8 votes

You've Been Declared Legally DEAD - Here's How To Correct The Record

Background Summary: In 1933 the United States of America went bankrupt for the 3rd time. (1795, 1861, 1933, 1999) At that time the PTB needed to collateralize a restructuring of the corporation in order to remain in control. This is the reason that the gold was called in. (See: HJR 192) All the people in this country - while alive - are creditors. Once you die - your estate can only build up debt because there is no living being left to "create."

What FDR did in 1933 essentially flipped that in order to turn everyone into DEBTORS (by their unknown consent). 2 minutes after you were born - a death certificate was created. From that point on you are considered a "debtor" and "trustee" of the estate.

HERE'S HOW TO CORRECT IT -> Go to it TODAY!

Go over to your IRS office. Tell them you need to correct the record and sit down with an agent. Give them the name - and the social security number - it will have you listed as a "decedent" - you tell them obviously that record needs to be corrected because you are alive.

Get a confirmation in writing before you leave.

If they give you any problems refer to IRM 21.7.13.3.2.3 "An infant is the decedent of an estate or grantor, owner or trustor of a trust, guardianship, receivership or custodianship that has yet to receive an SSN."

http://creoharmony.blogspot.com/ Don't worry if this is confusing - the instructions above are all you really need to be concerned with for now.

You are now of lawful age and have received a social security number therefore you cannot be a "decedent." You go from being the "trustee" of a decedent's trust to the EXECUTOR of your own.

http://www.irs.gov/irm/part21/irm_21-007-013r.html -> Do a page find for "21.7.13.3.2.3" once then hit find again. It states at #2:

"An infant is the decedent of an estate or grantor, owner or trustor of a trust, guardianship, receivership or custodianship that has yet to receive an SSN."

Every debt against the estate is then nullified because the creditor/grantor is alive.

When you are dead - you can no longer "create" therefore your estate can only build up debt. While you are alive your estate builds credit because you can create.

It's that simple.

This is what they did in 1933 - in order to turn all the creditors into debtors - by making them legally "dead."

Blessings - spread the word.

...and welcome to the land of the living :)



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Be Redeemed!

Congress used a pronoun "They".

They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand...

Don't assume they mean Federal Reserve notes from two sentences before. They mean people who make their demand.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU6fxC5CXMg

Not filing federal tax returns

Is a federal offense. Claiming otherwise pits you versus at the very least against an entity that can literally litigate you into the ground, whether this is true or not. Besides the fact that pretty much every juror out there will find you guilty.

Most people are wise enough to pay rather than destroying their family for the sake of principle.

Ron Paul - Intellectual hero

You Don't Have to File

You don't have to file if you don't "owe."

What do you think? http://consequeries.com/

Thanks, RPvGS!

I tried to suffer through the Tim Turner experience - found too much nonsense to get to the facts. Then I met a couple people fighting this fight, watched one in court, realized there was SOMETHING going on, but still did not know where to begin. It will take me a while to get to the "local" IRS office - I am in the boonies now! BUt we will get on this.
I hope you make this a series - I'll be anxious to see "step two for sovereign dummies" - lol!

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

Tim Turner is a CIA plant

who didn't even follow his own rules.

No proof of the CIA thing that's just my opinion. Their "vice president" was also selected, not elected. Additionally word got out that he was kicking strict constitutionalists off the grand juries by a unilateral dictatorial decisions when he stated in an audio on his radio program that jurors can only be removed "by a majority vote of the grand jury."

Step two would be to read probably the most complete book of how and why when it comes to being sovereign:

http://1215.org/lawnotes/sovereignty/errant-sovereign-handbo...

I can't recommend this book strongly enough.

Next listen to these audios:

http://1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/lectures/introduction/inde...

Then study up top to bottom on this page:

http://1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/foundation.htm

When you're ready for more let me know :) Thanks for your comment.

