8 votes

Still Report #38 Not So Fast Mr. Johnson

Still Report #38 Not So Fast Mr. Johnson

Libertarian Presidential candidate Gary Johnson said at the Florida presidential debate on Sat., Feb. 11 that "none of ... those on Wall Street ... committed any crimes", and therefore none of them deserve to be criminally prosecuted. Bill Still responded forcefully saying that the criminal activity has not only been proved, but continues even today and called Johnson's assertion "nonsense."


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

To Velveeta Underground

You and legalizeliberty with your false claims, are destroying Gary Johnson's campaign. I can't believe how much you spam, I am starting to think the term "GJ trolls" originated because of you and LL.

Not only do you have double standard, but also do not realize that gary winning 5% =/= winning for liberty.

"Truth is Treason in an Empire that lies" - Ron Paul

Educate the masses, and win in the end.


Enough with the libel already.


The Irony. If you guys stop, I will stop here.

"Truth is Treason in an Empire that lies" - Ron Paul

Educate the masses, and win in the end.

Bill Still

which I am learning exposed alot and no one listened.


Here we go!Nice......

You know, you could save

You know, you could save valuable space by starting one gigantic thread containing every little pet peeve you've posted about Gary Johnson. You have a lot of them. Think of it as your clearinghouse for bitterness.

Further, Gary is running. Ron isn't. People are occasionally capable of deciding what's important to them.

Another interesting development... Judge Napolitano endorses Gary: http://youtu.be/VGRqnZzlpPw

Do you seriously think a thoughtful person of the Judge's character is less intelligent than you or Bill Still?

Why would this be a pet peeve?

It seems rather significant that GJ does not see any criminal activity associated with wallstreet.

Why is this classified as bitterness rather than truth?

Oh, I don't know... Carrying

Oh, I don't know... Carrying out an anti-Gary Johnson smear campaign, despite Gary receiving the explicit endorsement of Judge Napolitano and the implied endorsement of Ron Paul, perhaps? Who here believes they have something on Gary Johnson that is so damning that it obliterates the explicit and implied endorsement of these two men? I'm willing to take them at their word.

Carrying out a smear campaign?

You and LegalizeLiberty seem to be the ones here smearing people, and you're destroying the Gary Johnson campaign in the process. If that was my goal, I wouldn't have to lift a finger. His supporters would do it all on their own.

You don't like the truth of Gary Johnson, fine, just don't act like the rest of us can't see and hear for ourselves.

Your idea of truth doesn't

Your idea of truth doesn't seem to comport with the truth of Judge Nap's endorsement. Do you trust and believe him?

I don't live my life through his eyes

I can see and think for myself, and I have no doubt that if Napolitano is worth trusting, he'll understand. Stop thinking endorsements matter to me.

They don't, and least of all yours.

Do you "live your life"

Do you "live your life" through Ron Paul's philosophy?

I thought I told you?

I don't live anything through Ron Paul. It's not HIS philosophy. He's trying to recycle an idea that came long before him, and will be here long after.

You just can't get over it can you? I'm the owner of my own mind. There's nothing you can do, because you SHOW ME nothing but disrespect and garbage.

You're a cancer to Gary Johnson and his campaign.

That makes sense, but

I am waiting for Ron Paul to explicitly endorse Gary Johnson before I notice endorsement from Ron Paul.

Judge Nap is the California write in as VP to Ron Paul. That is pretty interesting. Do you know if it is true?

I find it interesting that Dr. Paul has not given an endorsement like he did in 2008.

But really, if people see danger associated with Gary Johnson, shouldn’t they say so?

I could probably throw caution to the wind if GJ didn't differ from Ron Paul on is the vey essential element to protecting liberty. RP says "Unless we understand…we must protect life, we cannot protect liberty."


Napolitano was not running

Napolitano was not running for anything, so I have no idea who was behind the effort to get his name on that list.

Also, are you accusing Gary of being a "dangerous" person? That doesn't square with the mans record in business, office and in person (yes, I've actually spoken to him one-on-one in a casual setting). He's only a danger to Romney and Obama if he is able to get the word out and attract more last minute voters!

Valid Write In


A valid write in candidate cannot be who ever you want. It differs state by state.

No, I am not accusing GJ of being a dangerous person. I said if people see danger associated with him.

Of course, I guess I could say that he presents a danger to the unborn.

I don't know enough about GJ to say he is dangerous. But if people have concerns, they should certainly say so.


"Concerns" are fine if valid.

"Concerns" are fine if valid. Smears are uncalled for and there is a lot of smearing being done by Paul hard liners, even after Ron suggested people look at Gary.

And the Bill Still who was attacking Johnson? He was running against him for the same spot on the LP ticket!


I find it interesting that Bill Still was running for the Libertarian Party Presidential Nomination.

He made it sound like Gary Johnson was a late comer with lots of money and stole the nomination. That is quite a claim if I heard him right.

Bill Still was the host of Money Masters wasn't he? Seems like he could have been a threat to the Fed?


Yes you are correct and I decided to look further on Gary Johnson.Bill Still was still running now that I looked into it.Yes Bill Still did Money Masters http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2zr4y-Ip2I.

Everything is connecting now,one question?
Why in the world were some of these posts buried?I did not even know who Bill Still was until I was searching on google and these came up.

You ask: "Why in the world were some of these posts buried?"

I have no idea. Up is down; left is right? Who knows these days why anything happens the way it does. Money Masters is on this DP tab: http://www.dailypaul.com/links at the bottom under Essential Videos. I just say that it was the same guy, Bill Still. I don't know all the LP Politics, but I began to find the whole thing concerning when I first saw this DP post http://www.dailypaul.com/257075/does-anyone-know-more-about-...
with attached video http://www.you tube.com/watch?v=0Y1egV2Q2FE&feature=youtu.be


Thank You so much for the other links here in your comment.Still googling and reading.

My Pleasure

This also is concerning to me:


and how it might play in with


and the video here:


Hope I haven't side tracked you too much.

So the numerous posts you've

So the numerous posts you've made of Bill Still criticizing Gary Johnson... you had no idea who Bill Still was, or why exactly he was criticizing Gary? You simply sought out information critical of Johnson with absolutely no context? Am I right?

I still can not figure out

I still can not figure out why people want to vote for Gary Johnson...

"and the truth shall make you free"
John 8:32

Bump again.

and why I am writing in Ron Paul.


I will not let them ruin or take over this movement!You can not be one way and all of a sudden FLIP!!!!!

Did Ron personally appoint

Did Ron personally appoint you? Because you never got my vote.