If Romney had been HONEST in the final debate...Submitted by pawnstorm12 on Thu, 10/25/2012 - 14:08
It would have been so simple.
In the final presidential debate, Romney busted Obama's chops about the attack on the U.S. diplomats in Benghazi, Lybia.
He raised the question as to what the administration knew and when they knew it.
But the real question Romney should have asked is this:
"Mr. President, how can you explain your attack on Lybia, using one billion dollars worth of U.S cruise missiles fired from U.S. warships off the coast of Lybia, without evan as much as consulting with the Congress?"
Did you not consider this an act of war?
And if not, how do you define an act of war?
Can you tell me without a doubt Mr. President, that in your attacks on Lybia, that you did not kill even one innocent Lybian citizen?
But no - Since Romney would have done the same thing, not a WORD about it.
The issue is NOT that they retaliated against our embassy, but that the U.S. attacked another country WITHOUT A DECLARATION OF WAR.
If Romney would have simply raised this issue he could have possibly won my vote.
Of course that would mean that Romney was actually somewhat of a TRUTHFUL man.
I guess that's asking too much of an establishment republican hack candidate.