I agree - Turner was a fount of disinformation

although I must confess, his declaration that he was president was the funniest thing I have seen in a long time, and politics needs more humor.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

Dead Mennonites, the lot of you!

A quick DuckDuckGo found the rrrrrrest of the story. Or rather the first of it.

There will be rare occasions where the grantor, owner or trustor of a domestic trust/estate entity type will not have an SSN or ITIN. [...] Following are some instances of when this may occur.

Grantor, owner or trustor may indicate Amish or Mennonite as the reason for not supplying an SSN or ITIN.

An infant is the decedent of an estate or grantor, owner or trustor of a trust, guardianship, receivership or custodianship that has yet to receive an SSN.

Estate is being established for a woman who used her husband's SSN with an alpha character immediately after the last digit of his SSN.

I have been declared a dead Mennonite!

Ĵīɣȩ Ɖåđşŏń

"Fully half the quotations found on the internet are either mis-attributed, or outright fabrications." - Abraham Lincoln

Dead Mennonites Don't Wear Plaid

Dead Mennonites Don't Wear Plaid... I loved that movie. ; )

Hey...

the Mennonites are not bad people. Let's not sully their reputation.

I would love to...

I would love to see this play out in court. Could someone please pass the popcorn?

RickStone

Do you

have a "license to practice law?"

Or are you just clueless?

Take care of your "decedent" status... gain a little bit of knowledge on the topic of status and I can assure everyone else (cuz I'm pretty sure you're a BAR member) that no "judge" is going to want you in his private club meeting room.

I don't have a license to practice law...

I don't have a license to practice law and I am clueless what I would gain and how it change my daily life. I don't see how getting a red flag put on me by the IRS is of great benefit. But I do know how that could change my daily life. How about explaining the cost/benefit ratio of pissing off the IRS. I have always found that keeping a low profile with any agency with 3 letters is a good idea.

RickStone

Then just wallow in your fear

but unless you're getting paid to spread that fear... don't bother spewing it out all over these pages. Frankly it stinks.

Land of the "free" and home of the "brave" - my a s s. It's people like you who should move to china instead of continuing to finance the tyranny you pretend that you're against. All you do is complain about the problem... maybe vote once in a while - do nothing to make sure the vote is counted properly... then go back to sports channel and wallow in your ignorance for another 3 years.

Sorry but...

Sorry but I genuinely do not understand what your point is in being so abrasive and abusive. Do you really think that you will covert me or anybody reading your rant? You are doing yourself a disservice by using such a poor strategy.

RickStone

Wow

can you say Ass Hole?

Ron Paul - Intellectual hero

Yeah..

You're an ass hole :)

Not to mention just another one of the scared sheep who "keeps a low profile" while the rest of the country burns and your children's (if you have them) future is flushed down the toilet.

"It's better to die a hero than to live as a coward."

ok, so let's say I do

ok, so let's say I do this...then what? What does it accomplish? How does it change anything for me? I'm still going to have to pay taxes, or else they'll simply take my stuff and put me in prison. This wouldn't give me some magical freedom to where they'd just say "well, that guy beat the system, we have to leave him alone now".

am i missing something here?

The only reason you should continue to pay your taxes, would

be if you are a government employee who's signed into an employment contract, and are receiving a bi-weekly government check. Then you are absolutely 100% liable for the income tax; because you are an employee of THAT corporation, you must follow their internal statutory rules-codes, and regulations.

http://www.dailypaul.com/226071/irs-failure-to-file-lets-add...

Sounds a lot like the argument described at

section C, number 4, on the list of tax arguments the IRS lists here:
http://www.irs.gov/Tax-Professionals/The-Truth-About-Frivolo...

4. Contention: The only “employees” subject to federal income tax are employees of the federal government.

How does that work out in practice?

Montero v. Commissioner, 354 F. App’x 173 (5th Cir. 2009) – the court affirmed a $20,000 section 6673(a) penalty against the petitioner for advancing frivolous arguments that he is not an employee earning wages as defined by sections 3121 and 3401.

