Paul Krugman: "You're stupid if you think this election is close."
Submitted by Allegory on Sun, 11/04/2012 - 16:47http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/03/reporting-that-m...
How many stories have you seen declaring that “both sides think they’re winning”? No, they don’t: the Romney campaign is visibly flailing, trying desperately to find new fronts on which to attack Obama. They clearly know that it will take a miracle — sorry, a last-minute surge — to prevail on Tuesday. It’s OK, I guess, to report campaign spin; but surely it’s not OK to report campaign spin as the truth, which is what these stories are doing.
More, including where he calls you stupid:
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/03/reporting-that-m...
»
- Login to post comments
not Gallup and
not Gallup and Rasmussen....the 2 oldest and most reliable. Romney +7%.
Going to be a landslide.
That didn't happen.
That didn't happen.
You were wrong before the election, those two were the ones I was talking about. Go back a month before the election and from there all the way to the beginning of the year, Obama was leading.
All you people insisting that Romney was going to win in a landslide are
1) Delusional, there is way more public support for Obama than Romney
and
2) Completely missing the point. THE GAME IS RIGGED. It wouldn't be a very convincing rig if anyone ever won in a landslide.
I mean I did expect Romney to win because he had a majority of the banksters, but we all know they didn't really care which one won. All part of the ploy.
I live in Oz.
Romney will take Idaho by a landslide, but my landlord still thinks I am ruining the country by not sucking it up and voting Romney. I feel like telling her "If you are so worried, vote twice, I'm sure they'll let you."
Ron Paul supports a new 9-11 investigation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH9nOWnp5G0
Paul Krugman, you're stupid.
Looks better that way.
...let it not be said that we did nothing.
-Ron Paul