4 votes

Washington Times Blog: Joe Biden says America needs more drones, Gary Johnson says “the war stops here”

WASHINGTON D.C., October 12, 2012 — An interesting revelation of the Obama Administration’s view of national defense came up during yesterday’s vice presidential debate. Concerned about America’s conventional counterforce credibility, Paul Ryan said “Look, do we believe in peace through strength? You bet we do. And that means you don’t impose these devastating cuts on our military. So we’re saying don’t cut the military by a trillion dollars – not increase it by a trillion – don’t cut it by a trillion dollars.”

After a few seconds of heated exchange between the two candidates, Biden invoked the Pentagon and said, “look, the military says we need a smaller, leaner Army. We need more special forces. We need … we don’t need more M1 tanks, what we need is more UAVs.”

“Some of the military,” Martha Raddatz interrupted, aptly and cautiously suggesting Biden’s characterization might not have been inclusive of all of the services. “I know that’s –”

Biden defensively cut Raddatz off in mid-sentence. “Not some of the military,” he insisted, gripping a pen and wagging it tensely, “that was the decision of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recommended to us and agreed to by the president. That’s a fact.”

Viewers of the debate not familiar with common military lexicon might have completely missed the implications of what a skilled politician like Joe Biden had just said. Notice he said “what we need is more UAVs” – that is Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, more popularly known as drones to the general public.

Continue:
http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/making-w...




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'm really tired of people citing a paper when it's really an

OPED. And even then it's not that. It's essentially a personal blog of someone who got approved to post there. No different than us posting here except there are gatekeepers on that site.

This is NOT an article from the Washington Times.

That is a very misleading headline.

And you can argue the point all you want. It doesn't make it correct.

This did not appear in that paper as a staff article. Your headline implies it was.

I wanted to have: Washington Times Blog

the word Blog if I added it to the headline would kick out the end of the headline.
Not enough space.
Get a herbal tea my friend and relax.

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
http://www.dailypaul.com/203008/south-carolina-battle-of-cow...
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

Lame excuse.

It's a misrepresentation pure and simple.

And it's not in the original OP, or at least it wasn't when I originally posted this.

Biden = Bush

Biden = Bush

Southern Agrarian

Mitt = Hired all of Bush's advisers

Basically this election is Bush vs Bush.

Well said

I read the list of Mitts foreign policy advisers and these are all warmongers hungry to attack Iran.

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
http://www.dailypaul.com/203008/south-carolina-battle-of-cow...
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15