Sullivan v. United States, 788 F.2d 813, 815 (1st Cir. 1986) – the court imposed sanctions on the taxpayer for bringing a frivolous appeal and rejected his attempt to recover a civil penalty for filing a frivolous return, stating “to the extent [he] argues that he received no ‘wages’. . . because he was not an ‘employee’ within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. § 3401(c), that contention is meritless. . . . The statute does not purport to limit withholding to the persons listed therein.”

United States v. Latham, 754 F.2d 747, 750 (7th Cir. 1985) – calling the instructions the taxpayer wanted given to the jury “inane,” the court said, “[the] instruction which indicated that under 26 U.S.C. § 3401(c) the category of ‘employee’ does not include privately employed wage earners is a preposterous reading of the statute. It is obvious within the context of [the law] the word ‘includes’ is a term of enlargement not of limitation, and the reference to certain entities or categories is not intended to exclude all others.”

United States v. Hendrickson, 100 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2007-5395, 2007 WL 2385071 (E.D. Mich. May 2, 2007) – the court permanently barred Peter and Doreen Hendrickson, who filed tax returns on which they falsely report their income as zero, from filing tax returns and forms based on frivolous claims in Hendrickson’s book, “Cracking the Code,” that only federal, state, or local government workers are liable for federal income tax or subject to the withholding of federal taxes.

LOL

Was waiting for someone to post this.

"But the theory is really sound, it's just in practice it gets screwed up and we all go to jail!"

Eric Hoffer

Shut up BAR member.

Go fleece some sheep at another location. Man I can't stand it people like you attempting to spread this irrational fear. Stand up for yourself and don't you dare call yourself an American.

P u s s y.

Yeah some people screw up because they're completely ignorant of the law and don't have a clue that the only thing the de-factos can do is scare you... so that you submit.

Bow to your Master - the STATE.

My Master is God - I cannot serve two masters.

Hello Agent Smith, I replied to your comment below, but

apparently you did not get the memo. Let me state it again for anyone who may miss my reply below:

As much as I'd like to take the time to rip those cases apart you've copy and pasted from this "frivolous" site:

http://www.irs.gov/Tax-Professionals/The-Truth-About-Frivolo...

For the sake of brevity and not adding to the confusion you people deliver to any thread such as this, perhaps the IRS hasn't been made aware of the information posted within THIS thread:

http://www.dailypaul.com/258853/bombshell-rod-class-gets-fou...

Note: Read the comments under the above link for other very important information that may not have been listed in the OP.

Looks like to me the IRS; it's attorney's; as well as the judges and state prosecutors aren't even public officials, that instead they are nothing more than private contractors who have no authority to pursue the collection of taxes from anyone other than employees of their own corporation; that they are not agencies under the Administrative controls of the state; that they aren't even lawfully able to collect so much as one red cent from anyone other than "person(s)" within their own agencies.

Now ain't that a bitch?

The IRS handpicks cases they have won and posts them on their site to scare the newbies; it's really as simple as that.

Not counting the fact that "jurisdiction" play a major role in their frivolous attacks against non-government employees. These people need to bringing this cases into the proper jurisdiction, which would not be the United States Tax Court, but rather the "district court of the United States".

Title 18 USC - 3231

Definition of courts: The district court of the United States shall have original jurisdiction - exclusively of the courts of the states, of all offenses against the laws of the United States.

Isn't the 1933 Bankruptcy Law?
Isn't the State of Emergency the Law?
Isn't the 1913 Federal Reserve Act the Law?

Aren't the banking laws under USC Title XII - 411 the Law?

Again: You people are word-smith's that CON-volute and distort the REAL law with your statutes-codes-rules, and regulations that do not apply to anyone other than you own employees.

