2 votes

State Level Liberty Ballot Questions/Initiatives

What are some proposals on everyone's state ballots this year that have some significance to the liberty movement?

For example, in my state, Oklahoma, we have a question (State Question 766) which, if it passes, would prohibit taxes on intangible property items such as the name of a business or industry certifications that someone might hold.

What about your state(s)? Any significant ballot measures to report? I'd like to take a few of them and write about them on my blog before the election.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Oregon's Measure 80 (Marijuana/Hemp Legalization)

http://octa2012.org/

Only polls I've seen have this behind a bit, but we can hope (and contribute?).

Personal possession and cultivation (for 21 and over) are legalized and
sales handled through the Oregon Liquor Control Commission system
of state licensed stores that currently have a monopoly on the sales
for hard liquor. That system is basically a holdover from prohibition,
and should be abolished, but that's about the only major downside
I can see to this law - it seems really well drafted - here's a
good and reasonably liberty-oriented excerpt (and I didn't even know
"liberticidal" was a word):

"Whereas the people hold that cannabis prohibition is a sumptuary law of a nature repugnant to our constitution’s framers and which is so unreasonable and liberticidal as to:

(a) Arbitrarily violate the rights of cannabis users to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure as guaranteed to them by Article 1, Section 9 of the Oregon Constitution;

(b) Unreasonably impose felony burdens on the cannabis users while the state grants special privileges to alcohol users, which violates Article 1, Section 20 of the Oregon Constitution;

(c) Unnecessarily proscribe consumption of a “herb bearing seed” given to humanity in Genesis 1:29, thereby violating their unqualified religious rights under Article 1, Section 3 and their Natural Rights under Article 1, Section 33 of the Oregon Constitution;

(d) Violates the individual’s right to privacy and numerous other Natural and Constitutional Rights reserved to the people under Article 1, Section 33 of the Oregon Constitution;

(e) Violates the state’s right to regulate and tax commerce within the state, as reserved to states under the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, thereby abdicating control to illicit markets; and,

(f) Irrationally subvert the ends to which, in its Preamble, the Oregon Constitution was ordained and the purposes, in Article 1, Section 1, for which our government was instituted; now, Therefore, the people find that the constitutional ends of justice, order, and the perpetuation of liberty; the governmental purposes of preserving the peace, safety, and happiness of the people; and the vitality of the other constitutional provisions cited above, demand the replacement of a costly, self-defeating prohibition with regulatory laws controlling cannabis cultivation, potency, sale, and use; defining and prohibiting cannabis abuse; protecting children with a comprehensive drug education program and strict penalties for the sale or provision of cannabis to minors; funding state drug abuse treatment programs; promoting Oregon hemp for fuel, fiber and food; and raising substantial revenue for public use."

then it gets to the "wherefores" of the actual provisions of the bill..