14 votes

Documentary that Gary Johnson, Jill Stein or anybody who believes in Anthropogenic Climate Change must see!

This is the best documentary, in my opinion, about the falsehood of the Theory of Anthropogenic Climate Change. I recommend it whole heartedly to anybody who has not seen it yet. The title of the documentary is "The Cloud Mystery" and it is about a Danish professor of Astrophysics Henrik Svensmark and his ideas how the Galaxy and our Solar System effect the climate of the Earth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANMTPF1blpQ

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Geo-Engineering

What if the candidates were referring to Geo-Engineering (Chemtrails) and how the man-made effect of spraying was changing the climate? What if they were referring to HAARP and how it changes the weather/climate and is definitely man-made?

Would you reconsider the validity of their statments?

What in the World Are They Spraying? (Full Length)
http://youtu.be/jf0khstYDLA

HAARP
http://youtu.be/QkLTzesBxGE

You...You Polar Bear Haters!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxis7Y1ikIQ

November 6th 2012 I voted for Dr.Ron Paul
"We must remember, elections are short-term efforts. Revolutions are long-term projects." ~ Ron Paul

Thank you for posting this!

If Svensmaks theory is correct, and it looks like he has ample evidence for it, a Nobel prize should be in order. Oh, an a little humble pie for the scientific community who rejected it.

Ample evidence?

I don't find a correlation based on a guess evidence at all. What's to say that they are both related to a third factor or even that some seemingly (now) unrelated factor isn't multiplied dramatically in its effect?

This is a very complex issue. Anyone who tries to show it in a simplified form is either lying or simple minded. Go try to automate a factory and see how even the most miniscule factors can have catastrophic effects when not counted for.

But my root question is "what are you guys fighting for? The oil companies?" You're laughing it up and having a great time making fun of those who are trying to get us off this freakin' oil monopoly (whether motivated by GW or $ or even by personal expense) and you're forgetting to look at the basic process. Big oil has a monopoly and they have you hooked on their product and as long as they can keep you off renewables, you will pay as much as they can get you to pay.

Is there a drive for some group(s) to implement a CO2 tax to control people? Sure. Is there a drive for other group(s) to keep burning oil, ng, coal to perpetuate profits forever? Sure. Is there natural causes affecting the global temperature trend? Sure. Is there man-made causes affecting that trend? That too.

The trick is to investigate how much overall effect each of those has on our decision to continue. In other words, weigh the benefits of a choice against its negatives. If possible, look for a choice that has no downsides and many upsides. If you should happen to find one, doesn't it make the rest of the discussion moot?

When you really investigate deeply into this, you'll find that that choice would be renewables. I'm not talking about the ones you see promoted on TV. Those are the ones that don't work, cost a ton and will guarantee the fossil fuel industry thrives. I'm talking about the ones that are struggling to keep control of their business because the only financing they can get (while keeping under the public radar) is mandating they give up control. So, between the patent expense and the finance expense, these are staying quiet for now. Just don't believe that they're out for good. A little public support would go a long way.

Try to get Max and Stacy to watch it.

keiserreport@rttv.ru

Watch your head for flying expletives.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

Thanks for the idea, fishy. I

Thanks for the idea, fishy.

I will send it to them.

And thanks for the warning; I will wear a helmet just in case.

"Air is the very substance of our freedom, the substance of superhuman joy....aerial joy is freedom."--Gaston Bachelard--

It is not profitable for

It is not profitable for politicians to investigate and promote the truth on any subject like this, they can only put their finger up and parrot the most prevalent public position on these topics! They would be ridiculed if they spoke the truth, and I only know one man that endures such torture with pleasure.