And don't even get me started on the subject of the government, courts, etc. flipping the trustee position they hold with respect of these estates upside down and assuming administrative control on the judges behalf, and handing the beneficiary hat over to the prosecutor, leaving the victim of their assault wearing the trustee hat.

That Certificate of Live Birth is one powerful document; as you are the only one who may obtain a certified copy of it - short a court order.

Why are IRS agents attempting to hold shareholders meetings with respect to the name on the COLB without the written consent of the true beneficiary/administrator/director?

I could go on and on and on and on, but I think you get the point.

Anyone who wants to read up on this subject may click on my name and see other relevant posts concerning the estate these people are attempting to administrate without your written consent.

Do more research.

If you are a "taxpayer" you have volunteered via private contract to pay taxes... the latter half of this book explains how to deal with the IRS:

http://1215.org/lawnotes/sovereignty/errant-sovereign-handbo...

The IRS cannot lawfully OR legally come after you for taxes once the record has been corrected. In that video it explains how they are then violating international law. It's their rules - they created them to comply with LAW - > By getting you into private contracts.

They have declared you dead so that the state can administrate your estate which is then in probate - since you're alive and walking around you don't realize you even have an estate - and hence you never named an executor... so the state can file a simple form which basically is a solution for when someone dies and there is no will and hence - no declared executor.

even if this does work, it's

even if this does work, it's not worth the hassle. if you buck the system this hard they will do everything they can to make your life a living hell. i'd rather just pay the tax than constantly have them taking me to court & trying to seize my possessions.

Then you are basically

saying you don't give a hoot if your children (if you have some) grow up in a free and secure country. Seriously the only thing stopping Americans from being free is for them to start being brave again.

Let's face it - you're just a coward.

No problem... folks like us will do all the work... take all the hits... put our fortunes and lives on the line while folks like you MAYBE reap the benefits once liberty has been restored.

You're welcome - in advance.

In the meantime keep your fear to yourself. If you want us to succeed but you don't want to get active yourself the least you could do is not shoot your own self in the foot by dissuading others from getting involved in protecting their own futures.

Can you walk me/us through

Can you walk me/us through your encounter at the IRS getting this done? I've never heard anything about this before and I'm very curious, would like to know how your experience went down. How did the employees react? How long were you there? Just the whole break down would be cool.

STRATEGY

Thats is exactly how they want it to play out...

Ez

Some die on their feet; others live on their knees.

How can they constantly take you to court and seize your possessions, when they are nothing more than private contractors? Hell, the Administrative Law Judge even upheld the decision(s).

The NC Attorney General in Rod Class' case claimed the people Rod was suing had 11th Amendment immunity; that they did not work for the state and the judge upheld it ... lol

http://www.dailypaul.com/258853/bombshell-rod-class-gets-fou...

You see: The state is bonded and insured (I meant the corporation, not the state), and the judge knows this. So instead of the state taking the heat, they (the judge) is going to allow Rod to take this to the Federal level.

Why?

Because the state (the judge) knows it's much better to let these individual private contractors masquerading as public officials to take the fall; to pay the fine, and do the time for tax fraud and embezzlement of public funds.

These people have ZERO authority over anyone other than employees of their own corporation, and now we have FOUR administrative rulings to prove it!

Yawn

Real proof of you living on your feet as opposed to on your knees.

1. Do you make a substantial enough income where you should pay taxes?
2. If yes, do you file any forms with the IRS with regard to that income? Do you pay the taxes they say you owe?
3. If you don't file with the IRS, would you be ok with providing your name, social security number, and address for the purpose of my calling the IRS to explain to them that you aren't paying taxes because you feel you are legally not obligated to do so?

If you're fine with number 3 because you're so sure of yourself, then it's absolutely the right thing to be spreading what you're spreading.

If you don't feel you could go face to face with the IRS but feel ok trying to guilt and shame other people into doing so, you need to see a counselor.

Eric Hoffer