bush or BO? Those are some of the most pressing issues of to this day.

I just do not see your logic or reasoning. And I dunno, the MSM says Mitt is quite a hunk, so if policy wasn't of issue, cuteness would be up for debate as well.

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” – Dresden James