87 votes

Martin Sheen and Woody Harrelson set for 9/11 'truther' film September Morn

Film's advance publicity says: 'We the people demand an independent investigation into the tragic events of 9/11'

Rory Carroll in Los Angeles
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 17 October 2012 17.28 EDT

Hollywood is to court controversy with a film that will challenge the official version of the events of 9/11, a previously taboo topic for the industry mainstream. Martin Sheen, Woody Harrelson and Ed Asner, who have all supported conspiracy theories about the terrorist attacks, have signed up to the movie, which is entitled September Morn.

Styling itself as a drama in the tradition of Twelve Angry Men, the film's advance publicity note hints at a cover-up, saying: "We the people demand that the government revisit and initiates a thorough and independent investigation to the tragic events of 911."

Details of the film, which is to be directed by BJ Davis and written by Howard Cohen, are expected to be revealed at an American Film Market conference in Los Angeles next week, Deadline.com reported.

read more http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2012/oct/17/martin-sheen-wood...

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

track down

why don't you track down Dan Rather and ask how he's doing ?


nuff said

"He's this eccentric Ghandi-Like figure that you cant touch with the normal bribes that people respond to."
the man Doug Wead on DR. RON PAUL

What character role will Woody play...

What character role will Woody play is the question. So don't pre-judge please.

don't forget

White Men Can't Jump and Hunger Games

Oh man...you're forgetting the best!

How about the psycho killer/rapist in "Wag the Dog"?
How about the serial looser in "King Pin"?
How about the idiot redneck in "Doc Hollywood"?

Come to think of it, Woody has played a whoooole lotta wierd characters!

Silence isn't always golden....sometimes it's yellow.

"The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." - Patrick Henry

Not sure what your point is

Are you some kind of Hollywood movie casting agent?

We all want progress, but if you're on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; in that case, the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive.

-C. S. Lewis

9/11 Truth

I just became aware of the controversy surrounding the events of 9/11 a few days ago. There is a group called Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Their website is http://www.ae911truth.org/en/home.html

I believe the evidence they present deserves a serious look. Here are some basic observations and questions for starters.

No high rise building has ever collapsed because of fire.
The buildings were designed to withstand the impact of a 707. (The jets that crashed into the buildings were 767’s)
Melting steel was observed pouring from the building. In fact molten steel was present in the rubble days afterward.
Is the temperature of burning jet fuel high enough to melt steel? Is the temperature of burning office furniture and fixtures high enough to melt steel? No to both questions.
The pattern of collapse of all three buildings is identical to the pattern of a controlled demolition.
WTC7, which was not hit by a plane, collapsed upon itself at a rate close to the acceleration of gravity. This indicated that there was no resistance to the fall.
WTC1 and 2 collapsed upon themselves at 2/3 the rate of the acceleration of gravity.
Squibs (unintended detonations) were observed 20 to 40 stories below the point of the collapsing buildings.
Witnesses reported hearing explosions.

So, can all of these observations be explained strictly as a function of the planes’ impact and the resulting fires?

(Disclaimer: this is from memory and if I misspoke it was unintentional.)

Gatekeeper organization

They will talk and talk and talk about anything to waste your time. They will never tell you about the huge video fakery, as illustrated here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/anthonyc31/5728754807/in/photos...
And they will never dispute anything about the official or quasi official victims part of this story. Planes crashing into buildings and killing 3000 Americans is the basis for the War on Terror and all this other nonsense we have to go along with. A&E will never attack those parts.

What do you think the 911 operation management is up to these days? Do you believe they retired that day? So where are they now? They are spending much of their time on controlling the opposition of course, and waste-of-time strategies, etc. Money is not their problem.

9/11 Circumstantial Evidence

I know that I am going to get down-voted here, but I have yet to see any concrete "truther" evidence. Each of the items you mentioned is circumstantial. There is no concrete proof anywhere, which is why the "truther" story is hard for most people to believe.

As for molten steel, I would have to agree on melting temperature. However, I would have to say that molten ALUMINUM has a relatively low melting point. There would have been a ton of aluminum in both the planes and the buildings.

Just sayin'...


This video has been among the most persuasive from the 'Truther' camp


Concrete proof here - no kidding:


Impact point not consistent between 3 different cameras. How could that be possible?

just like

just like the tons and tons of aluminum on the pentagon lawn right ?

"He's this eccentric Ghandi-Like figure that you cant touch with the normal bribes that people respond to."
the man Doug Wead on DR. RON PAUL

ecorob's picture

hey, NeilBJ...

welcome to the rLOVEution!

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

The Sheens

are Knights of Malta.

Charlie sheen set out to marginalize 9/11 truthers as drugged out crazy people on the Alex Jones Show. It was picked up by mainstream media (what a surprise) when no other topics Jones covers get mainstream attention.

I'm not sure about the Knights of Malta,

but you're correct about Sheen and 9/11.

Nothing is ever going to

Nothing is ever going to happen. Some interesting facts may come to light, but the actual evidence was immediately shipped off to China. Even if a controlled demolition was somehow proven instead of a jet fuel fire doing all of the damage to the steel, the general population would still have their heads up their asses and would still think it was "the terrorists" and that our government/Zionists/Israel/fallen angels/whatever had no hand in it.

Please come join my forum if you're not a trendy and agree with my points of view.

Woody isn't his father

... just because his dad may have shot JFK doesn't make Woody guilty of anything. I hope this film explores all the myriad ties between the CIA, JFK assassination, and September 11th . . .


The JFK Assassination and 9/11: the Designated Suspects in Both Cases

Martin Sheen is one of the best documentary film narrators:
Who Killed the Electric Car

"Funny" you should mention Hawaii, when commenting re: Woody.

I know [in person] a very very very smart professional computer hacker who's been "online" since the 80's who says Hawaii is a hotbed of illegal snuff porn films (see illegal murder sex films.)

If you know even 1/5 of publicly available info of the CIA and [its] mind control projects, to have Woody [aka CIA] in such close proximity of many missing persons, is interesting to say the least.

I up voted your comment.

Woody Harrelson is hiding on the...

back side of Maui and doesn't care a rip about all the missing persons accruing there. So screw you Woody i now your true nature and that is your a Fraud!


Since the website thought my above comment was separate from yours.

Took A Look aaaaaand...

A IMDb search of BJ Davis brought up stuntmen, one actor and a production company that Made a Charlie Sheen flix in the nineties.

This is what people think about it.

They are saying they want to make it like 12 Angry Men. O.k. I like that movie, but BJ Davis is no Sidney Lumet. They will not have the budget needed to tell all the angles. So complex. Woody Harrelson, IMO, can't play Peter Fonda's character but Ed Asner can, and most likely will, do E.G. Marshell's.

Here's the Poster and stuff to the movie "September Morn".

~Good Night, And Good Luck~



scawarren's picture

Jeez... there are a lot of

Jeez... there are a lot of ignorant comments on that article (Guardian).

It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. – Mark Twain

sharkhearted's picture

Also check out this short documentary....


Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Do not trust Woody.

Don't trust Woody.


All these down votes are hilarious.




scawarren's picture

Well if he's supporting an

Well if he's supporting an independent investigation on 9/11 then that's one thing he's got right!

It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. – Mark Twain

Why not?


The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.
-Thomas Paine

The most simple answer, with no backstory:


I've been drinking with my neighbour all night,

right now, I can't formulate a proper, concise, detailed answer. Trust whoever you want to trust. Just seriously, I strongly suggest, don't trust Woody.